Medal of Honor Preview

Taliban hammer.

Some people love music, others love comic books. Some people love more than one thing, and how they fit it all in their heads I will never know. Me, I love listening to people talk. Sometimes a game sneaks its way into the middle of that and I'll play it, but great conversations can make me love an ostensibly dull game and poor dialogue can ruin what might otherwise be a great experience.

Basically, I'm a massive banter fan. And it's even more important in war games, where the plot is frequently nonsense and the action so close to a template. The shouty rubbish in Modern Warfare 2 wore me out, and the cohesive and likeable banter of Bad Company 2 allowed me to gratefully gloss over the game's flaws. That bit when the squad leader took time out to reassure his group about the quality of their puns? That, right there, added two to my internal score.

Yes, I'm sure a lot of Scottish men shout a lot during globally critical missions, and Andy McNabb might have told The Sun that Modern Warfare 2 is realistic, but if that's what you're after then let's get rid of regenerating health and magical medkits and see how realistic you really want your war.

So, the second mission reveal of the modern-day Medal of Honor reboot is potentially exciting. After our previous report on the highly organised and precise operations of the Tier One Operators, I'm interested to see how the grunts chat.

'Medal of Honor' Screenshot 1

As we all now know, the new Medal of Honor is a story told with members of two groups: those super-trained Tier One Operators, and the plucky Rangers. If the Tier One guys are Bruce Lee's deadly one-inch punch - with guns - then the Rangers are a gang of drunk blokes kicking each other to death on a Saturday night. With guns. (This isn't the official, or even an acceptable, analogy, incidentally - EA is going with "scalpel" and "sledgehammer" respectively.)

They're all part of the same storyline, and the whole game is set in Afghanistan. You don't crash-zoom out to a spinning green globe and zoom back in to a Tiawanese warehouse. You don't need to.

The team at EALA worked from photographs of the region and were stunned by the variety of landscapes and locations available in Afghanistan. To you and me, it's a couple of dunes patrolled by a rusty tank. But there are slum towns, vast mountains, their inverted friends the valleys, deserts, and rubble villages like the one we're about to walk through.

With all the usual provisos that this is not a comment on war, but a fictional story told within a real situation, the film begins. It's a black screen, and a voice. One of our rangers is phoning home, but he's missed his wife. "I just wanted to let you know, everything's fine," he says. He wishes his kid good luck at the soccer game. He goes on to reassure his family that he's nowhere near the action, which is all up in the North.

'Medal of Honor' Screenshot 2

Dramatic irony lends a little tingle. The audience know something someone doesn't: our man is either lying for the mental well-being of his family, or he's ignorant of the imminent threat himself. People don't get medals of honor for having a lovely helicopter ride. "Don't worry," he says. "We're Rangers. This is what we do." He seems like a nice bloke. Thank God he'll have the luxury of checkpoints and difficulty settings.

So it's already a lot subtler than Modern Warfare's relentless bangsplosions. Teetering on the brink of mawkishness, maybe - but with enough finesse to keep you engaged. The Rangers land in a valley in what's described, quarter-convincingly, as a partial homage to that seminal 2002 MOHment, the Normandy beach landing.

Our mission is explained. A machinegun placement is preventing the progress of our team, so a group of volunteers need to get up there and take it out. The plucky hands-uppers are Corporals Favreau and Hernandez, Tech Sergeant Ybarra, and our heroic player character. The difference in play style from the Tier One "scalpel" to the Ranger's "sledgehammer" is summarised by two sentences:

"There are no friendlies here. If it moves, kill it."

The Ranger combat seems bang up to scratch. The assault rifle effortlessly takes out enemies both close up and distant on the hillsides - but without getting my hands on the controller I can't tell if that's because of an over-friendly assist, or an over-talented demo guy. In terms of what we're doing, there's nothing mindblowing or unexpected.

We come into a devastated encampment. Broken stone walls support a wooden skeleton where the roof once lived. Flipping 90 degrees to the right, our man takes out an Afghan soldier approaching over a rock. I make an internal sad gasp as the enemy soldier transforms into a ragdoll and flies over a dozen feet backwards.

The official line on setting the story in a current conflict is that Medal of Honor has always been about telling a soldier's story, with strong elements of authenticity and respect. I'm no fan of reality, as we've established, and I'm not overly fussed about the transfer of momentum - but seeing as we're dealing with a current conflict, it would be more comfortable if the corpses of the enemy weren't treated with undignified fantasy physics. Legs don't do that.

Our man requests a clip of ammo from a squadmates, but he needn't have bothered - we're about to stumble across a stash of enemy ordnance. I'm half-worried that we'll find a rocket launcher (the universal language that a ruddy great helicopter is about to arrive) but this is simply making sure we've got enough ammo to lay down suppressing fire on our mission objective - an encampment with a DShK anti-aircraft machinegun. Our hero's fire lets his squad advance in close enough to set a marker flare, and then it's a simple matter of hiding behind a rock while an air strike does the final killwork.

'Medal of Honor' Screenshot 3

The reactions of our squad to the huge explosion are diverse. Awestruck: "Holy s***!" Awesome: "That was sick." Withdrawn: "I don't ever want to be that close again." It's the first chance we've had to get a feel for the individual characters of our team. Finally, some banter - and it's good to get the feeling that although we're all professionals, and we'll get the job done - between Favreau, Ybarra and Hernandez, some are more suited to war than others. This is the kind of thing I'm after from a modern-day war game. A little bit of connection.

It's one click to the new LZ. We walk through the mess of the bombed camp, and Ybarra kicks tentatively at a corpse. Either he's stronger than he thinks or ragdoll physics is at work - the dead Afghani soldier guy rolls down a hill. I find myself imagining how hard it would be to flip a corpse over using only your ankle joint. It's a difficult thing to imagine, so I stop.

'Medal of Honor' Screenshot 4

After a bit more workmanlike soldier business - taking out RPGs coming in from the hillsides, flushing guys from their cover in the valley, that kind of stuff - we come to the foot of a mountain. It's a chance to see Afghanistan's wilderness in all its unpopulated splendour. The landscape looks deadly and beautiful - the only break in nature, and therefore the thing to which our eyes are instantly drawn, are a couple of huts.

They're not like the other buildings. Their walls and roofs are intact. They look inhabited. Our boys adopt the usual position - either side of the door. Then something unusual happens. A mobile phone rings. It's momentarily mood-breaking. Like hearing a text alert during a radio show, you end up batting your pockets to see if it's you. So, I'm looking away when the reason for the call becomes clear, and the bomb inside the hut is triggered.

I look up, feeling slightly stupid, to the same black screen we opened with, only this time I'm not sure if the kid taking soccer practice right about now still has a dad. It's the end of the demo.

Medal of Honor is due out for PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 on 15th October.

Comments (46) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Tonka #1 2 years ago

    Man that guy is so fucking HARD!
  • Negotiator #2 2 years ago

    Not very impressed then.
  • orpheus #3 2 years ago

    Well written preview. Not sure about the game yet. :)
  • dom6918 #4 2 years ago

    The rag doll physics being unrealistic is not a good sign...personally the next treyarch game is more appealing.. +1 for dismemberment
  • Kenshin001 #5 2 years ago

    "our man takes out an Afghan soldier"

    They were shooting Afghan soldiers or Taliban? If the story is supposed to be grounded in reality it'd make no sense to shoot Afghan soldiers. Really hope the story is a bit mature after the insultingly stupid tosh that was MW2.
  • mcmonkeyplc #6 2 years ago

  • ronuds #7 2 years ago

  • tifutu #8 2 years ago

    This is one of, if not, the best articles on a game I have ever had the honour of reading.
    Thank you for the most enjoyable piece of literature, this was thoroughly mood setting and visual.

    I am really looking forward to see if the game can keep the tone all the way through and if they tone down, even a bit,
    on those rag-doll physics.

    I didn't even bother finishing COD:MW2, and other than fitting right into that template you mention, I think the game as
    a whole just became about as annoying a screeching 5 year old who can't stop nagging for a sweetie.
  • hy4000uk #9 2 years ago

    so they're exploiting a real war for entertainment purposes?

    in the most retarded way possible?

    sounds like EA
  • Madafunkola #10 2 years ago

    "bangsplosions"
    My word of the day.
  • TruWari3r #11 2 years ago

    So I assume this game has destruction like bfbc2?

    Regardless, nice preview and hope to read more soon.
  • CaptainQuint #12 2 years ago

    Honestly, I'm more interested in playing Call of Duty: ASBO Pursuit. Due in the first quarter of 2011.
  • darleysam #13 2 years ago

    Well I actually like the sound of this. Sure the ragdoll physics sound a bit over the top, they could maybe tone that down, but even if they don't the atmosphere sounds good.
  • sarcasmoidosis #14 2 years ago

    "Corporals Favreau and Hernandez, Tech Sergeant Ybarra"

    Not that American... :)
  • ybfelix #15 2 years ago

    It's spelled "Taiwanese".
  • Super_Zee #16 2 years ago

    Got to say, that's a beautifully written article and a great example of why I favour EG over other gaming sites. Game sounds interesting, sounds like they got a few elements nailed down pretty well.
  • chessboxer #17 2 years ago

    @ TruWari3r

    The MP will have destruction like BC2 as it uses Frostbite, but I think the SP is using Unreal Engine 3. It's still capable of destruction but the only UE3 game I can think of that has done this well is Stranglehold, but Massive D was enabled and the engine was heavily modified.
  • Gazza_UK #18 2 years ago

    "Not that American... :)"

    Americans were all immigrants so... yea.

    edit: spelllllling!
    Edited by 1 at 14/05/10 @ 15:33
  • nuanimal #19 2 years ago

  • VibratingDonkey #20 2 years ago

    So basically this demo showed a game in which you shoot people.

    The goats and beards mentioned in the previous preview still have me interested though.
  • Feanor #21 2 years ago

    MOHment... very clever.
  • tiredoldandy #22 2 years ago

    "Got to say, that's a beautifully written article and a great example of why I favour EG over other gaming sites."

    slurp slurp
  • Shinetop #23 2 years ago

    Not into shooters, but "their inverted friends" made me laugh pretty hard.
  • ignatiusjreilly #24 2 years ago

    Are there any war games where you don't play as an American soldier? Genuine question.
  • MMMMMM7 #25 2 years ago

    I 'm not really sure but from the screenshots in
    the preview the graphics unfortunately aren't as
    sharp, detailed and rich in colors and light
    like for example Battlefield Bad Company 2.

    Maybe the game graphics engine needs some
    improvments.
  • mcmonkeyplc #26 2 years ago

    I think you self rightous people need to calm down a little. You have no idea if it's one sided or not yet.

    Why is it right for a film to portray an ongoing war (The hurt locker) and not a game?

    Grow up and wait for a proper idea of how the game is set.
    Edited by 2 at 14/05/10 @ 16:38
  • ignatiusjreilly #27 2 years ago

    Why is right for a film to portray an ongoing war (The hurt locker) and not a game?

    Because films don't usually have the main character killing 1000+ people?
  • SBfistfun #28 2 years ago

    "Don't worry," he says. "We're Rangers. This is what we do."

    I just sicked a bit
  • RedSparrows #29 2 years ago

    Yeah, let's play pseudo-politics with games... >.
  • KillerMonkey #30 2 years ago

    ignatiusjreilly: Because films don't usually have the main character killing 1000+ people?

    Are you kidding? Films regularly portray the main hero as some unstoppable badass poppin' a cap in the faces of whoever gets in his fucking way.
  • mukki #31 2 years ago

    Mnnn bah!
    will wait... but not excited

  • Pasco #32 2 years ago

    I don't get the hate. Firstly, this game is running at 60 FPS and looks better than the only other first person shooter running with 60 FPS, that is until Rage comes out. Secondly, you are whining about the portrayal of Americans saving the world yet again when there are at least some varied characters while Call of Duty has you raining death from a helicopter for 15 minutes and a guy constantly commenting about how funny it is that the corpses fly?

    I don't know if it is a good game but what they have shown up until now makes me optimistic that it will be at least better than Call of Duty Modern Warfares.
  • Rodchenko #33 2 years ago

    Way to dehumanise an entire reisistance movemant EA

    If I take your stance, the Nazis were a 'resistance movement' as well. Resisting the allied invasion. Way to dehumanize all these poor Nazis in past WW2 games!!!
  • Mark1412 #34 2 years ago

    Mmmm brilliant article.
  • ShinMegami08 #35 2 years ago

    Not interested in this.

    I'm waiting for Call of Duty: Secret Super Future Space Warfare!
  • FireMonkey #36 2 years ago

    @Chessboxer - "The MP will have destruction like BC2 as it uses Frostbite, but I think the SP is using Unreal Engine 3"

    I was gonna ask if you were sure about the 2 engines as it seems a very odd decision. After a quick Google though I see that you're correct.
    That's madness isn't it? Doesn't that just double the licensing costs and mean there will be a hell of a lot of differences between the single and multiplayer games? Most engines define what the game will be like. For instance it is fairly easy to recognise most Unreal games partly because of how it handles it's texturing and lighting.
    A few differences this is going to likely through up between single and multiplayer are destruction in one not the other, differences in lighting and texturing methods, frame rate, physics, etc. No matter what the devs do, I can't believe they will be able to get the 2 parts of the game actually feeling like they same game and when I play a multiplayer version of a game, I want it to be an actual multiplayer version of the single player game where I can do the same things and it looks and feels the same, but I am doing it with a group of mates.
    As quite a few people seem to either play only the single player campaigns or only the multiplayer in games like these, I wonder if EA are actually planning on releasing these as 2 separate products and so they aren't bothered about them being overly similar and so they will also re-coup the costs of licensing both the engines.
    Edited by 1 at 14/05/10 @ 22:58
  • Soul_man #37 2 years ago

    "They were shooting Afghan soldiers or Taliban? If the story is supposed to be grounded in reality it'd make no sense to shoot Afghan soldiers."

    If the man was an Afghan, then surely "Afghan soldier" is not wrong, whether or not he was fighting for Taliban or some local insurgency group? As bad as the Taliban are, it's not like the coalition forces are the only ones who qualify as soldiers, or Afghans. Unless you believe that whole "unlawful combatant" silliness.
  • Super_Zee #38 2 years ago

    @tiredoldandy
    That's very kind of you, and I'm flattered, but I'm a married man.
    Still, I'm very impressed that you're so open about your sexuality on a games site. Bravo.
  • hiddenranbir #39 2 years ago

    Legs don't do that.

    Afghan legs do, I've heard.
  • BritishBlue1 #40 2 years ago

    Hm, the more I hear about this new MoH, the less I like.
  • Ptarmigandalf #41 2 years ago

    "it will be at least better than Call of Duty Modern Warfares." - Not that, from a maturity or subtlety point of view, it's saying much...
  • kipper #42 2 years ago

    "There are no friendlies here. If it moves, kill it."
    Not again. Why hasn't EA, or anyone else since Return to Castle Wolfenstein (AFAIK), come up with a game which features innocent civilians which the gamer is required not to harm? The stereotype of American soldiers being trigger-happy cowboys is only being reinforced.
  • evilrobot #43 2 years ago

    Simply because of the word "Soccer" i would avoid this game, at least call it by its proper name, how would you like it if we started calling Baseball, "Rounders".........no wait.
  • dingo75 #44 2 years ago

    Am I the only one disgusted by the casual "kicking a corpse"?
    How about some tiny amount of dignity in those games?
  • othelaatko #45 2 years ago

    Very well written preview. . .
  • Fr3gU #46 2 years ago

    Really well-written. Thank you. :)