Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Star Wars Battlefront Review

Xbox PC PlayStation 2 Review by Tom Bramwell

5 October, 2004

Given just how much fighting goes on across the five Star Wars films we've seen to date, it's surprising that it's taken this long for someone to marry the films' vast, iconic battles to a Battlefield 1942 style premise. It seems, in hindsight, like the obvious thing to do. Although, to be fair, it's not entirely accurate to say that nobody's thought of it before - many have tried to emulate the sprawling conflicts of Hoth, Endor and Naboo, but the key thing is that outside of the space combat genre, no one has succeeded to any significant degree. With Star Wars Battlefront though, Pandemic Studios crushes those pretenders with a sinewy, Force-ified claw. And a Sarlaac pit. And Droidekas. And AT-ATs and snowspeeders. And so on.

Then name the system

'Star Wars Battlefront' Screenshot 1

It's a remarkably simple and effective idea. Mine the original trilogy and the recent prequels for decent locations - Mos Eisley, Kashyyyk, Endor, Yavin 4, Rhen Var, Kamino, Hoth, Naboo, Bespin - and then create a couple of sprawling maps out of each, and populate them with disparate but defensible command/spawn points that change hands depending on who's controlling the nearby area. Whack in a few secondary objectives (defending a shield generator, for example, or capturing a carbon freezing chamber), and then channel a few cherished memories (like the Sarlaac pit's tentacles and pig-like squeaks) to complete the picture.

Then split players and/or bots between the goodies of the appropriate era (be they Rebels or the Republic Clones) and the baddies (the Empire, or the Droids and Geonosians), and throw in the occasional bonus character, like AI-controlled lightsabre-wielding Jedi NPCs (stand up Luke, Dooku, Windu, and even Vader), or playable Wookiees. Oh, and sprinkle some vehicles around. And make them good ones, like AT-ATs, AT-STs, X-Wings, TIE Fighters, snowspeeders, hover bikes and, why not, tauntauns. Then just make sure there's enough action on screen most of the time to stave off that creeping sense of isolation that sometimes penetrates the Battlefield veneer, and Vader is indeed your uncle's brother.

Although in this case, he actually isn't. You'll occasionally band together with noted Star Wars characters, and Pandemic takes advantage of the freedom afforded to it by LucasArts and sprinkles plenty of memorable scenes from the film in and about the single-player pursuits, but on the whole the idea is that you're just one of the troops. (Which is probably just as well - it wouldn't do to have Vader running around yelling, "Who's your daddy? I am your father," would it?) You're one of the guys in oily overalls and rags and odd-looking hats fighting against a demented grey despot with lightning fingers and an intergalactic armada; or one of the white-helmeted Stormtroopers clubbing and clanking together to stop them. Or a Republic Clone, one of the precursors to the Stormtroopers, armed with Jango Fett's gravely tones and a fleet of drop-ships and primitive walkers; or one of those slightly irritating Trade Federation Droids.

This had better work

'Star Wars Battlefront' Screenshot 2

What's distinctly clever about it all though is the way the game handles scoring. Whereas Battlefield 1942 and Vietnam saw your team's points total fall depending on how long you were without a decent clutch of control points, Battlefront ties the number directly in to your 'reinforcements' - the amount of times units can spawn. If you have control of more spawn points, your enemy's chances of keeping up with you are limited, they are easier to cut down in thinning numbers and their spawn count drops quicker as a result. You can win battles either by taking them down to zero units, or by controlling all the command points on a map for 20 seconds. You are not the hero, but notch up a few kills without succumbing yourself, and maybe capture a wayward control point, and you will be in the eyes of your team-mates.

What's surprising though is how ordinary it feels to play, at least initially. When it's just you and your gun, you'll probably feel a little aggrieved as you run around pointing and shooting. Graphically there's a lot of detail, and everything looks right, but it's not doing anything demonstrably different. FPS and even third-person control is average-to-good, the weapons are a pretty standard bunch, and even some of the vehicles can be a bit underwhelming. But then you start to play as a team, working towards shared objectives. You realise that while it's not groundbreaking in mechanical terms, it is engaging and easy to pick up - thanks partly to a stabiliser-style auto-aim option that steadies your hand until you're efficient enough to work without it, and a choice of third and first-person views - and that it's suitably epic in scale.

Before long, it really starts to hammer this Star Wars fan's buttons. If you're fighting for control of Hoth, you expect to see AT-ATs and snowspeeders clogging up the horizon, ships hurtling around overhead, tauntauns prancing around and laser fire peppered back and forth between turrets and advancing troops constantly like a thousand simultaneous tennis matches. And you do. And, although the developer will probably argue it wasn't deliberate (if only to save themselves a smiting from the Lucas Empire), putting the player on the Droid side of the Droids vs. Gungans conflict on Naboo was definitely a good choice for the first single-player mission. Most people's first memory of Battlefront will be slaughtering Jar-Jar Binks again and again. Pandemic's clearly onto a winner there.

If this is a consulate ship then where is the ambassador?

'Star Wars Battlefront' Screenshot 3

Not content with that, Battlefront's single-player offering flies somewhat in the face of accepted multiplayer shooter wisdom by virtue of being a lot of fun anyway. You can opt just to dive into any battle you like on any side with Instant Action mode, but the other options - Historical Campaign and Galactic Conquest - are a better way to see all the sights and between them should keep you occupied for as long as the average single-player first-person shooter does. And that's "happily occupied", incidentally.

That said, Historical Campaign is a bit higgledy-piggledy in places. It's split between scenarios from the Clone Wars and the Galactic Civil War (the original Star Wars trilogy), and touches on every map in the game once or twice, giving you a fair run at the Droids, the Clones, the Imperials and ultimately the Rebels, and a chance to find your footing as the challenge ramps up and you find yourself up against it from the start - by the end you often begin levels with a reinforcements figure a quarter less than your enemy.

However, while the gradual introduction of new units (Super Battledroids, Droidekas, the vehicles, etc, start to appear after a few levels) and the whistle-stop tour of galactic hotspots is welcome, the intermingled Star Wars footage feels forced and unnecessary. We all know the story inside out anyway, and since Battlefront sensibly makes no attempt to augment proceedings, it's not a convincing fit. (Particularly when you find yourself yelling "That's Endor not Kashyyyk for Tarkin's sake!" when a level is book-ended with the wrong footage.)

There will be no stopping us this time

'Star Wars Battlefront' Screenshot 4

And yet you still soldier through it, and gladly, only to discover that Galactic Conquest is a much more impressive offering. It's split into various campaigns and involves taking over the galaxy planet by planet. Before the first round, you pick a planet you want to attack. If you win, you can choose another planet to attack. If you lose, the enemy can attack one of yours. There are two battlegrounds on each planet, and with control of a planet comes a choice of planetary bonuses. Take control of Kashyyyk, for example, and you can add an extra garrison of troops to your reinforcements, meaning you have more troops to work through in battle. If the enemy controls Rhen Var, though, he can jam your sensors so his troops won't show up as red blobs on your mini-map in-game, and you'll have to fight entirely by sight.

Between Historical Campaign and Galactic Conquest, it's hard to imagine even the most talented sharpshooter mastering the various classes (snipers, repair-capable pilots, basic troopers, Droidekas with their shields and Monkey Ball-esque roll-around modes), vehicles and map strategies in less than weekend of more or less solid play, and when the going gets particularly tough, the option to tackle levels co-operatively, split-screen, or via System Link, is another boost to the game's offline value.

Not that it's particularly hard, but anybody who tells you it's too easy is playing it on the wrong difficulty level. Of course it helps that the bots, while rarely genius, are perfectly capable of holding their own, and take advantage of vehicles, Jango-style jet packs, and hiding spots just as often as you do. Even if they sometimes ignore your single-player squad commands, meted out with the D-pad, and run off on their own.

You said it, Chewie

'Star Wars Battlefront' Screenshot 5

However, the fact that Battlefront is entertaining enough played solo is a bonus rather than the point. If there were an offline-only Cube version (and there isn't), it would probably rank some way above Pandemic's previous Star Wars offering, the disappointing The Clone Wars, but it wouldn't trouble Rogue Leader for Star Wars-related kudos, let alone dethrone it. Playing Battlefront online though adds immeasurably to the experience. Suddenly battles become a lot more balanced and yet, simultaneously, unpredictable. You may find that you can control the Bespin mines level in single-player by racing towards the uncontested spawn point in the centre of the map, and then clogging the Imperials up at a nearby choke point until they're sufficiently depleted, but played over Live you'll have difficulty lasting with so many enemies piloting TIE Fighters across the skyline, and even taking advantage of them to go round the back and flank you.

Even though many of the maps are relatively straightforward in terms of objectives and strategies, the sheer number of units (particularly if, as it should be, the server operator's totted up the numbers by throwing on a smattering of bots) means that you can't take things for granted, and some of the design decisions here are extremely clever. On Hoth, for example, you'll need a pilot and a gunner in a snowspeeder if you plan to tow-rope yourself an AT-AT; otherwise you can just expect them to waltz up to your base without too much hassle. Remember Han's line in A New Hope as they close in on the remains of Alderaan? "It'd take a thousand ships with more firepower than I've..." He's cut off before he can finish. You will be too, if you don't get your snowspeeding in order, and you're left to try and take down an AT-AT with some blasters. The interruption will be a bolt of red laser to your soon-to-be-frazzled face.

Then of course it's always a good idea to keep someone around to deploy and repair turrets - which, while more powerful, also leave the gunner susceptible to well-aimed headshots - and to take advantage of higher vantage points, repair droids (just press Y to have your health gradually refilled), and natural advantages. Like the Sarlaac pit. During one multiplayer game on Tattooine, we banded together with a couple of like-minded Imperials and drove countless Rebels into reach of its tentacles as they came charging over the hill from a nearby command post.

Evacuate? In our hour of triumph? I think not

'Star Wars Battlefront' Screenshot 6

But it's the overarching sense of war that gives Battlefront the most points. Pandemic delivers on the right scale. Environments and vehicles are vast and sprawling, and somehow - heaven only knows how considering the smoothness of frame rate - the hardware manages to keep up. Even though all the units and locations - the Stormtroopers, the AT-ATs, the Rebels, the Droids, Mos Eisley, the map room on Geonosis, the bloody Sarlaac pit - all look exactly as they should, within reason (the Xbox can't really compete with Industrial Light & Magic, after all).

Of course, there are flaws and little discrepancies here and there, and there is certainly a sense that Pandemic can improve on this for what now - in light of the game's success both critically and commercially - looks like an inevitable sequel. For a start, we'd like to see a wider range of ways to secure victory; it feels a bit silly that secondary objectives are only really optional, particularly when you win the battle of Endor by controlling command points, while the shield generator remains intact and the Death Star above presumably well defended.

And when certain maps boil down to whichever team can affect the obvious battle plan most efficiently, it takes some of the shine off. We'd also like to see slightly more refined character movement and viewpoints - the first-person view, for us, seems a bit pressed-up-against-the-glass, which can make it unwieldy on tight maps like Mos Eisley - and we'd like some "Get off my vehicle" bound to one of the D-pad arrows. And for the bots to pay attention.

Great, kid, don't get cocky

But on the whole, Star Wars Battlefront is a success, and the best Star Wars action game we've played since Rogue Leader, delivering the sort of galactic conflicts we've long marvelled on the big-screen in a balanced and inviting manner that continually satisfies. PC first-person shooter fans might think differently - Battlefield 1942 clearly still has the edge over this in terms of depth and scope - but in console terms there's nothing like it at the moment, and it's yet another reason to keep an eye on Pandemic. The force is definitely strong in this one.

8/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Star Wars: Battlefront on PlayStation 2/Xbox?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-36 of 36 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Thamuhacha
05/10/04 @ 14:50
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A strong contender for "pun laden review of the year" I think.
mad_caddy
05/10/04 @ 14:58
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
can you shoot ewoks?
Communal Toilet
05/10/04 @ 14:59
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yes, yes you can :D
Dizzy
05/10/04 @ 15:03
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I have been ready to buy this for a a couple of weeks but always walk out of the store thinking "well... Halo 2 will be here soon".
Royal Fool
05/10/04 @ 15:03
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Minus two points for not including a "Hunt Jar-Jar" mode... that would rock. Play Bounty Hunters and collect his head.
Lutz [mod]
05/10/04 @ 15:05
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Minus two points for not distributing enough copies. It's sold out in Manchester.
p3rks
05/10/04 @ 15:26
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
8 out of 10?!
Ignoring the obvious comment, thats is a bit much isn't it?

I've got loads of niggles with this game, main ones being:

3rd person "sucks". 1st person looks like you are 'zoomed-in' all the time, amazingly irritating.

the AI, or *TOTAL* lack of it. Then again, I suppose it provides the comedy...

I'd give this a 5 or 6 tops. very, very average IMO.
Blerk
05/10/04 @ 15:29
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought it was toss. But each to their own, eh?

/nudge nudge
p3rks
05/10/04 @ 15:30
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
ahaha. yes, thats what i meant.

its toss. ;)
Frogger
05/10/04 @ 15:33
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've seen a 5/10 on a serious french website. They even give it a 4/10 for the PC version.
Caps Lock
05/10/04 @ 15:39
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Lovely crossheads Tom.
driptray
05/10/04 @ 15:50
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nice: a review that exactly voices my opinions!

I've noticed a lot of people think it's really dodgy, but I can't see that at all; it's definately the most fun I've had with a game for ages. I wonder if non-Star Wars fans will get as much out of it though?

Also, the AI is NOT awful. Yes you will see some bots that sit about in corners, but then you see tens of others battling it out, providing supporting fire, giving health and ammo to the troops, getting into vehicles and dogfighting, taking command posts, fixing turrets, etc. Example: Hoth level: I get into snow speeder and bot takes other seat: I pilot and blow things up and then switch seats: bot then steers towards and round an AT-AT for me to harpoon. Team-work! Fantastic!

Anyway: Star Wars fans: genius game!
silver jon
05/10/04 @ 15:57
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'd say this deserves an 8. In the same way that GT3 deserved an 8. Or Soul Caliber. It doesn't do anything revolutionary, but what it does it does well. I don't understand the comment about 1st person feeling like you're zoomed in all the time or that 3rd person sucks (actually useful when flying a snowspeeder). IMO it's an entertaining, solid, well presented game. It's fun, can be picked up in 10 minutes and then played for hours. It's not a "Halo" but neither is it a "Red Faction".
groovychainsaw
05/10/04 @ 16:00
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
or split screen play over xbox live?
/edit damn people commenting in between my typing up a comment....
Edited 1 times, most recently on 05/10/04 @ 17:01
Whizzo
05/10/04 @ 16:24
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A good review of a good product, not played much of the Xbox version but the PC version is bloody excellent, both single and multiplayer.

The bot AI is pretty decent, they do some odd stuff now and again but probably not any more daft than some humans. They'll cap objectives, take down AT-ATs with Snowspeeders, they'll man fixed guns, build gun turrets and you'll even get them chucking ammo and health at you if they think you need it!

One very nice touch that's in the game is you can see the health of any target you're attacking so while you don't know the AT-AT is on its last legs (sorry!) from it smoking or showing damage it's clear when it's about to go up.

One of my fave games of the year.
onyxbox
05/10/04 @ 16:33
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm very surprised it got a good review.

I bought this game and took it back on day 3 of my Game 10 day guarantee.

Single player was a breeze and the online play was a Joke 90% of the time (spawn killing lagg fests), this game IMO is a 5 or 6 and no way is it an 8/10.

People just get carried away with the whole Star Wars thing IMO.

Ah well each to their own I guess.



deathgibbon
05/10/04 @ 16:34
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Just wait for Halo2. Don't buy Battlefront. Save for Halo2. Plus, SW: B is shit. Unless you have Live or PS2 Online.
Dabs
05/10/04 @ 16:38
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"The force is definitely strong in this one."

Ungh. Why does every review of every vaguely decent Star Wars game have to end with those words? Other than the pun carpet-bombing, good review. Wouldn't buy the game though - saving my cash for the gaming big-guns of the year like Half-Life 2 and San Andreas.
Daryoon
05/10/04 @ 16:42
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Actually, it's "Evacuate? In our moment of triumph? I think you overestimate their chances!"

Good god, I can't believe I'm posting this...
Whizzo
05/10/04 @ 16:47
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
On the subject of the bot AI : "These are the droids you're looking for."

/runs away.
deathgibbon
05/10/04 @ 17:07
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/crashes Millenium Falcon
binky
05/10/04 @ 17:10
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Those screenies look so much better than the demo that came with the Trilogy DVDs.. ?
binky
05/10/04 @ 17:11
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
hhhmm Battlefront or Fable?!? :/
Hunam85
05/10/04 @ 17:35
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I really dont like this game at all, it just reeks of mediocrity, me and a friend played it dual-screen on the xbox and we really didnt have fun at all, had to strain cuz of the low quality graphics, but what clinched it for me was i was in an at-at, killing stuff, then i realised i didnt even need to hit them, just somewhere in the 30 mile spash radius, thus the fun went.
Scimarad
05/10/04 @ 18:29
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Okay, I only played the demo on the Star Wars DVDs but I really didn't think it was up to much. For a start I couldn't bloody see any of the enemies let alone aim at 'em:-(
Zeitgeist
05/10/04 @ 19:06
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Most people's first memory of Battlefront will be slaughtering Jar-Jar Binks again and again. Pandemic's clearly onto a winner there."

Thats probably worth the price of admission right there.
jumpdeveraux
06/10/04 @ 00:39
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Are we to expect a review of the PC version?

The LucasArts SWBF PC forums are an interesting read, looks like Pandemic ported the XBox code to PC including the shoddy netcode :-/
3william56
06/10/04 @ 06:12
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Shooting JarJar - check.
Shooting Ewoks - check.

Just tell me that I can introduce the little brat from Ep 1 to the sharp end of a correlian blaster, and it's a sale.
disc
06/10/04 @ 09:41
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
cannot agree with that scoring at all...

playing the pc-version it plays like battlefields younger and less pretty and star wars freak cousin...

5 or 6 /10... far far away from an 8...
gizmo
06/10/04 @ 10:34
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Excellent game. Nice atmosphere, fun even in single player - even better played with friends on live. And this from someone who has racked up MONTHS on bf1942, bf vietnam, COD et al. And I think the graphics engine is bloody marvelous.

Pop-up?? not on the xbox matey?

Running around, can't figure out what to do? Try space invaders (They're coming down, you shoot them)

eviltobz 
06/10/04 @ 11:57
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
fooking hell. never thought there'd be so many people here disliking the game. i played a bit on the xbox demo version that came with the dvds and found it to be pretty good fun, then got to play it properly at the recent mobilan soak test where to put it into suitable language for an internet forum:

1t w45 t3h r0xX0r5!!!1!!11!1omglolwtf 4dn th3r3 4r3 5p33d3rb1k35!!11!1!169

admittedly i'm pretty new to the current face of fps gaming since i got pissed off with quake way back when, and the battlefields may have the edge on depth, but this game is great. certainly some of that joy comes from the fact that it is star wars, but i'm no fanboy, i enjoy the originals, remasters and prequels all pretty much equally for what they are, kids films. it's so ingrained into pop culture however that i can't help but love some of the moments. and those jetpacks. gotta love them.
Wretched Chin
06/10/04 @ 12:36
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Binky : "Those screenies look so much better than the demo that came with the Trilogy DVDs.. ?"

Yes, the demo on the DVDs really doesn't do it justice. It was obviously a very early build with crappy menus and pretty poor visuals (particularly in the character models I felt), but I reckon the actual game tops it in every way.

I agree with this review. It's a top game. When people say it's laggy, they're right, but no more than any other Xbox live game - it's just a case of finding the right game.
APHIZM
06/10/04 @ 19:06
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
They have to make it clearer in the bandwidth settings of these games that you may have a 1.5Mb cable line, but the chances are you're upstream is only 256k. Not knowing this causes laggy servers and wastes potential gaming time looking for that elusive smooth game.

Lag is the only single problem with XBL, and considering you PAY for the service you shouldn't expect such issues. Games should not allow hosting on connections that cannot cope with the selected player numbers, simple as that.
driptray
06/10/04 @ 22:59
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
kjonrad ......... um ... w h a t ??
kallenai
07/10/04 @ 08:29
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Just a warning to those considering buying this game, you might want to take a browse of the support page for it. I've reviewed and played many games in my time, but this one is without doubt the most bug ridden and rushed I've experienced in a long time :(, just a warning to those who might be tempted by the LA name. I've tried everything along with many other gamers to get it to work properly without any success. Sadly LA does not provide game support for countries outside the US, so us UK gamers are a tad stuck. http://forums.lucasarts.com/forum.jspa?forumID=36&start=0
Edited 1 times, most recently on 07/10/04 @ 09:30
strontium dog
31/10/04 @ 21:35
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i bought the pc version of this and it sucks.first off the menus look cheap and nasty.when joining a game u might have to wait a long time also the server will drop u without explanation.im a big fan of star wars and this was the first game of the film that i was interested in.i play bf 42 and vietnam and this is a poor contender to the crown.badly developed needs a lot more work,the only good thing about it is the graphics are great if your using a high end pc.the gameplay is dry and you die to easily.command posts can be captured to quickly .it just sucks on so many levels.i cant help feel ive been ripped off.and game dosent swap or give you refunds on pc games anymore[BASTARDS]GO BUY HALO 2 OR HALF LIFE 2 INSTEAD WHEN THERE REALESED

Comments: 1-36 of 36 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery