Lara and friends on GfW label News
PC News by Tom Bramwell
Although their existence won't come as a surprise to anyone, Microsoft has announced the names of a few upcoming games that have found their way into the Games for Windows line-up.
Might as well list all of them - Alone in the Dark (Atari), Bionic Commando (Capcom), Conflict: Denied Ops (Eidos), Empire: Total War (SEGA), LEGO Indiana Jones (LucasArts), Microsoft Train Simulator 2 (Microsoft, smarty man), Sins of a Solar Empire (Stardock), Space Siege (SEGA) and Tomb Raider: Underworld (Eidos).
They join the likes of Age of Conan: Hyborian Adventures (Funcom/Eidos), Borderlands (2K), The Club (SEGA), Fallout 3 (Bethesda Softworks) and Frontlines: Fuel of War (THQ) on the GfW label, which is designed to ensure compatibility with Windows PCs and uses a similar front-end to Xbox Live, complete with unlockable Achievements/Gamerpoints and Gamertags.
Microsoft reckons GfW "thrived" in 2007. "We went from two titles in 2006 to a continually growing portfolio of over 60 titles here at CES 2008," said Kevin Unangst, who doesn't sound concerned about some of the crippling bugs that took a while to quash, and is senior global director for GfW. "We delivered on our promise one year ago to reinvigorate the PC gaming space and bring the best portfolio of games to Windows. And this is just the beginning. With our partners, we will continue to drive the resurgence of Windows-based gaming."
It's certainly a more impressive position to be in than they were at launch, when GfW was used to promote Windows Vista with Shadowrun and Halo 2 the only releases. Since then compatibility with Windows XP has been added officially after hackers embarrassed them by opening the aforementioned duo to the older operating system prematurely, and games on the label have improved considerably - with Viva Piņata and Gears of War among them.
Don Mattrick, Microsoft games boss-man, also sounds excited about it all in a leaked memo unearthed by the Mercury News, claiming: "In November alone, Games for Windows titles accounted for over 20 percent of all PC game sales at retail in the US."
So, get used to it, presumably.
Are you excited about Tomb Raider: Underworld on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games
Related Games
Space Siege
LEGO Indiana Jones
Bionic Commando
Tomb Raider: Underworld
Latest Features
Latest Videos
Space Siege - Teasers [3] 13 August, 2008
Space Siege - Popcorn [5] 31 July, 2008
Latest News
-
Space Siege demo pops up [14]
-
SEGA: Sonic Unleashed out in November [13]
-
Chris Taylor reveals Dungeon Siege 3 [30]
-
Space Siege coming to consoles? [4]
-
E3: Space Siege details emerge [6]
Latest Screenshots
17 July, 2007 [2]
Release Date Out now!
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
Comments: 1-21 of 21 in total
|
jaywalker3010
08/01/08 @ 09:40
0
Theres a big difference between GFW and GFW Live.
Conflict for example is GFW only, NOT Live. GFW means the installer and gaming experience is simplified/standardised for users. Live means the online server stuff and achievements Edit - skillian ta for pointing out i was putting 4 and F hehe :) proof should really read what just wrote before hitting send :)
Edited 3 times,
most recently on 08/01/08 @ 10:40
|
|
0
GF4? Do you mean GFW?
Anyway, it seems to me that all GFW has done has put a logo on the top of game boxes. Can anyone else point out how this is supposedly "reinvigorating the PC gaming space" and "driving the resurgence of Windows-based gaming"? GFW Live even seems to be doing the opposite, what with pay to play and enforced logins to save games. |
|
0
Er yeah there's a huge difference between GFW and GFWL, tons of games have GFW slapped on them and don't have anything to do with Live and achievements but they should adhere to the GFW standards such as native widescreen support and alt-tab properly.
Tomb Raider Anniversary was a GFW title for example and had nothing to do with GFWL. Which is probably just as well as GFWL is rather crap. |
|
0
Nobody is forcing you to 'pay to play' a GFW Live title.
All games must support multiplayer with a free (Silver) account. It's only the extra features such as matchmaking and leaderboards that you have to pay for. I would suggest that if you don't know what you're talking about, you don't comment and avoid spreading misinformation. |
|
0
The point is, though, that without paying you only have a really crippled multiplayer. It is extremely frustrating that when I want to play co-op GoW with my friend the only way to do it is over "Live List Play", where you have to scramble to click on the game before a random does or else you have to start the process all over again. Actually CHOOSING directly who you play with is for paying customers only. Why? I don't know, seeing as we've had stable server browsers with a host of options on games for over a decade now.
Having to sign up for xbox live is an inconvenience as well, although once you've done it it's done so I guess it's not too bad. But the fact you have to sign in to be able to play even in single player is a joke. Rar! Also, for all this talk of GFW improving the ease of use, ensuring quality standards etc, Bioshock - my first GFW title, had all sorts of problems on release, which were only partially solved by the patch about 4-5 months down the line. Anyway, unusually pessimistic post for me, sorry! I just don't see how this is actually helping apart from 1) Having a shiny label at the top of the box and 2) Getting 360 pad support (the only tangible benefit as far as I can see). |
|
0
Many games require you to create a 'Profile' to save single player game progress though.
GfW Live just avoids having to create a different one for every single game. There is no requirement to even tie this in to a Live account, either Silver or Gold. You can just create an offline profile, much as you would on the 360 if you didn't wish to use LIVE. |
|
0
Hmmmmmmmmm. Trouble is, on GoW you can't even have more than one save game (unless i'm being thick). You have one single player game tied into your multiplayer, and you can't use the same game for multiplayer. In other words, if I try to host a multiplayer game with my friend over the free live list option, the game will start from where I got to in my single player game. And If I want to go back to my single player game, it will have progressed to where I got in my multiplayer game! So it ends up with you needing to create multiple profiles. Very annoying.
|
|
YourMessageHere
09/01/08 @ 16:48
0
Man this is a ridiculous initiative. What the hell does it actually do? Simplifying installations? Bullshit, if you can't do something as simple as installing the average game, you have no business using a PC. Then again, Bioshock and all its activation fuckery (far from average) was a GfW branded product too. All I can see this doing is spoiling game box art.
|
Comments: 1-21 of 21 in total
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
