Team Bondi - The First Interview

Brendan McNamara on how Team Bondi's top-secret PS3 project will be 'even more ambitious' than The Getaway - and won't take any less time to make...

Having just spent the past 10 days applying the Factor 20 and casually taking in the blissed out view of Chaweng beach through a pair of Spitfires, I can certainly relate to why Brendan McNamara and his Aussie cohorts would want to return to their Antipodean roots and remind themselves of the feel of Bondi beach sand between their toes.

Flush with the success of the three-million-selling The Getaway, McNamara and a bunch of former Team Soho colleagues recently founded Team Bondi, signed a "long-term exclusive" deal with SCEA and got to work on an as-yet-untitled PlayStation 3 title (no it's not coming out on PSP, before you ask).

So far, details on the title have been scant - and we'd expect that to be the case for some time. McNamara today admitted that Team Bondi's project will take "about the same time" to develop as The Getaway, which points to the game's eventual release being three years off.

Evidently, as with The Getaway it's all about aiming high - with McNamara refusing to let some of the harsher critical elements blunt his creative drive, proudly declaring that Team Bondi's project will be "even more ambitious" than The Getaway, and will be a game that is "going to ask new questions from our audience in terms of gameplay, how the narrative plays out and also the concept of success and failure".

Perhaps tellingly, McNamara revealed that he's off to Japan to "do some research", so make of that what you will. A crime caper in Tokyo perhaps? A job advert for the Lead Tools Programmer reveals the team working on the game will be 100 strong, and further down the job spec for Lead AI Programmer states the team is "targeting the most challenging character AI ever seen in a video game", with the AI system "simulating 200+ real-world agents for a real time, single player, story-focused game".

Real-world agents, hmm? Reading between the lines it would appear the game hinges around a persistent state. Assuming driving is involved (and why stop there?), it would appear that the player will have far more scope to approach missions as he or she sees fit. As McNamara hints above, the narrative structure would certainly have to be much less linear to accommodate this, and his thoughts on the concept of success or failure challenge the currently linear structure of most games.

Mindful of the huge sales of The Getaway in the face of polarised critical opinion McNamara admitted "the big issue is to meet the expectations of the public", but also rued that "the polarity of reviews was pretty hard to fathom", while later reflecting that "Games journalism has a responsibility to up the standard of criticism". Try telling that to a PR bod when you've given their latest big hope a less than positive score.

Although McNamara's hands are evidently tied about telling us too much about Team Bondi's latest project, his answers are characteristically upfront about almost everything else we fired his way. Read on...

Kristan Reed: Are you hoping for a shorter production cycle than The Getaway? ;)

Brendan McNamara: No, about the same amount of time but with more people. I'm open to ideas as to how to make it quicker though...

Kristan Reed: What's the manpower going to be on this project versus The Getaway?

Brendan McNamara: We haven't completed the technical design yet but it looks like it will require almost twice as many people.

Kristan Reed: Is the PS3 going to be easier for developers to get to grips with than the PS2?

Brendan McNamara: I don't think that is the big issue. There are loads of quality programmers in the world who will harness the potential of any new console. The big issue is to meet the expectations of the public. In our case the feature set that we have to implement to make the world believable is huge.

Kristan Reed: Will it be, creatively, a complete change of direction after The Getaway, or are you looking to build on the success and promise in that game?

Brendan McNamara: The Getaway 2 is being made as we speak in London and I'm expecting big things from the team and the game. There was certainly plenty of room for improvement from the original game. Having said that I'm still proud of what we achieved first time round.

We are looking to do something that is a change of pace and doesn't necessarily mean killing 200 people in one day. It's pretty hard to maintain the plausibility of the story with that kind of body count.

Kristan Reed: Do you believe you'll be as ambitious this time around? If so, in what way?

Brendan McNamara: I'd say the new game is even more ambitious as it's going to ask new questions from our audience in terms of gameplay, how the narrative plays out and also the concept of success and failure.

Kristan Reed: How are you funding the project? Has SCEA given you an advance or is this self-funded and totally independent?

Brendan McNamara: The project is wholly funded by Sony Computer Entertainment America. We have a long-term exclusive arrangement with SCEA.

Kristan Reed: What prompted your return to Oz? Glad to be back home? Missing Blighty? Still smarting about the World Cup?

Brendan McNamara: I agreed with Sony that I was going to return to Australia a couple of years ago. It was a personal choice and my wife having twins confirmed the decision. Australia is a fun place for kids to grow up. I think we all miss our friends in the UK and London can be a pretty special place but Sydney is so beautiful and a much more relaxed place to live. The World Cup was great and even down to the last kick I thought Australia would win. The celebrations in London looked fantastic.

Kristan Reed: How did you feel about some of the criticisms of The Getaway? Did you feel they were justified, or as a result of some of the ambitious claims made to Edge all those years ago?

Brendan McNamara: The polarity of reviews was pretty hard to fathom although I think everyone is entitled to their point of view. "This isn't like my favourite game," isn't really criticism. It's just expressing personal preference. Some people hated the game but three million people went out and bought it so I'd like to say a big thank you to all of them. We are going to pursue doing what we do as long as people want the product. If we had across the board amazing reviews and no one bought the game there wouldn't be much point continuing. Games journalism has a responsibility to up the standard of criticism. I notice everybody is carrying stories of how Vice City is being vilified in the US but I don't see the games press using editorial to defend RockStar's right to freedom of expression the way the movie press would.

Kristan Reed: Why do you think The Getaway polarised opinion quite as much as it did? Was it people reacting to the hype?

Brendan McNamara: The videogames business is pretty strange. You would think that being such a young industry that people would be open to all sorts of new ideas but it's not true. People stick religiously to the heritage of game design most of which is a hang over from three-minute arcade games. Videogames can't continue to only be a test of reaction time to pressing a button.

I think what people should remember is that The Getaway was an original title. It wasn't the third in a series or a major license and we were trying to compete with pretty heavily established brands. Under those circumstances you have to work very hard to create awareness. I think we did a good job of letting people know that it was coming. Whether it lived up to the hype or not I don't know. People in the industry or journalists ask that question. I don't think the audience cared. They either liked it or they didn't. Obviously quite a few liked it.

Kristan Reed: Why has the game been signed up by SCEA, and not SCEE? Given your connections with the latter, we'd have expected it to be signed up by them first...

Brendan McNamara: SCEA has always been big supporters of The Getaway and what we do in general. Right from the start of The Getaway it was on board. It's 14 hours to Los Angeles and 24 hours to London so we opted for LA.

Kristan Reed: Do you envisage this new project as the first part of a series of games, or is it a case of make this one and see how it goes?

Brendan McNamara: It's a long-term agreement with Sony - which is great - because we know Sony and still feel like part of the team there but in the end it all comes down to how many you sell. If the new game sells we'll get to make another - if not we'll be out of business.

Personally I'd prefer not to do sequels if I can avoid it because the emotional commitment to a three-year plus project is too much, and if you do the sequel you end doing another couple of years which I think is too long a time to spend on any subject no matter how much you are interested in it.

Kristan Reed: Are you involved in any PSP development as well, or is this your sole project? Are you planning to work on any other games concurrently?

Brendan McNamara: No we are not doing anything for PSP although I'm really interested to see the results. We won't be doing any other games at the same time. I personally can't spread myself any further than one project of this size.

Kristan Reed: Is gaming stuck in a rut at the moment? Are developers finding it harder to take risks these days?

Brendan McNamara: I think gaming is on the cusp of something very new. Currently we are stuck doing things that we know and that customers expect from game developers but the technological freedom is arriving to allow us to create more involving experiences and not just better graphics.

I think developers will always take risks if the budget is available. That's not the problem. The problem is that we are moving now to the mega studio model and that projects have to be extremely commercial to recoup. So you now need to take risks within the subject matter not with the subject matter. It's a little bit like all of the great writers and cinematographers working in the movie studio system in 1940's. Citizen Kane was subversion from within the fairly conventional subject matter of the story of a newspaper tycoon.

Kristan Reed: Name your key moments as a gamer in 2003.

Brendan McNamara: The only game I finished was Prince of Persia although I'm not sure quite why. It was a game a dearly loved on the Amiga and I wanted to see whether they could reinterpret the fighting mechanics in 3D. It's a great game within the current conventions of video games. I thought the lighting was great in Splinter Cell. Very encouraging for the future.

Kristan Reed: Brendan, thank you and good luck.

Comments (21) Latest comment 8 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • pjmaybe #1 8 years ago

    Is it just me or is Bondii Beach on a rainy day just like a really grotty english seaside resort...?!

    Peej
  • bero #2 8 years ago

    Sounds good...

    (hoped to be 1st)
    Edited by 1 at 20/02/04 @ 15:17
  • lost_soul #3 8 years ago

    Is it just me or is Bondii Beach on a rainy day just like a really grotty english seaside resort...?!

    I thought that as well. Manly beach is a lot nicer.
  • krudster #4 8 years ago

    Undoubtedly it's still nicer than Soho...even when it's hot it's an unbearable smog (remember mid August...ooof!).
  • ssuellid #5 8 years ago

    How many years did 'The Getaway' take to make? And this is supposed to take the same time.
  • Whizzo #6 8 years ago

    Bondi is certainly nothing special but it does have a Nandos so if it's raining, like the day I was there, at least the food is nice. :-)
  • pjmaybe #7 8 years ago

    Is it just me or is Bondii Beach on a rainy day just like a really grotty english seaside resort...?!

    I thought that as well. Manly beach is a lot nicer.


    Well said. People at Bondii seem to be complete surf-headed arseholes too, which is weird considering the surf at Manly and most other beaches around Sydney is far superior to Bondi's

    One good thing about Bondii though, one of the best chippies I've ever eaten in.

    Peej
  • Abscido #8 8 years ago

    McNamara finished POP but he's "not sure why" (is it not obvious why?) and the "lighting in Splinter Cell was good". That's his opinion of 2003 as a gaming year? God save us all if this is the kind of person involved in making big budget games.

    Don't get me wrong, he comes across as a pretty intelligent guy and I'm sure he does a good job, but surely if you're not *playing* all the best games as they come out, you can't bloody well make any can you?

    Of course, I was one of those people who thought The Getaway was a 4/10 game.
    Edited by 2 at 20/02/04 @ 16:16
  • Shinji #9 8 years ago

    I don't see the games press using editorial to defend RockStar's right to freedom of expression the way the movie press would.

    Um. I can only assume that he reads about as much games journalism as, well, he plays games.
  • bzzct #10 8 years ago

    surely if you're not *playing* all the best games as they come out, you can't bloody well make any can you?

    Umm, yes. If you have ideas of your own instead of being reactionary.
  • Dizzy #11 8 years ago

    Amazing some people can get funding even when they make a weak first game. Well I guess sooner or later they might be lucky and produce a decent game.
  • bungalooBunny #12 8 years ago

    He had plenty of resources to make The Getaway - lots of money from Sony and plenty of time due release date delays. If he couldn't figure out how to make a game then why would he now?

    Why is EG wasting time speaking to this guy anyway? I'd rather read what people that make good games , ie, Hideo Kojima, Halo's designer or Ico's designer have to say.
  • Whizzo #13 8 years ago

    There are a fair amount of regulars to the site that enjoyed The Getaway, myself included. It most certainly wasn't perfect and had some flaws that should have been picked up, not being able to skip cutscenes when you've already watched them is unforgiveable.

    I wish this casual/hardcore gamer bullshit would end though, it's childish labelling that doesn't do anyone any favours.
  • MoFo #14 8 years ago

    Well said Kolmar.

    I didn't like The Getaway but McNamara says he's prepared to push the boundaries of conventional gaming concepts, so in my mind that makes the guy a saint. If it all turns out to be BS then I'll crucify him, but for the mean time I wish there were more developers prepared to take chances.

  • Abscido #15 8 years ago

    "Umm, yes. If you have ideas of your own instead of being reactionary."

    Ha! Are you telling me that learning from what makes other games good is a bad thing? Are you saying that you can't learn from great titles and *still* be innovative? Come on.

    Reactionary is one thing - but real gamers, um, play games. Even the most innovative games are all influenced by other titles - if McNamara wants to make storycentric cinematic game, has he played Beyond Good and Evil to see why that worked so well? Of course he bloody hasn't.
  • Abscido #16 8 years ago

    "I wish there were more developers prepared to take chances."

    And The Getaway took chances? I'm sorry to come across abrasive here fellas - and I sincerely hope Team Bondi pull a great game off - but there are probably better developers to place your faith in if innovation is what you want.
    Edited by 1 at 21/02/04 @ 18:01
  • snibril #17 8 years ago

    "But that doesn't explaine why this interview is on a hardcore gaming site such as this where there's probably few people who enjoyed The Getaway. "

    But then again, is this really a hardcore gaming site? I never perceived it that way. I have a tendency to think of it as a "something for everyone" site. Off topic, I know.
  • LostToys #18 8 years ago

    "Don't get me wrong, he comes across as a pretty intelligent guy and I'm sure he does a good job, but surely if you're not *playing* all the best games as they come out, you can't bloody well make any can you?"

    Depends on how much work this guy is doing as of right now. Ask Hideo what he has been playing, and I bet he is going to be off by at least 6 months if not a year since he is in crunch time for several games. Carmack, Molyneux, etc. might have the same responses.

    "But that doesn't explaine why this interview is on a hardcore gaming site such as this where there's probably few people who enjoyed The Getaway. "

    yeah, and that is why this site gets a lot of screenshots from such hardcore classics as The Sims 2, or Karaoke Stage. Hardcore is how you percieve it.

    Eurogamer is designed to give all the latest news, screenshits, reviews, and in house content that the UK can handle. There is nothing within its pages that prescribes it as being for the hardcore gamer. Granted, much of the language and references require much knowledge about games [and often movies] but this site is still for one and all.
  • tiddles #19 8 years ago

    Speaking as a games designer, I tend to steer a middle way - you need to keep up with the latest developments, but it's also possible to become TOO immersed in games. You need a bit of distance, otherwise you just end up recycling what you're currently playing. You have to be able to bring something new to the table.

    When the new 3rd person Bond game came into our office last week, there was a lot of ooh-ing and aah-ing about particular features they'd implemented well or in an original way - when you're working on something similar, immediately you start thinking, hey we could do it like that too. But if you did that every time something new came in, you'd never be able to bring it all together into a consistent whole - developers have to stick to their vision and not be too influenced by the stuff around them.

    But yeah, Shinji, where's the interview with the designers of Ico? ;)
  • Abscido #20 8 years ago

    "But if you did that every time something new came in, you'd never be able to bring it all together into a consistent whole - developers have to stick to their vision and not be too influenced by the stuff around them"

    That's a valid point, of course, but surely designers have enough self control to regulate themselves on this level? For instance, just because you like aspects of the new Bond game doesn't mean you *have* to implement them into your own does it? But by playing it, you might want to change something that *is* implementable - even something as simple as the way a sound effect was cleverly used, or a strong camera angle during a cutscene.

    However, the reason I directed my criticism at Mr McNamara was mainly because the game is clearly in its early stages - leaving well enough time to be influenced by other good titles and still maintain his original vision.
  • bungalooBunny #21 8 years ago

    I can't believe people still believe this corporate BS. Lots of promises and hype but the games then turn out to be rubbish, seen it happening hundreds of times.