Jump to navigation
Advertisement

FTC rules on Hot Coffee News

PC PlayStation 2 Xbox
News by Ellie Gibson

9 June, 2006

Following a slap on the wrist from the Federal Trade Commission over the hidden Hot Coffee content in GTA: San Andreas, Take-Two and Rockstar have said they're very sorry and promised never to do it again.

The Hot Coffee mod, you may recall, allowed players to access a filthy mini-game where you could see all the lady's bits and everything. Take-Two was forced to remove San Andreas from shelves following its discovery, so the game could be given an Adults Only rating - a move which apparently cost them more than $24 million.

The FTC was jolly cross about the whole thing, claiming that naughty Take-Two should have submitted the content to the Entertainment Software Ratings Board for review.

But now everyone's made friends again after Take-Two agreed to set up a new system designed to ensure that all game content "is considered and reviewed in preparing submissions to a rating authority" in future.

They've also promised to "clearly disclose" any naughty bits relevant to each game's ratings on the packaging, unless the ratings people have had plenty of opportunity to give it a look over first.

"Parents have the right to rely on the accuracy of the entertainment rating system," said Lydia Parnes, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.

"We allege that Take-Two and Rockstar’s actions undermined the industry’s own rating system and deceived consumers. This is a matter of serious concern to the Commission, and if they violate this order, they can be heavily fined."

Indeed, if Take-Two and Rockstar fail to meet their promises, they'll face fines of up to $11,000 for each time they're out of order. Plus at least 10 minutes on the naughty step.

Take-Two CEO Paul Eibeler commented: "As you can imagine, we are pleased that the FTC has concluded its very thorough investigation, and that the matter has been resolved," not adding "And that they haven't made us give back all our pocket money," but probably thinking it.

"We recognise the importance of the FTC investigation, and the necessity of maintaining public confidence in the ESRB rating system, and helping the ESRB educate parents and consumers about the rating system. We look forward to putting this behind us."

It's not all fun in the sun for Take-Two though - they've just published their second quarter financial report which reveals a net loss of $50.4 million, up from $8.2 million last year. More than half of that was due to the cost of asset write-offs and studio closures as cost-cutting plans get underway, it says here.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-11 of 11 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
oDii
09/06/06 @ 12:24
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nice. Lets add nude skins to the Barbie game and see if we can get it an 18 rating.
Steroyd
09/06/06 @ 12:54
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i'm actually tempted to do that.

*laughs maniacally*

Willing to fund me a barbie adventures game?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 09/06/06 @ 13:54
09/06/06 @ 13:13
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Great 'easter eggs'!
York
09/06/06 @ 13:26
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"They've also promised to "clearly disclose" any naughty bits relevant to each game's ratings on the packaging"

So that 13 year olds can choose the games that have boobies in!
Roachdog
09/06/06 @ 14:33
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Parents have the right to rely on the accuracy of the entertainment rating system," said Lydia Parnes, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection"

How many parents of kids who are genuinely 18+ give a shit about the content of their children's computer games? The ones that have complained blatently bought them for their underage kids, thinking there's nothing but a bit of violence...but freak the minute there's a bit of tit shown...then pass the buck $

Irony is, there are probably more more explicit Teen/15 films out there....ridiculous bloody Yanks ^^
Krun
09/06/06 @ 15:12
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So we can have an 18 rating on pens and pencils now?
I drew a rude picture with pen just now and I'm outraged that these pens are availiable in shops to children. Ban this sick filth.
I_Have_The_Power
09/06/06 @ 16:31
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think if you drew the picture yourself, than you are corrupting yourself. Guess the only action left is to sue yourself. Unless you clearly drew a classification on it, and if you are under the age of said classification, then you should counter-sue your parents for concieveing you.

I'm sure any arguement like this can be traced back to video games though (which seems to bo the case in the good ol' US of A - so i guess just pick a dev studio out of a hat, and file a lawsuit.

Easy.
yiannis
10/06/06 @ 15:22
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"they'll face fines of up to $11,000 for each time they're out of order."

wow that much? ROFLMAO
urban
11/06/06 @ 18:33
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
fuck the FTC!
Drakron
12/06/06 @ 01:05
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You know when I gone to GameFAQ I was amazed with the people that claimed playing M rated games with 12 years old ... the excuse its the same "they were mature enough".

No, its their parents that are lazy ... its not a slasher film at 11 PM they managed to watch, its a $50 game that runs on a $150+ game console.

One could argue they get those games from peer pressure, that since everyone in school plays GTA so sould then ... of course if everyone in school entered a burning building sould they followed then?

Its also funny that the ESRB is not the one that is under pressure because they rate games based not in actually playing then or even watching gameplay but from a written description by the developer/publisher ... not that PEGI is better since it uses the same stupid of developers/publishers submitting a yes/no check list.

In short, goverment regulation works as industry self regulation is nothing but a poor joke.

And I know some dump people trust PEGI ... PEGI "works" because at least the UK and Portugal have a goverment rating system so they end up having to follow those countries rating system.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/06/06 @ 02:06
BurningR
12/06/06 @ 10:58
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This is just like in South Park the movie. except of course.. SP is a caricature and satire.. and this is real life.. fucked up US..

Comments: 1-11 of 11 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery