Turning Point: Fall of Liberty
The Nazis invade America.
Surely it's time to put an end to World War II? I mean, how many Nazis/Japs can one gamer blow away before it gets boring? There's only so many battles you can fight, surely? Only so many theatres of war that you can shoot people in? Right? Wrong. Sort of. Now there's another theatre of war: the US of A. Turning Point: Fall of Liberty is the latest game by World War II FPS specialists Spark Unlimited, but it's got a twist: the Allies have lost their battle against the Nazis, and now Hitler's minions have invaded America.
And so to the labyrinthine bowels of the War Rooms, which is apparently where Churchill ran World War II. It's a good location to show off Turning Point because the game's counterfactual universe exists because Churchill wasn't around to run World War II. He was killed in a taxi cab accident in New York on December 13, 1931 - a twist of fate that ultimately results in the surprise Nazi invasion of New York some 20 years later. Which is where the game starts, accompanied by all the usual screen-shaking explosions and bombastic action that you've come to expect from the sort of authentically gritty World War II shooters that Spark has pioneered - except this one also throws in an alternate timeline, advanced technology, and a new emphasis on guerrilla tactics.
This is the team behind games in the Medal of Honor and Call of Duty series, and the company's CEO, Craig Allen reckons that each of those games marks an evolution in the way videogames depict war. From the unbridled heroism of Medal of Honor, to the war-is-hell survivalism in Call of Duty, and now, with Turning Point, to the personal impact of war - the way small twists of fate can affect everyday lives.

Real-world monuments provide a stark backdrop for the Nazi invasion of America.
To judge from the various demos that Codemasters run through at the War Rooms, there's another way these games have evolved: they've got louder and more intense with each new instalment. The first demo of the afternoon starts off at the top of a skyscraper that's in the middle of being built. Then all hell breaks loose as Nazi planes fly overhead, gunning down builders, and bombing buildings, apparently meeting no opposition from US forces. There's an orchestral score, falling debris, massive explosions, and all the scripted chaos that World War II first person shooters have made their own.
But, as Allen points out, this isn't a conventional World War II game. For a start, the game's protagonist isn't the well-drilled military man of the previous two games. He's an average Joe construction worker (who just happens to have a capacity for inspired military heroics). The scenario sees this average Joe, or Dan Carson to give him his proper name, caught up in a history that's very different to our own. After Churchill is killed in that cab accident (a cab accident which actually really happened in real life, fact fans), history diverges from our own timeline, to see England surrendering in 1940, before American forces can be drawn into battle.
Thus, it comes as a complete surprise when the Wehrmacht attacks the East Coast in 1953, because, as Codemasters' David Brickley points out, the Nazis have, at their disposal, "The advanced weaponry that stems from another decade of uninterrupted, unchallenged research. And we know what they were coming up with towards the end of the Second World War as it was, with the V2 bombs and so on. That's where the blimps come from, the troop carriers that are capable of crossing the Atlantic. Why didn't they see it coming? Well it's 1953, there's no satellite."

After beating the Allies in Europe, the Nazis have had an extra ten years to come up with all sorts of nefarious technology - like attack blimps.
And so to that enormously impressive opening set-piece, which ranges from vertiginous heights to claustrophobic tunnels, with the intensity never letting up. Take, for example, the moment in which Carson sneaks up behind a Nazi parachutist to break his neck, steal his weapon, and push him off the top of a tall building. Or the first moment where he grapples an enemy in order to shoot him in the chest at super close range. Or the first moment he takes his first human shield - apparently an essential tactic in some of the game's more open areas. Or the first moment a grenade goes off and your vision is reduced to a blur.
It is, as Allen points out, unflinching in its depiction of violence. During his introduction, he explicitly links the conception of the game to 9/11. Which is interesting because there are other moments of resonance during the various movies and demos: planes crash into skyscrapers, rendering them towering infernos; bodies fall from the rooftops; kneeling prisoners are executed with a bullet to the head. It's interesting because it's clearly a manifestation of the American fear of invasion (which has ironically spawned several American invasions of other countries). It's also interesting because, of course, ratings boards on both sides of the Atlantic have shown a recent tendency to clamp down on the depiction of violence in games.
But Allen is confident that such an unflinching approach is justified: "We're not doing things in a gratuitous fashion. If we have any scenes that are shocking it's because they are a reflection of the reality we're trying to portray, and we're basing that on real or probable events. When we do have violence and mature moments in the game, they're serving the theme, and the theme is that this war is personal. And war is a brutal thing. We're not trying to romanticise it or to glorify it: if it's shocking it's because it should be."
In any case, there's more to the game than violence. There are also jet aircraft and massive zeppelins overhead - a facet of the advanced Nazi technology that is one of the game's key features. Like the counterfactual scenario, all of the technology is plausible and based on the research breakthroughs that the Nazis had made by the end of the real World War II. Technology like infra-red goggles, for example, or the attack blimps all stem from real-world discoveries. And in the second demonstration of the day, the blimps play a big part, as Carson dodges their searchlights, rappels along ledges, shoots people in the chest and takes out an entrenched machine-gun position in what Allen describes as one of the game's quieter levels. It's still very loud.

Something about tanks on the lawn.
As is the final showreel, which sums up the cinematic polish and the atmospheric sense of an occupied America by showing off another of the game's key features: real-world monuments (largely getting blown up). As the action spans across New York, Washington and London, Nazi gunboats proceed down the Thames under Tower Bridge; The remains of the Chrysler Building provide a dramatic backdrop for another shootout; and finally, the White House explodes, offering a hint of the dramatic twists and variety that Allen reckons will characterise the narrative.
"Good entertainment has something to say or to invite discussion on," he argues. "What we would hope is that Turning Point offers a number of interesting themes that hopefully invite discussion. One of those is about people being the product of the decisions they make in life. On a global scale, decisions by political leaders lead to global changes, so we're really trying to have a game that explores those sorts of ideas."
You may also like...
-
Why Can't Videogames Do Sex?
-
Dear Esther Review
-
Girl Vader stars in Kinect Star Wars trailer
-
Assassin's Creed 3, Splinter Cell: Retribution coming this year?
-
Motorola Xoom 2 Tablet Reviews
-
Total War: Shogun 2: Fall of the Samurai gameplay
-
UFC Undisputed 3 Review
-
Metal Gear Online to be switched off in June
-
Mojang won't sue FortressCraft dev, "bored" by Minecraft clones
-
If I Were in a Sealed Room With a Girl, I'd Probably XXX trailer
-
Will there be a PS3 version of The Witcher 2?
-
PlayStation Vita trailer launches new Sony campaign
-
App of the Day: Candy Train
-
Happy Action Theater Review
-
Resistance: Burning Skies PS Vita release date
-
Wii RPG Pandora's Tower release date
-
Project Draco's final name is Crimson Dragon
-
Why Devs Owe You Nothing
-
Infinity Blade's Chair: "we're in the golden age of gaming"
-
ModNation Racers: Road Trip Review
-
Skullgirls trailer features Nurse Valentine
-
Sony explains PlayStation Vita game price strategy
-
Latest SSX footage shows off Moby
-
DICE working on multiple Battlefield 3 fixes
-
Who Killed Rare?









Comments (37) Latest comment 5 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
seems to be a bit of a fad going on.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Yeah. Look at Command & Conquer: Red Alert for the best mainstream example of an Alternative History computer game.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Oh, the article mentions that.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Then I read the piece and thought, ooh that actually could be good. sorta like freedom fighters on PS2 which I enjoyed a lot.
Heres hoping its actually good.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
USSR vs USA > Nazis vs USA
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I think I have that 'saved' (ahem) to a laptop somewhere - may have to dig it out and revel in the eighties memories for a while.....
WOLVERINES!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
You should know better, Taurus. Tch.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
But there was radar you fcuking idiots.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
You should know better, Taurus. Tch.
Perhaps Scotland fights on, holding a line at Hadrians wall.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
This game looks pretty cool, I like the Idea, i dont care how 'unrealistic the blimp is', im sure it wont ruin the game for me. Looking forward to it.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The Scottish and Welsh keep fighting. Maybe.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
...and all of 'Gods country, land of the free, freedom feckers' get BLOWN TO BITS - ha ha.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Oh, fuck off.
I refuse to believe a game containing giant nazi blimps will teach anyone any meaningful lessons about the nature of world conflict. Its just war porn.
At least when Red Alert 2 did this several years ago it didn't take itself so bloody seriously.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
If the UK had surreneded by 1940, this would have been a huge help to the Germans who could have concentrated almost all of their forces in the East. No single event decided the war, so its unfair on the other Allies to say it was all the Soviets (although granted, they played a huge part).
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Spark made Call of Duty Finest Hour, right? That was crap, but probably due to the technical limitations and not the quality of the developers themselves.
Even so: WW2 is yawn-inducing for me these days. I think only Airborne will interest me.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
This is an overblown alternate history war game and that's how they should publicise it. I'm tired of games saying how truthfully they depict the horror of war. They just don't.
Games are fun. War isn't. Action titles are necessarily geared at making war unbelievably cool. They hardly promote pacifism.
As for blimps, if this game was aspiring to depict anything but a pulp fiction invasion of the USA, it seems far more probable the Nazis' rocket research would have a much greater influence on their strategy.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
No, not aimed at you at all. I was just surprised at them trying to pass off blimps as amazing high tech advanced vehicles when they're patently not.
What you say looks pretty accurate to me, all things considered; I too disapprove of them trying to make out that this is super-realistic when it is clearly another exercise in "what if...?". I suppose I just ignored that as marketing speak. So far as I can see all games seek to portray themselves as The Most X Game Ever or The Game That Makes The Experience Of Y More Realistic Than Ever Before in one way or another.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'm much more likely to believe the Man In the High Castle turn of events.