Ever since Jak & Daxter, PlayStation 2 has become the console
for platform games, with Ratchet & Clank and Sly Raccoon
serving to emphasise this during the last few months. Nintendo must
be livid. But the main architect of this shocking changing of the
guard is a little company called Naughty Dog, most famous for
giving the word 'bandicoot' actual meaning. A little while ago, we
asked you what questions you might ask Naughty Dog co-founder Jason
Rubin, given the chance. Well, we recently did have the chance, and
put a number of questions to Jak & Daxter's minder-in-chief on
EurogamerWhat drives and inspires you? Why did you choose
to develop games?
Most of the Naughty Dogs grew up on games. For me,
this started in the late seventies and continued into my teens. At
fifteen, Andy Gavin and I co-founded Naughty Dog and released our
first game: Ski Crazed. Since then, our drive to make better games
has been fuelled by the dual desire to entertain and to see video
gaming as an equal entertainment medium to movies and music. In the
last half a dozen years, thanks to Sony's aggressive entry into the
video game industry, the latter of those goals seems to be not only
possible, but right around the corner. I guess it all boils down to
revenge against those who said "ew, you play video games?" when we
were young. Nobody says that anymore.
Do you get time to play many videogames? If so what are your
favourites, past and present?
The entire company has been loving Grand Theft Auto: Vice City
and The Getaway. There is a large group that plays TimeSplitters 2
at lunch. We are also playing Ratchet & Clank and Sly Cooper
[Sly Raccoon in Europe]. Sure they're our competition, but we love
character action games!
Which games, developers and programmers have influenced you?
"Doom"/Id Software definitely influenced us, as did
"Ultima"/Origin in the early days. Obviously The "Marios"/Nintendo,
"Donkey Kong Country"/Rare and "Sonic"/Sega were huge influences in
our specific genre, and in the creation of Crash. The freedom shown
in "Grand Theft Auto III"/DMA is inspiring us today.
could have made any game in the world, what would it be?
Doom. That game really changed my view of gaming. Before Doom
games were something I played. Doom was a game I lived. When an
enemy jumped around the corner I could fall back in my chair. No
game had ever touched me like that before. Many have since.
What's the biggest misconception about making games?
That it is easy. That it doesn't take much time. That it is
fun. Hell, it's bloody war sometimes. And if it weren't for the
result, and seeing people enjoy what we made, we'd never be doing
it. Looking back, I loved being involved in every game I have made.
At the time…
Do you ever think that there's scope for a truly original game,
or are major developers/publishers happy sticking with tried and
tested formulas just to play safe and make money?
You can't answer this question with a short answer. It is very
complicated, and the dynamic is continually changing. Right now, I
think it is "attachment" (sequelization and/or licensing), rather
than lack of original gameplay, that is restricting developers
right now. I do understand the reason publishers are pimping
attachment at the moment, however. And viewing the gaming world
through their eyes, it does make sense. Suffice it to say that
precious few developers will get to work on titles that are both
original gameplay ideas and high budget/high production
value at the same time.
Does Naughty Dog have any plans to do any side projects
that aren't just "3D platform collect-em-ups"?
It isn't Naughty Dog's style to do more than one title at a
time. Having said that, there is no reason why we couldn't be doing
another genre in the future. At the end of every game, we see what
we want to do next. Most of the time, that has been a character
action game. But it hasn't always been (remember "CTR: Crash Team
Racing"?). Only time will tell.
How do you feel about the low cache, high bandwidth design of
the PS2, compared with the traditional PC/Xbox/Cube style of big
cache, low bandwidth?
Frankly I think polygon for polygon power is less important
this generation than last, and will less important still in the
next generation. On the PlayStation, the difference between a good
developer and a bad developer was outputting 1000 vs. 3000 polygons
a second. That determined whether or not a developer could even
make a specific type of game. Life or Death!
This generation, on the PlayStation 2, the difference between a
good developer and a bad developer is 50,000 vs. 150,000 polygons.
Well, since we know that we could make games with 3000
polygons/second last generation, we know that 50,000 this
generation is plenty. So the difference this time around is style,
not the ability to make a type of game or not. Next generation, the
difference will only be icing. And if you look at other hardware
that competes with the PlayStation2, the numbers simply aren't that
divergent to make a difference.
More textures, less polygons? Who cares. In the end it is the game
content this generation, and not the system, that is determining
success. That is evident if you look at some of the top sellers.
GTA3 is not pretty. Tony Hawk is downright ugly. But the games are
good, so they are selling.
The tech in J&D was a massive leap forward for the
PS2 - can we expect the same leap forward on your next project, or
is it using a tweaked version of the existing J&D/R&C GOAL
We're currently working on an engine that is greatly improved
from that of Jak & Daxter. Having said that, our next title
will still be on the PlayStation 2, rather than a new hardware, so
you certainly won't see the 100x performance leap you saw from
Crash 3 to the Jak & Daxter.
When are we likely to see another Naughty Dog title? Will it be
out this year, and (whispers) will it be a J&D sequel?
We haven't made any announcements so far about our next title.
However, I can let you know there's been a lot of creative hard
work here in the studio and you will be stunned with the leaps we
have made in the gameplay department.
How does Naughty Dog's and Insomniac's technology sharing deal
work, is it just the GOAL engine being shared or will we ever see
the characters appearing in the same game?
This is our official statement:
"Insomniac Games and Naughty Dog have a sharing agreement in which
there is a free flow of technology back and forth between the two
companies. Insomniac was the first beneficiary of this agreement in
that after Naughty Dog developed the engine for Jak & Daxter,
they shared it with Insomniac. Insomniac used their proprietary
techniques and heavily modified most of the code to work with the
gameplay and environments they had created for Ratchet and Clank.
In turn, Insomniac has given the modifications and tools that they
have developed back to Naughty Dog in the hopes that their next
game will benefit."
Obviously, the technology sharing agreement doesn't involve
character sharing… but who knows, anything can happen.
Will Naughty Dog be going online with any future PS2
I think that it is inevitable that Naughty Dog will start
adding online options, or going fully online with some of its
future titles. When exactly Naughty Dog will enter the online fray
hasn't been decided, though. It might be next game, it might not.
What's in you console/PC disc tray at the moment?
Console: Grand Theft Auto: Vice City. PC: Don't personally play
many PC games, sorry.
A number of platform games now take the form of a "buddy
comedy", even Mario has Yoshi as a sidekick. So why go for two
people rather than one?
In our case, it was the answer to a problem that had been
vexing us since Crash: We didn't want to distance the player from
the main character by giving the main character a strong
In our estimation, this is what killed GEX. Sure, you might play
the game, but with all those horrid jokes, you certainly weren't
becoming GEX. In fact, every time he opened his mouth, most people
felt more distanced from him.
That is precisely the reason that Crash didn't talk. But with the
PlayStation 2's power, and out ability to get movie-like cut
sequences into the game, we needed some interaction with the world.
Daxter gave us that opportunity. Jak was the gamer, Daxter was a
sidekick. If Daxter said something funny, the gamer laughed. If he
said something stupid, that was ok, because it was just Daxter, not
the player/Jak. I think we are ready to try making the main
character talk, now. We'll see what happens.
Jason Rubin, thanks for your time!
Buy things with globes on them
And other lovely Eurogamer merch in our official store!