PS3 gamer fury over Mortal Kombat DLC
UPDATED: WB responds, pricing incorrect.
UPDATE:
"Unfortunately, due to some technical issues, the Mortal Kombat Skarlet DLC will not be available to PSN users in Europe until next week," Mortal Kombat publisher Warner Bros. has told Eurogamer in a new statement.
"We apologise for any inconvenience but assure fans that Skarlet and her fatalities are on the way.
"To clarify the posted price of the Classic Skins pack on PSN is incorrect and is currently being rectified to £3.19 for UK users and €3.99 for European users.
"All users will have access to the compatibility pack and free classic skins – Cyrax and Sektor - once Skarlet is available."
ORIGINAL STORY:
European PlayStation 3 gamers are in uproar after the hotly anticipated Mortal Kombat downloadable content failed to launch as part of the PlayStation Store update yesterday.
Add-on character Skarlet was made available to US PS3 owners on Tuesday. She did not show during yesterday's EU Store update.
Adding insult to injury, the Klassic Skin Pack, $4.99 in the US, costs £5.49 in the UK and €6.99 in Europe.
Predictably, PS3 gamers have reacted angrily to the news on the EU PlayStation Blog.
"So, not only we pay double the price for the Mortal Kombat skin pack, but there's also no word of Skarlet?" wrote HerrSpiegelmann. "That does it. Mortal Kombat was the last multiplatform game that I get for the PS3. As a matter of fact, I'm considering selling my MK copy and get the 360 version instead. It's what I should have done in the first place. And by the looks of things, I know which company won't get a cent from me next generation."
"This is getting stupid," wrote angry urikobb3. "We finally get the Klassic Skin pack for MK (but at £5.49, when US only paid $5!) BUT we now don't have Skarlet, or the compatibility pack that includes Klassic Sektor/Cyrax."
Eurogamer has requested an explanation from Mortal Kombat publisher Warner Bros.
You may also like...
-
Dirt Showdown Review 73
-
The Cave Preview: Double Fine's New Game for Sega 15
-
Going Hardcore in Diablo 3 88
-
Activision vs. Vince Zampella and Jason West: Inside the game industry trial of the decade 14
-
App of the Day: Hiragana Pixel Party 14
-
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Review 129
-
Judge recommends US Xbox 360 ban 168
-
Fake Angry Birds developer fined £50,000 19
-
Double Fine reveals Ron Gilbert project The Cave 6
-
Metal Gear Solid HD Collection Vita release date 42
-
Sign up for new Eurogamer content digest emails 11
-
Kingdoms of Amalur studio execs jump ship 36
-
Diablo 3 Review 243
-
Screenshots of Amalur dev's Copernicus MMO leak 18
-
Dragon's Dogma Review 133
Comments (74) Latest comment 11 months ago
Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I've already got copyright, hands off.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I noticed a few weeks ago that Beyond Good & Evil HD on the PS3 was selling for almost twice the price of the 360 version but it was quickly corrected and with the 30 days free PSN+ sub it worked out cheaper. I still don't understand though why the same publishers charge more for stuff on the PS3 than the 360. Is it greed or do Sony add a surcharge on top or something? Why?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
As for not releasing stuff I know how much that ticks me off >.< Espec hate when the developer puts it on the disc but you have to pay to unlock! *cough* crapcom *cough*
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Why does the UK get raped like this all the time, Sony Piss on us and tell us its raining. I do love both consoles, but this is beyond a joke now.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Quite sad really
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Doesn't explain the missing Skarlet thing though.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
You dont get free gaming for nothing, someone always pays for it
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Also DLC is evil.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
can i buy this second hand and use my unused online activision code? (PSN was down)
in fact, i used the trail online and it was laggy as fuck, is it still like that?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Definately no fanboy motives there then. Sad day when the price of DLC is what makes people determine which consoles is better.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Basically the publisher thinks it will earn more profit in the US by selling it cheaper, and more profit in Europe (and particularly on PS3) by setting the price higher.
If they thought they could earn more by selling it cheaper they would, and likewise if they thought they could earn more by bumping the price up in the USA they would do that too. These are just what Warner believes to be the best price points for the various platforms and territories.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The PSN Bandwidth Charge argument doesn't actually make any sense in this case though. The cost (from the article you linked) is $0.16 per gigabyte. If this is just an unlock code then the size is going to be very small. Even if this was a 1 GB download then the price should still only be marginally higher to cover those costs.
The sceptic in me suggests some of the inflated prices are due to wanting to include them in a future promotion (PSN+ or "special offer"
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Oh the lulz.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Yeah, go on! Buy the game twice that'll show the money grabbing bastards!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Yes, exactly. They believe if they sold it more expensively on Xbox Live they would earn less revenue. They don't believe this is true for PS3.
If it's just the publishers setting the prices higher, why do MS manage to get better prices out of them consistently?
Why do Ebuyer charge a different price than Dixons for the same products? Because they each choose the most profitable prices for their audience.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
They simply believe that on average, PS3 owners are willing to pay more. Just like they believe on average Europeans are willing to pay more than Americans.
People are wondering why prices are higher on a service that's made a loss for 5 years in a row and is trying to make a profit - the answer isn't hard to work out.
Setting a higher price doesn't guarantee more revenue. If it was that simple they'd set a higher price on Xbox too.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'd imagine they have figures to back it up. DLC is a very important part of a game-maker's strategy now, and you can bet there has been lots of research done on setting price points.
Why is a game £0.59 on the App Store but £9.99 on DSiWare? Because those are the right prices for their audiences, or so publishers believe.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
'give me £30 a year and you'll get a 10% discount'.
'err shouldn't it be free or something'
'no'
'how about dedicated servers'
'no'
' what am i actually getting for my money then'
'fucking 10% discount and an amazing service'
'amazing service?'
'yeah'
'without dedicated servers'
'yeah'
'Ha, think i'll pass bye'
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Blimey, that was a quick response! I wonder if those who paid a fiver will get some sort of refund to their PSN wallet.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The industry is so blinded by greed this gen and I doubt it will ever go back to the golden days of gaming (pre-internet gaming). So sad how gaming has fallen and it's only downhill from here
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I don't think I can convince you then. You seem to be implying they set a lower price on Xbox as a favour or something. That's simply the best price for maximising profit on Xbox, and likewise for the PS3 price.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The US price on PSN for the Klassic Skins pack is $4.99, roughly equivalent to the 400 MS points price ($5). It's more the fact that $4.99 doesn't translate too well to £5.49 or €6.99. I doubt you'd get the same reaction if they were selling it for £3.40 / €4.80 which would be exactly the same as the US PSN / 360 market place.
The complaints are being made on a regional basis rather than a platform one. As far as I'm aware, the publisher chooses what price to charge in each region and for Europe they've decided to charge a premium on the PSN where in the US the've made it comparable to the 360 price.
Edit: Given the update, it seems PSN users in Europe get the best deal (if my currency calculations are correct). Also note that it was the publisher that released the statement. Still, gave us an hour and a half of good bitching in the comments
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
No we will not, because we would
1. Have it already
2. Not have had to complain at the blatant rip off price then be told its an Error?
3. Not have to listen to BS about tech issues, tell me what tech issue? More fucking Sony lies.
If anything ill be happy? Ill actually have friends to play it with now & no Sony BS. I feel pretty good thanks.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Genuine question then, why did you buy the PS3 version in the first place?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"More fucking Sony lies."
"Ill actually have friends to play it with now & no Sony BS. I feel pretty good thanks."
The statement was issued by WB, not Sony.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Funny as it happened to Beyond Good and Evil when he was mouthing off about that last week.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
If you actually have friends to play it with now on xbox then why the hell did you not get it on that in the first place?
Also. People make mistakes. Get over it. It's a fact of life. It's been rectified now so what's the problem?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
All that effort put in, only for it to be for nothing.
ul son!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
First BG&E gets a big price drop and now this.
Maybe they'll stop publishing them once they realise their mistake
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Furthermore, I totally agree with those stating that those buying this kind of rip off content are keeping this kind of DLCs alive and kicking...
It's a shame really. Especialy when you think back (o say 6 years before Xbox 360 and PS3) to an era of PS2s and Xboxs when you could unlock this kind of 'extras' just by completing a game. You could then say that it was all down to your ability or skills and have a feeling of proudness because you got those funky new extra's... That I sincerely miss...
Damn how I miss the good old days...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Edited: ... negged to -10. Interestingly, to downvote this you'd have to agree with the conclusion...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Once upon a time 10-15quid expansion pack would give you something worth that value. Sometimes from 5-10 hours extra SP content.
This is an unlock key for some character art. Complete Disgrace
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
...I blame Sony. I always do."
360 fanboys like you always do - even for something that went wrong on your beloved 360 or XBL.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"Funny that I'm called an Xbox fanboy since I always found that the prices on XBLA are lower than on PSN."
Not just that. I know your post history, and from that I can gather what subjective perspective your posts stem from.
"I simply do not like the PS3 nor Sony for my own personal reasons. That doesn't make me a fanboy, man.the.king."
And it's this history of glorifying everything MS and condemning everything Sony that gets you called a 360 fanboy, who doesn't like the PS3 because he is a 360 fanboy and therefore feels the need to slag off the PS3 and everything related to Sony PS3. This is not just a preference, this is fanboyism.
Fine with me that you choose not to recognize it though.
"Or is it to defend the purchase of your PS3?? "
I'm quite happy with my purchase of a PS3 Thank You. Fine enough that I do not feel the need to slag off the "other" console every chance I get. You on the other hand seem to feel the need to criticize everything PS3-related as often as you can. Just like coolbritannia and guillotine.
And BTW, I do have a 360, a launch model from 2006. Still going strong. And a Wii. And a PSP.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show