Why Uncharted 3 won't get single-player DLC
Naughty Dog would rather work on next game.
Uncharted 3 won't get any single player DLC - and Naughty Dog says it's because the studio would rather be working on its next game.
Uncharted 3, like its immediate predecessor, will get full post-release support, with co-op and multiplayer content planned further down the line.
It won't, however, be adding any single player updates - and Naughty Dog is perfectly happy to explain why.
"There's a very specific reason," game director Justin Richmond told Eurogamer. "Whenever we sit down and think we should do some single-player DLC, someone pitches something and we realize - that's a five hour level."
"Dialling back our ambition is difficult," admitted Naughty Dog community strategist Arne Meyer.
"We'd rather build out another game than we would do episodic content," Richmond continued. "We're so small that we can't afford to have a whole team working on DLC."
Uncharted 3 has been produced by a core team of 90 people - nearly a fifth of the number that Activision has put to work on Call of Duty.
"That's why we don't do it," said Richmond, "we'd much rather be working on the next game, producing the game quickly and having people play another adventure."
Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception launches over here on November 2, and Naughty Dog are currently in London for a preview event that's open to the public, taking place in London's The Pelican Bar tomorrow afternoon.
You may also like...
-
Asura's Wrath Review
-
In Theory: How iPad 3 Breaks the 1080p Barrier
-
The Rise and Fall of Sega Enterprises
-
AMD in "hush-hush effort" to put graphics chip in PS4
-
GAME to close 35 stores
-
Gameplay signs off with £5 Gamestation.co.uk voucher
-
The Essential PlayStation Vita
-
BioWare: we finished Mass Effect 3 before working on DLC
-
Syndicate Review
-
Sony: 3G gives Vita "immediacy"
-
Ridge Racer Vita Review
-
Battlefield: Aftershock pulled from App Store
-
FIFA 12 gets January transfer window squads update
-
Assassin's Creed: Revelations The Lost Archive DLC details
-
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs announced for PC
-
Eurogamer Expo 2012 early bird tickets go on sale
-
Can SSD Upgrades Boost PS3 Performance?
-
PlayStation Vita: where's the cheapest price?
-
GAME: "we can't stock absolutely everything"
-
Dating site for gamers launches in the UK
-
BioWare unboxes Mass Effect 3 video
-
Guild Wars 2 open beta sign-up begins
-
BioWare blasting Mass Effect 3 copies into space
-
Xenoblade Chronicles developer hiring for 3DS game
-
PS Vita: Sony defends Uncharted, FIFA price, explains expensive third-party digital games, reveals larger memory cards are coming









Comments (45) Latest comment 4 months ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Fixed that for you.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
...and that's a problem?
Woah, what's the with the negs? You guys wouldn't want a DLC pack that added 5 hours of SP content? The full games are only about 10 hours, and cost far more than a DLC pack would.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Kinda looking forward to this too.
Oh well..
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Then you'll be missing out on alot of nice games.
Mass Effect 3
Battlefield 3
Batman Arkham City
all have online passes
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
>Mass Effect 3
Got bored quite soon into 2.. dont care
>Battlefield 3
Dont like battlefield. COD gets irritating - often - but not as much as BF.
>Batman Arkham City
Wouldve gotten it maybe.. but now I know it has an offline online pass - for that reason - im out.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
And for that I have massive respect for them.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I guess you need more folks to build on multiple platforms and then 50 people to hype it up.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Seriously... if you REALLY like a game so much why would you buy it second hand and prevent the developers getting your money for their hard work, and risk them never making any more games. Sometimes gamers brains do not compute. It's even funnier when you take into account people only sometimes saving a few pounds on second hand stock...
Anyway, I think they should make UC4 next, but for the PS4 rather than worrying about UC4 on PS3. I think that will help sales of the console when its released and be a true showcase of what the PS4 can do. Though it would be nice to see what else they can do.. but i always worry it would be something i wouldn't like and then be disappointed that UC4 would be delayed a few years because of this *other* game.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Actually TudeScud I think the online pass stuff like the prices for some DLC is decided by the publishers, in this case sony whom are the publishers probably brought in online pass and I bet if you asked a naughty dog employee they would probably not care about online passes.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
It cost developers and/or publishers money to run servers for online play.
So if you chose to buy the game second hand (which I've nothing against BTW) do you really think its wrong for them to expect you to pay for the service they will be providing?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
When a game changes hands, one person stops using that service and the person who bought it starts using the service. The game's online mode doesn't get more players each time the game is resold. They never needed this BS to keep servers running before, why would they now? It's one more disgusting way to get easy money, besides petty DLC that comes locked in the game disc.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Now, I myself can see a valid argument. The game feels like it has less intrinsic value when it's locked to a console. Just as is the case when a second hand purchaser cannot play multiplayer without extra fees to unlock (perhaps the only reason they're buying pre-owned was because they didn't want to put the 'extra' money in for the single player, lets say). Or just as is the case when I buy a game with multiplayer, but the prospects of playing it in the future are dim because the second hand market is not maintaining the player base. The best solution I submit is opening up the services (which is how I can play Heroes 3 online to this day without ever paying a dime extra).
Okay, I'm ranting, I guess a simple answer to why 64 people agree that "I would rather that they worked on the next game too." without my insinuation would do, lol.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Just hoping it's split screen multiplayer and not stupid 2D with glasses multiplayer.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show