Eve Online dev responds to server attack
Taskforce mobilized to evaluate risk.
Jón Hörðdal, chief operating officer at CCP, has responded to last night's service outage with a statement on the developer's website.
"At 17:00 UTC today, CCP became aware of a distributed denial-of-service attack (DDoS) against the EVE Online cluster and web servers," he wrote.
"Our policy in such cases is to mobilize a taskforce of internal and external experts to evaluate the situation. At 17:55 UTC, that group concluded that our best course of action was to go completely offline while an exhaustive scan of our entire infrastructure was executed."
CCP also stressed that subscriber information - including payment details - remained secure and were unaffected by the attack.
"Further, we can also confirm that no personal details such as users' credentials or credit card numbers were exposed through this incident."
An update later in the evening revealed that attempts to flood the EVE Tranquility server with traffic had led to a further withdrawal of the game service, this time instigated by the developer.
While notorious hacker collective LulzSec wasn't named in the statement, the group claimed last night to have targeted the game, along with the log-in servers for indie favourite Minecraft.
CCP is continuing to monitor the situation, and have warned that Tranquility may be taken offline again should circumstances require it.
You may also like...
-
Dirt Showdown Review 70
-
Going Hardcore in Diablo 3 85
-
The Cave Preview: Double Fine's New Game for Sega 13
-
App of the Day: Hiragana Pixel Party 14
-
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Review 129
-
Judge recommends US Xbox 360 ban 168
-
Fake Angry Birds developer fined £50,000 18
-
Metal Gear Solid HD Collection Vita release date 42
-
Kingdoms of Amalur studio execs jump ship 36
-
Double Fine reveals Ron Gilbert project The Cave 7
-
Diablo 3 Review 243
-
Sign up for new Eurogamer content digest emails 10
-
Japan chart: My Little Sister Can't Possibly Be This Cute takes top spot 95
-
Dragon's Dogma Review 133
-
Mass Effect Infiltrator launches on Android 16
Comments (24) Latest comment 11 months ago
Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Sadly most so-called politicians are incapable of understanding the further implications of these malicious activities so the chance of getting effective legislation to bring these so-called hackers to justice is nothing but a pipe dream. This combined with the almost zero interest in a global co-ordinated effort on just about anything means that if any Government did bring in effective legislation there'd be no way to actually prosecute as the jurisdictional arguments will prevent any charges from being brought in the first place.
Also, coolbritannia: during the PSN outage you almost started to turn into someone tolerable in these threads, but now you're back to trolling after the banning of ChalieChan, coincidence or are you feeling the loss of your favourite sock?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Trivia fact: The Icelandic alphabet has no letter Z as it was removed in 1973.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I love EVE and used to play it religiously. From my experience though, most of the other players were either boardroom sharks, too-clever-by-half geeks or out and out psychopaths, gawd bless 'em. Not a group you'd want to piss off on in a cyber conflict.
Fingers crossed for a targeted podder backlash.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'd suggest you steer clear of debates you're not capable of participating in to be honest anyone who doesn't see the need for robust global legislation on cyber crime lacks the necessary understanding to discuss it logically and rationally and therefore has rely on poorly constructed reactionary arguments such as the one you just made.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Bunch of fucktards.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
And you show your lack of understanding in matters of security. No organisation can fully insulate itself against these attacks, someone will eventually get in or the attackers will move to smaller/softer targets. Prevention is of course the best cure, but that doesn't negate the need for some way of dealing with things after the event. Bearing in mind that proper laws to give consequence to these actions would be a preventative measure in themselves.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Don't think I'll announce any Sony partnerships for the time being...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Can anyone here suggest a deserving target...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
<a href=http://www.chestnutcatsanctuary.co.uk/Content/sanctuary-charity-store>Here's one for you</a>