Wheelman Review

Wheelie bin.

Version tested: Xbox 360

Vin Diesel is the new Sonic! Well, he's got two games out in the space of a month. The Chronicles of Riddick: Assault on Dark Athena should be interesting. The first one, Escape From Butcher Bay, was a surprisingly low-key, atmospheric first-person action game where Vin did almost as much good with his mouth as he did with his fists and shadows. But first there's Wheelman, which is much closer to what you'd expect from a trip to see beefy old gravel-mouth at the cinema (or on DVD when you're pissed, which seems more likely). It's all about fast cars, firearms and confrontation. But mostly fast cars.

Vin Diesel nominally plays Milo Burik, some sort of undercover policeman from Miami who's in Barcelona to sort out the Catalonian underworld or something, but really he plays Vin Diesel, muscle-bound baldie with a leather tongue and a love of cars, and he drives them around on all sorts of pretexts smashing up the city, drifting, boosting off ramps and doing ridiculous flying carjacks on the motorway, occasionally spinning his car 360 degrees in slow motion to shoot out petrol tanks with pinpoint accuracy. Forget whatever else is happening: look at Vin! In a car!

For a while, as you're getting used to "Air Jacks" and "Cyclone" attacks, you actually get a bit excited about this, because Midway Studios Newcastle appears to be onto something: rather than following GTA out of the car and onto the streets to go a bit Michael Mann, the focus is on solving all the world's problems from the driver's seat. Has Midway, amazingly, somehow repeated the Riddick trick, and inadvertently channelled one of the bald hero's passions into a smart take on an old standard?

If you need to take somebody out, you don't bash into them until they get out and then chase them onto a rooftop and stick 'em with their own knife; you pull alongside them and use the right analogue stick to sideswipe them until their car's in critical condition, and then you do it again so they cartwheel through the air and explode. Sometimes they have guns, but that's okay, because so does Vin Diesel, so you hold down the left bumper to shoot out the tyres automatically, or you use Cyclone or Aimed Shot to target them in slow motion and take them out in one shot.

'Wheelman' Screenshot 1

The story really is nonsensical. You never work out what Vin Diesel is actually in Barcelona to do, or why, or for whom, and half the people you meet make no sense.

You don't even have to get out of your car to get another one. Instead you can line up behind something you like the look of and hold a button until an icon goes green, at which point Vin Diesel climbs smoothly out of the driver-side window, leaps impossibly through the air and lands on the other car, swinging neatly through the passenger window to boot the driver onto the street and take over the wheel. He can do it for bikes too. And scooters. Vin Diesel isn't afraid of riding scooters.

The city of Barcelona is hardly living and breathing, and hardly the entire city of Barcelona either - it's a simplified playground designed for Vin Diesel, with broad thoroughfares connected by a few alleyways, and just enough traffic to add obstacles to pursuit missions but not enough to slow you down. You glide effortlessly over kerbs, use stairways and roundabouts as ramps, mow down trees and lamp-posts and street cafés as if they're not there, and the police barely ever turn up unless a mission tells them to, and even then, they're easily outwitted.

Everything is in service to the one core goal: let Vin Diesel drive around in a car being a maniac, because that worked in The Fast and the Furious. As if to hammer the point home, the threadbare story mode quickly takes a back seat to the dozens of side missions available on your GPS map, which are all about driving fast and smashing things up. Vin Diesel doesn't like to wait around, so you can hop straight to them at the click of a button, and soon you're playing Crazy Taxi, taking part in street races, assassinating other drivers car-to-car, stealing vehicles to order and sometimes just smashing up the city until you've caused a set amount of damage. Doing all these missions unlocks garages, weapon caches and upgrades for the Focus meter that powers your Cyclones and boosts, and it's all unapologetically videogamey. You certainly can't imagine Vin Diesel apologising.

That said, he's obviously a gamer, or he wouldn't have his own games company, and he wouldn't go on TV and get excited when Jonathan Ross mentions his wife's spectral tiger, so while he might not do any apologising, he might agree that Wheelman also has a darker side, or at least a more boring side. Those side missions, for example. There are certainly loads of them, and there are hidden cat statues to smash up, and there are loads of unique stunt jumps to find, but after you've done one of everything there really isn't any variation or evolution of the core ideas. You just do the same thing in a different bit of the city with a slightly different time limit.

The car combat isn't very interesting either. Cyclone and Aimed Shot are novel and the exploding enemy cars and bikes sometimes catapult their drivers hilariously across the street, but jostling with enemies using sideswipe is repetitive and lacks conviction. This isn't helped by very blatantly elastic AI. It's most obvious when you're pursuing someone and you fall behind, and realise that their icon on the mini-map has virtually come to a halt, waiting for you to pick up the pace, but it's more aggravating when you're trying to escape, and no matter how successful you are smashing up your enemies, they have no difficulty reeling you back in. This happens in the street races too, where it graduates from 'niggle' to outright sin.

At least there's nothing much wrong with the car handling, which falls somewhere between Crazy Taxi and Burnout Paradise, but there is a lot to be said against the bits where you get out of the car, and after a while - perhaps as the developer becomes conscious of the repetition - you're forced to do more of it. The cover system is rudimentary (stand next to a block, and duck), and the lock-on combat is far too simple - and your bland, identikit enemies far too tactically naive - for this side of the game to have any sort of positive effect. It doesn't help that the mission design is weakest here either - one of the first examples involves working your way through a maze of knackered tube carriages, retrieving a hostage, and then working your way back out through the same maze, with enemies spawning at predictable intervals along the way.

'Wheelman' Screenshot 2

It's just as well for the AI that it's been given permission to cheat, because it couldn't think its way out of a paper bag. To compensate for this, later missions simply hurl enemies at you remorselessly so you have to Air Jack constantly.

Visually, too, the game is very bland, unable to boast the amazing, atmospheric lighting of GTAIV nor offer any decent alternative. Vin Diesel looks like Vin Diesel, but most of the characters are last-generation next to their counterparts in other Unreal Engine 3 games, with chunky faces and poor lip-synching, and the sun-drenched Barcelona is a characterless sprawl of boring buildings and identical roads. Without the map, you would get lost, because everything looks the same, and of course you would get lost either way, because you keep skipping to the missions using the GPS map-screen icons. And the less said about the soundtrack the better. I cannot remember a single piece of music, except the thing you hear on the load screen, because you spend a lot of time on the load screen.

After a dozen hours in Wheelman's company, you will have seen most of everything, but you've more or less seen everything in a fraction of that, and the promise of an openworld game that concentrates on what you can do with a car is long forgotten. There are some highs, but they all come early, in the thrill of your first Air Jack or Cyclone, or the first hilarious ragdoll enemy death or the sight of Vin Diesel on a scooter. After that, nothing really changes. It's all smoothly presented, accessible, and easy enough to play for a few hours, but it has very little to offer beyond not making you especially angry. Perhaps Vin Diesel is the new Sonic after all.

5 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (40) Latest comment 3 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • bad09 #1 3 years ago

    I liked it, fun silly insanely over the top. From the demo it's like GTA and Burnout got touchy behind the bike sheds and out popped this little one.

    Mind you still undecided if I'll buy at full price, very unlikely I'll pay 30-40 notes for it.
  • gilroyneil #2 3 years ago

    So its wheely-bad then?
  • UncleLou #3 3 years ago

    Not really surprised - the previews sounded decentish, but the gameplay trailer published the other day looked terrible.
  • superjag86 #4 3 years ago

    Not a surprising score from my impressions of the demo.
  • Doctor_What #5 3 years ago

    I really enjoyed the demo - the graphics were pretty awful, but the game was surprisingly fun. It felt very old fashioned, but the simplicity was quite appealing in these days of 'hold L2, then push up and X to perform the manoeuvre'. I still might pick it up, but it was always looking like a bargain bin guilty pleasure.
  • DFawkes #6 3 years ago

    I'm, still havng this, it was one of the best demos I've played recently. The main issue from the review is it all sound a bit one note, but I just want pretty much an extended version of that excellent demo, so I don't think I'll be disappointed :)
  • DUFFMAN5 #7 3 years ago

    I agree with DF, my copy should be here today, play right through to the end and then wack on my April swapsies/sale list.
  • Darren #8 3 years ago

    So those early 80-90% scoring reviews may have been misleading then...?

    I can't say I'm surprised that EG gave the game 5/10 as I thought the demo was a bit middling; initially silly and fun but then I realised how rough and ragged the whole thing was. It screamed out 6/10 to me so the game getting an average score here is no surprise to me.

    It'll be interesting to see how it fares on other sites though, it seems the Americans at least like it...
  • Darren #9 3 years ago

    @gilroyneil - "So its wheely-bad then?"

    Nope, it's just wheely-average! ;)
  • Darren #10 3 years ago

    @Doctor_What - The Wheelman is just a penny short of £18 on the PC so that is perhaps the best way to experience the full game at the moment. It's likely to look better if you have a decent rig since it uses the Unreal Engine 3 which, IMO, runs much better on PCs than consoles (and supports AA with Vista!). Paying almost twice as much (£30+) for the console versions is certainly more of a risk.
  • muscleblade #11 3 years ago

    "It'll be interesting to see how it fares on other sites though, it seems the Americans at least like it... "

    Well, IGN gave it 48 wich is very low for them. They usually never go below 50.
    IGN gave Wanted 73 for example.
  • Doctor_What #12 3 years ago

    @ Darren: cheers, but I sit in front of a PC all day at work. When I get home I like to play my games from my sofa!
  • insincere_dave #13 3 years ago

    Shocker... ex-Midway game turns out to be pointlessly mediocre!
    Edited by 1 at 26/03/09 @ 08:29
  • Bongo #14 3 years ago

    I think this is pretty harsh. The game is most importantly fun, it's the equivalent of a Hollywood blockbuster, and it never claims to have a brain. Sure there might be a few flaws, and the on foot isn't as good as the driving, but if you enjoyed the demo, I'm sure as hell you'll enjoy the full game.
  • Quint2020 #15 3 years ago

    Quite a harsh review this, I played the demo through a few times and thought it was a bit of a giggle, not the best game I've ever played but a good laugh nonetheless, I've not agreed with an EG review for awhile now.....
  • Ceatlan #16 3 years ago

    I enjoyed the demo, however after playing through it a couple of times I was bored with it. The review makes it seem like the game is just the demo over and over again which I could understand resulting in a low score for a game that showed some promise but never went anywhere.
  • DFawkes #17 3 years ago

    I agree with you Quint2020, it is a tad harsh. It's not unusual nowadays for EG to be among the most pessimestic/optimistic on the web. If you took all the scores and used the olympic socring system of discounting the lowest and highest scores, EG would never get a look in!

    I could see the main points well enough, but I couldn't see anyone thinking this is average. Shit, I could understand, and good, but just average seems harsh, almost as if i isn't good enough to judge harshly properly. Does that make sense?
  • TheComedian #18 3 years ago

    There is no way that read ANYTHING like a 5. I was expecting an 8, or a 7 at the least. :S
  • riz23 #19 3 years ago

    The demo felt like Midtown Madness with some half baked vehicular combat tacked on. Just not good enough in this day and age. 5/10 is accurate.
  • andywilkie35 #20 3 years ago

    From my personal experience of the demo, this was a very kind score
  • Thunderbolt #21 3 years ago

    Although I did enjoy the demo it was average at best which is reflective of the review score.

    Saying that I'll pick this up when its around the £20
  • bluem4gic #22 3 years ago

    Me getting the PC version even though I have the choice of the 360 or PS3 version. Unlike some people I don't care which console version I play on as long as I can get the game cheap. We are in a recession.

    @Doctor What

    You talk like it is so hard to hook up a PC to a TV these days

    DVI to HDMI sound through ATI Graphic Card 4870 :)

    No different to hooking up your 360 or PS3
  • Zebula77 #23 3 years ago

    What was interesting about the week this demo came out, is that the Riddick game also had a demo out. The difference in quality was immense. Vin never felt like Vin in Wheelman, but was instantly recognizeable in Riddick. Not getting this. Might be getting Riddick.
  • Gnort #24 3 years ago

    @bluem4gic

    It's not actually that simple, because your console can stay by your TV, but unless your PC is a dedicated gaming rig, you'd have to keep moving it back upstairs when you wanted to do boring, PC things on it again.
  • bluem4gic #25 3 years ago

    @Gnort

    Not everyone has their PC in their bedrooms and some people I know have 32 inch HD TV in their rooms for their consoles in order to not disturb their rents or housemates. So it is not as hard as you make out. Unless you don't have the rig to play it.

    Either way up to you guys. No way I paying more than 17.99 for this game. Same for the poor souls who will buy Wanted Weapons of Fate. That is definitely not worth the 34.99 price tag on consoles!

    It's gonna be a fun experience but it's a appetizer for the Chronicles of Riddick: Dark Atena. I played Escape for Butcher Bay back when I was at University and to this day it's still one of the most underrated games of it's generation. I wish Starbreeze the best of luck second time coming as the game deserves to go triple platinum at least.

    Looks like I will have to import the American PC or PS3 version as I can't wait the extra three weeks for it's release here in the UK

    EFIGS anyone :p


    Edited by 2 at 26/03/09 @ 10:13
  • ryohazuki1983 #26 3 years ago

    I thought the demo was decent, will pick this up when it drops in price.
  • penhalion #27 3 years ago

    This isn't helped by very blatantly elastic AI.

    I highlight this one phrase because I am always complaining about it in all other racing games. Yet in games like Burnout etc. etc. they completely ignore this stupid trend of having elastic AI. Basically elastic car ai negates any and all skillfull driving that we as players do. Because no matter how good you become, the game is always cheating it's way back to you.

    How the frak is this the first time a game has had points knocked off for it. If reviewers had highlighted this before, then modern games would not be including it still!
  • Machetazo #28 3 years ago

    @ Darren. Agreed. The demo gave the impression of a 6/10 game, all-day-long. I was hoping it would reach up to the 7 at some point in the full game, but at mid-price, I could entertain getting it; but like I think you said in the thread, it's very much a game you play when you aren't embroiled in, or need a small break from, a heftier title.
    A fair bit of the review mirrors aspects that showed up just in the demo. Unfortunately, it also confirms that I was right to heed them when the issues did flag up, as I played. Neither do they iron away, as I'd hoped, but they actually increase in effect and magnitude of influence, as the game continues! Not good.
  • bonson #29 3 years ago

  • Darren #30 3 years ago

    @mem - Hmmm, so who to trust... an EG reviewer who can spell, capitalise, punctuate and paragraph correctly as well as articulate his views in as objective a way as possible... or a poster who clearly can't because his post is so damn difficult to read in the first place! ;)
  • Baranga #31 3 years ago

    So this is Burnout Paradise with guns and Vin Diesel, then?
    Sold.
  • captain-future #32 3 years ago

    "Vin Diesel is the new Sonic!"

    epic. just epic. :-)))
  • Waldo #33 3 years ago

    The demo was good dumb fun, but I wouldn't pay full price for this.
  • darc #34 3 years ago

    spectral tiger WTF?
  • Retroid #35 3 years ago

    Not surprised: the video footage Playr kept showing didn't exactly look great, and while I enjoyed the demo it really felt like a touched-up PS2 game from years ago in actual gameplay. Or Midtown Madness 3-ish
  • Gearskin #36 3 years ago

    Yeah, Rockstar must have bought every single game journalist out there. Every single one.

    You still around Ultimo? Still being a cock? What opportunities are you referring to? The chances to make yourself look stupid?
  • JayKwon #37 3 years ago

    Perfect review imo, these were almost exactly my thoughts, except for the sonic part:).
  • migasUK #38 3 years ago

    not a bad game, at least 6
  • Slipstream #39 3 years ago

    You see I loved the demo. But once it was up and they displayed all of the 'stunning features' this game had, I realised I had seen it all in the demo...There doesn't appear to be much else going for it, which is a shame because I pegged it as a game that that would reward the persistant player with unlockable driving and shooting skills.

    Don't get me wrong, I could probably sit through this game until the end, but I couldn't see myself playing it again afterwards, or dealing with the repetitious side missions.
  • markgreyam #40 3 years ago

    It's really getting frustrating that rubber-banding has become the replacement for actually coding decent racing AI. I can appreciate that there is a fair challenge involved in creating racing AI that can provide a realistic challenge first time through without being unfair, but weak cop-outs like rubber-banding just cheapen the experience. I'd almost prefer that the opponents were slightly cheatingly fast and you just had to be good at it, as opposed to having their speed dynamically altered in response to your abilities. Then I suppose crap people would complain at it being too hard, so it's probably hard to win in this case.

    The demo was really promising for this game; yet another Midway "knock-off of a genre game done by much less technically-skilled developers" surprise (/sarcasm), but personally I have a soft spot for any sort of open world game (and Midway, to be honest). Games that are a little graphically rough around the edges like this one always strangely endear themselves to me, kinda like say Driver : Parallel Lines. So personally I'm disappointed to see this getting only half marks. Although I agree with the sentiment that while this game is worth getting, it's not worth paying full price for. And with Midway beyond help now anyway, there is no point in blowing money getting this before it inevitably hits the bargain bins in the near future.

    Also, came for the review, stayed for the inevitable Crofto commentary. Never change your profile blurb, please, Leo. The purity of your incredible arrogance is a joy to behold, and it would be a shame if this prime example of what is wrong with the internet were to ever be removed.