Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Avary talks Wolfenstein film News

PC Xbox 360 News by Robert Purchese

12 September, 2007

Hollywood director Roger Avary has been chatting about his big-screen take on Wolfenstein.

Talking to Ain't It Cool News, he said the film probably won't be the same as the games, but that's because he has real-life constrictions to worry about. As long as he remains true to the spirit of the game and blows things up - like Nazis - then he thinks we'll all be happy.

"Whenever someone whines to me about breaking canon...I remind them that the book, video game, or poem will always exist in its original form for their enjoyment, but that a movie has special needs and compromises that occur due to a variety of real-world constrictions," said Avary.

We're told there will be an over-the-top style with a pinch of reality, with most, but not all of the action taking place in the iconic castle.

But there's no word on who will be starring, although Avary suggests he's looking for less well-known European talent, and mused that "All one needs to do is look at the box art on the Return to Castle Wolfenstein game and you can see who I see in my mind for the role".

It's Jason Statham! Wait, no, Jeremy Irons! Oh we don't know. You try.

Avary's Wolfenstein film is due out sometime next spring. A release date for the Castle Wolfenstein game is yet to be confirmed, although we know it will definitely won't be this year.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Wolfenstein on PC/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-35 of 35 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
bivith
12/09/07 @ 10:33
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
surely it's Vin diesel
lambtron
12/09/07 @ 10:35
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It looks a bit like Colin Farrell?

Not exaclty my first choice and I'm sure he'd avoid this like the plague anyhow ;).
asphaltcowboy
12/09/07 @ 10:36
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
There's already a Wolfenstein film, it's called Where Eagles Dare, with Clint Eastwood. All it's missing is some occult craziness!
Machetazo
12/09/07 @ 10:37
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No occult-fanatic nazis = not wolfy. From that piccy, I thought Russell Crowe, or Cypress Hill's B Real - you chose.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/09/07 @ 11:39
Metalfish
12/09/07 @ 10:38
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This will be awesome and rubbish at the same time. Seriously though if this was in the same style as the Indiana Jones films....
DanWhitehead
12/09/07 @ 10:38
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
BILLY ZANE.
Drpwnage
12/09/07 @ 10:45
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Guaranteed to be crap, why do they bother?
crazyhorse174
12/09/07 @ 10:46
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
BILLY ZANE

Thats what I was going to say!
AcidSnake
12/09/07 @ 10:51
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Get a grip!...It's Bruce Villis...(His european not very famous identical twin)...
Universal Hamster
12/09/07 @ 10:51
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Put a cork in it, Zane!
xAx
12/09/07 @ 10:52
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If Hellboy can have occult loving nazis why can't Wolfenstein, damn you Avary
sickpuppysoftware
12/09/07 @ 10:53
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"It looks a bit like Colin Farrell?"

That's what I would have gone for
TheDifficult3rdAlbum
12/09/07 @ 10:55
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Come on chaps, it's clearly Tom Hanks.

And I have no doubt that the budget for this movie would easily stretch to cover his salary.
lambtron
12/09/07 @ 10:58
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"I never liked the name 'Wolfenstein', it kinda makes me think of a hairy jewish person, abit like an ex of mine."

Ok then...
Killerbee
12/09/07 @ 11:01
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's the doctor out of Lost.
RexRunti
12/09/07 @ 11:05
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
To be honest this could be quite good if they make it totally OTT and have a body count higher than all previous films put together and have the lead (blatently Stratham) fight a mecha-Hitler at the end.
Skeletor
12/09/07 @ 11:07
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
They should go for Uwe Boll as one of the villains! He would be very believeable and many people would love to see him "fragged" at the end:-)
JonFE
12/09/07 @ 11:35
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No leather-clad Nazi-babes and disfigured freaks, them??? Think I'll pass...
BillyBrush
12/09/07 @ 11:40
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's Pat Butcher!
sanctusmortis
12/09/07 @ 11:50
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So it's just going to be a film of US special forces fighting Nazi soldiers in a castle? Yeah, that'll stand out... should've got Hellboy's director in, he knew his stuff.
coach_mcguirk
12/09/07 @ 11:59
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Speaking theoretically, the equation should be thus :

Where Eagles Dare + The Keep = Wolfenstein Movie.

At least in terms of tone. Whether it could reach the level of quality of either of those movies is another question.
gaijin
12/09/07 @ 12:14
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
it's jude law. It's *always* bloody jude law.
Mentalist(air)
12/09/07 @ 12:20
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
He never said it wouldn't contain any of the occult, just not all the stuff from the games.

Either he means it won't have all sorts of locations like submarine bases and airfields full of experimental planes (like RTCW), or it won't have some of the most ridiculous things out of the original Wolf3d games like ending with a gunfight against a cyborg Hitler.
Wayne
12/09/07 @ 12:28
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I wonder what he means by "real-world constrictions"?
chudders
12/09/07 @ 12:32
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Idiots, all of you.

It's clearly The Rock, already a veteran of the game turned film genre.

Picture him dressed as a soldier, and (for those who remember the original Wolfenstein game) his face bears a not too uncanny resemblance to the character portrait at the bottom of the screen.

"I wonder what he means by "real-world constrictions"? "

He means that he can't actually gun down real Nazis in a castle, instead he has to use actors and special effects.

Spoils the realism a bit admittedly.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 12/09/07 @ 15:18
Trane
12/09/07 @ 12:54
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Rick Moranis should play the lead.

Film has potential actually, I'm easily pleased though - a few Nazi's shouting "It'z ze ameriken!" and I'll be happy.
lambtron
12/09/07 @ 13:07
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"or it won't have some of the most ridiculous things out of the original Wolf3d games like ending with a gunfight against a cyborg Hitler."

By "ridiculous", I assume you mean "best"?
Dr.Haggard
12/09/07 @ 14:13
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Better pic

Sarah Jessica Parker?
The_Pope
12/09/07 @ 14:54
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Mentalist(air)
13/09/07 @ 07:57
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
By "ridiculous", I assume you mean "best"?

I think you may have uncovered the eternal dichotomy of game-to-film adaptations there. The cyborg Hitler gunfight would please the hardcore early 90s shooter fans, but I doubt Roger Ebert and his colleagues would be singing its praises.
Fitzmogwai
13/09/07 @ 08:45
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You never know - mechaHitler might be the Ebert tipping point where he realises that games can be art too.
4thVariety
13/09/07 @ 09:41
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If you take the original cover, then the choice is clear: KURT RUSSEL
http://www.mr-atari.com/afbeeldingen/jag...

He is badass, can crack out one timers and he looks good with a gun.
Spong
13/09/07 @ 10:35
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Roger Avary is a complete doofus. He can't write movies for shit (I don't care what anyone says about Pulp Fiction, he ruined Silent Hill). And the thought he's managed to worm his way into the Director's chair for Wolfenstein doesn't bode well.

He should get UB in to give him a helping hand.
lukerocc
14/09/07 @ 08:35
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
How can anyone say Silent Hill was ruined?

The film took all the set pieces and ideas of the Games, and remixed them into a movie. After all, you can't say all Silent Hill games are identical, they are only 'grouped' together by the ideas, setting and ambient.

Personally I think he got it right, It was horrifying, gruesome, bloody and the pace of it was quite right.
Collie
18/09/07 @ 02:38
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A movie of a game without Uwe Boll at the helm? Bound to be rubbish!

Comments: 1-35 of 35 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery