Jump to navigation
Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time Review

PC Review by Tom Bramwell

15 December, 2003

Picture the scene. You're playing a platform game - it doesn't matter which one - and you've been stuck on the same chunk of the same level for the best part of fifteen minutes. You know exactly what you need to do, but you keep fouling it up and having to start again. Your eyes are narrowed and your blood is simmering as you stab the Retry button for the fifth time in as many minutes. All of a sudden though, you're in the zone! Pixels are connecting precisely, the timing is perfect, your path is almost clear, and then, just as you gather enough momentum and leap victoriously towards the final platform, a scuttling rodent of an adversary wanders into your character's knees, and you stumble sideways into a bottomless pit. Continue? Quit? Or throw your pad across the room and scream blue murder at the cushions and the coffee table?

An ocean in a storm

'Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time' Screenshot 1

Prince of Persia is different. As the young and courageous prince, you abandon your father's invading army to scour the treasure vaults of the conquered Maharajah's palace, hoping to secure honour and glory and a souvenir of your first battle. And that you do, in the shape of the Dagger of Time, a magical trinket so powerful that it can freeze and even rewind time to undo your mistakes. It's one of the most significant evolutions in platformers since Mario 64. But although the TV campaign might highlight the Dagger's potential to keep you happy at the expense of the game's other charms, it's the quality of the construction of the game itself for which Ubisoft Montreal deserves most praise. Prince of Persia is quite simply the most intuitive and dynamic platform adventure of the year.

Every room sees your fingers weave an acrobatic, death-defying pathway for the prince, as outlandish moves flow into one another effortlessly. In the first hour alone, you'll find yourself running on walls to leap to adjacent horizontal bars, only to turn around at the top of your swing and launch yourself diagonally upward at the wall again, using your momentum to fire yourself back off the rocky surface at another horizontal bar farther up, which happens to be within swinging distance of a series of crumbling pillars, which you can also leap between just by pointing and bashing the jump button. Later on you'll probably end up climbing along a series of narrow ledges, avoiding the crumbling ones and launching yourself backwards just in time to catch another surface, dodging sequences of rotating knives and spike pits along the way.

When you enter a complex room and the camera scans around, there's no anxiety at the task ahead, and there's no shame in mistakes. If you run along a wall, misjudge the distances and leap to your death, all you have to do is hold the rewind button to fly back through the air, run backwards along the wall and regain your footing on the ledge from whence you came. When you're safe, you stop holding rewind. Even better, the chances are you won't misjudge the distance in the first place, because Ubisoft Montreal has worked hard to eliminate unsatisfying failure altogether - moving the camera so you can line up tricky jumps at odd angles and even painting shadows on the wall so you know roughly where to jump.

Regal

'Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time' Screenshot 2

It strikes the perfect balance - a few niggling sections aside, it's challenging without becoming frustrating, as the prince dances balletically across the crumbling palace of Azad, skimming along walls, swinging between chains, tiptoeing over narrow ledges and leaping between stalactites, all the while the palace's defence system snaps sharply at his heels. Mistakes are quickly rectified, and every exotic set-piece is gloriously simple to control, with the flow of the gameplay matched by some beautiful lighting effects. An iridescent humidity hangs in the air throughout, as the Sands of Time sparkle and cloud round the prince's ankles, veils flap in the wind, parting as he rushes past, and the environment trembles and crumbles to counter his progress. Object and model detail isn't anything especially fantastic, but the environments are vast and often beautiful - the menagerie, the guestrooms and the cavernous home of a life-affirming fountain are amongst the highlights - and the quality of the animations - particularly the transitions between each of the prince's fantastical moves - are delightfully seamless. And by the end of the game, you'll share the prince's feelings for the heroine, Farah, thanks to some extremely expressive voice acting and CG cut sequences.

Ah yes, Farah - slender, curvy, subtly beautiful and another key to Ubisoft's success. As the female lead, she begins at odds with our hero - who along with his father ransacked her palace, killed her father the Maharajah and brought her as a gift to the Sultan of Azad - but quickly develops an attachment to him, which is borne out in some detailed cut-scenes (admittedly a little grainy in the PC version) that capture the intensity and desperation of their relationship. Having built up the relationship literally on a knife's edge - Farah wants the Dagger of Time to undo the horrors unleashed on Azad by the Sands of Time, and the prince can never quite escape the conviction that she might steal it - the developer plays with them both throughout the latter sections of the game, before wrapping the story masterfully in one of the best end sequences of the year.

Kicking sand

'Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time' Screenshot 3

While Prince of Persia is not without its faults, the sum of quality elsewhere completely overshadows them - and given that they would be seriously niggling issues in any other game, that's quite a statement. There are plenty of camera issues, including plenty of fixed perspective swapping between adjacent areas, which regularly sends you back and forward unnecessarily (something I definitely don't remember encountering this much in the PS2 version), and although the dagger effects are useful in battle, slowing and even halting proceedings so you can strike at will, by the end of the game I had slipped into a pattern that left me rather cold whenever faced with opposition.

The prince has plenty of moves at his disposal, many of which match his Tomb Raidering endeavours for sheer ingenuity - leaping over an enemy's head to strike him from behind, using the scenery to knock enemies down, backflipping and rolling away from sword blows, and parrying and thrusting like an accomplished swordsman - but his adversaries are disappointing, quickly broken down into a number of easily identifiable builds with simple weaknesses. Chain men can't block the over-the-head strike, swordsman have trouble with off-the-wall attacks, the bats always fly away before they're done, the vulture-like birds are just plain tedious and annoying, and the women are largely useless (sorry girls). Most enemies continuously respawn until the prince dispatches a certain untold number, at which point the game cuts to a face-to-face shot of him sheathing his weapons to indicate the bout is over.

Granted, it's nice to see the prince's acrobatic exploration matched by some balletic swordplay, his beautifully animated sword and knife slinging antics, including all manner of dagger thrusts to finish off enemies, but all in all the combat feels underdeveloped, a poor relation to the rest of the game, and quickly becomes tedious and repetitive. Fortunately it also becomes straightforward enough to battle through without much ceremony. It just feels like a pity that more time couldn't be spent with some of these encounters; particularly the game's boss fights, which are almost non-events. Indeed, although the 3D exploration and puzzles regularly draw comparison to ICO - and deservedly so - POP's conclusive battle was actually rather unconvincing, whereas ICO's final confrontation was an almost perfect finishing touch.

Just deserts

'Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time' Screenshot 4

In the end though, it's all rather easily overlooked next to the sheer artistry of Ubisoft's accomplishment elsewhere. The Dagger of Time has given us a 3D platform experience almost entirely devoid of frustration, which anybody playing Jak II or Ratchet & Clank 2 right about now would probably kill for; the adventure is seamless and beautiful; the puzzles often pacey, always gigantic, but never less than logical; and almost every last detail is finely tuned. Save points are neatly spaced and coupled with sepia-tinted flash-forwards, which foreshadow key puzzle elements and gameplay additions like chain-swinging without actually giving away solutions; health is regained by sipping on a steady supply of water, a dangerous diversion during a battle with teleporting enemies, but a great way of keeping up the suspension of disbelief; the demented logic of the palace defence system, which seems to focus on you far more than your demonic adversaries, is discussed and analysed by the prince's narration, and a perfect excuse for the scale of the prince's task... It's difficult to think of anything that feels out of place.

Thankfully, when played on the PC, The Sands of Time looks and feels almost identical to its PS2 counterpart. The higher resolution is nice, but it doesn't make a huge impact in a game where an ICO-style scale, unusual lighting effects and free-flowing animation are the main technical triumphs. On the other hand, with the right sound system it does offer a Dolby Digital 5.1 environment, which will come in handy during one infuriating trial-and-error puzzle late on (you'll know the one I mean when you get to it).

Clearly well aware that the game's fluidity was at stake, Ubisoft has also taken to bundling a PS2 Dual Shock 2-alike gamepad from fellow Frenchies Thrustmaster. Although the exclusive Prince of Persia "design" on the pad is a damp squib (and the huge box is left rather empty when the pad takes up permanent residence on your desk), it's still the ideal way to play the game, and at £34.99 it's an "Exclusive Limited Edition" bundle that won't break the bank. Although you can play the game quite happily on the keyboard, you'll be much happier with a pad in hand - it's just a shame that the skill tutorials, which slot seamlessly into the first section of the game, can't be updated to talk about the buttons on the pad. For first time players, it's sure to be confusing without a list of inputs stuck to the side of the monitor.

Timeless

Although it hasn't always enjoyed sales to match, Ubisoft's Christmas 2003 line-up has been the strongest of any publisher - with games like XIII, Rainbow Six III and Beyond Good & Evil worthy of all manner of superlatives - but in the end it's Prince of Persia which stands tallest, and Crystal Dynamics had better take serious note if they aim to resurrect the Tomb Raider franchise in 2005. If there's one final thing that deserves a moment's consideration, it's that Ubisoft's peerless achievement is marred by a rather slight runtime of between seven and ten hours (in fact, having finished it on the PS2 earlier this month, this PC version took just five), but like ICO, it's a game that will live long in the memory, and needs to be played from time to time just to refresh the senses and reinvigorate the gamer inside us all. There's very little distance between this and a top score, and it's done more for Ubisoft Montreal's reputation than a dozen Splinter Cells.

9/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 60 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
smccafferty
15/12/03 @ 09:09
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Woo hoo !
Blerk
15/12/03 @ 09:14
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
PS2 version is £17.99 from Play at the minute.
tiddles
15/12/03 @ 09:18
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Just buy it everyone, goddammit.
Whitey McCool
15/12/03 @ 09:36
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Thanks Blerk! :)
TipTop
15/12/03 @ 09:37
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Scripted events? PoP? Behave yourself gasman. There are only 2 things you can level at PoP (both mentioned in the review) the first is a very annoying puzzle at the end (wtf?) and the second the length of the game. Otherwise you will not play a better game all year. Critise away, but dont make sh*t up cos your a lazy ar*e.
Mr Harvest
15/12/03 @ 09:52
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
TipTop:
"a very annoying puzzle at the end (wtf?)"

Which puzzle was this? I've heard people complain about some puzzle near the end but I didn't get stuck on anything at the end.
Eraser
15/12/03 @ 11:25
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
PoP: SoT is a fantastic game in terms of graphics and jumping puzzle gameplay.
However, as soon as the Prince takes out his sword and his dagger then things start to get really tedious. During combat, the camera swings around like crazy and is positioned in places where you can't see what you are doing. Blocking is nearly useless because enemies tend to pile up around you and you can't block all of 'em at the same time. The Prince also has a bit of a life on his own during combat. Sometime's he'll refuse to stab a "dead" enemy with his dagger to finish it off and he'll stab a "living" enemy instead. The first boss battle is incredibly annoying. Combat also becomes rather boring when you progress through the game. It's the same every single time.

Other than that though, this game is nearly flawless (except for some sound issues with the PC version which ofcourse wouldn't happen on a console version).
Eraser
15/12/03 @ 11:28
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So this is Ubisoft's strong Christmas lineup?

You sound like a whiner when you say you put a game down after 15 minutes.
UncleLou
15/12/03 @ 11:28
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Scripted events, i mean when i first move towards a piece of wall, someone shoots a cannonball at it. I reload, and the game repeats itself.

Er? Um, so what? That's a cinematic sequence to get the story going. And of course the game repeats itself when you reload. This is a jump and run/puzzle game, of course it's linear. Every game of this kind is linear, unless you count the option to change the order in which you solve the (in itself linear) levels in other jump and runs as non-linearity. PoP makes more than up for it with the story and level design, which couldn't have been done non-linear of course.

More and more people seem to think that non-linearity is a sign of quality - which is rubbish, imo, it depends on the game and the genre - would it have been possible to create the magic that is Ico in a non-linear game? No, and it's the same here.
Razz
15/12/03 @ 11:54
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"(in fact, having finished it on the PS2 earlier this month, this PC version took just five), "

Five what? Days?
linkster
15/12/03 @ 11:56
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Agree with Eraser about the first boss battle, and on his other comments too. It's a really enjoyable if short lived experience. Like Ico, but fun ;) I really enjoyed the humour too, genuinely witty script at times.
MikeD
15/12/03 @ 12:01
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Unfortunatelky I haven't played it myself yet (mostly because I am waiting for the gamepad bundle, haven't encountered it in the Netherlands yet). But all my friends who have played it show none of the enthusiasm that the reviews and many of you guys do. They call if frustrating, boring after a while, whine about the horrible cameras.

To be completely honest (being lucky that none of those friends visit this site) I trust your judgement more, but still it makes me wonder if the praise isn't just a tad too much.

Maybe this is not a game for casual gamers somehow?
UncleLou
15/12/03 @ 12:03
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Just drop those fanboy-glasses and see the reality: PoP: TSoT is just yet another completely linear platformer with no personality.


I am wearing fanboy glasses? Because I like the game? Riiiiiight. I already said it's linear, which is imo a good thing. for that genre. And that PoP has no personality is, hands down, the most ridiculous statement I've heard in a long time. But we can end the discussion here, seeing that you said you've played it for 15 minutes.
tiddles
15/12/03 @ 12:23
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The first section of PoP (set in the big castle) is designed to show you the ropes, and as such is pretty linear and pre-scripted. Once you get to the main section of the game, pre-scripted events become relatively rare. Yes, it's basically linear throughout, but again later rooms are sufficiently complex in their layout that this isn't an issue - each room is a puzzle where the fun lies in figuring out just where you're supposed to go, much like the original Tomb Raider game.

I don't think you'd want this kind of game to be non-linear - imho, it would lead to a lot of unnecessary back-tracking, and up the frustration levels.
tiddles
15/12/03 @ 12:25
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Anyone who dismisses a bunch of (arguably) good new games by comparing them to Quake, Mario and Zelda should also probably hold off on "fanboy" accusations.
TipTop
15/12/03 @ 12:26
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
For Mr Harvest, the whole archway and voice puzzle. Bloody drove me nuts on the PS2. As for gasman, you gaming idiot. So Call of Duty, the most heavily scripted and linear game in history is cr*p? Stop making silly arguments and go back to enjoying your non-linear WWF games...
Mr Harvest
15/12/03 @ 12:41
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh, that annoying puzzle. Funny, I had completely forgotten about it. My mind had probably repressed the painful memory once I was past it, yes it was hideously irritating.
El_MUERkO
15/12/03 @ 12:44
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
My little brother has the playstation version of this and its awe inspiring to watch the things he does, the gmae is so intuitive that when I asked him about it he said "Oh the time thing, I dont use that" while balancing upsidedown on a poll preparing to back flip off the far wall and get so some secret area, all I could to was the perfect race in Kick Start 2 :(
TipTop
15/12/03 @ 12:51
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
:) It does make you look like a gaming guru when it goes right. I remember the scene where you have to wall run, back flip, grab a pole, swing and then somersault to a platform. This is repeated three times. It looks incredible and I had the biggest smile when I complated the task ...
krudster [mod]
15/12/03 @ 13:14
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Gasman, what the jenkins are you on about? Seriously have a reality check.
mouse [staff]
15/12/03 @ 13:16
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Five what? Days?

Read back a bit, Razz: "a rather slight runtime of between seven and ten hours (in fact, having finished it on the PS2 earlier this month, this PC version took just five)"
TennesseeStiff
15/12/03 @ 13:22
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ok so which version should I get? PC or Game Cube?!!
Blerk
15/12/03 @ 13:37
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Will X Box and Gamecube versions be subsidised this way next month.

We live in hope! :-)
Razz
15/12/03 @ 13:41
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Cheers Mouse.
306
15/12/03 @ 13:45
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ok, PoP i snot the best game I have ever played but it is a damn good game IMO. Not only is the story done well but the puzzles are, for the most part, pretty good. Ok, so there are a *fair few* scripted events but how many games get away withoiut these scripted events?

One problem I found within the PC version was after I completed the stairway puzzle with dirty gurlie in the red number and defeated the guards I was faced with finding my way out the chamber - which was none too hard - but where was the lady?? She was gone!! Now I managed to find her when I opened the chamber door and she promptly drops out the sky and splats on the floor. The only way round this was to either begin the level again or borrow someones saves or cheat - I opted for the save. ;) Anyone else get this problem or was I the unluckiest mutha in the game playing world?

This was not the worst thing about the game for me though - that was the *odd* control* method chosen whereby left is not always left - its sometimes back or forward? I think the game would have been a little better for me had it had a Soul Reaver/Hitman style control method. The camera also works against you on the PC version - when you neeed to see from behind the character and time a wall run the camera would not allow this as there was a wall behind you and you had to rely on changing to first person or landscape camera views - but that is no massive issue.

However, to stop playing a game after 15 minutes and complain about the scripted events is being pedantic - I mean does 15 minutes even see you past the training in PoP?? Seems to me that one or two bods decided they would not like this game before they even played it! ;)
TipTop
15/12/03 @ 13:48
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
... you are the unluckiest mutha ...

(no seriously you are, Ive checked several forums and that seems to be the first instance :( )
daveo
15/12/03 @ 13:53
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Beyond Good and Evil, which despited the protestations of some people on this thread is an accomplished and enjoyable (if slightly short) experience is going for 19.99 in HMV. I guess everyone is buying MOH Rising Sun instead.

BTW gasman, Stopped playing after two "castles". How would you know how big the world is then? A bit like Zelda (a game you're obvoiusly familiar with) the game area expands the more you play it.
Oceadge
15/12/03 @ 14:15
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
...(admittedly a little grainy in the PC version)...
When are we going to see PC games released on DVD instead of on multiple CD's and with low resolution cut scenes?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 15/12/03 @ 14:16
UncleLou
15/12/03 @ 14:31
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hm, the cutscenes didn't look especially grainy to me - the only thing that looks a little sub-par on the PC are the visions which probably were done using an early PS2 version.
Cubfan
15/12/03 @ 14:56
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Rented Prince of Persia, and just completed it. I was dissapointed. The game looks great, and if I was to just watch someone play I'd be really impressed. However, I found the gameplay to be flawed, contrary to what I had read in pretty much all of the reviews.
The majority of gameplay is comprised of "acrobatics" jumping, swinging, running along a wall to a ledge, platform, whatever. From there you look for the next ledge or platform to jump to. Its very straightforward, and not difficult to determine where you need to go next as there really is only a single path. So gameplay boils down to following that path- its a matter of pointing the stick in the correct direction, and hitting the 'action' button. The only challenge that occasionally arises is due to the camera. You sometimes can't see where you need to jump to next, or you don't have a good perspective to judge the distance to the nearest ledge, pole, rope whatever. This simplicity is hampered by the good-looking but annoying character animations. Every time you perform an action, you have to 'wait' for the animation, which further detracts from the immersement of gameplay. Its lacks the freedom of movement of a platformer- at times its kinda like playing Space Ace or something, you hit the button and then watch as the game plays out.
Combat is similarly flawed. You have one weapon, and few actual 'moves' to dispatch enemies. You basically do the same thing over and over and over again. It looks damn cool, but again the animations kinda pull you out of the game, you can get stuck in the middle of an animation, when you really want to alter your method of attack. Not to mention that combat is artificially lengthened by enemies that spawn and spawn and spawn again, until you really wish they would just fucking die already. They can keep coming ad infinitum, as there's always a pool of water nearby to regain health, not to mention the handy rewind function, so its not like you could possibly be killed. Combat could last forever, and it wouldn't make any difference.
I wouldn't say it was a bad game. I liked the story, the cut-scenes (which there should have been more of), I liked the characters and voice-acting. Overall though, it wasn't quite the AAA gaming experience I had anticipated. It's a very polished game, and I think watching the game and how great it looks... might convince people that the game is much better than it actually is. Then again, maybe its just me. You may love it.
Tyronne
15/12/03 @ 14:59
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well i got both this and beyond good and evil...finished beyond good and evil and now about 10% into this...not bad either one of them....
ekko
15/12/03 @ 15:04
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If gaming was perfect this would be an average game, it didn't really blow me away at any part but just did what it had to do very well. Only a few very slight niggles (camara, fighting THAT puzzle) but overall it more than made up for it.

It didn't really revolutionize the genre but I don't think every game has to, to be good. I'd also like to concor on the part about getting a decent pad for it, it just makes it a more enjoyable experiance.
TipTop
15/12/03 @ 15:27
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
" ... every time you perform an action, you have to 'wait' for the animation ..." Erm? Some of your points are very valid (combat especially) but this isnt somehting you can level at PoP, it is widely (check gamerankings reviews) recognised as having the best character animation and transition animations of its genre. Stick to the facts maam ...
UncleLou
15/12/03 @ 17:13
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I would have loved this if I was 10 years old. Simulations rule!


Strange, it's exactly the other way round for me. :p
krudster [mod]
15/12/03 @ 17:29
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Simulations? Zzzzzzzz....
Amajiro
15/12/03 @ 18:42
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Mario 64 comes close to a non-linear platformer, surely. It's a dumb-ass argument anyway - any game with a plot is 'linear' by some definition.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 15/12/03 @ 18:42
Kami
15/12/03 @ 21:48
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
*cries that POP is doing so badly when it's actualluy one of the best games - if not THE best game - of the year*
Eraser
15/12/03 @ 23:16
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I read people complaining about this game being linear. Think about it in a different way. Creating a non-linear game has two major disadvantages:

1 - As a developer you'll have to create a lot more content for the game without adding gameplay time for a single run. Playing the game a second time through is only interesting if most of the game is different, which would require from the developer that they'd actually develop twice the amount of content, which is unrealistic with the time development cycles for a single game take these days.

2 - If you create a non-linear game then it's hard to direct the progress of the game. I'm not a game developer either, but many people do not realise that designing a game is much like directing a movie. You want the player to experience something and if you're going to try to put non-linearity into your game, you'll be providing a number of experiences of which one will be more satisfying than the other. As a developer you have to gently nudge the player in the right direction to let him experience what you thought up for him (or her... gotta stay politically correct ;))
If you would write a movie with two endings, then one of the endings will always be less pleasing than the other, so why bother implementing the lesser ending if it can save time (and money)?


Non-Linear storylines sound interesting and all, but I'd rather have two completely seperate and unrelated titles from the same developer than one game with two storylines.
striker
15/12/03 @ 23:42
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Is it that hard to understand the Prince is telling a story?

If you want non-linearity buy an RPG, but don't depreciate a game for being a different genre from the ones you like. (This "you" is for everyone that doesn't like this great game)

And more, I don't really apreciate platformers like Mario 64 (well, it's not that I don't like them, it's just that was never much of a console gamer) but find this game incredible.

POP:SoT is exactly what PoP was in its time.



Cubfan
16/12/03 @ 01:17
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The problem with game isn't the linearity due to the story, or the fact that you progress through each level in a specific order. No, the linearity is in the path you have to take through each level. Like I said before, jump, swing, whatever to a platform, look around, find next platform to jump to. There is always one single path, just one. I can't think of a platformer ever- as linear as this game. Name me one.
Eraser
16/12/03 @ 09:14
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well I don't see this game as your standard platformer either, since no platformer before this one had it's emphasis set so much on being agile enough to reach a certain point.

I just see each room in PoP as a single puzzle which needs to be solved. Once you've figured out how to do it, then the time comes to execute it, which can be rather tricky at times when everything you touch just collapses under you and a slight miscalculation of a series of 5 or 6 tricks can send you plummeting to your death. A normal jigsaw puzzle has only one solution as well, and I've never heard anyone complain about that.

Sometimes I just wish we were back in the age of Wolfenstein and DOOM, when everybody still thought games in general were just cool and people weren't complaining about linearity yet.
Blerk
18/12/03 @ 16:31
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What? The tards are utterly incoherent today!
Brutalisk
18/12/03 @ 19:12
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
How many people remember (and have played) the original Prince of Persia? Raise your hands! :)
BartonFink
18/12/03 @ 19:29
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
o/ Me

Blerk
19/12/03 @ 08:44
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
o/
UncleLou
19/12/03 @ 09:00
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
o/
Singularity
19/12/03 @ 09:13
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
o/
Blerk
19/12/03 @ 09:16
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This could be quite a thread...
Mike_Hunt
21/12/03 @ 13:41
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
o/
Shakermaker
22/12/03 @ 01:42
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
o/

Playing PoP:SoT now and I must say its a beautiful and very enjoyable game.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 22/12/03 @ 01:42

Comments: 1-50 of 60 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Metaboli

X View gallery