I Am Alive gameplay details revealed

ESRB rating talks "sexual mistreatment".

The US ratings board has revealed new gameplay details for I Am Alive, Ubisoft's in-development action game.

The PC, PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 game contains blood, intense violence, sexual themes and strong language, according to its Mature ESRB rating (spotted by Destructoid).

As always, the ESRB rating summary makes for interesting reading. It is reproduced in full below:

"This is an action game in which players assume the role of a man who must find his family in a post-apocalyptic world. From a third-person perspective, players traverse through city ruins and use a machete to kill human enemies in melee-style combat.

"Battles are accompanied by realistic gunfire, slashing sounds, and cries of pain; characters emit brief splashes of blood when hit. Players have the ability to kill or knock unconscious wounded/vulnerable enemies via finishing moves (e.g., throat slashing, impaling, pistol-whipping); these scenes are highlighted by close-up camera angles and increased player control (e.g., on-screen prompts with button-press sequences).

"During the course of the game, players encounter women who can be saved from nearby enemies; sexual mistreatment is sometimes implied in the dialogue (e.g., 'These guys kept me as their pet, or mascot, or something.'). One sequence depicts the background silhouette of a man fondling and threatening a captured female survivor; the exchange includes phrases such as 'Do you hear me? Don't touch me!' and 'Don't be like that. You know I can make your life a lot easier if you would just cooperate.'

"The words "p*ssy," "f**k," and "sh*t" can be heard in the dialogue."

It now appears the game, which had been thought mired in development hell, is approaching release.

I Am Alive, which sees you attempting to survive in a Chicago laid to ruin by a cataclysmic earthquake, was first announced way back at E3 2008.

We'd heard barely a peep about it since, save for news back in 2009 that original developer Darkworks had handed over the reins to Ubisoft Shanghai, before last month's leak of a trailer, no longer available due to a copyright claim by Ubisoft.

I Am Alive was originally intended as a full retail release, but a report earlier this year stated it had become a download title for PlayStation Network and Xbox Live Arcade.

Comments (18) Latest comment 8 months ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • bburdett #1 8 months ago

    In before someone points out that that whole "download" thing was reported as being false.
  • Spielo #2 8 months ago

    For a minute, I thought this was a follow-up to "I'm OK".
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I%27m_O.K_%...
  • el_pollo_diablo #3 8 months ago

    I'm still bummed out by the cancellation of Disaster Report 4.
  • MENTAL1ST Verified Senior Software Engineer, Picsel UK Ltd. #4 8 months ago

    I'm looking forward to some pissy funk shot action.
  • peterfll #5 8 months ago

    I went from a "maybe" to an "absolutely" because:

    a) It's set in Chicago - I've just got back
    b) Sexual mistreatment is sometimes implied in the dialogue
    c) The words "p*ssy," "f**k," and "sh*t" can be heard in the dialogue

    and d) and e)
  • Cappy #6 8 months ago

    Hold on... Let's get this straight.

    I Am Alive started off as third person, then later it was first person with some worrying hints that first person shooter style game play might creep in, then more development Hell followed and it's third person again.

    Somewhere along the way it's transformed from a disaster survival game to a game where you hack people with a machette, to um... survive I guess, whilst the pistol whipping is just for fun. Looks like they ditched the first person perspective but kept the combat. Why does every game have end up like this these days? In every game shop an endless line of boxes with scowling men brandishing weapons on the cover.
  • God_Octo #7 8 months ago

    @vamos

    You know what they say- sex sells. Especially sexual mistreatment, apparently.

    And yeah, whilst I am looking forward to this game, the development run on it sounds like a mess. Multiple developers, multiple apparent design changes and multiple game mechanics changed multiple times. It could end up a mess. I just hope it doesn't. And EG, pull your finger out and do some work- the downloadable rumour was dismissed yonks ago, and yet you wheel it out every time. please do your job and do some research. It makes you look ridiculous when you keep getting simple things wrong.
    Edited by God_Octo at 26/09/11 @ 14:53
  • The-Bodybuilder #8 8 months ago

    'Don't be like that. You know I can make your life a lot easier if you would just cooperate.'

    Wow, even the rapists sound poorly developed. :-/
  • MisterM #9 8 months ago

    I would have liked a game like this that didn't rely heavily on combat, but was instead about the more emotional aspects of surviving a disaster. Which is what I thought this game would be.

    Looks like it's just become another boring stabby/slashy/fighty thing. FFS.
  • lockload #10 8 months ago

    If ubisoft believed in this game surely they would be talking about it and hyping it up
  • RevanNL #11 8 months ago

    So... in development for a billion years and all they could come up with is a third-person shooter (from the description in the article )?
  • glottis0 #12 8 months ago

    @Cappy - totally agree. At what crazy point in the development of the industry did fighting/shooting/killing people become the defacto standard, whilst any game that casts you as a normal person who avoids combat is some kind of crazy indie thing that publishers won't go near...?

    Even Deus Ex seemed like a really fun novelty by providing the option to not kill people. How is that a novelty!!?

    That said, my most anticipated games are Batman, Skyrim and Battlefield 3, so I'm mostly a hypocrite :S
  • metalangel #13 8 months ago

    We'd heard barely a peep about it since

    Is that why you have 16 news stories about it?
  • bad09 #14 8 months ago

    Sexual Mistreatment?

    Is that in game content or the next UbiDRM?
  • smelly #15 8 months ago

    "Gameplay details revealed"


    .. Funny, as i only read stuff about the plot.
  • Mr_Brown #16 8 months ago

    I really want this to be good, but I have a bad feeling about this. Button combinations (quick time events) and what could be an emphasis on combat (rather than survival). I will reserve judgement until we heat anything about this,but it cannot be that good if they are not showing anything.
  • loksfox #17 8 months ago

    Ubisoft will ruin anygame...this game will suck =x period
    it could be a great game but it wont
  • metroid455 #18 8 months ago

    MisterM wrote
    I would have liked a game like this that didn't rely heavily on combat, but was instead about the more emotional aspects of surviving a disaster. Which is what I thought this game would be.

    Looks like it's just become another boring stabby/slashy/fighty thing. FFS.

    Agreed from the way it was initially shown I also thought this game would actually be something mature and emotional, sigh instead we get another silly overly violent shooter. just plain stupid sigh