West/Zampella to work with EA
With new studio Respawn Entertainment.
Ex-Infinity Ward bosses Jason West and Vince Zampella have created a new studio called Respawn Entertainment that will work exclusively with EA as part of the EA Partners program.
Crucially, this means West and Zampella retain ownership of their own IP.
"Respawn Entertainment marks a fresh start for Jason and me," said Vince Zampella in a statement. "For the past decade we led a great development team and poured our hearts into creating an epic game franchise.
"We're very proud of what we built - and proud that so many millions of fans enjoyed those games. Today we hope to do it all over again - open a new studio, hire a great team, and create brand new games with a new partner, EA."
"We're excited," added Jason West. "Now that the team is in control of the games and brands, we can ensure that the fans are treated as well as they deserve." Oof.
The studio will focus for now on assembling a "world-class" team, so send over a CV if you fancy signing on.
EA Games boss Frank Gibeau added: "This is the start of a great publishing partnership - one that I expect will develop blockbuster game franchises. Jason and Vince are two of the top creative leaders in the entertainment industry. At EA, we're honored to be their partners and to give them the support they need to hire a team and return to making incredible games."
You may also like...
-
Glorious Technicolor 49
-
GeForce GRID: Can Cloud Gaming Match Console Performance? 41
-
Day Z: The Best Zombie Game Ever Made? 132
-
Game of the Week: Ghost Recon Future Soldier 24
-
App of the Day: Penny Time 9
-
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Review 132
-
Gravity Rush Review 69
-
Dragon's Dogma Review 140
-
New Star Wars franchise to be unveiled next week 122
-
Diablo 3 Review 245
-
Rockstar to push Max Payne 3 "to its limits" on high-end PCs 63
-
Sony patents method to interrupt your gaming with an ad 171
-
Wii U Aliens: Colonial Marines is best-looking version because of console's "more modern tech" 117
-
How The Elder Scrolls Online hopes to avoid repeating Skyrim bug fiasco 39
-
Dirt Showdown Review 89
Comments (50) Latest comment 2 years ago
Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Hopefully EA wont be cunts to these guys like Act were.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Then again, if you want to make $100m games, I guess EA or Activision are your only choices.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I say 12...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
EA is essentially funding the company in exchange for Publishing rights for 1 or more of their IPs.
Basically, EA has to hope that W&Z sell millions or they've just flushed that money down the drain and will own nothing after all is said and done despite funding the studio.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
the new studio promises to position its leadership team as "the owners of the intellectual property they create".
Good move by EA me thinks and if West & Zampella win their court case that'll be Medal of Honour, Battlefield and Modern Warfare EA will have access to.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Fixed.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I think they twigged that if you hassle people and steal all their money they just bugger off. As they saying goes, you can shear a sheep many times, but skin it only once. We'll see, but I think we owe them the benefit of the doubt in the short term.
I wonder if the IW chaps own the 'modern warefare' brand? If not people will probably ignore any new game they make and buy any trash that Acti shovel out under the COD banner - worked for World at War, and that was pish.
EDIT: where does this leave the medal of honout update. They are rolling that out as a COD beater at Christmas. Add that to Battlefield, and you have a big stable of modern military shooters. Not good sense, surely?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
ta-dum-dum
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
This quote from the studio intrigues me. Are EA really not going to want a slice of the IP ownership pie?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
EA is much more into the laissez faire approach these days.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Although I do hope they've got some sort of in-house gym facility. Those two sure love their donuts.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'm confident that this won't be the case. As part of the EA Partners program they receive funding from EA in return for EA having exclusive publishing rights, it's a good system that works for both publisher and developer.
Besides, EA is earning massive PR points by showing themselves as a supporting publisher rather than a controlling one such as how Activision are being portrayed throughout this saga. People love the "new" EA, they're not going to want to throw that away.
EDIT:
"This quote from the studio intrigues me. Are EA really not going to want a slice of the IP ownership pie? "
They have exclusive publishing rights under the EA Partners program, as long as the relationship remains healthy they don't need a slice of that particular pie.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Hopefully, some nice new games will be born out of this, beside MW series.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
But anything that shoves Acti's nose in the dirt is good news.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Names are tricky mind...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
You seem to know quite a bit about this EA Partners Program, any good links for any information about it? Interested to read a bit more about it.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Maybe they just intend to do a lot of wanking over ponds.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
After I sell my dear car I won't go to a judge to cry about how much heart I put into taking care of it while it was mine. I don't get this.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
West and Zampella clearly made a power move. It also appears that they had intentions after MW1 to jump ship and form their own company since MW brought in over a billion I believe. Trying to get the second game called only MW proves that these guys were planning to take the MW name away from Activision. I do not know any company that would be happy if the talent tries to take away their money producing project. If West and Zampella wanted to leave then they should have just left instead of trying to basically F*** over Activision. It was the greed of West and Zampella that caused this whole mess.
They should have did the same thing Bungie did and leave their money making IP to the company that owned them outright and instead keep their company name and employees. If West and Zampella truly believed in themselves, creating new multi-million dollar IP should not be an issue for them. If West and Zampella thought more about keeping their company name instead of taking the big time IP things probably would have gone a lot different. This way everything would have gone down much smoother and it wouldn't be the crap that it is right now.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I've heard it mentioned a lot here on EG actually and sort of pieced it together. Valve and Crytek especially speak very highly of the program, it was described by long time EA sceptic John Carmack as being "much more than just publishing deal" and more of a "menu of support services" where Valve took one set of options for Left4Dead, Crytek picked a different set of options for their projects and iD, during their time as an EA Partner before leaving for Bethesda took another set of services for Rage.
If you google for it you'll see a number of news reports and interviews that mention it but EA doesn't seem to have a dedicated page for it, which is a shame because I'd love to know more about the inner workings of it myself.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Fresh new shooter...zero chance for something else than shooter
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I wouldn't worry, if you look at the companies signed with EA. Bioware, Criterion and Valve, all have free reign over their creations, EA knows talent when they see it, to the extent that they are aware of their own boundries when they make such aquisitions.
Good buy, and a very symbolic name, Respawn considering the situation and genre they specialise in.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Actually I think you're right and I was probably wrong earlier. It sounds like a much better deal for a studio that wants to be able to think and create more independently (although we never know the fine print of the contracts) so hopefully this will free them up to make the games they'd really like to.
In a way I hope they don't have rights to the Modern Warfare name, because that whole brand just leaves a bit of a sour taste in the mouth and this is the perfect time to bury it and start something anew.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
In a way I hope they don't have rights to the Modern Warfare name, because that whole brand just leaves a bit of a sour taste in the mouth and this is the perfect time to bury it and start something anew.
I hope they do something other than simply bring out a MW clone, which I gather is what they wanted to do and what started the whole mess with Activision. Off the top of my head I'd love a steampunk game of some sort. Someone let them know.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show