American gran sues Take-Two News
PC
PlayStation 2
Xbox
News
by
Tom Bramwell
Games journalists are running out of witless punnery to help frame stories about the Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas "Hot Coffee" scandal, it emerged today.
"I've tried just about every variation imaginable on burnt tongues, frothing, taking people for mugs, dark stains and the like and I just don't know where else I can go with it," an anonymous source told this website. "Why couldn't the joke have been something to do with a night-cap? You could refill that endlessly... Refill! REFILL!" he yelled as he reached for his laptop and ran off adjusting the first two lines of his news copy.
Journalists are thought to have been caught short of puns this week by the news that an elderly American woman has filed a lawsuit against publisher Take-Two, following her discovery that the game she bought for her 14 year-old grandson was deemed suitable for people over the age of 18, not 17.
Florence Cohen, 85, claims to have been damaged by the discovery of a sexual mini-game hidden in San Andreas, accessible through modification of the PC version or using a third-party utility like Datel's Action Replay device on PS2, which led the ESRB to reclassify the game "AO" instead of "MA", and is seeking in excess of $5 million on behalf of herself and consumers nationwide.
Cohen is seeking class-action status for buyers of the game, accusing Take-Two of committing or engaging in Consumer Deception, False Advertising, Common Law Fraud and Unjust Enrichment citing various civil statutes.
"They should really make sure this doesn't happen again," her lawyer, Laurence D. Paskowitz told the Associated Press. "The least this company can do is offer refunds."
The British Board of Film Classification, whose legally-enforceable 18 certificate remains in place on all copies of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas in the United Kingdom, has added nothing to its original statement on the subject of the American controversy. A fortnight ago, a spokesperson told this website: "Even if we had been aware of it, we would not have had a problem. From our point of view the hidden material does not contravene the 18 rating and so the rating stands."
Apparently TV ads were still running in the US on Comedy Central and MTV this week with the words "Rated AO for 'Adults Only'" replacing previous notes about the "M for Mature" rating. US website GameSpot has since reported that Rockstar claims the ads were the result of a pre-existing media purchase with broadcaster Viacom and have now been suspended.
Meanwhile, fans of the game reacted to the latest Hot Coffee development with exasperation. Popular gaming blog Kotaku railed against Florence Cohen's childrearing skills, demanding that more attention be paid to the fact that she had considered a 17+ rated game suitable for her 14 year-old grandson in the first place. "What I really think is that someone needs to knock on Cohen's front door and ask her at what point did our nation's ability to parent get replaced by a subcommittee and frivolous lawsuits?" the blog demanded.
Are you excited about Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games
Related Games
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Latest Features
-
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas Review [264]
-
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas Preview [153]
-
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas Preview [132]
-
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas Preview [191]
-
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas Preview [207]
Latest Videos
No videos found.
Latest News
-
Take-Two settles Hot Coffee class action [20]
-
GTA: San Andreas to be Xbox Original [31]
-
Thousands claim Hot Coffee compensation [51]
-
San Andreas is best-selling in US ever [17]
-
Mad convict files suit against Rockstar [41]
Latest Screenshots
10 June, 2005 [15]
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
Comments: 1-42 of 42 in total
|
tonynibbles
28/07/05 @ 08:48
0
From the BBFC: "Even if we had been aware of it, we would not have had a problem. From our point of view the hidden material does not contravene the 18 rating and so the rating stands."
Welcome to Britain. We're not total fucktards over here.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 28/07/05 @ 11:58
|
|
PearOfAnguish
28/07/05 @ 09:05
0
"What's that you're doing, Timmy? Having sex with hookers, then beating them to death with a dildo? Oh look, that policeman burns very nicely when you hit him with a molotov cocktail, and look at the detail when you blow someone's head off. And...DEAR LORD IN HEAVEN, POORLY DIGITISED BREASTS!"
|
|
President Weasel
28/07/05 @ 09:15
0
Yes this is a glaringly obvious attempt to make money off the latest controversy.
Yes, this woman should be sued for exposing a 14 year old to 17+ material. Yes, America is clearly the Land of the Fat Idiots. There's an actual point that can be taken from teh story though - if America just had a proper ratings board like the BBFC then none of this crap would have happened. The game would have had a legally binding 18+ slapped on it from the first. |
|
captain-future
28/07/05 @ 09:31
0
hmmm, from the obvious joke that this matter is... I get more and more the strange feeling that it will have serious impact on game publishers and modders. a development that frightens me.
|
|
0
There's an actual point that can be taken from teh story though - if America just had a proper ratings board like the BBFC then none of this crap would have happened. The game would have had a legally binding 18+ slapped on it from the first.
If America's rating system was legally binding I imagine it would have been much worse for Take-Two. Not declaring the content has already been taken pretty seriously, imagine if the result was that by doing so they had made content available to people that it should not legally be sold to. |
|
0
hmmm, from the obvious joke that this matter is... I get more and more the strange feeling that it will have serious impact on game publishers and modders. a development that frightens me.
In all honesty what I see happening is this: Publishers submitting a game for rating will have to declare everything that is on the disc, not just what is accessable via the game. Whether this will extend to commented out code or not I don't know, but even if it did it still wouldn't be a major issue. |
|
PES_Fanboy
28/07/05 @ 09:58
0
The hot coffee section wasn't commented out code - that's the problem. They merely hid it fully formed and some geek found it.
If the code was #ed out, then - at least for the PS2 version - there would be no way to access the modules as you obviously can't change code or decompile from a read-only disc. |
|
PES_Fanboy
28/07/05 @ 10:19
0
It wasn't commented out, it was merely just not accessible via the game logic - the code must have been 'live' in order to reference the area on the disc that it resided.
Hidden and #ed out code are two separate things. One can't be accessed without reverse engineering and decompiling, and one can be found just by snooping around... |
|
0
Um, actually, I think we're a bit confused about our programming. If you comment code out of a program it will not be compiled at all. Which basically means that if Rockstar commented it out, it wouldn't be in the game code and you couldn't access it. Unless you wrote the entire Hot Coffee scene yourself- which is pretty unlikely.
As far as I know, the Hot Coffee code was left in the program, but was disabled with a simple check of a variable. The modders changed this, and lo and behold, the scenes were unlocked. But there's absolutely no way that you can reverse engineer blocks of code that were commented out- as they aren't even in the compiled executable! |
|
0
angrytone, you forget most games are script based.
But as I keep saying. Chances are they put the minigame in, realised it didnt play well, and only left it in as they thought they might come back to it to make it better. I cant for the life of me think they left such a crappy mini game in on purpose! Even then, the nudity was added (I understand) by the modders by changing the textures. |
|
0
What about the fact that the game takes its title from a serious crime in the first place? Grand Theft Auto (as a term) isnt as immediately connectected (in my mind) to crime - if they called it Car Thief, or whatever the term actually is over here you would see how the title must appear in america.
Can you imagine the same (bitch) granny going in to a shop here, buying a game called Grievous Bodily Harm, or Car Thief Extravaganza or something then trying the same shite? I remember my gran got me presents like a jumper with a lego guy attached at the bottom that could pop on and off......nothing about serious crimes.... |
|
Mr_Whacker
28/07/05 @ 12:23
0
Well I think Take Two should account for this. They have brought a serious murder and theft simulator into disrepute.
Seriously though someone should sue her for being a twat. |
|
0
Wait, so her gandson HACKS into the game and knowingly unlocks hidden game content, and SHE sues T2? T2 should sue HER for breaking the eula!
"is seeking in excess of $5 million on behalf of herself and consumers nationwide." - Ah, good, so she will be sharing with anyone "damaged" by this game? How many copies have been sold? Lets say 1m, that would be a fiver each, forgetting about costs and such. Shes doing it for the "right reasons" so she should pay the costs and not look to make a profit, right? Is it just some kind of genetic defect that makes them have so many morons overthere? |
Comments: 1-42 of 42 in total
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
