Study to link gaming with mental illness
ESA counters, labels report "dubious".
A forthcoming study which claims to establish a link between gaming and metal health problems in children has been junked by the Entertainment Software Association (ESA) as "questionable" and "dubious".
Although the exact contents of the report, authored by Iowa State University researcher Douglas Gentile, have yet to be made public, it's angered the ESA enough to coax a statement from senior VP Richard Taylor.
"We commend credible, independent, and verifiable research about computer and video games. However, this research is just more of the same questionable findings by the same author in his campaign against video games."
"There simply is no concrete evidence that computer and videogames cause harm," Taylor continued. "In fact, a wide body of research has shown the many ways games are being used to improve our lives through education, health and business applications."
According to the ESA, the methodology used in Gentile's report just isn't sound.
"Its definition of 'pathological gaming' is neither scientifically nor medically accepted and the type of measure used has been criticised by other scholars.
"Other outcomes are also measured using dubious instruments when well-validated tools are readily available. In addition, because the effect sizes of the outcomes are mainly trivial, it leaves open the possibility the author is simply interpreting things as negatively as possible."
Gentile, who has a long history of research into the alleged negative side-effects of gaming, issued a retort via Gamasutra.
"Although the ESA claim that this study is flawed, they give no credible evidence of significant flaws," he said. "Furthermore, the article was subjected to peer-review by independent experts in a top medical journal, experts whose interest is in evaluating the quality of science."
"My position is and always has been that games are powerful, and that they can have many effects. Some effects are beneficial, others can be harmful," he added.
"The various effects depend upon many different features, upon amount of time spent with the games, and possibly upon characteristics of the player. By being aware of both the potential benefits and potential problems, families can maximise the benefits while minimizing the harms."
We'll have more to say on this one as soon as Gentile's report gets published, but in the meantime we'll take the time to remind you that a different set of eggheads recently claimed gaming helped youngsters do better at school and stay away from drugs. Who to believe, eh?
You may also like...
-
Going Hardcore in Diablo 3 36
-
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Review 122
-
Judge recommends US Xbox 360 ban 144
-
App of the Day: This Could Hurt 2
-
Growing Paynes: How Remedy's Hero Went Rockstar in Max Payne 3 35
-
Diablo 3: Blizzard nerfs monk in first hotfix 48
-
Diablo 3 fastest-selling PC game ever, biggest PC game launch in history 60
-
Diablo 3 Review 242
-
Wii U Darksiders 2 graphics "at least as good" as PS3, Xbox 360 versions' 39
-
From Dust playable in Google Chrome browser 17
-
Heroes of Ruin Preview: Fantasy Stars Online 4
-
Face-Off: Max Payne 3 144
-
Street Fighter 25th Anniversary Collector's Set announced 21
-
Japan chart: My Little Sister Can't Possibly Be This Cute takes top spot 23
-
Dragon's Dogma Review 125
Comments (45) Latest comment 1 year ago
Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
*Not to be confused with the band INXS, which is also bad for you.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Shocker 2: Indignant gamers also attack report without reading it or knowing the details of its findings in comments thread.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Metal health! Yeah! Rock on!
Also, sounds a bit like a dumb study...Even though I have often suffered through US teens saying clearly deranged things over the headset I wouldn't think they're actually deranged...
No evidence to even base the theory on...A bit like having a study to see if excessive gaming increases your appetite for sushi...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
*punches cat*
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'll be sure to keep that study in mind for my defence, thanks EG.
/resumes stabbing baby orphans
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Have to go back to LBP2 now.. my hands are shaking.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
ie they eat all the food.
take more fuel to run their car
now gaming.... repent now, if you move off your sofa you gonna cause some harm to something or someone
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
In other words, video games are being singled out as a "possible" cause of mental illness, when in reality any form of suggestive media has the same effect. Disturbed individuals have been doing shitty, violent things to others way before such games a Grand Theft Auto or Counter Strike.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
If you are obsessive-compulsive, press 1 repeatedly.
If you are co-dependent, please ask someone to press 2 for you.
If you have multiple personalities, press 3, 4, 5 and 6.
If you are paranoid, we know who you are and what you want. Stay on the line so we can trace your call.
If you are delusional, press 7 and your call will be transferred to the mother ship.
If you are schizophrenic, listen carefully and a small voice will tell you which number to press.
If you are a manic-depressive, it doesn’t matter which number you press, no one will answer.
If you are dyslexic, press 9696969696969696.
If you have a nervous disorder, please fidget with the pound key until a representative comes on the line.
If you have amnesia, press 8 and state your name, address, telephone number, date of birth, Social Security number and your mother’s maiden name.
If you have post-traumatic stress disorder, s-l-o-w-l-y and c-a-r-e-f-u-l-l-y press 0 0 0.
If you have bi-polar disorder, please leave a message after the beep, or before the beep, or after the beep. Please wait for the beep.
If you have short-term memory loss, press 9.
If you have short-term memory loss, press 9.
If you have short-term memory loss, press 9.
If you have short-term memory loss, press 9.
If you have low self-esteem, please hang up. All operators are too busy to talk to you.
Source : [link url=http://www.webwombat.com.au/entertainment/humour/readfiles/manic.htm
]http://www.webwombat.com.au/entertainmen...[/link]
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Pure genius! I wish I could give more than +1
EDIT: I thought it was genius attributable to you, until I stumbled upon this
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
/runs
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'll reserve judgement on the study until I can read the details for myself, but if this quote is correct, "Furthermore, the article was subjected to peer-review by independent experts in a top medical journal", then I am immediately suspicious since that is not what peer review is.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Richard Dawkins is considered far too passionate about disproving the existence of God, and as such his studies cannot be considered reliable.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
That's the problem, gaming turns kids into boring life-less nerds. Save your child before it's too late!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The man who formerly held the "Simonyi Professorship for Public Understanding of Science" is laughed upon by the scientific community? The man who's won the Faraday award and countless scientific doctorates? You're telling me this man is laughed upon by the scientific community? That can't be true, unless you define creationism as science.
If that's the case I apologise and i'd like some of what you're smoking too. Why did you bring up Dawkins here anyway? Apart from being completely inaccurate, it's a completely irrelevant topic to discuss here.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
(Seriously, go watch it because it's a good movie about an autistic kid who plays an MMO.)
Comment below viewing threshold Show
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0098663/
Comment below viewing threshold Show
*exhales deeply*
pppppppppphhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
'Richard Dawkins is considered far too passionate about disproving the existence of God, and as such his studies cannot be considered reliable.'
Just out of interest, would you also consider religious leaders to be far too passionate about convincing people of the existence of various gods, and thus also incredibly unreliable?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
If you want to defeat a scientific study that works against your aims you can't do it by shouting and crying foul, you have to do it properly, look at the results, the methodology, the original hypothesis. You find a flaw in the study and you focus the debate on that, what you certainly don't do is shake your head and say "nuh uh" while calling your opponent names as the ESA appear to be doing here. The methodology in Gentile's studies (all of them) alone gives more than enough ammunition to shoot down his findings without the need to resort to such a playground response.
No wonder nobody takes this industry seriously.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'm curious what that will turn up..
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
It's probably a good idea to read something before attempting to discredit or misrepresent it - and that's why I'm not going to express my knee-jerk reaction to this particular study - not just yet, anyway.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Er, whichever findings are born out by academic peer review and meta-analysis!
It does the ESA no credit to pre-emptively attack somebody's research just because the findings might be inconvenient for the industry!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"play COD and meet that SPECIAL Someone"
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Seriously, someone needs to invent a new media so it can have it's turn being the scapegoat of all societies problems.
I mean we had Music, TV, Film, now games - need something new to move on to.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show