Limbo
Get the lowdown.
Uncertain of his sister's fate, a boy enters Limbo. That's the remit. Those are the only words you'll get before watching a bright-eyed youth wake up in a silent monochrome world and valiantly set out from left to right.
As you do so, it isn't long before it dawns on you that what you're playing is in all likelihood a classic, liable to be mentioned in the same breaths as Portal or Braid, potentially even Another World, a game whose sensibilities Limbo certainly shares.
On the surface it's a somewhat snooty puzzle platformer - inspired by German Expressionism and Film Noir, it's easy to confuse it for a lesson in pretention from a developer who's spent longer sitting in an arty cinema than making heads explode.
It is, however, one of the smoothest, most refined and charming games that will be released this year. Originating in a tentative animation put up on the internet three years ago by its Danish creator Arnt Jensen, a small industrious team has grown around it - polishing it to a high sheen for a summer 2010 release on Xbox Live Arcade. One dedicated Dane has spent three years on the movement and animation of the boy alone.
Said boy - a cross between Calvin out of Calvin & Hobbes and the ancient image of a Game & Watch character silhouette - must walk, climb, grab and drag his way through the bleak surroundings, facing down frequently deadly puzzles.

There is no bombastic music. Sometimes there's little to do but wander from hillock to puzzle in pleasant silence, with only your footsteps, the occasional bristle of wind or suspicious cracks emanating from the undergrowth to serenade you.
The paucity of sound effects and the relatively barren screen condenses the gameplay into seemingly simple tasks, but it also envelops you - almost drowns you - in its minimalist loveliness.
And then, just when the German art-house cinema stylings and foggy sheen have transfixed you, the boy's head is cut off. Dark glops of silhouette blood go everywhere. His decapitated corpse jiggles in the breeze.
It's absolutely hilarious. He drowns, snaps, gets caught in whirring machinery, finds himself pierced by a vast and grotesque Shelob-style spider right in the face... He dies for your pleasure, with physics-attuned animation both grotesque and brilliant.
The last game that had this much fun with gruesome traps is Lemmings - and the hungry mantrap jaws the boy stumbles into, and the way his guts cling to the masonry that's crushed him, are surely references to the halcyon era of DMA Design.
The contrast between the utter joy the game has in ripping its little hero apart, and its apparently high-brow stylings, make it a genuine laugh riot. When you come across something that looks vaguely sharp or pointy you'll inevitably kill that boy in Limbo, just to watch him die. Checkpoints are regular as clockwork, so death rarely becomes a frustrating commodity.
So what, exactly, do you do in terms of platforming? Well, the controls are simply the 360 analogue stick and a grab/do button; the game's keymap option screen is a minimalist joke in itself.
An early, simple puzzle has you come across a corpse that's buzzing with flies hanging from a rope attached to tree branch, and unreachable platform above it. Your task is to manoeuvre a nearby mantrap beneath the mouldering body and leap onto the rope - dragging down the tree bough, dipping the maggot-filled legs into the waiting teeth of the trap, and once the body is detached swinging on the rope to freedom (of a sort) on the ledge above.
Rotten trees can be pushed over, and rolling boulders that thunder towards you must be dodged, but repetition never becomes an issue. As each new puzzle emerges from the gloom neat twists on existing gameplay veer your problem-solving in different directions - one minute you'll be snapping off arachnid legs with your mantraps, the next it will have cocooned you Frodo-style with its web and all you can do is hop over the landscape as if trapped in a zipped up sleeping bag while desperately trying to avoid the rolling architecture.
Later on, as scenes become more urban and industrial, vast moving cogs and magnets come out to play, the screen starts to revolve around you and… spoilers, spoilers, spoilers. Needless to say, Limbo isn't quite as trapping and motionless in its approach as its name might suggest.

If there is a worry about Limbo it's that its puzzles might become too complex in the closing stretch of its four-hour runtime, yet the first 40 minutes I've played this year at GDC are user-friendly in a way that only the most incessantly playtested games could ever be.
The way the game nudges your attention to relevant puzzle items through the usage of butterflies, rumbles, falling leaves, subtle camera-points and the movement of the boy's beautiful glowing eyes is fiendishly clever, and the deaths associated with them rarely anything but stabby/shreddy perfection.
Above all, Limbo is mysterious - and developer PlayDead wallows in the mystery. Is the boy dead? "Maybe." Was that his sister on-screen? "Who knows?" What more can you tell me about the story? "Uncertain of his sister's fate, a boy enters Limbo." Do I need to get something to float on this water so I can stop drowning in horrible ways? "Who can say?"
The only thing I can nail down here and now is that Limbo already feels like it will be up there with the most interesting games of 2010.
Limbo is due out exclusively for Xbox Live Arcade this summer.
You may also like...
-
Dead Island: Ryder White Review
-
Hirai: Sony could be facing "serious trouble"
-
THQ reveals plans for 1.4m unsold uDraw tablets
-
BioWare suggests keeping Mass Effect 3 saves
-
Lumines Vita Preview: History Repeating
-
Skyrim PC Creation Kit release date announced
-
Dirt Showdown Preview: The Ghost of Destruction Derby
-
Final Fantasy 13-2 Review
-
Mass Effect 3 Preview: The Good Shepard?
-
Redundancies confirmed at EA Canada
-
Cannon Fodder 3 is… well…
-
US lawmaker proposes 1% tax on violent video games
-
App of the Day: Bag It!
-
Aliens: Colonial Marines trailer shows gameplay glimpses
-
Eurogamer.net Podcast #98: Resident Evil and the Circle Pad Pro
-
The Witcher 2 Xbox 360 enhancements trailer
-
SoulCalibur 5 Review
-
Official Uncharted: Golden Abyss Vita case announced
-
Sony on Vita sales: "we do not think we have any problems"
-
Namco Bandai enters SoulCalibur 5 DLC debate
-
Valve teases secret Team Fortress 2 project
-
Atari "dream team" reforms to make games for "the new arcade", iOS
-
The Last of Us: first in-game screenshots, new gameplay details
-
Mass Effect 3 Facebook app rewards Xbox 360 players
-
DoDonPachi: Blissful Death iOS release date announced









Comments (25) 2 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
i'm joking, i'm joking.
i do like this type of game - looks promising...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
what kind of worry is that?
I hope it gets at leat as interesting and inventive (and complex) as Braid before the halfway point!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
interested to see how the game play is
but it sure looook pretty
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Here's a hypothetical question - whose life is more valuable? A 30-year old man's or a young girl's? How do you measure worth when it comes to someone's life? I see all these "news" in the TV where, somehow, it is supposed to be more tragic if a young woman/girl dies? Does that mean the loss of life of a guy (esp if he's not young) has little significance?
I know this is completely off-topic, but I am always surprised when people seem to affix worth to a life based on gender and age.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
A young girl hasn't had much life so far, whereas a 30 year old man has had a little of life. A child who dies is a life not lived.
I want this. I like quirky little titles. Something different to temper the COD OCD and maddeningly poor braking distances on Ferrarri's.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"A young girl hasn't had much life so far, whereas a 30 year old man has had a little of life. A child who dies is a life not lived."
Okay. That's one plausible explanation - accounting for age. What about gender? What makes some people think the life of a girl/woman is more precious than a boy's/man's? I'm not slating anybody here. Genuine question.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Actually, that explanation of yours may be pretty close to the truth. All about perceptions, isn't it?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show