Skip to main content

Long read: The beauty and drama of video games and their clouds

"It's a little bit hard to work out without knowing the altitude of that dragon..."

If you click on a link and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. Read our editorial policy.

Reverb regrets PR stunt that threatened to leave homeless kittens euthanised

Had already donated to the Humane Society, but said it needed extra funding to.

Earlier today a press release from Reverb Publishing went out saying it would donate $5000 to the Humane Society to rescue homeless kittens if Edge of Space, a game it was publishing, got approved on Steam Greenlight by 15th October.

The publisher then stated, "if the game doesn't get approval, that money will disappear, like a puff of smoke in the uncaring wind, leaving poor kitties to survive in the harsh elements, be placed in harm's way and possibly scheduled for euthanasia. The challenge is out there, and for a simple 'yes' vote on Steam's Greenlight consumers can actively take a role in saving the lives of kitties."

Um, what?

'I can haz Greenlight approval plz?' -Reverb

It didn't take long for word of this to spread like wildfire and the game received a sudden jolt of negative comments on its Steam Greenlight page.

We got in touch with both Reverb and Edge of Space developer Handyman Studios to hear their sides of the story.

First Handyman's Jake Crane got back to us with his response.

"Hey everyone! There has been a misunderstanding on the marketing side of Edge of Space. We do not support guilt voting in any way and our sincere apologies go out to anyone who felt that way. This was meant in fun, if anything, Reverb's intent was to add a bonus; if we can make it to the top 10 by the 15th, we will help out a worthy cause. Understand that there is some dark humour in the game and they wanted to play off of that. We love cats! That's why we have them in our game to begin with! We have sugar bears too! So we like exotics."

He also noted that Reverb would be the ones making the donation, not Handyman.

Notice the phrasing "Reverb's intent," and "they wanted to play off that." While he didn't throw the publisher under the bus and seemed sympathetic to its plight, all signs pointed to Reverb being the mastermind behind this idea.

We caught up with Reverb to catch its end of the story. Apparently Reverb had already donated the $5000 to the Humane Society, but pretended that it hadn't in order to get others to vote for the game it was publishing. Here is Reverb's official response:

"Earlier today, we issued a 'call to arms' press release to garner support for a game that we're publishing, Edge of Space. It's a game that we're really excited about and we took a non-traditional approach to garner attention for it as well as creating a chance to donate money to a good cause, but it seems as though our release was taken the wrong way by some people."

"Even before the promotion was approved Reverb had decided to make a donation of $5,000 to the Humane Society today, this was just a fun way of drumming up some attention for the game. The release was meant to grab attention and call readers to action, but we regret if we made anyone uncomfortable or angry with its content. Millions of stray cats enter shelters each year, with the yearly cost of humane shelters resting in the billions. Our wording may have been muddled, but our intentions are good."

Additionally, Reverb vice president of business development Doug Kennedy posted the following response on Edge of Space's Steam Greenlight page:

"I challenge anyone else on this board to make a donation to the Humane Society, I committed $5000, and we requested a vote of YES for the game. If anyone did their homework you would know we have made a variety of donations to animal organizations. if you don't want to vote for the game I fully respect that, if times are tough and money us tight a "yes" vote would be greatly appreciated, provided the company continues to do well, we will continue to fund and support a number of animal organizations, either way its a win - win for the kitties. (Lastly, does anyone really think that that we were not going to make the $5000 donation, come on folks, seriously? I've been in the industry for 20 years, I remember when it was fun, lighten up a bit and appreciate the fact that a great organization like the Humane Society is getting a ton of attention and a nice contribution)."

On one hand that means the publisher flat out lied - though Kennedy insists it was kidding - but at least that means the poor, cute kitties are safe.