Silent Hill: Downpour Preview

Puddle quest.

What separates the good horror films from the really good ones? What holds the genuine shockers apart from the moderate spine-tinglers? I've been thinking about this - for at least two minutes - and I'm pretty sure the answer isn't sharks. In fact, I'm pretty sure the answer is something like ambiguity: a creepy sense of uncertainty, a little bit of leeway for your imagination to work its dark magic.

And sharks, of course. But Silent Hill: Downpour doesn't have sharks in it so let's stick with the ambiguity for now.

Silent Hill's always thrived on ambiguity. It offers you passage into a half-seen world, obscured by mist and rust: a place where abandoned buildings poke out of the fog as you creep closer, and where two conflicting dimensions grind against each other in the shadows, one a landscape of faded fifties Americana, another an ugly and corroding force of entropy.

Downpour's got all of that, of course, but it also takes the ambiguity a little further. This time, you've been dropped into the shoes of Murphy Pendleton, who sounds, now that I think of it, like a brand of open-toed sandal ("Barbecue, darling? I'll bust out my Murphy Pendletons,") but is actually a prisoner being transported to the slammer. Brilliantly, the game's early moments leave you with few clues about why Murphy's been sent down, and that makes for an experience where you're eagerly waiting for clues to your own character as well as to the mysteries of the environment.

The opening cinematic of the game's latest short but fiercely atmospheric demo build works wonders with this notion. Murphy's prison bus crashes on a lonely stretch of highway and we're left with no idea as to whether it was an accident or something far worse. Then, in the blur of action that follows, a state trooper falls to her death from a cliff, and it's hard to tell whether Murphy was trying to save her or was giving her a parting shove.

Casual dinner party? Don't forget to polish your Murphy Pendletons!

As Murphy heads into town under your control - uh oh, the town in question is Silent Hill! - you can't help but read things into his appearance and his demeanour. He has a thin, rattish kind of face, like Denis Leary, which can't be good, and he pads through the game slowly, yet heavily, his frame bent forward, as if he has the spirit of a predator perhaps, or the hip joints of a really old lady.

Once he's in town, Murphy's the least of your problems, however. Actually, he's the least of Murphy's problems, too. Vatra Games, the Czech studio handling the latest Silent Hill, has no problem pouring on the derelict backwoods ambience, and things are soon nice and creepy.

A gas station looms eerily out of the mist as you round a corner. There's nobody there, but when you smash open a nearby gate with a crowbar and work your way onto the roof - never look for reason in this sort of game, it ruins all the scares - you discover a wheelchair abandoned on top of a pile of pressed tin plating - and its back wheel is still turning!

That's nothing, though. Wander onwards and you'll find a cable car that will take you deeper into town. The only problem is that the cable car is operated by tokens, and the token machine has been stolen.

A puzzle has clearly appeared, and while it's a simple variation on locked doors - and only a little more evolved than the locked door you had to smash open a few minutes ago - the detailing is wonderfully disquieting. Whoever took the token machine had to drag it behind them as they went, and it's up to you to follow the tracks out the back of the building, across a leafy stretch of deserted highway, and into what can only be described as the world's nastiest diner - and that's taking into account a place called Norm's that Sega once took me to in Santa Ana. Things don't start well at the Devil's Pitstop, as this establishment is called: after a quick chat with a friendly Silent Hill postman who turns out to be a ghost of the vanishes-when-your-back-is-turned variety, you head inside only to find yourself plunged into almost total darkness.

Downpour's lighting - or rather its lack of lighting - is beautifully handled, forcing you to head deeper into locations you'd really rather not go near at all, just in order to simply orient yourself. In the gloom of the diner, all busted tiles and smeary windows, you'll have to find your way to the kitchen using only the glow from a nearby jukebox: luckily there are chairs scattered around along the way for you to arm yourself with and, besides, it's hard to be miserable near a jukebox.

Once you're in the kitchen, those Czech designers reach for the slider marked "trippy". (It's next to the slider marked "sharks".) There's been a gas leak, by the smell of things, and when Murphy goes to turn off the ovens, the whole place bursts into flame. A kitchen fire in a deserted diner would probably be terrifying enough for most of us - particularly since the place is probably insulated with, like, asbestos or something - but Silent Hill's just getting, um, warmed up. First the blaze turns on the sprinkler system, and the room starts to flood - water is the game's dominant theme, incidentally, and it also happens to be Murphy Pendleton's greatest fear - and then the landscape starts to collapse inwards as that famous Silent Hill entropy effect takes hold.

For the last few minutes of the demo, Murphy's lost and terrified in a grisly dimension of rusting metal and mouldering horror: a place where half-eaten corpses are bound to bed frames by bonds of barbed wire, and where something unspeakable is intent on pursuing him as well as on acting like a tutorial to show you that the left bumper activates a kind of rear-view-mirror cam. Murphy's off and running, then, as you lead him down endlessly extending corridors and over sudden steep drops. Then, as quickly as it started, it's over.

As demos go, it's short and gorgeously incoherent, but it's enough to showcase a game that's being put together with a real feel for authentic scares. We'll need a longer glimpse of this to see how Murphy shapes up - and to see whether the developers' ambition to bring a more open-ended approach to puzzles has paid off - but for now, the sense is of a game that's filled with plenty of questions and plenty of sprightly shocks. And all that without a genuine horror game enemy in sight. Or a shark, come to think of it.

Comments (40) Latest comment 10 months ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • daver #1 11 months ago

    Cannae wait. This sounds great so far.
  • Bertie Verified Senior Staff Writer, Eurogamer.net #2 11 months ago

    Christian Donlan I salute you.
  • jonfon #3 11 months ago

    On PS3, excellent. And with the Silent Hill Complete-so-long-as-you-count-only-the-middle-bit-of-a-series-as-it-being-complete Edition coming to PS3 too this makes me very happy.

    Now for petes sake Sony Europe show some brain power and release the original Silent Hill on PSN for the PS3 and PSP.
    Edited by jonfon at 13/07/11 @ 11:49
  • -cerberus- #4 11 months ago

    Game's going to blow. Mark my words. Every iteration after The Room was mediocre, at best.
  • TheDudesRug #5 11 months ago

    Tag line is superb.
  • bumyoghurt #6 11 months ago

    This looks teh awesomez.

    Apologies for saying 'teh awesomez'
  • darm #7 11 months ago

    Oct 2011, really? I was sure about 2012 release.
  • tomkuryakin #8 11 months ago

    I would love this to be good. Please be good.
  • Lunastra78 #9 11 months ago

    I like what I'm seeing so far.

    But I'm still a bit grumpy that the Silent Hill Collection won't be including the first game or a remake of it, so you still haven't won me completely over, Konami!
  • sega #10 11 months ago

    "Game's going to blow. Mark my words. Every iteration after The Room was mediocre, at best."

    Not so - I'd go as far as to say Shattered Memories is one of the best in the series. A very grown up story that managed to bring a tear to my eye ( a very manly tear, mind).
  • DUFFMAN5 #11 11 months ago

    Love the SH series, so all good.
  • Zebula77 #12 11 months ago

    Somwhat puzzled by the humorous tone in the preview. I kept expecting it to be all ironic/sarcastic and end with a "...the demo sucks", and instead it ends rather optimistically.

    As with any SH game, I will be getting this. But at least now I'm a little more intrigued. :)
  • darleysam #13 11 months ago

    I'll take some optimism from this, sounds good.
  • Bigglesworth #14 11 months ago

    Ooohhh yeah, Silent Hill is back. Great trailer.

    I'm looking forward to extreme creepyness with this one; the Czech's always turn out weird shit. Vatra Games. Even their name sounds creepy.

    Though, it's probably Czech for "butterfly" or "rainbow" or something.
  • flaming.carrot #15 11 months ago

    @jonfon

    I've got Silent Hill 1 which I downloaded from UK PSN about a year ago - has it been pulled since then?
  • Markus #16 11 months ago

    @Bigglesworth
    "Though, it's probably Czech for "butterfly" or "rainbow" or something."

    It's "balefire" :)
  • randompanda #17 11 months ago

    Disappointing lack of sharks?
  • Peregrin #18 11 months ago

    I love reading about upcoming horror survival games, Silent Hill particularly. The anticipation, the mystery, the fear...

    Hate playing them though.
  • Bigglesworth #19 11 months ago

  • AnsemsApprentice #20 11 months ago

    Sounds bad to me. All the footage I've seen doesn't look even remotely disturbing; is it really worthy of the Silent Hill name? I'm still getting it on day one, but these little snippets -- so far, anyway -- have left me cold.

    I'm giving it the benefit of the doubt. Most Silent Hill games take a while to get going anyway, and I've probably only seen about two percent of Downpour's early stages until now. Let's hope it's great.
    Edited by AnsemsApprentice at 13/07/11 @ 13:40
  • jonfon #21 11 months ago

    @flaming.carrot

    I've never been able to find it any time I've checked. First time was about 2.5 years ago on the PSP, last time was about a week ago or so on the PS3.

    Of course it could be that I either missed the window for some reason, or that I suck at searching (let's opt for option A).

    Edit : Looks like it was released in late 2009 alright. So it was option B after all. Can't check the official site cos it's down for some reason so I'll have another look this evening (and probably fail again).
    Edited by jonfon at 13/07/11 @ 13:47
  • Bulbatron #22 11 months ago

    This does look and sound very good to me.

    I'm pretty annoyed that the Silent Hill HD Collections isn't coming to the Xbox 360 - and the reasoning behind it makes no sense whatsoever.

    So let's hope Silent Hill Downpour lives up to expectations.
  • geeza2020 #23 11 months ago

    Just curious, but why have Konami decided to farm this out to a European dev? Can they not be trusted with it themselves anymore?
  • Darknight #24 11 months ago

    @jonfon

    The first Silent Hill was released, but was swiftly pulled from the store due to some licensing problem that Konami had with some of the music that it used. I don't think they are even looking at re-licensing it so the game can be released at this stage.
  • -cerberus- #25 11 months ago

    @sega #12: True that Shattered Memories at least tried to do something different. So yes, it was the best of the spin-offs (because that's what Origins, Homecoming and SM are).
  • coomber #26 11 months ago

    And then this happened, and then this happened, and then this happened!

    Yep, the usual Eurogamer preview.
  • Rufus #27 11 months ago

    Nicely written, but there's no mention about controls, HUD etc. Considering the SH series is renowned for its clunky controls/combat (with the exception of SH3 maybe), I'd like to know what Vatra have done in that regard.
    Edited by Rufus at 13/07/11 @ 16:26
  • Bulbatron #28 11 months ago

    @-cerberus-

    I can understand how Shattered Memories might be considered a spin-off, but how are Origins and Homecoming spin-offs? Surely Origins is just an addition to the Silent Hill 1 story just like Silent Hill 3 was, and surely Homecoming is just another separate story, just like Silent Hill 2 and 4 were separate stories?
  • -cerberus- #29 11 months ago

    @Bulbatron #30: Instead of me posting a gigantic wall of text, I will simply give you a link and encourage you (and others) to watch the in-depth documentary found there called 'The Real Silent Hill Experience': http://www.silenthillmedia.net
    Edited by -cerberus- at 13/07/11 @ 17:13
  • Bulbatron #30 11 months ago

    Well I've just finished watching 'The Real Silent Hill Experience'. While it was undoubtedly well-researched and the presenters did make a couple of points which seem valid to me, for most of the time it came across to me as little more than an agonisingly drawn-out series of hair-splitting and angry rants.

    If the existence of the new Silent Hill games offends them that much, then why don't they just stick to playing the old games and forget the new ones even exist, rather than trying to dissuade other people from taking them as part of the series.

    They spend a lot of the time bombarding the viewer with their opinions, which in itself is fair enough, but they state them as though they were facts. To me, 'The Real Silent Hill Experience' seems hardly worthy of the word 'documentary'.
    Edited by Bulbatron at 14/07/11 @ 02:53
  • Timotei #31 11 months ago

  • -cerberus- #32 11 months ago

    @Bulbatron #32: "If the existence of the new Silent Hill games offends them that much, then why don't they just stick to playing the old games and forget the new ones even exist, rather than trying to dissuade other people from taking them as part of the series.
    They spend a lot of the time bombarding the viewer with their opinions, which in itself is fair enough, but they state them as though they were facts."


    Did you even pay attention during the analysis or the supplementary videos? All of their statements were backed up by solid facts and more than valid arguments that made Origins', Homecoming's & Shattered Memories' raison d'être at the very least questionable...

    And they do stick to playing the old games and also encourage fans to do so.
    Edited by -cerberus- at 14/07/11 @ 08:25
  • savant #33 11 months ago

    Sharks? Hahahahaha!

    /sigh
  • IneptPercy #34 11 months ago

    This looks like it may be a return to form, I did say while playing alan wake 'if only silent hill looked like this'

    As for the other games, I missed origins and homecoming but loved shattered memories.
  • Bulbatron #35 10 months ago

    @-cerberus-

    I did pay attention. It may have been flagging a little towards the end, but to be fair I had already endured over two hours of them.

    I did say they made some points which seemed perfectly valid to me, and when it came to pure analysis of the plot and meanings, they did indeed seem to have proof for everything they said. I suppose it boils down to how much you let the continuity errors bother you. I feel able to cope with them and still enjoy the newer games as decent - if by no means as good - additions to the series. If that somehow makes me less of a Silent Hill fan, then I can live with that.

    As I said, it was clearly very well researched and when they were sticking to facts, there was some really interesting information in there.

    But what I was really thinking of (and possibly should have made clearer) were their statements about how scary or boring the games may or may not have been. They made these sort of statements very forcefully, and I suppose it was that which really got my back up. I can't begin to imagine how long they spent hunting for bugs in the newer games, especially since I don't remember encountering any.

    I suppose what it boils down to is that for the makers of the videos - and yourself, the continuity errors within the newer games are enough to categorise them as spin-offs. For me, they aren't. I suspect we're never going to convince one-another of our arguments - and that's fine. I was just curious as to how the newer games were counted as spin-offs. For such an uncompromising statement, I was expecting an easy answer. Didn't realise I'd have to subject myself to so much opinionated ranting (I'm talking about the videos, not you) in order to get what amounted to an opinion.

    Once again, I'm not arguing with their facts, I just didn't like the way they spilled over into the territory of opinion.
    Edited by Bulbatron at 14/07/11 @ 19:40
  • -cerberus- #36 10 months ago

    I've got the mark of Samael tattooed on my left shoulder for my 18th birthday (I'm 25 now) so yes, the main series' story means a hell of a lot to me and I cannot forgive the inconsistencies that plague the spin-offs.

    But fair enough, let's agree to disagree :)
  • Bulbatron #37 10 months ago

    Can't say fairer than that.
  • obiadekanobi #38 10 months ago

    i hope this is areturn to the old slient hills i loved the first games but they lost there substance along the way this is looking stunning though
  • Minotauro #39 10 months ago

    Wow. Murphy actually resembles an older, better looking version of myself. Yes, I have a "thin, rattish kind of face.." :( I'm staring at 1:10 and it's freaking me the fuck out!
  • Silent-Hal #40 10 months ago

    The unique style of horror to be found in the earlier games seems to have died a quiet death long ago. Whilst still enjoyable, the newer games have a very different feel to the earlier games, which I mostly blame on the series losing its J-horror elements in favour of a more familiar, westernised take on horror (though not surprising considering the change in developers). Shattered Memories still managed to be excellent despite this though.