Mobigame slams Langdell, Edge
"Cynical attempt to generate sympathy."
Mobigame CEO David Papazian has responded via Eurogamer to the statement made last night by Edge Corp., the company run by Tim Langdell.
He called Edge's defence a "cynical attempt by Tim Langdell to generate sympathy".
Edge's statement painted Future Publishing (owner of Edge magazine) as the villain. Apparently Future paid Edge $275,000 in 2004 to acquire worldwide print rights to the trademark Edge. In return, Edge guaranteed it would "take action" against any third parties using the word Edge in relation to video games. If Edge didn't make good on this promise, the $275,000 fee would need returning "along with other extreme penalties".
This "sizable [sic] pressure" led to the case against Papazian's Mobigame and its iPhone game Edge.
"Edge never wished to enter into a dispute with fellow Indie developer Mobigame, but was required to do so by Future," declared Edge, which was apparently first made aware of Mobigame's Edge iPhone game by Future Publishing. Cue a lengthy and well publicised war of words between Edge and Mobigame.
But now that Future agreement has been "terminated", Edge Games wants to get back on good footing with Mobigame.
"Edge hopes and trusts that now the requirement on it to take action against Mobigame has ended with the Future agreement being terminated, that Mobigame and Edge may commence amicable relations," the statement read. "Edge has extended the olive branch to Mobigame’s David Papazian and not yet had a response."
"We have no connection to Edge games (and we don't want one)."
David Papazian, CEO, Mobigame
But Papazian has snubbed the offer of an olive branch, and the suggestion that Edge games is promoting Mobigame, and told Eurogamer that Tim Langdell will "probably be put in jail" for his current appeal against a Future lawsuit.
"We have no connection to Edge games (and we don't want one)," wrote Papazian. "We believe this is a cynical attempt by Tim Langdell to generate sympathy for his court case.
"He will try to use the argument 'Future made me do it' for his appeal against the Future lawsuit.
"We are certain that he will lose again, and he will probably be put in jail.
"Furthermore," Papazian added, "we sent a DMCA notice to the company hosting his website, because he has no right to use our company name or our games names, which are protected by the trademark law."
Mobigame has also sent a cease and desist letter to Apple to get Edge Games' Edgebobby2 game - a sequel to Bobby Bearing - removed from the App Store.
"We are certain that [Langdell] will lose again, and he will probably be put in jail."
David Papazian
"This game infringes Robert Figgins' copyright (Robert & Trevor Figgins created Bobby Bearing back in the 1980s, and they own the copyright on this game since Langdell's UK company was closed into liquidation in 1990)," Papazian explained. "This game also infringes Future Publishing's logo, our trademark EDGE, and confuses our fans."
Edge Games told a different story: "Apple has informed Edge that Mobigame had filed a complaint apparently stating that Mobigame owns the sole right worldwide to the word Edge. This came despite the fact that Mobigame's application for Edge in the US still not being approved for publication, and despite both Edge and Mobigame owning UK rights in the same mark (along with Future).
"Given how severely Edge and Tim Langdell were pilloried when people thought Edge was claiming sole rights to the word Edge, it is hoped Mobigame doesn't pursue this claim to owning the word Edge to the exclusion of Edge's 27 years of use of Edge/The Edge," concluded Edge.
Edge Corp. is appealing against Future's court victory that will see Edge's UK trademark registrations cancelled. The decision was "plain wrong" and made "in error" by a judge who was "gullible" and "did not understand technology". Edge is "confident" of "entirely reversing the first Judge's judgement" in the Appeals court.
Edge has also filed a counter-claim against Future for "damage of reputation" caused by the Mobigame case, and for Future not promoting Edge's use of the trademark as was apparently the agreement. "Edge is extremely confident it will prevail on the counter-claim."
You may also like...
-
Dirt Showdown Review 80
-
Activision vs. Vince Zampella and Jason West: Inside the game industry trial of the decade 43
-
The Cave Preview: Double Fine's New Game for Sega 16
-
Going Hardcore in Diablo 3 88
-
App of the Day: Hiragana Pixel Party 14
-
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Review 129
-
Judge recommends US Xbox 360 ban 168
-
New Minecraft XBLA content incoming 10
-
Double Fine reveals Ron Gilbert project The Cave 9
-
Gearbox: Aliens: Colonial Marines a "massive" project, hundreds working on it 13
-
Diablo 3 real money auction house delayed again, client side patch out next week 7
-
Diablo 3 Review 244
-
David Cameron spends "a crazy, scary amount of time playing Fruit Ninja" 36
-
Fake Angry Birds developer fined £50,000 24
-
First Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2 image spotted 10
Comments (41) Latest comment 10 months ago
Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
When is this guy going to figure out how to use a bloody spell checker?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
So Edge, Edge and Edge have the right to Edge now, but Edge are suing Edge for using it now, after Edge sued them over Edge before, because they say Edge made them do it?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
EDIT: Mobi-Games, counter-claims.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
what a mess.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
i've just started up GolgoLovestoReamandFeltchforFreeGames. see you in court.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Also, EDGE Magazine paid him $275,000.
Fucking Hell.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
'LMAO'
^ hope you haven't copyrighted that!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'd love to see him actually try that.
I'm beginning to wonder whether he might not, in fact, be insane, and in need of help? Quite seriously. In which case he needs to be hauled off, not only for the sake of the (howsoever similarly hypocritical and shitty) game development company that he's attempted to extort, but also for his own sake.
I've often thought this when reading some of his responses. He is dead certain that he's doing no wrong and is totally in the right, he can't see his world crumbling before him...that's WAY past dyslexia.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I can only imagine how great sending that letter must have felt for them.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
But then i suppose they wouldnt have had a trillion years of media attention and free adverstising i suppose.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Actually, the judge understood technology better than you did Langdell, you devious, scheming cunt.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I also wonder why he didn't sue Dell yet.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Quite. Judging my Walker's write-up, the judge not only had an excellent grasp of technology, but fully understood when Langdell was trying to bullshit his way through things, such as with the mysterious dates on his disk with the logo that Future Publishing didn't actually steal from him.
As for Mobigame, I think they're just lashing out, although one suspects it would have made more sense for them to chill a bit.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
W... what?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
*sigh*
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"Fabricated evidence" you should say as its Langdells M.O..
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Hilariously, Langdell has claimed in the past that he and "The Edge" have come to an understanding
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show