Rock Band Review

Will Wii rock you?

Version tested: Wii

It's about time Rock Band made it to the Wii. After all, Nintendo's little white box is the ultimate social gaming machine, and Harmonix's big expensive box is the most fun you can have with friends you don't want to sleep with. The perfect match, in theory. In practice, the core gameplay is present and correct, making for a highly enjoyable experience. But if you've played Rock Band on the PS3 or 360, you can't help noticing that something's missing. Quite a few things, in fact.

At least the instruments are up to scratch. The full kit retails for GBP 129.99 (though it's easy enough to find if for under a hundred quid online). For that you get a USB hub, wired microphone and wired drum kit, plus a wireless guitar and receiver. The game must be purchased separately, as with Rock Band for other consoles.

Side-by-side, the Wii peripherals look almost identical to the Xbox 360 ones - the most obvious exception being the drum kit is white instead of black. The pads are identical and make just as much noise. The spring on the Wii kit's foot pedal feels like it has slightly more recoil, meaning a little more effort is required but less accidental presses are likely.

The microphones are the same, except the chunk of plastic near the USB end of the Wii mic's cable is much smaller and neater. The guitars are indistinguishable, apart from the fact the Wii one is wireless. So if you're one of those people who complained about the 360's guitar for having spongy fret buttons and a click-free strum bar, you won't get on any better with the Wii version.

Once again, basic gameplay involves watching coloured notes scroll down the screen and hitting the relevant buttons or pads, or singing the right notes. It's instantly familiar to anyone who's played a music game before, and easily accessible to anyone who hasn't. The gameplay works just as well on the Wii as it does on other consoles, and the arrangements for the songs are just the same.

'Rock Band' Screenshot 1

Actual screenshots of Wii Rock Band are almost impossible to locate.

The list of songs you have to choose from, however, is slightly different. There are 63 in total, which includes five bonus tracks not featured on the PS3 or Xbox 360 discs - "Dirty Little Secret" by The All-American Rejects, "Roam" by The B-52s, "Rockaway Beach" by The Ramones, "Roxanne" from The Police and Oasis' "Don't Look Back in Anger" - although all are available as downloadable content for the bulkier consoles.

The remaining tracklist will be familiar to anyone who's played Rock Band on another machine. Expect contemporary hits ("Are You Gonna Be My Girl" by Jet, The Killers' "When You Were Young") alongside nineties classics (Nirvana's "In Bloom", "Sabotage" by the Beastie Boys) and golden oldies ("Gimme Shelter" by The Rolling Stones, "CSI: Miami theme tune" by The Who).

Not a bad selection of songs, then. But you'd hope so, because you're stuck with it. Unlike the PS3 and Xbox 360 versions of the game, Rock Band for Wii has no online functionality. Obviously, this means you can't play with other people over the internet - not a massive deal, considering the large number of Wii owners who couldn't give a fig about Friend Codes.

However, being able to build your own library of tracks is a key highlight of Rock Band on other consoles, and it's a real shame there's no option to do so in the Wii game. (At least it makes a change from waking up with a hangover to realise your friends spent all your Microsoft Points on No Doubt records and the Jimmy Buffett track pack, though of course "Cheeseburger in Paradise" is worth every penny.)

Online functionality isn't all that's missing from Rock Band Wii. There's no proper World Tour mode, so no faffing about with fans, cash or different venues. Just like in the old Guitar Heroes, you play through groups of four songs to unlock the next level of difficulty and set of tracks. There are those who will prefer this more straightforward approach, specifically those of us who don't care about being able to buy a new fictional guitar that sounds like the old fictional guitar but has a funny shape.

There's no character-creation option either. You can choose a name for your band (or use the excellent random name generator - say hello to Men With Hat and enjoy the smooth sounds of Pixelface Horse) but that's it. Again, not everyone will mind. In fact, it'll come as a relief to those who of us are bored senseless of creating avatars, and would rather anally ingest a drumstick than choose which t-shirt to put on yet another virtual representation of ourselves as a plasticine robot with learning difficulties.

The reason there's no character-creation option becomes clear as soon as you play your first track. If you've experienced Rock Band on the PS3 or 360, you'll know songs are accompanied by footage of the band members you've designed "rocking out" in real time. If you play Rock Band on the Wii, you get pre-rendered videos of random characters that have been compressed within an inch of their lives. There's been some effort to hide the poor quality of the images by dressing them up as grainy film footage, but it's been in vain. Rock Band Wii looks rubbish, especially if you're playing on a HDTV.

Of course, Harmonix is constrained by technical limitations, and a Wii game is never going to look as good as one for PS3 or Xbox 360. Perhaps said limitations also explain why Rock Band Wii has no character-creation, World Tour or online options - they just couldn't fit it all on the disc. Except they could, judging by the Wii version of Rock Band 2. Released in the US just before Christmas (with a European date still to be announced), it's got World Tour, both online and offline, character-creation and real-time videos. Plus, they're working just as fast as they can to open up the music store to Wii owners.

'Rock Band' Screenshot 2

EA hasn't been able to help us get hold of any, and even these looks suspiciously good compared to the real thing.

In short, although the visuals might not be up to the same standard, Rock Band 2 for Wii offers all the same functionality as the PS3 and Xbox 360 games, and it's a shame they couldn't do the same with Rock Band 1. It's also a shame they didn't think more carefully about the Wii's appeal and its demographic, and tailor the game accordingly.

That's not to say they should have dumbed Rock Band down, or replaced the excellent core gameplay with maths problems and cooking mini-games. But why not make all the songs accessible in multiplayer from the start? Instead you have to play through the entire career mode to unlock them all. Many gamers will enjoy doing this, of course. But many gamers, especially Wii owners, will just want to get some friends round, boot up Rock Band and go mental to "Don't Fear the Reaper" - without having to play through 25 other tracks first.

But that's a problem with all versions of the first Rock Band, as are things like the fact you can't carry on a multiplayer career without your bandmates. So is the Wii version worth the considerable investment? If the Wii the only console you've got, if you're desperate to experience Rock Band and if you just can't wait for the sequel, then yes.

Otherwise, hold off. Rock Band for Wii may not have been stripped down to the point where it's no longer enjoyable, but this is a pretty lazy conversion. Unless you're in a hurry or you plan to buy both games eventually anyway, you're better off waiting for Rock Band 2.

7 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (39) Latest comment 3 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Redeye #1 3 years ago

    Bizarre review, Ellie, certainly didn't read like a 7. And whilst it might be seen as a lazy conversion, methinks you expected too much from Ninty's little white box.

    And the screenshot comments were just as strange - are you lot incapable of taking your own pix? Or does EA (or any other publisher, for that matter) mandate what images you use in your reviews?
  • Weezer #2 3 years ago

    Yeah, that's what I thought. Can't believe one of the biggest gaming websites doesn't have any grabbing hardware. Hey, you could always point a digital camera at the telly...
  • Xerx3s #3 3 years ago

    "And the screenshot comments were just as strange - are you lot incapable of taking your own pix? Or does EA (or any other publisher, for that matter) mandate what images you use in your reviews?"

    Sites almost always use bullshots from the publisher game press portfolio.
  • Hermiod #4 3 years ago

    Holy crap, Ellie got to review a good game!
  • monkeyspasm #5 3 years ago

    Bit late innit?

    It's been out for months on Wii - I've had it since last September, RB2's pencilled in for the end of this month IIRC!

    Review is spot on though IMO. Guitar Hero World Tour is very good on Wii.
  • Zomoniac #6 3 years ago

    So with RB2 estimated to be out next week, EG have decided to review a four-month old game instead??
  • Skurmedel #7 3 years ago

    Maybe the idea was to review the old Wii Rock Band, so you'll know what to expect from the sequel...
  • DFawkes #8 3 years ago

    Why use pre-rendered video? I know it's not up to 360 and PS3 standards, but I'm pretty surethw Wii can do basic 3D. Some might say it regularly does. Some might even say Guitar Hero: World Tour does. I don't get why you'd do that except if you're doing a lazy port and don't want to downscale/create the models.

    Apart from that, bet it's still a laugh.
  • Goodfella #9 3 years ago

  • rhubarbandcustard #10 3 years ago

    Wii owners deserve to be shat upon with £130 ports of great games.

    Hey, and guess what!

    They have been.

    HaHa.

    Wiilol
    Edited by 1 at 22/01/09 @ 09:00
  • Doctor_What #11 3 years ago

    Have I missed the RB2 kit being released on the PS3, or is that still to come? Does anyone know when that might happen?

    (Before anyone says 'just buy the 360 version', I've fitted a nice and cheap 250GB HDD in my PS3 and don't fancy forking out for anything similar on my 360 to save the DLC songs.)
  • varsas #12 3 years ago

    Redeye
    22-Jan-09 08:21:41

    Bizarre review, Ellie, certainly didn't read like a 7. And whilst it might be seen as a lazy conversion, methinks you expected too much from Ninty's little white box.


    Ellie did mention that Rock Band 2 hasn't been cut down so it's clear that Harmonix just couldn't be arsed with Rock Band 1 on the Wii.
  • mowgli #13 3 years ago

    Only the Wii could fuck up a game where all you have to do is press the right coloured button to the sound of music. The fucking DS managed this.
  • LazyDan #14 3 years ago

    Because the Wii and all other consoles are sentient beings which create these games for themselves? What a moron.

    "The Wii" didn't fuck it up, the developers did. Conversely "the DS" didn't do it right, the developers did.

    Similarly, "The Eurogamer Comments" didn't fuck up your post, you did.
    Edited by 1 at 22/01/09 @ 09:24
  • spudsbuckley #15 3 years ago

    More irrelevant crap from EG. Instead of reporting the news late as per usual they've decided to review a game 4 months late.

    Genius.
  • andromeda #16 3 years ago

    soon we'll be rid of the music party game fad and can get back to real games.

  • mowgli #17 3 years ago

    "Because the Wii and all other consoles are sentient beings which create these games for themselves? What a moron.

    "The Wii" didn't fuck it up, the developers did. Conversely "the DS" didn't do it right, the developers did.

    Similarly, "The Eurogamer Comments" didn't fuck up your post, you did."

    Good point. What I meant to say was only on the Wii would such a simple game be shit. :)
  • spekkeh #18 3 years ago

    It's about time Rock Band made it to the Wii.

    Wait. What.
    It's about time it was reviewed you mean? It's been out for ages!
  • Eighthours #19 3 years ago

    A curious choice for review, since Rock Band 2 on the Wii is nearly out, and is far more feature-complete than this version which has been out for ages!
  • Dan234 #20 3 years ago

    Why not push the boat out and review Rock Band 2, which is technically much better and has just come out?

    Or if you're going to review old guitar games (I'm sure you have your reasons...), why not do a head to head with Rock Band 1 vs. Guitar Hero World Tour?
  • Zomeguy #21 3 years ago

    For those that are planning to buy this, the GH3 Les Paul guitar does NOT work with RB1, but will work with RB2 (and GH:WT).
  • HuggyAtHome #22 3 years ago

    Sounds an even worse conversion job when you compare with GHWT on the Wii -that has the ability to download tracks and create avatars. And the 'instruments' are better quality.

    However, does Rock Nand force you to have 4 Wiimotes to play with all the kit - GHWT does and it's rubbish it that regard
  • secombe #23 3 years ago

    What I meant to say was only on the Wii would such a simple game be shit. :)

    7/10 is "shit" now? I appreciate that I'm a Wii owner and therefore have no clue about anything, but EGs scoring policy makes it pretty clear that things are getting ropey when you hit 5 and below. I've played plenty of '6' games that have been perfectly respectable, particularly if you're into that specific genre.
  • monkeylite #24 3 years ago

    Read like a 5/10

    As for screenshots, can't you guys take your own friggin screenshots? You have PCs there no???
  • kinky_mong #25 3 years ago

    soon we'll be rid of the music party game fad and can get back to real games.

    But whatever will you do when there's no comment sections about music games for you to recycle the same comment in?
  • ps3owner #26 3 years ago

    ...and would rather anally ingest a drumstick...

    so, Ellie... how does that feel then? maybe you should do a review based on that experience ;). I'll better leave now, might get a slap for that
  • sneetch #27 3 years ago

    @secombe
    What I meant to say was only on the Wii would such a simple game be shit. :)

    7/10 is "shit" now? I appreciate that I'm a Wii owner and therefore have no clue about anything, but EGs scoring policy makes it pretty clear that things are getting ropey when you hit 5 and below. I've played plenty of '6' games that have been perfectly respectable, particularly if you're into that specific genre.


    Yeah, it's "shit" because they need the score it to be "shit" in order to reinforce the idea that all games on Wii are shit: it's cognitive dissonance at its very finest. :)

    Without wanting to get too much into the whole score post-mortem a score of 7/10 seems very reasonable to me when the Xbox version got 8/10: the number of features cut for no apparent reason (I say no apparent reason because they're implemented in RB2 on Wii) would count for the drop from "almost brilliant" to "something we greatly recommend you have a good look at before you buy" particularly with RB2 just around the corner.
  • skillian #28 3 years ago

    As for screenshots, can't you guys take your own friggin screenshots? You have PCs there no?

    I've been asking this for years - there is clearly some other reason that only approved press shots are used. Even in PC games where all you need is a Print Screen button and Miicrosoft Paint.
  • sharky_ob #29 3 years ago

    "would rather anally ingest a drumstick".

    EurogamerTV?
  • Garulon #30 3 years ago

    "I've played plenty of '6' games that have been perfectly respectable, particularly if you're into that specific genre. "

    Well you would say that, you're a Wii owner and therefore about as technically literate as that Grandmother from the Beverly Hillbillies. So what's all this about loads of Wii games not supporting something as basic as widescreen? Is there nobody in the Wii community who flags these sort of things?
  • mechamonkey #31 3 years ago

    Wow, this review is months late.

    I've got RB 1 & 2, GH 2,3 and WT on the 360 with a good HD tv and 5.1 audio and have played this loads on it.
    My friend has a similar set up but has this on the Wii, guess what , it's still funny as fuck to play regardless of the download limitations and ropey FMV, you dont really ive a toss about any of that when youre all wailing along to the game :)

    Basically, get the 360 or PS3 version if you can but definately get this if you have a Wii and get RB 2 later on, it's still very much worth it and incredibly fun.
  • electrolite #32 3 years ago

    Wow, Wii comments thread usually bring out the 'specials'. I can only imagine the froth on the keyboards in front of the likes of rhubarbandcustard and Garulon....
  • Garulon #33 3 years ago

    What? The Wii's lack of of widescreen on any game is nothing other than shameful. I don't expect HD (because it's a GameCube tech) but how can you possibly excuse any game coming out in the past two years as not supporting widescreen? Eh? EH?
  • black2 #34 3 years ago

    This sounds identical to the similarly feature-gimped yet still as-playable PS2 version.
  • Chalee #35 3 years ago

    @Garulon

    I own both a mythical pc of the future that can play Crysis on high, as well as a Wii. And I love both equally, because you can play fantastic games on both.

    Where does that leave me? I am some sort of hybrid of casual thickie and high brow pc snob?
  • Binny #36 3 years ago

    God Eurogamer you are now officially the worst review site of games in the history of video games. Time after time you get your reviews completely wrong. People will start to think that your a bunch of PS3/ 360 fan boys! either that or you totally hate the Wii, if so then don't do these reviews.

    Have you played this game fully EG?
  • zzyzx #37 3 years ago

    EG could have saved everyone a lot of time by posting the relevant link to metacritic, captioned: "Rock Band for Wii: fair effort. Rock Band 2 for Wii: good effort. Spend your money on the latter."
  • secombe #38 3 years ago

    Well you would say that, you're a Wii owner and therefore about as technically literate as that Grandmother from the Beverly Hillbillies. So what's all this about loads of Wii games not supporting something as basic as widescreen? Is there nobody in the Wii community who flags these sort of things?

    I know, it sucks just having to enjoy games for what they are, with no preconceptions of technical deficiencies. I was over my parents the other day and they were playing Mario Kart, I knew, deep down, that they weren't really enjoying themselves as they hadn't previously researched how many polygons were being shifted around per second.
  • konnsky #39 3 years ago

    I want to see (read) more Ellie's stuff in the '09. Please deliver Eurogamer!