460 while a wee bit old at this stage is still a decent card, should be able to handle 1080p with decent framerates.
The Budget Gaming PC thread • Page 85
-
Page
of 105 First / Last -
mikew1985 9,705 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 6 years agoWorse than a 460.
460 while a wee bit old at this stage is still a decent card, should be able to handle 1080p with decent framerates. -
dawguk 4 posts
Seen 7 months ago
Registered 6 years agoI thought that was the case, which leaves me with the CPU / motherboard / RAM needing a spring clean.
Considering that I won't in this case benefit from the embedded graphics due to the 460 being capable, should I get myself an i3 with a view to an upgrade path later in the year? -
mikew1985 9,705 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 6 years agoYou'll certainly see an increase in the performance with an i3 based system. If its within your budget it wouldn't be a bad upgrade at all. -
dawguk 4 posts
Seen 7 months ago
Registered 6 years agoIt's definitely in my budget, if I can get the i3 3220T for about £90.
Pretend that I know nothing about motherboards. Which motherboard for around £90-100 (€120) should I be looking at? Is there such a thing as a stand-out motherboard these days? -
mikew1985 9,705 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 6 years agoI generally just refer to various tech sites recommendations when I'm looking to upgrade as I'm not bothered to keep up with motherboard tech unless I'm in the market for it (shocking I know, they're so interesting!).
I'm fairly certain you could go for a board cheaper than £90 - £100 with everything you would need. mATX boards are sometimes a good bit cheaper than their ATX brothers and offer all the same features and overclocking bells and whistle that your average gaming PC would require.
Edited by mikew1985 at 16:17:02 18-10-2012 -
dawguk 4 posts
Seen 7 months ago
Registered 6 years agoThanks indeed mikew1985 (rolls off the tongue!), very helpful advice there. -
Maturin 1,688 posts
Seen 12 minutes ago
Registered 4 years agoYes I've been reading Tom's hardware's CPU guides recently and it's made me realise there's no point me buying an i7 over an i5 for my new build given the software I'll be using on it. So the money saved means I'll get a GTX670 instead of the lower card I was considering.Pre-childish ragequit username - Harry
-
quadfather 4,738 posts
Seen 6 hours ago
Registered 3 years agoWell, built the new pc (i3 2120, 8gb, 660 to, ssd). It's absolutely unbelievable! Fast isn't the word. The samsung 830 boots from after bios to windows in 9 seconds. Windows says that its 7.1 overall. 7.1 was the CPU, memory is 7.5 and the rest of the gaming scores all on 7.9. Didn't think the i3 would be that fast but there you go. Haven't tried games yet as they're all downloading but so far so good.
Only issue was on first bootup it was making a noise, but realised it was the CPU heatsink lead slightly catching the fan.
So anyone pondering i3 or i5 with a tight budget, I think its better to spend a bit more on gpu and mobo to start with then maybe upgrade CPU later.
Anyone want to buy my old rigk specs on previous page I thinkpsn = quaddy456
-
superdelphinus 6,177 posts
Seen 7 hours ago
Registered 8 years agowhy????!
i have the same chip and a lower graphics card and it's 8.0 on mine!
that samsung SSD is the best thing I put in mine I think, it's fantastic -
superdelphinus 6,177 posts
Seen 7 hours ago
Registered 8 years agojust don't buy two full priced games one time and buy one of those instead - transforms the machine -
superdelphinus 6,177 posts
Seen 7 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoi use it for everything I use regularly - at the moment I have the OS, a few media type things (lightroom, photoshop and premier) various other smaller programmes and about 6 or 7 games. I try not to have less than 25 gigs or so free, and make sure things like lightroom and premier are using the HDD as scratch disks. At the moment my hdd spends most of its life powered down (it must be on some sort of energy saving setting in windows) and only really comes on if I'm looking at stored photos or listening to music etc) -
quadfather 4,738 posts
Seen 6 hours ago
Registered 3 years agoOne thing that I read was to move the swap file off the ssd. Theyve got a limited lifespan so while it'll be slightly slower, it will extend the life of the ssd. Will have to monitor the progresspsn = quaddy456
-
whatthefu 758 posts
Seen 7 hours ago
Registered 7 years agoLimited life is probably what put me off buying ssd.
Quadfather, I think I'll pass on your system.
I've had bad experiences with used goods online and since you overclocked your system, I don't fancy the chances lol. -
quadfather 4,738 posts
Seen 6 hours ago
Registered 3 years ago@Ilovechips - I think its just to help the life of the ssd as it'll be writing constantly to the ssd if.itthatpartitiMust admit though, very impressed with the i3 as long as you get everything else upgraded to the same degreepsn = quaddy456
-
quadfather 4,738 posts
Seen 6 hours ago
Registered 3 years ago@whatthefu - no problem. Though for the record its nit overclocked at the moment. No matterpsn = quaddy456
-
superdelphinus 6,177 posts
Seen 7 hours ago
Registered 8 years agowhat is a swapfile
how do i move it -
quadfather 4,738 posts
Seen 6 hours ago
Registered 3 years ago@superdelphinus - its what windows uses to cache stuff. It's basically a reserved area on the hd that it uses. But because its used a lot and an ssd has a limited life span, its an idea to move it. Go into sysm properties and move it from your ssd to another drivepsn = quaddy456
-
quadfather 4,738 posts
Seen 6 hours ago
Registered 3 years agoSorry for all the typos, I'm drunk and the phone isn't helping
psn = quaddy456
-
MMMarmite 617 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 6 years agoSearch your c:\ drive for pagefile.sys that's the swapfile
Windows moves stuff from memory to the swapfile when you run out of active memory, then reads it back in when it needs it again. It's basically more RAM just slower to access.
Also with Windows 7 and newer SSDs longevity shouldn't be a problem, the wear-levelling algorithms used by newer controllers are able to spread the writes so that the average user will get over 5 years of usage before the disk starts "playing up". -
Dirtbox 73,731 posts
Seen 4 seconds ago
Registered 11 years ago -
superdelphinus 6,177 posts
Seen 7 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoYeah the lifespan thing does seem a little bit like a self perpetuated myth -
quadfather 4,738 posts
Seen 6 hours ago
Registered 3 years agoIs it best not to move it then? I'm about to start a formatting frenzy on drives, so I'd rather get it all setup right in the first placepsn = quaddy456
-
MMMarmite 617 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 6 years agoMoving it to a HDD would make paging slower which kinda goes against the reason for getting an SSD in the first place
Also with plenty of memory, paging shouldn't be happening too often unless you're using a lot of memory intensive applications. -
quadfather wrote:
Yeah, don't bother. I moved mine and lost most of the performance ramp the SSD gave me, even with 32gb of ram.
Is it best not to move it then? I'm about to start a formatting frenzy on drives, so I'd rather get it all setup right in the first place
Edited by Dirtbox at 12:52:40 20-10-2012+1 / Like / Tweet this post
-
Page
of 105 First / Last
