Advertisement
WoW hits 8 million mark News
PC News by Robert Purchese
Once upon a time MMOs were a fantasy reserved for hairy people with Elven nicknames.
Today, Blizzard has announced that World of Warcraft is played around the world by more than eight million people. Shift-one. It's also reached a significant subscriber milestone of more than 2 million players in North America, 1.5 million in Europe, and 3.5 million in China.
"We're ecstatic that the World of Warcraft community has continued to grow steadily since we launched the game," said Mike Morhaime, president and cofounder of Blizzard Entertainment, speaking from his golden yacht in a river of silk. "This milestone wouldn't have been possible for us to achieve without the incredible support of our players.
Tuesday 16th January sees the release of The Burning Crusade across North America and Europe, with previously announced stores offering special midnight launch bonanzas.
This first expansion pack aims to increase the size and content of the game by one third, as well as increasing the level cap to 70. It will also introduce two new races, flying mounts, and jewel crafting.
Will it help push the figure to ten million?
The only other online game to have come remotely close to the success of this was Lineage in January 2003, boasting around 3.25 million players. Lineage II peaked at just over two million in 2005, whilst household names EverQuest and Final Fantasy XI both hovered around the 500,000 mark.
If you assume that the subscriber milestone means roughly seven million people are paying GBP 8.99 a month to play the game, that's an income of GBP 62,930,000 ... a month! If I was Blizzard, I would fill a swimming pool with the money and buy a chimpanzee to enjoy it with.
Head over to freshly launched Burning Crusade flash site for more information.
Advertisement
Are you excited about World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games
Thanks!
Related Games
World of Warcraft
World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade
Latest Features
-
World of Warcraft Interview [47]
-
World of Warcraft Review [120]
-
World of Warcraft Hands On [22]
-
World of Warcraft Interview [4]
-
World of Warcraft Interview [13]
Latest Videos
World of Warcraft: Call of the Crusade [1] 5 August, 2009
World of Warcraft - Ulduar [4] 14 April, 2009
Latest News
-
Blizzard on 15 years of Warcraft, 5 of WOW [41]
-
BlizzCon moving to Vegas in July? [2]
-
Battle.net now required to play WOW [8]
-
Blizzard keen on WOW micro-transactions [37]
-
WOW patch 3.3 in "coming weeks" [27]
Latest Screenshots
28 June, 2008 [19]
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
Poster
|
Thamuhacha
12/01/07 @ 15:50
0
"GBP 62,930,000 ... a month"
Good lord. Even if you knock off 25% as a precaution that's still more than some publishers are making a year for their whole portfolio. So can we have a new Diablo please? And not a MMO one either ... >first!!!!!! Are people still doing this? WTF for?
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 12/01/07 @ 15:51
|
|
JediMasterMalik
12/01/07 @ 15:55
0
They should reduce the monthly fee and I may bite. They can afford it after all.
|
|
TheSnotGoblin
12/01/07 @ 15:57
0
Are those numbers only the active players or inclusive of all the players who have since quit (Or like me played the 30-day trial then called it a day)?
|
|
0
The people who made the Diablo series left Blizzard and are busy finishing Hellgate: London. WEhich apparently will have an optional persistent-world (paid MMO thingy or Battle.net style cheatorama) element.
For your Diablo II fix there's always Titan Quest. And for the older Diablo, best clone around is F.A.T.E. |
|
SpeedyThing
12/01/07 @ 16:01
0
Shouldn't that be Final Fantasy XI?
Which makes me wonder how long the Final Fantasy series can continue with its naming before journalists and consumers alike despair at getting all the roman numerals in the right order!! |
|
chupachups
12/01/07 @ 16:16
0
"Good lord. Even if you knock off 25% as a precaution that's still more than some publishers are making a year for their whole portfolio. "
That's just what I was thinking, they've got a money printing machine going there. That comes to 744 million pounds a year, or about 1.4 billion dollars a year. Can this really be right?!!?? That's more or less the same as the whole of Nintendo's yearly profit. Can one game really be making as much money as the whole of Nintendo? If they're getting over a billion dollars a year in income, surely they'd be doing a lot more with it than just keeping WoW ticking over? One thing though: How much does it cost to run an MMO with that many players? You'd have to knock that off their income from subscriptions to find out how much Blizzard really get.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 12/01/07 @ 16:19
|
|
Thamuhacha
12/01/07 @ 16:20
0
>One thing though: How much does it cost to run an MMO with that many players? You'd have to knock that off their income from subscriptions.
Well, yes. And all the other costs involved in being a company. But it's still a huge amount. >If they're getting over a billion dollars a year in income, surely they'd be doing a lot more with it than just keeping WoW ticking over? Other than going "Amuhahahaha" and constructing space weapons? |
|
thefishmonger
12/01/07 @ 16:27
0
So from that (correct me if I'm wrong).
8,000,000 X £8.99 (if all players were paying the same monthly subscription) = £71,920,000 per month (Gross) 71920000 X 12 = £863M per year. OR (1 month = 4.34812141 weeks) 71,920,000 / 4.34812141 = £16.5M per week 16,540,477 / 7 = £2.4M per day 2.4M / 24 = £98,455 per hour 98,455 / 60 = £1,641 per minute 1,641 / 60 = £27.35p per second
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 12/01/07 @ 16:30
|
|
0
From Joystiq:-
According to Blizzard's and The9's web sites, the subscription model for WoW in China is different from other parts of the world. Instead of a monthly subscription fee, Chinese gamers purchase WoW Points cards for 30 Yuan ($3.64) that are worth 600 points. Points expire at a rate of 9 per hour of play, so this amounts to 66 hours and 40 minutes of play for each card at an average of .45 Yuan ($.06) per hour. From somewhere else:- MMORPG gamers spend on average 21.0 hours per week playing So that works out at... /calculator...about $5 per month for Chinese players. 3.5m of the 8m players are Chinese, so that's $17.5m per month from the Chinese and about $90m from the rest of us - call it $80m in case some parts of the world are cheaper. So, nearly $100m a month... that's not bad. |
|
ComradeSheep
12/01/07 @ 16:35
0
... all I can picture is the scene from the Simpsons.
"Money fight!" |
|
JediMasterMalik
12/01/07 @ 16:37
0
They should change all MMO subscription models to a pay as you go system imo, would remove the fear of necessary comittment for some people. Like me.
|
|
chupachups
12/01/07 @ 16:39
0
With money like this, why isn't EVERYONE doing MMOs?
Even if only one in 100 attempts succeeded like WoW, it would still cover the costs of all the others (assuming an MMO costs about $10 million to create). "They should change all MMO subscription models to a pay as you go system imo, would remove the fear of necessary comittment for some people. Like me. " If they're making 1.4 billion dollars a year I don't think they need to change anything, at least from a business point of view.
Edited 2 times,
most recently on 12/01/07 @ 16:40
|
|
JediMasterMalik
12/01/07 @ 16:41
0
You're right , it's probably bad for business, but it would be good for customers and players. imo
|
|
0
"MMORPG gamers spend on average 21.0 hours per week playing"
Really... bugger, don't people have better things to do with their time? I started playing WoW over Christmas for the first time and while its kinda fun if it ever got to that stage I'd be forced to slap myself round the face and remind myself there is more to life... |
|
0
But how much of that cash turns into pure profit? Blizzard have got, like, thousands of people working for them and a huge world-wide infrastructure, plus the game took a lot of money to make in the first place, I'm sure. I'm not saying they're not raking it in, they are, but you cannot compare it to the business model of a normal publisher. Blizzard are in the service industry now, so you'd be better comparing them to a cable TV company or something...
Also they'd be absolutely insane if they weren't pumping that money into making new games, they're bound to have a few big projects on the boil at the moment, even if they pretend that they don't.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 12/01/07 @ 16:46
|
|
0
Well now it's difficult for others making MMO's I think. How many ppl play more than one at a time, cant be many...plus now they have such a grip on alot of ppl, it will have to be a really good game to tempt some of those away.
I know alot of the experienced WoW players are frustrated and looking for something new, but with the combo of the press WoW gets, so attracting new players, and if they play it sensible and keep the older players happy with expansions, they could be dominant for a while yet, and not give any other MMO's a sniff! |
|
Fatallyflawed
12/01/07 @ 16:50
0
I want a Murky for god's sake Blizzard. I think 2 years at £8.99 a month deserves a Murky. I would have attended Blizzcon but what with me living in the UK.......Tight arsed money bags...Grrrr (And so on)
|
|
0
"I know alot of the experienced WoW players are frustrated and looking for something new, but with the combo of the press WoW gets, so attracting new players, and if they play it sensible and keep the older players happy with expansions, they could be dominant for a while yet, and not give any other MMO's a sniff!"
I would love to try something different (Lvl 60 tank, finished mc, but not willing to do the time needed for BWL/AQ/Naxx), but anything i have tried so far (EQII, SWG, Vanguard) just lacks the polish of WoW. Deeper is fine, but I want something that has the same quality of animation, initial ease of use etc, graphics speed etc. LOTR online MIGHT be it, or maybe Warhammer , but warhammer looks a bit too pvp for my taste |
|
0
I'd just like to point out that the budget for producing the game in the first place was pretty god-damned huge. The only reason Blizzard could afford to make WoW was because of the huge successes they've had with Diablo1+2/Warcraft2+3/Starcraft. Their consistently excellent output lead to a healthy business model and a very expectant and loyal fan base. All they had to do was release a product that was as polished as anything else from the Blizzard brand and their success was assured. Where they really nailed it on the head was releasing an MMO that actually frikin worked and was in a finished form (content updates notwithstanding).
WoW is now an absolute leviathan and anyone hoping to enter the same market place has a stark reality to face... Until WoW kills itself, you can't win. By all means try for second place though :D |
|
chupachups
12/01/07 @ 17:17
0
Another advantage MMOs have over normal games is that with normal games you get bored if you play them too much and eventually you never play them again, but with MMOs if you've invested so many months in building your character and possessions you're going to want to stick with that MMO rather than try something different.
Wasn't there a guy in Korea who died last because he played an MMO for three days solid? |
|
0
chupachups said... "With money like this, why isn't EVERYONE doing MMOs?"
Two reasons spring to mind... 1) Most game developers aren't primarily driven by greed. 2) If every game was a subscription based MMO's then the market would be saturated, therefore each game would receive a smaller portion of the pie.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 12/01/07 @ 17:35
|
|
George Roper
12/01/07 @ 18:38
0
Big numbers but I estimate that 250 billion flies eat shit, every second. Does that make shit tasty? Or does it mean that flies mindlessly grind away at eating it because they're drones who don't know any better?
Food for thought. |
|
0
@George Roper
Yes! In terms of WoW... it's some mighty fine shit! Mind you not everyone grinds instances all day everyday, that is the preserve of high end raiding guilds that on entry demand 8+ hours a day, 6 days a week for the rest of your life or until they find someone better :). Some of us just like getting together with friends and PvPing while laughing at the stupidity of the Alliance in Battlegrounds
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 12/01/07 @ 19:59
|
|
Fozzie_bear
12/01/07 @ 21:48
0
If I was Blizzard, I would fill a swimming pool with the money and buy a chimpanzee to enjoy it with.
From now on i vote that Mr Purchese is referred to as "The Voice of Reason" |
|
Lemon Project
12/01/07 @ 23:58
0
MMOs are evil. And I say that having played and loved WoW for a /played of around 25 days. Utterly softcore compared to a great many including those people I know who still give it their lives through playing/raiding and guild administration/politics.
|
|
Royal Fool
13/01/07 @ 13:02
0
Probably one of the most cringeworthy headline puns in EG history. Keep at it!
|
|
0
Great game. I guess its accessability is what makes it such a great game, that and the fact that it is easily very deep enough for hardcore and commited gamers too. I just wish I could reactivate my account...been trying for days but the Euro website just won't work. Can't belive it, must the first time a company doesn't want my money!
|
|
chupachups
13/01/07 @ 15:55
0
"Two reasons spring to mind...
1) Most game developers aren't primarily driven by greed. 2) If every game was a subscription based MMO's then the market would be saturated, therefore each game would receive a smaller portion of the pie." 1) Game developers don't fund games, publishers do, so it's publishers that decide what happens and what doesn't. Publishers have a duty to their shareholders to make as much money as possible, so games that make $1.4 billion a year are exactly what they would be interested in. In any case, why is it greedy to want to make a game that makes lots of money? Are you saying most game developers would turn down that kind of money because they want to "keep it real"? 2) Obviously too many games is bad, but if one game is making $1.4 billion a year then the market clearly isn't anywhere near saturated and there aren't enough games to satisfy it. |
|
George Roper
13/01/07 @ 21:08
0
@fawe3
The reason is that Vivendi Universal are a bunch of greedy motherfuckers, who's one and only cash-cow has been and currently is World Of Warcraft. Why do you think it's taken this long to put an expansion pack together? Because of the content? The reason is that VU have been milking WoW like a newborn on the tit, with MINIMAL content output for the player base. Yes, there's been content added via patches but nothing even approaching the level of an expansion pack and most of it has been in the form of high-end gaming, purely and simply to give the 60's something to do rather than hitting 'Cancel account'. It staggers me to think that WoW players have next to nothing, end-game, to look forward to aside from mindless button-bashing in Raids or BGs. I'd sooner hammer my bollocks, repeatedly, than grind the same Raid instances and BG content over and over and over and over and over and over again. I realise this is the way most onliners go nowadays but the time required for WoW Raiding just kills the opportunity for most adults. Hence the 'kids play WoW' tag, because they have the least to lose by dedicating so much time online. WoW is the gaming equivalent of shooting up. Instant high (via almost immediate, hand-held, on-rails, leveling to 60) and then nothing but mind-numbing, brainless, scrabbling. |
|
0
level 60 is dull as hell, but thanks to the expansion it'll be fun again for 2 weeks before we all reach the dull as hell level 70, which is a bit like 60, only you can grind for rare items in new areas :P
Also, didn't the TV advert say "over 8 million subscribers" a few weeks back? was that a lie then :P |
|
0
I hope EG plan on running a news piece about how many people who pre-ordered the Collectors Edition (including seemingly all who ordered via HMV) have had their orders cancelled at the last moment. Apparently HMV cancelled all their online pre-orders at the request of Vivendi, who asked that all CE's be reallocated to the London branch of HMV for their special midnight opening.
There are stories of people who pre-ordered the CE on the day it was originally announced who are now getting emails saying their order is being cancelled. I've even read one story tonight of someone who pre-ordered it from the London HMV which is holding the launch event who was phoned and told that his copy was now being held at the store, but upon going to the store was informed that his pre-order had been reallocated to the midnight launch. The whole thing has been a complete joke. And from what i understand it's much the same situation in the rest of Europe. |
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
