Sly 3: Honor Among Thieves Review
Stealing our hearts, yet again.
Version tested: PlayStation 2
We've never quite been able to get our heads round why Europe spurns the lovable Sly Raccoon games. They're among the finest platformers to grace any platform (never mind the PS2), more than holding their own against the esteemed Jak and Ratchet titles. Full of wry wit, charm, slick playability, wonderful visuals and top class production values, they should be routinely grazing the top end of the charts.
Which couldn't be further from the truth.
To put it into some kind of Sony-related context, even the alarmingly low-selling ICO (around 25,000 units shifted in the UK) massively out-sold the original 2002 Sly title - by an estimated nine to one. Estimated, because the Sucker Punch-developed platformer didn't even scrape the Top 200 PS2 best sellers of 2002 (that's less than 3,500 copies). And to add insult to injury, last year's superb sequel sold just over 7,000. How is it that an acclaimed series from the platform holders themselves can flop so dismally in a territory that loves its platforming titles? It's a mystery that Agatha Christie herself would have been proud of.
Normally, by the time the third game in a series arrives (on the same platform, in less than four years), we're slightly bored of running over the same ground. Not so with Sly and the gang. There's something heart-meltingly endearing about each of their adventures; it's the gaming equivalent of Scooby Doo or Danger Mouse. You know roughly how it's all going to play out, and the formula is so well worn that it's hardly going to inspire yelps of surprise from the household pets. But when a game manages to deliver 15, 20 or more hours of satisfying entertainment, we're strangely happy to get more of the same.
Band on the run

Sly's ability to scurry over narrow pipes allows for some pretty crazy level design.
As ever, the story is one of the main attractions, and Honor Among Thieves picks up where the last one left off. Poor old brainy turtle, Bentley, has suffered a crippling injury that's confined him to a wheelchair, and Murray - the hapless, lumbering pink Hippo - blames himself for the incident. Wracked with guilt, Murray troops off to the Australian outback to find inner peace. Hooking up with an Aboriginal guru, he rejects his life of violence for a life of spiritual meditation.
But when his old gang find themselves in a bit of a jam, they talk him into using his brawn for 'peaceful' means, and coax him back into the fold in time to do battle with their latest set of adversaries. In this instance, the nefarious Dr M is attempting to crack the Cooper family vault, and has gone as far as building a fortress around it - so in order to put a stop to these evil plans, Sly must put together an Ocean's Eleven-style gang of specialists to infiltrate the vault and claim back his family's legacy.
As with the superb second game, each 'episode' takes place in a hub-style environment where nine or so 'jobs' must be undertaken in order to progress. In terms of the feel and the formula, the gameplay hasn't really changed. In fact, the opening Venice-based level is almost a carbon copy of one of the latter stages of Sly 2, which tends to suggest the game's quick turnaround involved a fair amount of corner-cutting.
Sly return

Wheelchair-bound he may be, but Bentley's a mean pick-pocket.
Once again, each episode opens with a brief overview from nerd-central Bentley, giving you a whistle-stop tour of the plan at hand with a quick rundown of what each character's supposed to do. Not everything goes to plan, of course, but on the whole you'll play for the majority of the time as Sly, while the remaining missions are split evenly between Murray and Bentley (later, you even play as a variety of other characters, without wishing to spoil it).
Exactly like last time, each character has their own unique characteristics and abilities, and all are upgradeable. These are bought with the cash you harvest from broken objects and downed aggressors, but by far the most effective means of building up a stack of loot is to sneak up behind your target and pluck their coinage from the little pouches that dangle from their behinds. Some upgrades are obligatory, so it's always worth picking pockets and smashing up anything that looks fragile.
So, as you might have gathered, the core of the game remains steadfastly the same. Sly can still land on a sixpence, you'll still be able to pull off the same improbable jump manoeuvres as before (yep, the old 'double jump and circle' to land on anything that sparkles), and the combat combos are as basic-yet-satisfying as ever. Murray's still full of hilarious bravado and biff-bang-pow missions, and Bentley's as nerdishly loveable as ever - even more so now he's in a wheelchair and capable of hopping from side-to-side while in it. And, yes, the game's still pleasant to pick your way through, being just the right side of challenging when it needs to be.
Comic capers

Split screen action, but pretty throwaway stuff.
From a technical standpoint, it's just as lavish as it ever was, with that living-breathing cel-shaded comic book feel that no-one else has carried off with such aplomb. Every character has a bunch of cute distinctive touches that add to the experience; not just in terms of the little animations at which Sucker Punch excels, but the little audio flourishes that underpin everything the game does. From the first episode onward there are little interchanges that you feel like you're eavesdropping on, from characters singing away to themselves or snatches of conversation. Such things add so much colour to a game, and it's an area so few titles bother with.
Although we did stumble through one notable area of slowdown in a tiny segment of billowing smoke, the rest of the game comes across as a masterclass of how to make a videogame look fantastic. The way the platforms yield to your weight when you leap on them, even the way things break apart. Layer all of the animation, and the incidental touches we've mentioned with a fantastic script and sympathetically pitched soundtrack, and it's a game you can't help feeling good about while you're playing. Even the controls and camera feel spot on. There's barely an area that doesn't feel just 'right' - and that includes dumb sentry AI. Yes, even that seems to work perfectly within the context of the game. You know the rules, you know what you can and can't do, and the whole game works from that point onwards.
Given that almost everything about Sly 3 seems practically unchanged since the last time out to begin with, it's a pleasant surprise to find that there's actually much more to it than initially meets the eye. It's absolutely rammed with mini-games, for a start, with all manner of driving, shooting, sniping, chasing, and flying interludes breaking up any remote chance of the game settling into a monotonous groove. In the main they're top-drawer examples of how to turn a bog-standard platformer into a bewildering pot pourri of game styles. Some might find the 'here-comes-the-mini-game' parade a little wearisome, and wish Sucker Punch could just focus on platforming, but we enjoyed almost every one of these interludes. They're consistently well-paced, never outstay their welcome and add much needed variety.
Cooper trooper

Sneaking over guards' heads is always the most efficient way to sneak around undetected.
Another new addition is the optional Master Thief challenges. Each episode contains around nine of them (to go with the nine or so mandatory jobs), and generally link up with tasks you've already pulled off but ask you to do them, say, within a time limit, or without taking significant damage. Interestingly, the game doesn't actually inform you that they're available, but should you go back to the game menu, there they are awaiting your attention - should you feel the need to go for 100 per cent completion. To be honest, most of the Master Thief challenges are just throwaway extras, but it's nice of Sucker Punch to go to the trouble of putting them there for the real diehard fans. Think of it as a 'hard' mode, which is probably as good a way as any of tackling the accusations that the game's too easy.
The presence of four individual Two Player challenges is another throwaway-but-welcome new addition. First up, you get a Cops and Robbers split-screen mode where one player controls Sly and the other takes charge of Carmelita Fox, with Sly trying to nick stuff in a Capture The Flag manner while Carmelita has to stop him. Nothing much to see here. After that, there's a co-op Hackathon game, where both of you control little spaceships while wave upon wave of attackers swarm you. Very Robotron, very retro, very throwaway. Next! Biplane Duel and Galleon Duel are, again, hardly essential unlockables, offering little in the way of long-term excitement. Are they nice to have anyway? Hmm, we could live without them.
One new addition we haven't mentioned yet that's pretty much entirely pointless is the '3D' mode, which lets players don 1950's 3D specs and get a headache while items of scenery pop out in front of their eyes. Given the fact that it's not compulsory, we probably shouldn't complain too much, but the effect isn't that great (it never has been, has it?), and it arguably only serves to put you off what you're doing. After a couple of sessions with it, you'll most likely just get on with playing the game the way your eyes can actually deal with. You'll save yourself a headache, at the very least.
More greatness

Two-player challenges: fun for a while, but that's it.
Given that most people around these parts never bought either of the first two Sly games, pointing out that the third one is kind of more of the same will be a bit lost on you. More useful, perhaps, is to simply point out that it's up there with the best platformers ever made.
Sly 3's rammed to the gills with heart-warming interludes, a lock-tight script that keeps you wanting more, and features some of the most loveable characters to have entered the pantheon of videogaming history. If they made Sly Racoon soft toys, we'd probably buy the set - and yours truly doesn't even own soft toys, if that tells you anything. That the game itself is still tugging at our heartstrings on its third incarnation is also a good sign. Sure, it's not especially new or revolutionary, but what it does is serve up a consistently varied and entertaining package of short, sharp tasks that rarely frustrate, and nearly always make you smile. Any game that manages to deliver gift-wrapped fun the way Sly does has to be worth a look. Just don't ignore it this time, eh?
8 / 10
You may also like...
-
Retrospective: Star Wars Episode I Racer
-
Face-Off: Final Fantasy 13-2
-
Why Devs Owe You Nothing
-
Game of the Week: Catherine
-
Digital Foundry: PS3 Skyrim Lag Fixed?
-
Mass Effect 3 Demo: The First 20 Minutes
-
Who Killed Rare?
-
App of the Day: Ascension: Chronicle of the Godslayer
-
Epic's Sweeney on graphics tech: "the limit really is in sight"
-
Face-Off: The Darkness 2
-
Gotham City Impostors Review
-
Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning Review
-
EA evaluating FIFA Street features for FIFA 13
-
The Darkness 2 Review
-
Catherine Review
-
Grand Slam Tennis 2 Review
-
Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 Vita Review
-
App of the Day: Sir Benfro's Brilliant Balloon
-
Catherine launch trailer is looking saucy
-
Sony admits "dropping the ball" with Demon's Souls
-
One Piece: Unlimited Cruise SP Review
-
Metal Gear Solid: The "Lost" HD Remasters
-
King Arthur 2 Review
-
CD Projekt: Witcher 2 intro cinematic "the most expensive asset we ever created"
-
Skyrim patch 1.4 now live for Xbox 360









Comments (52) Latest comment 6 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Just like I was whining on in a different thread about console FPS games not looking at Halo when building their aim assist system, anyone working on a platformer should definitely have this on their reference list.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Everyone buy it for the love of GOD! If anyone is disatisfied I will refund them personally*
*This does not consitute an actual guarantee of repayment and is for demonstration purposes only.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
What I would like to know is if they can bring a new game out every year why cant Ninty bring a new Mario game out every year. Just more of the same would do and it would get the cobwebs off the Gamecube.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
So it's not that hard to find.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Am as genuinely excited about playing this through with my son at Xmas as I am about getting stuck into any new DMC game. Great series.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
http://shop.uk.playstation.com/product_detail.ph p?partno=9431329
It's £19.99 now, however.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
woot
/orders
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
/cancels 19.99 + delivery order
/places 14.99 inc delivery order
/pats finian on the head
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Try it, you might just like it!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Which kinda sucks.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I know I'm in the minority here but I might have to give this one a miss.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I agree to some extent but there are games out there that look 'kiddy' but still manage to sell well. For example, the excellent Pikimin looks incredibly kiddy but sold respectibly.
I think sly's failure to sell has more to do with the fact that the main character is not that apealing to main stream tastes. I mean he's not got the immediate charm of Mario or the coolness of a Jack & Daxter........
(Edited to show this statement is my opinion not 'true' as krudster quite rightly critises)
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Remember those hooks you can swing on using your cane? Right, I can grab those with pretty much exactly 50% probability, despite my best efforts. And since you have to traverse a series of them in one level and I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong I randomly drop down to the bottom of the room. Not hard, just very very frustrating.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Have you not heard. IT IS. just with a diferenct appearence, name, personality and voice.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"I think sly's failure to sell has more to do with the fact that the main character is not that apealing to main stream tastes."
I don't buy that (not aiming my wrath at you here BTW). A good marketing company could make a field of mouse traps appeal to an accident prone octopus. Sly is no less marketable a character than Mario, Spyro or Crash.
Low sales in the UK are perhaps down to a bad marketing campaign, or a low marketing budget (the pr company could have done their best I concede) but the character appeal should be small fish under the might of a good sales campaign.
EDIT: Just to expand on my response to your actual comment. I think "main stream tastes" are driven by good ad campaigns to a greater degree than is often credited. Selling snow to eskimos is the old cliche, which is born of fact.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I like the idea to play with the "foxy" detective
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I whole heartedly agree that marketing is a major factor in the sales figures of a game. I'd be naive to think otherwise!! But I seem to remember there being quite a bit of media coverage and Ad campaigns for Sly 2 but it obviously didn't seem to help!
I think the 'selling snow to Eskimos adage' also serves the game buying public an injustice. Yes the original NFSU sold mainly because of marketing (and its 'urban' theme) but would the same people have bought the sequel, if the first game was complete shite?! No, it’s because the first game was actually half decent…………….. (cant believe I said that \ shudders…….)
I remember that GTA3 originally didn’t have much marketing to begin with. Through word of mouth (and developing notoriety in the press) it sold shed-loads! Of corse subsequent GTA’s had phenomenal ad campaigns, but you can’t deny that some games can sell okay without marketing by simply being good games…….
Comment below viewing threshold Show
So..£17.99 you say? Sold! To the man in the fez!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"It's absolutely rammed with mini-games"
Wasn't keen on the minigames in the first one. Thankfully only rented the second and found more of the same. Hoped the third wouldn't be so reliant on this sort of filler. Oh well.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I mean, I really liked the first one, and very thoroughly enjoyed the hard mode in the first game (which I'm proud to say I completed fully!).. The style and all, and the beautiful platforming gameplay is really excellent, but I feel the above-mentioned part restrains and colours the whole experience in a way that I feel I really can't love the Sly games 100%, I'm holding back quite a bit.
If Sly could only be a bit more sly and snappy, it would all be, imo, soo much better.. And more successful too, I bet.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'm not saying good marketing is the only way to shift a product. Word of mouth is very powerful and the example of GTA3 that you mentioned is spot on. I'm just not sure that pure coverage alone if what makes a good ad campaign. A Sly poster on the side of every bus won't shift copies if the poster design sucks.
Also, regards my snow to eskimos comment, last time I looked (which was admittedly about a year ago so things may have changed) about 80% of game purchases were impulse buys, with no reference to reviews or other objective comment. The sad truth is that readers of EG such as ourselves, who base their purchases on reviews that they trust, are in the minority. Most game sales occur purely because of a good ad campaign.
Anyway, I don't want to split hairs and we do seem to agree for the most part.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I agree 100%, it's definitely a sad (and depressing) fact that a large portion of purchases are made based on marketing and hype alone. It's criminal that games like Sly get over looked for more mainstream purchases like Fifa Street.
But should we be so critical of peoples (arguable) ignorance to good games and the choices they make? As you say, we are arguably less vulnerable to buying games based on marketing because we are (arguably) more knowledgeable on games - but when it comes to buying a brand new car we may appear to be the equivalent of ‘Fifa street buying morons’ to Jeremy Clarkson
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show