Jump to navigation
Advertisement

MGS3 servers stay up in Europe News

PlayStation 2 News by Tom Bramwell

12 March, 2007

Konami has moved to reassure European gamers that Metal Gear Solid 3: Subsistence servers will remain online for multiplay, despite the company's decision to switch off the American ones.

"The European MGS3 Subsistence Servers will stay online. Indeed, Konami recently announced a dedicated league system - www.MGS3LEAGUE.com - which will continue to provide services for fans of the game," the publisher said on its website.

Presumably this is because MGS3: Subsistence only came out here recently, whereas it's been out in the US since March of last year. We thought it was pretty amazing, if you're wondering.

Mind you, keeping your servers online for one year seems a bit tight. Even EA does better than that. What do you reckon, chaps? Would this affect your decision to go with a Konami online game in the future?

Advertisement

Are you excited about Metal Gear Solid 3: Subsistence on PlayStation 2?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-28 of 28 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Steroyd
12/03/07 @ 12:32
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Woohoo?
bushwod
12/03/07 @ 12:36
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
tight bastards.
dadrester
12/03/07 @ 12:37
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
how few copies must this have sold in the US?!
fuzzyfelt
12/03/07 @ 12:38
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Keeping the servers live for only a year is a bit tight. I think the decision will be associated with the MGS series rather than Konami itself - with this in mind I think MGS4 will be too bigger a game for the this subsistence servers incident to inform peoples decision whether to buy or not.
moggsy
12/03/07 @ 12:47
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Still, not bad for free though.
HyperShadow
12/03/07 @ 13:13
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
See, this is a benefit of Live's yearly subscription. You don't really have to be worried about servers being taken down.

Get what you pay for I guess.
Rambaldi
12/03/07 @ 13:15
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Therein lies the problem with Sony's online strategy. And this is from one of the (if not the most) key developers exclusive to their platform!
dudefella
12/03/07 @ 13:16
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
People can still set up their own servers right? Or is MGS online in the USA just gone for good?
moggsy
12/03/07 @ 13:29
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nope, it`s gone for good.
[TR]
12/03/07 @ 13:30
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Maybe it isn't possible, but they could just release a windows or linux version of the server and let people set up private ones.
In fact, maybe they should do that for their next PSN games.
Doesn't Live work a little like this? Each person hosts his game on his own console?
Aurifex.
12/03/07 @ 13:31
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Call of duty is the boy. Still going for online play.
MORZTAN
12/03/07 @ 13:33
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
They shut down servers?? Holy Hell, online gaming must suck!!
chupachups
12/03/07 @ 13:39
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"See, this is a benefit of Live's yearly subscription. You don't really have to be worried about servers being taken down. "

That's what worries me about any "free" service, how long is it going to be around?

If something's free, that means it has fewer resources but is likely to have far more players, which is a recipe for trouble.
skillian
12/03/07 @ 13:51
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Doesn't Live work a little like this? Each person hosts his game on his own console?

That's what I thought, and if Sony Online is free you'd imagine they'd do it the same way. As long as someone out there has the game, surely they can just create a new server?
Zomoniac
12/03/07 @ 13:54
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
how few copies must this have sold in the US?!

Well they only seem to have made 8 copies for the whole of the UK, so my guess is they only did a 20-strong print run for the world.
AcidSnake
12/03/07 @ 13:56
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh, one of them is here in Italy...So that's 21 worldwide?
tonynibbles
12/03/07 @ 13:58
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
NEED THIS!
trevd72
12/03/07 @ 14:04
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
so how do the other sony games work, especially the ps3 games. are these hosted by me and you on our consoles? UBI even put in the option to allow your xbox to be a dedicated host. Is this another area where M$ cane $ony?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/03/07 @ 14:04
Xerx3s
12/03/07 @ 14:04
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A year online is rubbish, free or not.

They should atleast make it possible for fans to host servers.
capcom23
12/03/07 @ 14:09
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
That's why i'll never buy a MMORPG with fees! What if it shuts? then you have the game and you've paid it for a year or what then you can throw it away. worthless.
Kami
12/03/07 @ 14:46
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Actually Capcom23, by paying towards the upkeep of the server you pretty much ensure they can keep it going. The shutting down of the MGS3 server (And the Outbreak File#2 servers are being closed too, as if you cared) isn't a surprise, you can keep them going for a while but as the hype dies away, people move onto other games and generally fewer people keep playing, they realise they are throwing money away on servers that don't get a lot of usage. So they cut loose and run - saves them money.

As said though, there are many games that set up the base originator of the game as the "host". Removing lobbies etc. takes something away though, that much is certain, but they still have to look at it from a usage point of view - if it isn't getting a huge amount of usage, do they need it? You get what you pay for? Heck yes. If you're not paying anything for it, if they close it down you can't really claim the right to moan over it.

Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/03/07 @ 14:49
floppylobster
12/03/07 @ 14:50
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Is MGS3 any fun to play online multiplayer anyway? I can't imagine it. C&C type games or FPS will surely keep people coming back for more, but MGS is best known as a one player experience.
chupachups
12/03/07 @ 15:07
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"That's why i'll never buy a MMORPG with fees! What if it shuts?"

It's a problem whether it's free or not, it's still worthless when the online servers are shut down.
Xerx3s
12/03/07 @ 16:31
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Doesn't Live work a little like this? Each person hosts his game on his own console?

That's what I thought, and if Sony Online is free you'd imagine they'd do it the same way. As long as someone out there has the game, surely they can just create a new server?


It still needs to interact with master servers. Live isn't simply a p2p network, there is a lot more going on than simply that. There are some nice articles on the general workings on msdn iirc.
TR421
12/03/07 @ 17:03
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
How much does it cost to run the matchmaking servers?
Aren't the master Quake III servers still running for instance?
dudefella
12/03/07 @ 19:37
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
With something like Quake 3, id software doesn't really have to do anything anymore. Any PC can fully host a dedicated game of Q3. MGS3 still goes through lobbies and shit that are on Konami's servers, and I guess they're taking all that stuff down.
dirigiblebill
12/03/07 @ 22:02
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I hope they keep it going in Europe a while longer, because MGS3 works bizarrely well online. Takes a lot of getting used to though- the wall-press flips you 180 when you least expect it, the lean-out-and-fire mechanic looks cool but is bloody useless and there's a nasty tendency to throw yourself flat in the middle of a knife fight. But the maps are great, the weapons/tools are many and I never tire of diving through them windows.
bdc
12/03/07 @ 22:34
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Because it's quite a rubbish game online, really.

Comments: 1-28 of 28 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery