...Kinect, indie games and red rings.
"If there's anything in reality that's not fun, we will change it."
Loading...hold tight!
Page
of 12 First / Last
Pissy pants.
superdelphinus wrote:Most of the things Apple won on here have prior art... that they were even able to patent them in the first place is ridiculous. The jury should be ashamed for ignoring that evidence.
It's amazing that some people are saying some of the design features that apple introduced and routinely patented are now essential for these sort of devices so the patents shouldn't be valid. Actually crazy
This post is sponsored by Apple and the iPhone 4S. Think different.
mowgli wrote:Apple invented nothing. I hope you realise they just took a load of existing technology and patented superficial design aspects.
Samsung and Apple make phones and tablets, they both like to borrow, Samsung a bit more than Apple.
Apple successfully sue Samsung for £1billion for stealing and not licensing patents.
Internet explodes with angry 14 year old Apple haters turn patent experts.
+1 / Like / Tweet this post
cheeky_prawnking wrote:You sound so bitter. Did Apple sleep with your girlfriend?
My gold plated butt-plug business is being sued by Apple.
Apparently they have a patent for overpriced crap for arseholes.
cheeky_prawnking wrote:genuine lol, well done
My gold plated butt-plug business is being sued by Apple.
Apparently they have a patent for overpriced crap for arseholes.
a Nexus a day keeps the apple away
Dirtbox wrote:Yeah? It is the design aspects they created and patented, which have been stolen. No one is saying otherwise.mowgli wrote:Apple invented nothing. I hope you realise they just took a load of existing technology and patented superficial design aspects.
Samsung and Apple make phones and tablets, they both like to borrow, Samsung a bit more than Apple.
Apple successfully sue Samsung for £1billion for stealing and not licensing patents.
Internet explodes with angry 14 year old Apple haters turn patent experts.
Pissy pants.
Pissy pants.
Pissy pants.
Trying to take ownership of artistic/design principles and concepts is needlessly stifling and detrimental to design process in general.
mowgli wrote:I'm guessing you've never seen TVs or monitors? At the end of the day, there's a limit to what you can realistically do with a rectangle of plastic. Making it so that pretty much only Apple can use a rectangle with rounded corners is a little ridiculous. This is why you've seen manufacturers adding all sorts of random "flair" to their rectangles (so as not to get sued).
Why shouldn't they be patentable, when it is the design aspects that distinguish models?
This post is sponsored by Apple and the iPhone 4S. Think different.
Pissy pants.
disusedgenius wrote:How is it any different from other patents? It wouldn't be patented if it wasn't worth something to the owner so how does it differ.Trying to take ownership of artistic/design principles and concepts is needlessly stifling and detrimental to design process in general.
Pissy pants.
mowgli wrote:Ideas and concepts are intangible. Implementation isn't.
so how does it differ.
disusedgenius wrote:Yeah, selectively quoting me to fit around a completely irrelevant attempt at an answer doesn't help anyone.mowgli wrote:Ideas and concepts are intangible. Implementation isn't.
so how does it differ.
Pissy pants.
disusedgenius wrote:Happy?mowgli wrote:Ideas and concepts are intangible. Implementation isn't.
How is it any different from other patents? It wouldn't be patented if it wasn't worth something to the owner so how does it differ.
Pissy pants.
Page
of 12 First / Last
