Driver: San Francisco

Life on cars.

Driver used to be the game where you could get out of your car. Now it's the game where you can get out of your body. That said, you can't get out of your car anymore. Bloody life, eh?

Driver: San Francisco has scrapped on-foot sections because everybody else is doing them these days. Instead, going completely out-of-body is Driver's new Big Idea, for an age in which all driving games need Big Ideas, whether it's Split/Second's explosives and jaunty use of mid-word punctuation, Blur's social networking and power-ups, or Gran Turismo 5's absurdly long delays.

Reflections, the developer behind Driver, is calling its new mechanic Shift, and while it seems quietly deranged at first - a driving game in which you can hop into another car further down the road if you're getting left behind - it's a fascinating idea with some brilliant applications.

Reflections gets the justifications out of the way quickly. Tanner is a cop who believes an accident has left him with the power to detach his consciousness from his corporeal form and fling it out into the world where he can grab passing cars and commandeer them. In actual fact, an accident has left him in a coma, so I guess the joke is on him.

'Driver: San Francisco' Screenshot 1

I repeatedly asked Reflections whether the 1971 Buick Riviera would feature: no clear answer. Still waiting to hear back on the '68 Ford Galaxy too.

Whatever's really happening, Shift is something you won't want to stop messing about with. One tap of a face button and you're out of your car, floating over the nearby stretch of road, from where you can highlight passing vehicles and see their stats, and then one more tap of the button warps you into them. If this were the 1950s, I'd have no problems declaring that little mechanic "nifty".

At the most superficial level, Shift means that chases have a real intensity to them, as Tanner's spirit hops from one car to the next to take down his foes. It quickly becomes clear that there's a rich strategic component too: why chase after somebody when you can steal a bus further up the road and ram it into them?

Later, missions even get rather puzzly. We're promised a flaming petrol tanker that you can cool off either by running over hydrants or by stealing a fire truck and sloshing it down with a side-on collision. (I'm pretty sure these strategies don't work in real life.) Back in 1999, Driver was one of the first sandbox games in terms of its world; now, a decade on, its missions are finally catching up.

'Driver: San Francisco' Screenshot 2

I think there's a Denzel Washington film with a similar premise to this - but Denzel Washington doesn't have squashy seventies cop movie handling or 120 licensed cars.

Shift can be upgraded over time - you'll be able to increase its range over the course of single-player until you can take in almost all of San Francisco's 208 miles of roadway - and it's not free to use, either. Rather, it has to be earned by driving in a cool way: catching air, drifting, heading into oncoming traffic. Anybody who's owned a new Toyota in the past few years shouldn't have a problem.

Also, think about this: Shift opens Driver up in terms of its storytelling as well as its mechanics, as when Tanner's spirit hops into a new car the audience gets a sense of the lives of its owners. Reflections is promising hundreds of bespoke characters, all with their own little stories, and it will be using picture-in-picture to help the plot unfold without breaking up the game's flow.

If all of this sounds potentially rather distracting, players will always see Tanner as Tanner, even when he's hopped into someone else's body. It's a nice steal from Quantum Leap, and the developer is hoping it will be enough to remind you that you're still a cop who thinks he's on a desperate mission even as he eases an ice cream bus out into heavy traffic.

Creating a feeling of coherency isn't the only challenge for the team: Shift has to be seamless when it works - an instantaneous pan out from Tanner's car to the wider environment. It is so far, and that's pretty amazing given the game's huge city filled with such densities of traffic, delivered at a rate that never drops below 60 frames per second.

On top of that the team has had to build AI that can leap in behind the player and take over abandoned cars at will. With all that going on, it's astonishing that Reflections has managed to give the cars such personality, too. More than most driving games, this is a series where the handling alone is a character, and it's fascinating as you Shift between vehicles to see just how different they feel, from the stodgy Dodge Neon to the fragile Zonda.

If it's hard to tell just how single-player is going to unfold at the moment, multiplayer is much easier to get a handle on. The finished game will have nine different modes - and a now-obligatory experience points system - but Reflections is only showing one for the time being: Trail Blazer.

Trail Blazer is theoretically very simple: stay within the neon light-trails of an AI-driven target car to earn points, with the first player to get to 100 winning. Shift, however, changes all that. Unlike with the main game, Shift power is currently unlimited in Trail Blazer, and with four players each battle for supremacy quickly becomes insane as you leap in and out of different cars, leapfrogging each other to stay in the scoring zone.

'Driver: San Francisco' Screenshot 3

Pedestrians scarper in a pleasantly hectic fashion.

The AI car weaves about a bit - possibly to make it more challenging but possibly because my dad is driving - and the game does a beautiful job of balancing the all-out chaos as you fight to get to the front, with a sweet note of pure precision as you seek to then stick tightly within the light trails and stay there.

Played on a stretch of downtown San Francisco (I could tell it was downtown because I was charged eight dollars for a watermelon juice) Trail Blazer feels nothing like a normal driving game. Actually, its lineage is rather hard to untangle: there's a hint of Mario Kart's battle modes in there, certainly, but a little of the frenetic brinksmanship of Mashed - gone but definitely not forgotten - and the treasure-sifting element of something like Monster Hunter as you Shift and then roam around looking for something special to steal. You almost always find something special too. Hints: Deloreans and the new Fiat 500s.

Pretty soon after getting to grips with it, Driver's out-of-body weirdness settles down, and you start to enjoy a racing game that you can play a little like God might - and it turns out that God really doesn't like taking corners. He prefers, instead, to hop from one car on a straight to another car on the next straight, and such impromptu tactics give Reflections' latest a unique rhythm, a rhythm that's both strategic and hilariously cruel.

'Driver: San Francisco' Screenshot 4

Damage modelling is fully implemented: astonishing considering all the licensed cars knocking around.

It's going to be weird, after long sessions, to return to games where you can't do this, and there's a special kind of pleasure that comes from executing a barge manoeuvre so perfectly that you can then watch to see a rival Shift into a speeding Maserati just as it piles through a wall.

Something has to suffer, of course, and due to the huge world and massive numbers of cars, the textures can be a little rough. It's earlyish days, however, and the lighting, more importantly, is already beautiful, with god rays lancing through the skyscrapers as you drive around America's most iconic car-chase city.

Such confidence masks the fact that Reflections is taking a big risk with Driver. Shift is a game-changer, and it's going to be fascinating to see how it works when stretched across an entire disk. As such, I can't wait to see how single-player copes with this sudden injection of Quantum Leap into its DNA, and I certainly can't wait to have another go on that multiplayer.

Driver: San Francisco is due out for PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 in Q4 2010.

Comments (27) Latest comment 4 months ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Raiko101 #1 2 years ago

    I'll be the only one gutted about this not coming out on the Wii, but hey, it sounds pretty damn interesting!
  • green_nifta #2 2 years ago

    There is a Wii version being developed (in the same studio) so I'm not sure why it wasn't mentioned
  • brommers #3 2 years ago

    is the movie editor still in? They took it out for the last one. Always loved creating my own chase movies.
  • psa89 #4 2 years ago

    The movie editor is in.

    I'm eagerly waiting for this game. I was a big fan of the first 3. Even with the handful of bugs in Driver 3 I still loved the chases.

    EDIT: corrected some typos
    Edited by 2 at 15/06/10 @ 03:03
  • ljvasey #5 2 years ago

    arrggh... Why can't we just have a solid chase game with great handling, physics, damage modeling, and enemy/police AI than one loaded with gimmicks? Hmmm... sounds like the first Driver.

    I'll save any more criticism of this until I've actually played it, but I hope Shift is a feature that doesn't have to be used to progress through missions. Call me crazy, but I'd rather lose the cops through skillful driving and bonkers high-speed cornering than by magically teleporting into another car. It's just Wheelman's car-to-car jumping sans the physicality, and we all know how that game turned out.
  • BBIAJ #6 2 years ago

    The thing I can't get my head around (other than the whole out-of-body Tanner thing), is how can he look so young, when he originates from the Seventies, unless he can time-travel now too?
  • FooAtari #7 2 years ago

    Reflections gets the justifications out of the way quickly. Tanner is a cop who believes an accident has left him with the power to detach his consciousness from his corporeal form and fling it out into the world where he can grab passing cars and commandeer them. In actual fact, an accident has left him in a coma, so I guess the joke is on him.

    W T F.
  • Haloboy #8 2 years ago

    Word is Tanner comes out of the coma and normal Driver awesomeness quickly resumes. Selling ice creams.
  • KreyAtiv #9 2 years ago

    It does sound a bit silly, even if the character is supposed to be in some sort of coma to "Shift" from one car to another.
    I mean where is the fun in that? Whole point of Driver is to Drive, right? High speed chases and other types of mechanical mayhem. I'll give the demo a try before I make a decision.
  • Kaspar #10 2 years ago

    A cop lying in a coma in a hospital bed. Is what he's experiencing real, or is it all in his head? And is there really Life On Mars?

    Not difficult to see what DVD boxed sets Reflections have been watching recently...
  • UncleLou #11 2 years ago

  • mikeck #12 2 years ago

    I wasn't expecting of any of this when I started reading the article.

    I'm definitely intrigued by it, I actually really enjoyed the first two Driver games.
  • simiankid #13 2 years ago

    That Denzel Washington movie is called Fallen, it's not bad either. Quite how this will play in the Driver world is another consideration entirely...
  • brseg #14 2 years ago

    It would make more sense to say you have access to a team of cops who can commandeer other civilian vehicles. You use the 'shift' mechanism to look around, choose a vehicle, then you see the other cop jump into the vehicle. Then you control it for as long as you want. No need for all that coma nonsense, and its actually a good gameplay mechanic since cops work as a team in most situations.
  • monkie_king #15 2 years ago

    60fps open world driving game? Crikey.
  • metalangel #16 2 years ago

    Given just about every Driver game (no, wait, scratch that, every Reflections game) is fucking awful, I don't really expect this to be much different.

    What Reflections ARE good at is making the game APPEAR to be a great, fantastic idea, certainly enough to blind game journos into writing gushing previews (and often reviews). I think back to the original game in 1999, PC Gamer and Official PS Mag both frothed and foamed over how amazing it was, look the cars are huuuuge and you can powerslide and it's the 1970s so let's make groovy jokes about hair and clothes.

    But then you actually played the game. The missions were ridiculous (a guy wants his car delivered across town... undamaged BUT within a time limit! What's the hurry?), the city design was appalling (huge long stretches with no sidestreets to cross over, meaning it was pure luck whether you encountered a police car and had to go slowly or could go full throttle the whole way), gibberish story (you couldn't tell what was happening in the cutscenes), terrible AI (the police swerved all over the place, killing themselves half the time) and, lest we forget... The President's Run, widely regarded as one of the most unfair, frustrating levels in a game ever.

    Then we can consider Driver 2, which had an engine so shitty you'd drive down what looked like a normal road only for a wall to suddenly pop into view - nope, a dead end in fact. Or Stuntman, where you only progressed by screwing up the first stunt, figuring out what you had to do, doing it correctly but then screwing up the second one, figuring it out, doing the first and second right but then screwing up the third, etc.

    And surely some folks still remember the 'Driv3rgate' review scandal? Or how poor Parallel Lines was?

    While this could be the big turning point, after over a decade it looks like once again this will be a game that sounds great on paper, looks great in photos but will be absolutely no fun to play. I don't know why we need stupid gimmicks instead of just a solid, decent cop chase game.
  • JimmyT67 #17 2 years ago

    Hmmmmm astral projection in a Driver game. oookay :/

    Metal Angel. Every point you made can be said true for most games.

    Hell you could even be describing every GTA game there...
  • Soton4084 #18 2 years ago

    Sounds a bit like Life on Mars, not that that's a bad thing!
  • glaeken #19 2 years ago

    It's tricky to see how the shift idea fits the game. You are a get away driver who does not have to rely on their driving skill but can switch to another car that has already taken a difficult corner. So taking out driving skill and how are the police chasing you going to keep track of you shifting? Do they also have some weird ability to allow them to track these shifts?

    It sounds to me like someone had a concept for a game that they have decided to brand as a Driver game. The shift idea in itself sounds fun just not for a Driver game.
  • Iain815 #20 2 years ago

    Stay away from DCI Jim Keats, Tanner!
  • MaxiSleep #21 2 years ago

    Let us be clear. This will be utter pants.
  • OnlyMe #22 2 years ago

    "driv3rgate" review scandal? Really? All I ever saw were the horrible reviews it got from non-official magazines - and I quite enjoyed part of it. The on-foot sections weren't very good, and it had a horrible amount of bugs. But the physics and the actual driving was extremely fun and satisfying, and not too far from the first Driver.

    Also, Driver: Parallell Lines was actually a decent game - it just drove a little too close to GTA3 in terms of gameplay, imo. The physics were decent, although not as good as the first.

    I think this sounds both genius and horrible at the same time though. We'll see how it ends.
  • BBIAJ #23 2 years ago

    Agreed, Parallel Lines, and Driver '76 were actually two very good Driver games, as was Driv3r, provided you could look past the glaring amount of in your face bugs and missing previously mentioned ideas.

    I'm having a Driver revival ATM, just booted up the first game on my PStwo, I have the second, third, fourth, and fifth, plus the iPod remake of the first.

    As for not making sense of the cutscenes in the first game, do you have A.D.D. or something!?
  • keano #24 2 years ago

    this really has the potential to allow players to be massively creative in every aspect and i do like the out the box thinking.

    however i do think without much direction this could end up like fifa's "create a set piece" and not find its true potential with majority of players leaing varied levels of frustration.

    course i wouldnt judge the performance of a car from just its engine size and the crazy boost system its using....its all about the balance and this could be a good game if its right.
  • craigm #25 2 years ago

    WALOFS = what a lot of fu**ing sh*t
  • Gammerz #26 1 year ago

    They take the great idea of bringing Driver 1 to current gen consoles, then ruin it with the "shit", oops typo, "shift" system. I do seriously worry about some game designers' decisions.
    Edited by 1 at 15/11/10 @ 19:14
  • evilhalo #27 4 months ago

    This is the worst out of all the drivers loved the other 1s.I hate this 1 whose the moron who thought up not letting the players leave the car.It destroyed the game and im never buying it for that reason.Shame they ruined it could had been a good game.Please do not waste your money on this trash buy something else.Just play the 1 before this 1 its much better.
    Edited by 1 at 08/10/11 @ 23:24