Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Gears of War Review

Xbox 360 Review by Kristan Reed

7 November, 2006

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

What do you expect from Gears of War? Does your fevered imagination place you in the white heat of mankind's very survival amidst the shattered remains of a once-proud city and a vicious, uncompromising alien threat? Do you picture a true next generation audio-visual feast so incredible that every scene looks like the most improbable rendered cut-scene where every monster you face looks like some of the grisly abominations that Capcom used as boss monsters in Resident Evil games? Do you fully expect to be left slack-jawed and powerless to resist maxing out your credit card to buy that high-definition TV and surround sound set-up that you've been hankering after? Could it be the perfect splicing of Halo and Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter that you've been looking for? Could it be the 360's big system seller this Christmas?

Or are your expectations so stupidly high that even a game as gloriously polished and relentlessly entertaining as this can leave you somehow let down? Maybe you're just so sick of the barrage of hype over the past 18 months that the endless pre-release coverage has had precisely the reverse effect. Could it be that the steroid-pumped character design of the COG war machine inspires nothing but bile-fuelled apathy every time you see Marcus Fenix's improbable jaw line? It's possible that you've played way too many shooters down the years to get excited about one that's got a prettier skyline than all the others. Or could it be you're impossible to please?

Me? I've lived through both sides of the argument several times over. I've drooled over the pre-release teaser videos - the ones that made it look more like a tense horror shooter than this year's Brute Force. I've sat through CliffyB's excellent presentations and wondered how it could possibly go wrong. I've marvelled at the technical feats that allow Epic to render glorious scenes of shattered majestic architecture and realised that spending silly money on that giant TV was worth every penny. I've also been fearing the worst - that Epic would ruin it with bullet-headed characters, grunting dialogue and a woo-hah save-the-world premise. Worse still, my early X06-based impressions suggested that Gears of War could end up being merely a template shooter with more emphasis on taking cover. An unsophisticated but riotously entertaining duck and gun, if you will.

'Gears of War' Screenshot 2

Someone needs to teach these guys to use cover. Cuh.

Just as contradictory as the arguments that surround the game, Gears of War is at odds with itself. It's a game with the most spectacularly beautiful backdrops and subtle graphical effects you've ever seen in a videogame, and yet within those incredible environments takes place one of the most pure, uncompromising, simple gaming experiences you could possibly have. The premise is as basic as it gets - shoot and try not to get shot by the determined Locust race that are hell-bent on killing every last human. As much as Epic tries to personalise the game with a cast of characters and some basic justification to your trail of destruction, it's about as relentless a shooter as we've played in years.

For the record, you play the disgraced war veteran Marcus Fenix, busted out of jail by his old pal Dom Santiago to aid the Coalition of Ordered Governments' (COG) desperate fight against the mysterious Locust race, thought to be a mutated version of Sera's native life form. The main problem with the lizard-like Locusts isn't just their determinedly violent nature and intent on wiping out all of mankind. No sir. What really makes them especially bothersome is that they reside in a complex system of underground tunnels deep beneath the mantle of Sera, making their whereabouts difficult to pinpoint and their arrival utterly unpredictable. Mere minutes after the game's kick-off, it's apparent that the Locusts can tunnel to the surface at will, making even the most straightforward journey across the planet's surface a hazardous one that's broken up into a regular face-off against them. Right there and then, Epic manages to explain away why enemies spawn out of the ground right in front of you, and it quickly sets the pattern for the game design.

'Gears of War' Screenshot 1

Marcus' singing prowess always got the Locust horde going.

And so, in true Bungie '30 seconds of fun' style, the same design ethos that served Halo so well is in evidence throughout Gears of War thanks to a combination of challenging-but-fair enemies, a forgiving recharging health system and a well implemented control system that puts an interesting twist on the familiar two-stick system that serves shooters so well.

As alluded to earlier, Gears of War's combat hinges on making good use of cover - something which fully justifies the game's use of a third person view. You'll quickly learn that even on the game's 'casual' difficulty that you can't just run around Rambo-style and expect to last more than about seven seconds. Instead, each and every door frame, piece of rubble and column becomes a vital ally in your ability to fight back - but also becomes just as crucial a part of the Locust's defence. With that in mind, Epic has devised an intuitive context-sensitive control system to simplify the process of taking cover and firing over the top or around the side of whatever you're hugging. Simply pressing A against any cover point (illustrated with an icon prompt to make it doubly clear) puts you in the appropriate defensive position, while squeezing the left trigger not only puts you in the over-the-shoulder aiming mode (think Resi Evil 4) but zooms in the reticule to give you the best possible chance of getting a bead on your relentless foe. Pulling out of cover is, again, a simple process of either pulling away from the cover point or giving a further press to, for example, dart between door frames or vault over the top of a low wall. Sprinting, again, is dealt with by holding down the A button while moving forward, allowing you to rush between cover points in a crouched position - complete with shaking war reporter cam view adding a touch of panic to the proceedings. It's a slick, almost perfect balance of functionality and usability that lets you slip into the game without spending more than a minute getting used to how to play the game.

'Gears of War' Screenshot 3

Fashion sense wasn't the Locust's strong point.

Once you're clued up with the controls, the game quickly settles into a series of often-prolonged duck-and-cover sorties as the Locusts begin to rip Emergence Holes through the concrete all around you, and from start to finish Epic does enough to keep all ends of the spectrum happy. As with any shooter, the toughest problem to nail from developer's point of view is coming up with a set of enemies that provide the sort of challenge that's always fun and satisfying. On the one hand you don't want the enemy AI to be too predictable, but nor do you want your arse handed back to you every time you pop your head out from cover.

There's a temptation at this point to grumble that most of the grunts you meet in the early part of the game are a little too one-dimensional. We're talking about the type of enemies that are content to remain entrenched behind cover, and consistently provide easy opportunities to pick off their exposed parts whenever they peep out to return fire. On the other hand, even the DroneLocusts are extremely well defended enemies that can often withstand a decent amount of punishment before they'll go down. And while you'll often take the initiative to do the flanking, it's interesting when the same happens to you and you're suddenly ambushed because all your squad mates are lying incapacitated. All we'll say is, if you really want to enjoy Gears of War from start to finish, take the initiative, be careful and don't play it on 'casual'.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Gears of War on Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 747 in total | next 50 »

1-50 | 51-100 | 101-150 | 151-200 | 201-250 | 251-300
Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
krudster [mod]
07/11/06 @ 17:27
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Car crash - this way.
Dirtbox
07/11/06 @ 17:28
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/reads review...

NOT BETTER THAN HALO
Edited 1 times, most recently on 07/11/06 @ 17:47
ecureuil
07/11/06 @ 17:28
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
omg!
Camburano
07/11/06 @ 17:28
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bah!
BravoGolf
07/11/06 @ 17:28
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So ... as good as Halo!
Hunam
07/11/06 @ 17:28
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No better than halo! :D
disc
07/11/06 @ 17:28
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
YES! 8/10! I WIN! A COOKIE! JUST AS GOOD AS HALO! DOES IT HAVE MOTORBIKES!? I LOVE YOU EUROGAMER.

krudster: Good review. It sounds like a great game if you enjoy shooting.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 07/11/06 @ 17:36
Lutz [mod]
07/11/06 @ 17:28
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was gonna deletethe first comment if it was a "first!!!1", but as it's Krudster... ;)
Tiiti
07/11/06 @ 17:28
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
WHAT a suprise! :)
Edited 1 times, most recently on 08/11/06 @ 09:07
Xerx3s
07/11/06 @ 17:29
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/cancels preorder
Psychotext
07/11/06 @ 17:29
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit amphetamines
bonker
07/11/06 @ 17:29
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Seems a more balanced review and score than the other reviews to me - same old FPS/TPS stuff with next-gen gloss.

ZzZzZzZzZz

Keyz
07/11/06 @ 17:29
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I knew it wouldn't get lower than 8.
morriss
07/11/06 @ 17:29
#14
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
kcbasjhcsjsonysonysonykvbvflhbvjfd
Psychotext
07/11/06 @ 17:29
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Lowest "pro review" score on the net so far... you just had to be different. lol
hamstand
07/11/06 @ 17:30
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
refreshing.
gizmo
07/11/06 @ 17:30
#17
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Not as good as Super Smash Bros then?
ecureuil
07/11/06 @ 17:30
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I looked at all the pictures and decided that an 8 seems about right. :)
boabg
07/11/06 @ 17:30
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Micro$oft.

/drinks
Benno
07/11/06 @ 17:30
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
ooooo mmmmmmmyyyy goddddd
brandon-flowers
07/11/06 @ 17:30
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
finally a 10!

WTF 8!?

DrDamn
07/11/06 @ 17:30
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I see they left room to up the score following more extensive multiplayer testing ...
JediMasterMalik
07/11/06 @ 17:30
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
lol Xerxes, don't lie.

Gonna read it in a bit, just wanted to see what the comments would have started as. I am amazed at 1up giving it a 10 after what they said about it though, alot of flaws to mention and they gave it a 10, weird. Otherwise though the game looks great.
Duckula
07/11/06 @ 17:31
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Region free???

??
captainrentboy
07/11/06 @ 17:32
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's strange that a site journalist would make a post,the first post infact, to provoke a bit of outrage,and conflict :/ I haven't read the review yet as I've got to shoot off to college,but an 8 seems fair enough.I'll still be buying it first thing,infact I'll hopefully get it on the Tuesday as I work in Game :)
tiddles
07/11/06 @ 17:32
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
the fanboys are gonna KILL you for lowering their Game Rankings score... :)
souljah
07/11/06 @ 17:32
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
DUCK AND COVER!!!!
Rusta
07/11/06 @ 17:33
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well if you gave CoD2 7/10 and I like that, then this is a must
Lex_Luthor
07/11/06 @ 17:33
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
At my signal... unleash fanboys!
Eighthours
07/11/06 @ 17:33
#30
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oddly, the review text in most places seemed more positive than the 1-up review!

The game's basically just being marked down because it's nothing "new" then, right?

(Hang on, didn't you guys just give FFXII 10/10?)
lemon
07/11/06 @ 17:33
#31
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
*gasp*

...teehee
Foundry
07/11/06 @ 17:33
#32
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
And so it begins.
JackB
07/11/06 @ 17:34
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Teamxbox - 9.6
1UP Review - 10/10
Gamespot - 9.6
Yahoo Games - 4.5/5
Xplay(TV) - 5/5
Official Xbox Magazine - 10/10
IGN - 9.4

Eurogamer 8, why does that not surprise me, when Chromehounds got a 4...

Doom got a 9 from Eurogamer. And here's a really funny one. COD 2 and Perfect Dark Zero both got 7's. Yeah, it was splitting hairs between those 2 shooters, but one thing is for sure, neither could compare to DOOM! Now that's a 9 for sure! LOL.

Good stuff. Reviews you can count on... Do they pick their review scores by playing darts after a few pints? LOL!
Edited 2 times, most recently on 07/11/06 @ 21:11
spindizzy
07/11/06 @ 17:34
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No mention of Sony bias yet? ;-)

Well, from skim reading it, it looks like this would probably be a lot of fun. And the graphics do look absolutely gorgeous.... so if I get a 360 at Christmas, this will be top of the list of games I want to play.
lambtron
07/11/06 @ 17:35
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
's funny

I don't own a 360 and I was kind of meh about this game.

But everything negative you have to say doesn't put me off at all - I kind of like silly machoism (i.e. 80s action films like Commando and Predator). I KNOW its stupid and completely improbable and in the real world has no place. But in light entertainment I like it!
Yossarian
07/11/06 @ 17:35
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
not enough spiky hair
Rambaldi
07/11/06 @ 17:35
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What's the big deal with an 8? What's the bid deal with it not re-inventing the wheel?

/sticks on Feeder and wonders why shite like Arctic Monkeys have to be 'new'
Razz
07/11/06 @ 17:35
#38
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
:D
Helios
07/11/06 @ 17:35
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
When does this ship to the UK?
JetSetWilly
07/11/06 @ 17:35
#40
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Otters noses, ocelots spleens, wolfs nipple chips. Get em while they're hot.
SwedBear
07/11/06 @ 17:35
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ahh, it's the same thing as usual from EG. It's not innovatinve enough so therefore it's not more than an 8 ;).

i liked the review though and since I actually do not mind it not being that super long it just confirms that this is the game for me.

Looking forward reading more about multiplayer.
BTW - no mention how the game plays in Coop mode? But you maybe didn't get more than one copy i guess. Would have been fun to see how Coop was on one machine though.
Yossarian
07/11/06 @ 17:36
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
needs a Gambit system, all this fighting yourself instead of having the game do it is tiring
binky
07/11/06 @ 17:37
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
From what I can tell, the only thing it's been marked down for is a lack of empathy with the main character?
DrDamn
07/11/06 @ 17:38
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
> Teamxbox - 9.6
> 1UP Review - 10/10
> Gamespot - 9.6
> Yahoo Games - 4.5/5
> Xplay(TV) - 5/5
> Official Xbox Magazine - 10/10
> IGN - 9.4

Seems like most of those also based the score on the potential of the online element - which until you get the full release will not really be rateable.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 07/11/06 @ 17:38
Dodgymat
07/11/06 @ 17:38
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Does this mean EG are also going to update the Chromehounds review ?
richardiox
07/11/06 @ 17:38
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds good, nothing that new granted but good nonetheless.
krudster [mod]
07/11/06 @ 17:38
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Offline co-op is fine, but I hate split screen. I'm waiting until I can play it on Live before commenting much. The gameplay is exactly the same, apart from the fact that you can revive one another - making it slightly easier to progress.
Lex_Luthor
07/11/06 @ 17:38
#48
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"needs a Gambit system, all this fighting yourself instead of having the game do it is tiring"

The gambit system is optional, but don't let that get in the way of the bitterness.
Yossarian
07/11/06 @ 17:38
#49
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"What's the big deal with an 8? What's the big deal with it not re-inventing the wheel?"

Eurogamer have a fetish for games doing something new, unless lololol they're on a Sony platform
ralphwolfenstein
07/11/06 @ 17:38
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
An EG 8 is as good as any of those scores

I think criticising a game for 10 hours solo playtime is odd though - I want to be able to finish it!"

Comments: 1-50 of 747 in total | next 50 »

1-50 | 51-100 | 101-150 | 151-200 | 201-250 | 251-300

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery