Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Diablo III, new MMO in "next few years" News

PC MMO News by Oli Welsh

13 November, 2009

Kotaku has secured an actual photograph of the rarest beast in gaming - a Blizzard release schedule.

The slide, from a presentation by Activision Blizzard chief finance officer Thomas Tippl, has StarCraft II, World of Warcraft: Cataclysm and the upgraded Battle.net down for 2010 launches. Diablo III, Blizzard's unannounced MMO, and "StarCraft Expansion" (presumably meaning the second and third chapters of the StarCraft II trilogy) reside in a column titled "next few years". Tippl described the lineup as a "full pipeline".

That pretty much squashes any lingering hopes that Diablo III might see the light of day next year. It looks like 2011 at the earliest for the action-RPG, now.

Advertisement

Are you excited about World of Warcraft: Cataclysm on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-40 of 40 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
optimusprym8
13/11/09 @ 10:00
#1
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Possibly DIII & GW2 in 2011... interesting...
cragtek
13/11/09 @ 10:05
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
2011 for D3? Ridiculous. Still, if it ends up awesome I won't grumble too much.
UncleLou
13/11/09 @ 10:08
#3
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Damn.
Azazel
13/11/09 @ 10:08
#4
+12
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/TomWaitsVoice

What the HELL are they building in there?
Tomo
13/11/09 @ 10:10
#5
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Fkin hell. Is Diablo III going to be absolutely gigantic when it's released? 200 hours or by the amount of time they're spending on it.
towser
13/11/09 @ 10:14
#6
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
2011?!

[Darth Vader]

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

[/Darth Vader]
bigbadbeasty
13/11/09 @ 10:14
#7
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
2011?! That seems like quite a release date jump.

Oh well, Torchlight for now then.
FooAtari
13/11/09 @ 10:16
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
2011.... No need.

Well gives me yet more time to work my through Diablo and Diablo 2. Assuming I ever get round it.
joe90
13/11/09 @ 10:27
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What is the MMO..
butler`
13/11/09 @ 10:28
#10
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
SNORE
Venkman90
13/11/09 @ 10:58
#11
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Blizzard could have it out next week if they wanted at a guess, but they want 2010 to be all about WoW and SC2, then they can own 2011 as well.

ps3owner
13/11/09 @ 11:11
#12
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
shit
VicViper
13/11/09 @ 11:12
#13
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It must be nice to work in a company that can actuall put a release date that is simple 'next few years' but then again if you have the money making machine that is Warcraft I guess you can do what you want. If it wan't for the fact that so far they haven't made a bad game (at least that I'm aware of, maybe Ghost was but that never came out) they can get away with it. Kinda like Valve and Half Life Episode 3 I guess.
penhalion
13/11/09 @ 11:37
#14
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Given it takes them 10 years to do a sequel is anyone really waiting for these titles? I remember when Diablo 3 was announced. A lot of us forum regulars simply shrugged and said "Ignore them it's never seeing the light of day anytime in the next three years".

I have no idea why they even bothered to announce it. I couldn't get excited because I know what they are like. The only real puzzle is why the waste millions on publicity for these titles when all the hype will be gone by the time the titles are ready to see the light of day.
Seoh
13/11/09 @ 11:37
#15
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If you are hungering for diablo 3 try out torchlight its really good and only £15 + it already has mods coming out.
Gaol
13/11/09 @ 11:40
#16
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Too right Vicviper, other dev team struggling to meet deadlines must look on with envy. Blizzard have all the time and resources they need. Wouldn't surprise me one bit if the new Starcraft and Diablo are both outstanding.
bionutz
13/11/09 @ 11:41
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
mods? what kind, where??? gimme gimme gimme! The engine is really cool.
jonny8
13/11/09 @ 11:45
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
To be fair, it's an approach to development that they've always taken. It's easier to achieve now as Morhaime and the rest are sitting upon a mountain of gold, like a group of hoary old dragons.
asphaltcowboy
13/11/09 @ 11:52
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
2011 for D3? :/
WinterSnowblind
13/11/09 @ 12:06
#20
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Surprised so many people are upset about the DIII 2011 news.
If you expected it next year, you were just fooling yourself. They were NEVER going to release it the same year as SCII.
M83J01P97
13/11/09 @ 12:30
#21
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah... have you guys never heard o Blizzard before? The company that almost always announces something and then doesn't bother to release it until 3 or 4 years later, if at all. Blizz are just the whorish teases of the video gaming world, and we love giving them every last penny in return. Roll on 2011.
Dekyriel
13/11/09 @ 12:47
#22
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Since Activision Blizzard has no way to know when Blizzard releases its games, it remains vague in that way. Blizzard however did mention how it planned to release a game a year, Diablo III being in 2010.

Even if that will not necessarily hold as a true release date, extrapolating from this screen that D3 will forcibly not be released in 2010 is pure speculation, the kind of information nobody cares about, Eurogamer.

Shape up.
DirtyDubs
13/11/09 @ 13:33
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Probably no point in releasing D3 yet as it will just take players from WOW which is making them a fortune. I'll guess they'll wait for the WOW trend to go down before releasing D3 to try and retain/grow their existing user base.
Eraysor
13/11/09 @ 13:34
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Diablo 3 vs Torchlight MMO?

That'll be a big fight.
FooAtari
13/11/09 @ 13:50
#25
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@M83J01P97

Well I'd rather that, than some rehashed sequel every year...
WJF
13/11/09 @ 14:41
#26
-4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@VicViper

Lost Vikings was a bit crap, IMO anyway. I don't think it received rave reviews back when it was released either.

Edit: Bloody hell, 1996? Well, certainly can't think of a Blizzard game released this decade that's been naff, so your point stands.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 13/11/09 @ 14:42
davisorle
13/11/09 @ 15:13
#27
-5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah its been announced that no titles from Blizz will be released before 2011. Another reason to make me start dissliking Blizz more and more. Ever since WoW they let down as if they had nothing else to do after their, till then, achievements. And to be bold about it , Diablo 3 looks good for a new Diablo that took a couple of years since the original , but sloppy and poor from a company like Blizz after 10 years from the last one. This is a new Duke Nukem story for me from now on. Grats Blizz, you messed WoW up the past 1 year + and now this . Nicely done.
jeebthegreat
13/11/09 @ 16:06
#28
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was 10 when I played D2. 21 when I get to play D3. What a waaaaaait :( still, gonna be awesoooome!
Emilia'sHorse
13/11/09 @ 16:50
#29
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Dear Blizzard,
You release it and I will buy it.

Best regards
Horse

P.S I love you
Miths
13/11/09 @ 17:06
#30
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@penhalion
"Given it takes them 10 years to do a sequel is anyone really waiting for these titles? I remember when Diablo 3 was announced. A lot of us forum regulars simply shrugged and said "Ignore them it's never seeing the light of day anytime in the next three years"."

I never bother getting excited about Blizzard titles for that very reason. Some day far off in the future I'll just notice that Diablo 3 has been released and then I'll buy it and almost certainly love it.
More or less what I did with Dragon Age: Origins actually. Although in that case I had pretty much written it off as vaporware several years ago, and then all of a sudden not much more than a month ago I notice that the thing is actually finished and ready for release :).
SpaceLettuce
13/11/09 @ 23:53
#31
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
2011 for D3! How depressing.
FortysixterUK
14/11/09 @ 01:23
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's all very well holding back a game release until the game is " just right", but I can't help but think they may be very slowly shooting themselves in the foot.....example...Half Life 2 episode 3. where is that? Does anyone really care anymore ?
Look at the awesome game releases that have happened in the last few weeks....and in a little under 4 months ( 12 weeks ) time, on March 9th, FF13 will be with us.
Blizz do amazing games, but they do them very, very slowly. And I'm still upset Starcraft ghost never got a release. What if the same thing happens to Starcraft or Diablo?......( I really doubt it tbh )
mandella
14/11/09 @ 01:39
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well, D3 in 2011... I'm afraid they are trying to squeeze it onto PS3 or X360 somehow, that's why the release date is so distant. Other than that, it's definetely will be WoW vs D3, and they surely want to do it later than sooner.

Anyway, D3 will be, in my opinion, the best selling game ever and will definetely live up to the hype. Got this strange feeling this game will be freaking HUGE.

On the other hand, I'm worried that this merge with Activision and their "gives us more money you dumbs customers" policy will mess Blizzard up in coming years and the first real victim of this mege might be D3. Hope I'm wrong, cause I see with eyes of imagination all those paid extra services on Battle.Net, microtransactions and all this DLC shit that is so tempting for typical companies like Activision. I just hope Blizz will not become spoiled by WoW success and they won't become money whore, but seeing their approach to WoW in recent months I'm a bit worried, ehhh...
Edited 1 times, most recently on 14/11/09 @ 01:39
Dekyriel
14/11/09 @ 02:21
#34
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ all the people complaining about the delayed releases and comparing said delays with other companies':

No one remembers a game because it was late, only because it was great. ;)

(Excluding DNF from this statement, it was never really a game, was it? :p)
Edited 2 times, most recently on 14/11/09 @ 02:49
IronCladChicken
14/11/09 @ 13:05
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I guess if they are releasing StarCraft next year, it makes sense to hold D3 back till 2011 - They don't want to blow their entire load in one year - This way they can have a major release for the next few years all setup - 2010 SC2.1, 2011 D3, 2012 SC2.2...

Shove in another WoW expansion or two along with news/screenshots/teases of their new MMO and they can keep things chugging along for a good while?
eizyark
15/11/09 @ 09:44
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
the reason why they will be releasing D3 on 2011 is because they already have 2 big games coming out next year.

Cataclysm being one, and SC2 being the other.

2 big titles from 1 company in the same year is pretty big already. so they don't want to kill D3 off simply because people will be torn apart from Cataclysm or SC2. releasing D3 in the same year will just be basically adding fuel to the fire (in a bad way).

atleast this way they will be having a steady income of money. SC2 and WoW:Cataclysm next year, D3 the year after, so on and so forth.

edit : yeh pretty depressing actually, since i'm looking forward to playing D3 myself :(
Edited 1 times, most recently on 15/11/09 @ 09:45
Canyarion
15/11/09 @ 15:29
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Is there anyone else more excited about SC2 than about D3??
FunkyRenegade
15/11/09 @ 16:18
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
FFFFUUUUUU-

Actually need Diablo III, I guess Torchlight will suffice for the next TWO years :|
Harmonica
16/11/09 @ 02:49
#39
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Is there anyone else more excited about SC2 than about D3??"

A lot of people in Asia.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 16/11/09 @ 02:49
Skywise
23/11/09 @ 00:54
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I wish they'd announce Warcraft 4 now so we could play it in 2013 :-)

Comments: 1-40 of 40 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Get Games.  Download Great PC Games!

X View gallery