N3: Ninety Nine Nights Review

And you will know us by the trail of dead.

Version tested: Xbox 360

Ninety Nine Nights? More like two hundred and ten nights, because that's precisely how long it's taken for Microsoft to get around to releasing a new Xbox 360 game in Europe.

Yep, when Dead or Alive 4 hit the shelves way back on January 27th, it kicked off the most prolonged first party release famine there's ever been following the launch of a new console - an incredible seven months without a single boxed product from one of the biggest game publishers in the world.

Fortunately for Microsoft, high-profile third-party successes (notably Oblivion and GRAW) helped enormously to plug the gap, not to mention various Live Arcade titles. But as the platform holder, its inability to deliver content for most of its console's early lifespan is odd to say the least - especially with rivals breathing down its neck.

My aching wrists

Today's release of N3: Ninety Nine Nights ought to herald the start of the machine's fantastic second wave of titles, but the critical response upon its release elsewhere in the world has been muted to say the least. Despite being a celebrated collaboration between Phantagram's SangYoun Lee and Q Entertainment's legendary Tetsuya Mizuguchi, the game's largely been condemned for being little more than a minor evolution of the Dynasty Warriors formula. In other words a visually flash action-RPG where you take on thousands of enemies with an intense amount of button mashing. It's RSI in a box.

'N3: Ninety Nine Nights' Screenshot wally

Where's wally? The orb spark attacks have to be seen to be believed.

Perversely, this makes us even more curious about the game. Is it just the achievement points that beckon, or are we just suckers for punishment?

Unless you're already a big fan of Dynasty Warriors (in which case you'll love this and disregard the score), the chances are the merest genre association with KOEI's long-running series could be considered something of a curse. You might have hoped for a large scale Onimusha, Ninja Gaiden or Devil May Cry, but no. It's definitely Dynasty Warriors territory we're treading here, but somehow far more interesting than you might imagine.

With that in mind, you'll know the drill inside out and back to front. N3 might shake up the settings, scenarios and types of enemies, but the action is very familiar indeed - and as such, you have to work hard to shake off the preconceptions before you come to really enjoy it. Played from seven contrasting and often overlapping perspectives over the course of the 30-odd missions, the premise nevertheless remains consistent at all times. Armed with a deadly melee weapon of some sort, you take on entire armies of orcs, goblins, and even frogs in a blizzard of flailing limbs and steel, while the neon swoosh provides the necessary visual feedback to the blur of frantic button-mashing going on in front of the screen.

Dead rising

'N3: Ninety Nine Nights' Screenshot stop

Stop me if you've seen this one before.

Regardless of whether you're controlling Inphyy, the 17 year-old female Temple Knight, or taking on the humans as vengeful Goblin warrior Dwingvatt, it's a game that adheres to Bungie's mantra of being thirty seconds of fun over and over. In N3's case, it's simply one massive rumble after another, where you and your small band of allied forces take on incredible numbers until you've decked as many of them as you want to, before heading off to some other pre-determined part of the map to hunt for more. Having survived the onslaught of willing subjects and left behind a trail of dead, you'll encounter disproportionately powerful 'boss' characters. Forcing you into actually using strategies and mastery of the controls, the bosses can be a bit of a jolt at first, causing frustrating Game Over situations at the end of half an hour of concerted slaying. Going from hero to zero in a matter of seconds often comes with little warning.

The more you stick with N3, though, the more it seems to mysteriously grow on you despite never really changing a great deal from one mission to the next or even from one character to the next. And yet before N3's tutorial's even played out, the premature conclusion to draw is that it sticks rigidly to basic and well-worn gameplay mechanics that are strangely primitive at times.

Almost every attack centres around chaining various combinations of X and Y together in rapid succession, with continual stabs of either reaping disproportionate reward. Unlike the more hardcore offerings in the hackandslash genre, N3 appears content to take directional context out of the combo equation entirely, leaving the novice player to lay to waste entire armies by mashing X or Y repeatedly. Occasionally adding Y to a string of Xs - or vice versa - delivers an awesomely effective attack, meaning there's little requirement to learn the more complex manoeuvres that get added to your range of attacks as you level up. Once you settle on a few powerful moves, the only other thing to worry about is charging up your orb attack gauge. As with the Onimushas and Devil May Crys of the world, N3 spits out red orbs from everything that you kill, acting both as experience points and as a means of charging up your all-powerful orb attack.

Spark of genius

Once you've harvested a set amount of orbs, you can then unleash a devastating assault on the masses around you, which in turn spit out special blue orbs. Strategically, it's always best to save such bursts of activity for when there are literally hundreds of enemies around you, so that your whirling dance of death catches as many foes as possible in the few seconds available to you. On the rare occasions that you manage to charge up your blue orb meter, you then have the chance to massacre entire armies in a truly spectacular blitz that manages to deliver the kind of scale that you expect from a next-gen imagining of an old idea. It's like when 2D shooters started giving players immense screen-clearing uber-attacks, except these are in 3D and often awesome in their scale and majesty. It's worth playing just to experience the rush of wiping out 1000 soldiers at once, and arguably the game's trump card. Once you've done the orb spark attack on one character, you want to see them all. It's a cunning ploy.

After a few hours of play, you start to base entire level strategies on what's coming next, and in that sense there's a real rhythm to combat and orb harvesting - always saving these devastating attacks for those tricky sections where you'd otherwise end up swamped. Needless to say, the feeling of becoming this all-conquering war machine becomes surprisingly addictive. It's like the inherently simple combat at the core of the game becomes as unimportant as a side-scrolling shooter being all about hammering a fire button. As simple as much of the game is, and as much of a level-grinding exercise as it can be, the key moments near the end of each character's story arcs always seem to make it worth seeing through.

In addition, the knowledge that another new character is around the corner is an excellent means of dragging you through the game, especially when it becomes apparent how different all the characters are. Some are slow but powerful (like the priest, Klarran, or the troll), some are super fast (Dwingvatt), while Tyurru's bizarre water attack gives the game a whole new dimension. By the end of it, you've not only seen numerous distinctly different combat styles, but enjoyed an overlapping storyline which completely turns the tables on the whole good-versus-evil premise. Few games can make you feel a little guilty for your actions, but by the time you've seen the story play out from seven different angles, you'll have a massively different opinion of N3 from the one you started with. The main problem is, it's extremely easy to write off N3 well before any of this will become apparent.

Casual murder

'N3: Ninety Nine Nights' Screenshot chaos

The game looks stunning at times, but you soon get used to the chaos.

And yet, as much as we enjoyed N3 overall, all the criticisms you'll hear trawled out will be more than justified. The combat, for instance, is unforgivably basic for a game of this stature and importance. Chock full of invitations to completely button-mash, it strips the game of any true depth, rendering it largely unnecessary to bother to learn the more complex combos that eventually appear as you work through the level-up process.

Stood next to any major action game or even RPG with action elements, its combat feels like a casual introduction to the genre rather than the definite article that it could so easily have been. Admittedly, there is the option to keep going back to maps to earn better gradings, and eventually play more difficult versions of them, but the incentive to do so is limited. The other problem, of course, is the standard of enemy AI. If the hack fodder weren't so completely dense it might be more satisfying to kill them, and the same thing tends to apply to the main characters as well. Exploits might not seem immediately apparent with some of the more hardcore enemies, but once you find them it can make the game look a bit stupid.

Talking which, visually N3 veers between being utterly spectacular to cringe-inducing, with some hideously unoptimised sections displaying some of the worst slowdown we've come across on the console. Tyurru's screen-filling orb spark attack, for example, slows the game to single-digit calamity every single time you use it, while numerous other over-ambitious sections with way too many enemies on screen send the frame-rate south way too often for our liking. It's all very well filling the screen with massive amounts of detail, but not at the expense of the gameplay.

Also, we have to question what the hell's the point of HD if developers are going to nullify crisp visuals by effectively blurring everything not in the immediate foreground? All too often, you see these potentially startling, sweeping views of massed battle, only to wonder who smeared Vaseline over the screen. Perhaps the most pointless design decision of all was to often leave the player completely obscured by enemies, leaving you totally oblivious to where you are, and just hammering the buttons until the crowd disperses. In effect, the ability to throw massive amounts of characters around the screen is a willy-waving exercise that doesn't work on a gameplay level. If doing this constantly obscures the player's view or slows the game down, what's the point of that? I'd rather beat up less enemies that I can actually see, and ones that appear to care about surviving.

Combo dumbo

'N3: Ninety Nine Nights' Screenshot flowers

I really don't recall any flowers being in the game!

In tandem with this is the way the combat system is locked into the animation cycle. For example, when you're taking on a particularly tough boss, you'll often launch into a combo, only to miss and get caught on the counter because you cannot respond once the move is in motion. Being unable to cancel a lengthy spinning combo animation in reaction to the onset of someone else's hugely powerful manoeuvre is recipe for frustration. If it means 40 minutes of replaying the same level to get to that point, you won't be amused, and it's a regular complaint until you suss the means to avoid such situations (like waiting for them to miss first!).

But eventually such minor niggles fade into the background alongside all those other little things that bug you about games. What you'll get out of N3 is the relentless pounding excitement that transcends the initial gripes. Yes, it is a basic battleground button masher; yes, you do go through the same types of encounter over and over again; yes, it is a bit clichéd. On the other hand, the cut-scenes are occasionally worth watching, and, as the fragments of the storyline start to piece together, it becomes one of those games that's greater than the sum of its parts. That by no means excuses the developer for the catalogue of flaws in the game, but there's still a mindlessly enjoyable game in there if you're prepared to stick with it for a few hours. The lack of co-op or online modes is an oversight, though, and once you're done with the campaign, that's likely to be the end of it.

On a superficial level, N3 represents our worst fears of next generation gaming: that of giving tried and tested templates a cursory lick of paint, charging top whack for them and expecting people to get excited about that fact. Some of you will rightfully want to take a stand against that sort of thing, but for those simply looking for an uncomplicated action RPG with often stunning production values, it's far better than first impressions might suggest. When we started playing N3, we had this down as 4 or a 5, but by the end we enjoyed it enough to think of it as a solid 7, but whichever way you look at it, N3: Ninety Nine Nights is never the classic it deserved to be.

7 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (69) Latest comment 6 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • pinhead #1 6 years ago

  • alimokrane #2 6 years ago

    The fairest Review I've read about the game so far. Thank you Eurogamer, Got the game yesterday and I have been playing it since. it has its flaws but Damn pullin a 1000 Combo can be so freaking fun!
  • TakeTheVeil #3 6 years ago

    good review.. i find with these games that the true value only comes thru when you reach the end.. so id agree with the 5 rating going up to a 7 if you stick with it
  • pinhead #4 6 years ago

    Liked the demo, I will pick it up once it hits the pre-owned bins though.

    /* patiently waits for emergence day.
  • coojam #5 6 years ago

    I'd love these sorts of games so much more if they didn't have any of the silly effects like flashing purple lines as you swing you weapon, explosions as you hit an enemy and a giant score in the corner of the screen.

    I hate to say it, but make them a little more "realistic" (ala Dead Rising) and you'd have a riot of a game on your hands.
  • Darkedge #6 6 years ago

    intersting - i'll get this when it drops in price.

    another interesting thing abotu this game is the time its taken to get here - MONTHS.
  • #7 6 years ago

    7 isn't ordinary, it's pretty good.
  • absolutezero #8 6 years ago

    Dead Rising =/= Realistic. It has a zombie kill count in the screen aswell you know.

    I got this on Monday from America, finally a Region Free game that I actually wanted to play.

    Its alot of fun, sure there are a few niggles and the game itself is inherently shallow but I really don't care, I have fun when I play. I like the characters, the story is alot more silly and fun than the DW series of games aswell. Each new character unlocked is like a little treat, because while controlling exactly the same, they play alot differently from one another. Especially the water loli of doom.
  • coojam #9 6 years ago

    Edit: Actually, I can't be arsed to argue.
    Edited by 1 at 25/08/06 @ 15:53
  • ssuellid #10 6 years ago

    Almost agree with disc. Trail of dead are excellent.
  • krudster #11 6 years ago

    Water lolly of doom, heh.

    /nicks
  • Darren #12 6 years ago

    I must admit I was expecting 5/10 tops seeing as EG tend to rate games lower than their competition so I'm surprised at it getting 7/10. I thought the demo was pretty mediocre personally and my opinion seemed to be supported by the middling 4 to 6/10 scores the games has been getting from other websites and magazines.

    EG's review does nothing to change my opinion of the game and with so many better games on the way for the Xbox 360 over the next few months I really can't be bothered with, nor will I have the time for, N3.
  • IAmBatman #13 6 years ago

    Looking forward to this hitting the sales.
  • krudster #14 6 years ago

    Darren, we can only call it as we see it. I was well aware of the 'other' scores, but hadn't read anyone's review, so this is my objective assessment. I just don't agree that a game as fun as this deserves a measly 6.
  • EmiliasHorse #15 6 years ago

    I will have a bit of this.

    /chop
  • TripSkyway #16 6 years ago

    Cool, was the story any good I didn't understand it when I played through.
  • krudster #17 6 years ago

    Story's neither here nor there, but well rendered and neat the way it's told from so many conflicting perspectives. It's the usual earnest fantasy stuff, but some of it's quite funny and even endearing once the cynicism dissipates.
  • Totoriko #18 6 years ago

    Told ya all it was crap
  • TripSkyway #19 6 years ago

    Nice to hear, I don't know if I have the energy to play through it again in English. That last boss was a nightmare.
  • millerlfc #20 6 years ago

    'In effect, the ability to throw massive amounts of characters around the screen is a willy-waving exercise that doesn't work on a gameplay level.'

    I think willy-waving is a term that could be descirbed the Xbox 306 overall. And the PS3 is about to run in screaming "mine's bigger than yours!" while Nintendo skulks around in the background mumbling "it's what you do with it that counts..."
  • tomdominer #21 6 years ago

    "and you will know us by the the trail of dead"...

    is this a smart comment, or a typo?
  • gaijin #22 6 years ago

    "the the trail of dead"

    two bands for the price of one...
  • Grim... #23 6 years ago

    It should be '3N', not 'N3'.
  • UncleLou #24 6 years ago

    I think willy-waving is a term that could be descirbed the Xbox 306 overall. And the PS3 is about to run in screaming "mine's bigger than yours!" while Nintendo skulks around in the background mumbling "it's what you do with it that counts..."

    Let's just hope Nintendo actually finds out, then, because as much as I am in love with the concept of the controller, I haven't really seen a game yet that interests me.
  • The12thMonkey #25 6 years ago

    I had a good couple of plays through the demo, and at face value, it's exactly as the review described. Gonna have to purchase, I think.
  • spongebob #26 6 years ago

    and you will know us by the the trail of dead ... they got that one good song...

    anyway, I thought EG would give this 5 or 6 tops. Maybe I'll buy N3 second-hand when I get X360 this Christmas.
  • captainrentboy #27 6 years ago

    Demo was alright,I'm not really big on hack and slash games.Like the review said the 'vaseline effect' throughout was particularly annoying,as was the slowdown,and I only managed a measly 850 hit combo :(Naa,the next purchase for me will be Dead Rising,I might get this when it's £25.
  • toy_brain #28 6 years ago

    Wow, I wasnt expecting Eurogamer to give it a 7 - as they usually give DW-style games a right ol' slating (or am I thinking of Gamescentral?).
    Sounds like it might be worth a buy after all - but I think I'll wait a month for SW2 to come out so I can decide which is best then.

    (Actualy I'll be getting SW2 anyway as I collect those kinda games - but mabye N3 will have dropped in price by then, or be available 2nd hand)
    Edited by 1 at 25/08/06 @ 19:17
  • Darth_Flibble #29 6 years ago

    I wanted to like the game but it's just average, the boss fights look annoying (I've seen the video review at GT) and quickly got bored of the demo

    I might get it when it's £18
    Edited by 1 at 25/08/06 @ 19:57
  • Scimarad #30 6 years ago

    Based on the demo, this game is a fairly enjoyable but pretty basic version of Dynasty Warriors. I think because Dynasty Warriors has had so many incredibly similar updates its detractors always seem to ignore the things that made it so good in the first place (If you are a fan, obviously) and therefore don't comment on their absence in similar games.

    The thing I found most glaringly absent in the demo was the sense that there were other heroes on the battlefield and other skirmishes taking place. In DW you always get reports from across the battlefield and you have to decide where you want to help out. There seems to be none of that in N3.

    I still found it pretty enjoyable though and will probably get it when it drops in price.

  • sajtion #31 6 years ago

    i guessed the review score again
  • Darth_Flibble #32 6 years ago

    VG+ is selling the US verison (region free) for £30 if that helps anyone
  • RealityCheque #33 6 years ago

    coojam: that flashyness and neon trails is what I like about it! RL = Boring.
  • KillahSouljah #34 6 years ago

    Graphics looks poo. Thought 360 could do better.
  • PS3lol #35 6 years ago

    Ok I've seen it all now from Eurogamer. This is one of the worst games ever made, all you do is hit X and that's all there is to it. It's the most repetitive game ever created and it gets a 7?.

    Please don't buy this game people, go play the demo first to see how shit it really is. Or go read other reviews that are not full of BS.

    Wait for Dead rising if you must have a game with lots of enemies on screen as this is a insult to gamers.
  • KillahSouljah #36 6 years ago

    This site loves Microsoft and will always back Microsoft, they hate Sony, you can tell when they write articles about each companys...
  • Fozzie_bear #37 6 years ago

    This site loves Microsoft and will always back Microsoft,

    They just can't win can they?

    They'd just be better off dumping the scores for 360 games altogether since whatever number they put at the end causes someone to burst into tears :/
  • RedPanda #38 6 years ago

    Post deleted at 14:31:59 28-01-2012
  • EmiliasHorse #39 6 years ago

    The graphics look far from poo!

    Eurogamer are not Pro MS over Sony, they do enjoy whipping up some fanboy fever every now and then (Ok all the time).

    Played the first 4 missions and really enjoying it so far.
  • DCrider360 #40 6 years ago

    N3 IS a very decent game!!! Sure it's not perfect, but I aint had as much hack-and-slash fun since my Goled axe, Rastan days!!!!!!

    hehehe
  • RealityCheque #41 6 years ago

    I think this is the first time I've ever seen EG be accused of being biased against Sony. Especially in a review that doesn't even mention Sony.

    Some of the people posting in this thread make Blackdog look positively even-handed.
  • manic_mouse #42 6 years ago

    "360 gets another ordinary title to add to its let than glowing catalogue."

    I'm glad nobody has dignified this imbecile with a response.

    Played the demo and rather enjoyed it despite expecting not to. The graphics are actually pretty good when you consider that there are literally thousands of guys running around. I would deffinitely consider picking this up if it's going cheap anywhere.

    "This site loves Microsoft and will always back Microsoft, they hate Sony, you can tell when they write articles about each companys..."

    Where were all these people a year ago, when EG where hyping the PS3 as "the REAL next-gen" and halfing other sites scores for certain Xbox 360 games?
    Edited by 1 at 26/08/06 @ 11:31
  • kangarootoo #43 6 years ago

    Not really my kind of game at all, but I played the demo and really quite liked it. So now I'm confused. Might pick it up in the future when its reduced.

    On another note. Please can everyone simply not respond to any platform fanboy stuff KillahSouljah posts. It simply kills interesting discussions. Discussing a platform's merits is one thing, but pointless accusations of bias have no logic in them and so can't be responded to with reason. Please don't even respond in support to this comment, lets just move on. Thanks :)
  • alimokrane #44 6 years ago

    Must every article written in this website turn into a fanboy War ... Pfff
    Edited by 1 at 26/08/06 @ 12:20
  • Lex_Luthor #45 6 years ago

    Just hit ignore when you see some fanboy shit getting going. Everyone wins.

    Played a bit more of this last night, and I honestly can't understand how anyone could possibly give this game 3/10(Gamecentral). It's great fun, the scale of some of the fights really is quite impressive, and the fact there's no tearing or frame rate drops or any of that(That I've noticed) is really something. The visuals are lovely to boot.

  • Mr_Whacker #46 6 years ago

    Doesn't appeal to me. Nothing to do with the combat being light or anything but I don't like slowdown at all. Especially on a game that aims to satisfy with its visual whizz bang like this.
  • Darren #47 6 years ago

    N3 does have some really bad slowdown if you read EG's review... /wink
  • Mr_Whacker #48 6 years ago

    OK - just missed Lex's post - so whats the verdict on the slowdown?
  • Lex_Luthor #49 6 years ago

    I haven't noticed a bit of slowdown(Well... yet anyway). I'm only about an hour and a bit into the game of course.
  • smelly #50 6 years ago

    honestly can't understand how anyone could possibly give this game 3/10


    Reviews are by definoition subjective, obviously the GC reviewer didnt like it. If you read his review, he probably explains why.
  • Lex_Luthor #51 6 years ago

    He gave no better reasons than I've seen in any other review of the game, and none of them gave it 3/10. It was an overly harsh score.
  • alimokrane #52 6 years ago

    @Lex_Luthor

    the only place where I noticed a bit of major slowdown is when playing withe the young witch Tyuru during her super Orb Attack but I can understand why, the effects on that instance are huge with all the water on the screen.
  • CitizenGeek #53 6 years ago

    Who made Kangarootoo the boss.......
  • fawe3 #54 6 years ago

    This is getting annoying, im just wandering where are guys posting bloody gamerankings webpage for this one.
    Oh yea, just remembered those guys normaly post it for xbox games that get high overall there, but are ranked low here.
    Edited by 1 at 27/08/06 @ 18:53
  • Ainudil #55 6 years ago

    It is a fair score.

    It is a fun game. None more none less. Just pure fun.
  • Les #56 6 years ago

    It's Dynasty Warriors with shinier graphics and still slowdown. Given that, the score is ridiculously high. Once again a "next gen" disappointment: only the looks have been upgraded, gameplay-wise it could have been on last gen. But as even reviewers want to like the next gen games so badly, it gets away with it. In these days turning a free PC flash game into something you can download for money from Xbox Live is guaranteed to earn you a nice review... and is the biggest selling point of "next gen"
  • alimokrane #57 6 years ago

    @ Les
    oh yes because on last gen consoles, you can easily put 200 enemies at once on the screen!!!
  • darkbhudda #58 6 years ago

    I bought DW5:Empires for the 360 even though I already knew it had mediocre reviews as I had never played the series before. Had a blast. Sure some similar characters, but plenty of unique characters and weapons.

    I played the N3 demo and almost fell asleep.

    Never have I felt less like I was achieving anything when I was killing 50 goblins at once.

    7/10 is a very easy score to predict. 7/10 Eurogame reviews for 360 games score them 7/10.

    To Test Drive advertisers....
    I'm having an epileptic fit with your ads. You play them the top and the side of the screen, competing with each other, it hurts my brain just reading this site. No way am I buying your game.
    Edited by 1 at 29/08/06 @ 02:52
  • Les #59 6 years ago

    "oh yes because on last gen consoles, you can easily put 200 enemies at once on the screen!!!"

    Yes you can, they just won't look as nice as on 360, but that's about all the difference.
  • Macross #60 6 years ago

    Well I bought this game, spent the weekend playing it, and guess what? Ive enjoyed every second, and for me, whether the game is truly next gen or not, that makes it a worthwhile purchase.


    And the graphics are really nice, and the enemies fly around the screen very satisfyingly indeed ;)

    PS there are some parts of this that DEFINATELY could not have been done on last gen consoles, however many bad guys you think they they could have handled, sometimes this game just goes insane with sheer numbers, its great.
    Edited by 1 at 29/08/06 @ 09:25
  • SlackMaster #61 6 years ago

    Personally I like the DW games so I actually enjoyed playing this one. I think that the Samurai Warriors games are the best games in the genre and added something a little fresher than the DW games.
  • jonsaan #62 6 years ago

    Hey, I bought this at the weekend. I enjoyed the demo. This game really grows on you. It's not so much about the button mashing anyway. It's more about WHEN you unleash orb attacks etc. The levelling up and items are really cool as well. It's a good game and fully desrving of it's 7/10. There is much more to this game than meets the eye. If you've only played the demo then you really can't comment.
  • EmiliasHorse #63 6 years ago

    Played a fair way through the game now and it gets better all the time.
    The story is actually rather good, and while there is slowdown it is not game breaking in anyway.
    Well worth a 7/10, although I would go for 8/10.
  • krudster #64 6 years ago

    In summary, the people who have actually bothered to play this game (and not written it off after five minutes) have really enjoyed it.
  • SeesThroughAll #65 6 years ago

  • decibel #66 6 years ago

    are there 'strategies' that one can employ like in Dynasty Warriors?

    i.e. do you start off with a map screen where you can plot out basic unit maneouvres and direction? Or are all the levels linear affairs?
  • Mox #67 6 years ago

    If it would just be a bit more generous with the health top-ups at lower levels, it would be perfect.

    Dynasty Warriors suffered from the same problem, which is health replenishment by percentage. It means that, the higher level you are, the more hit points you have, the better the healing items are. So, it starts hard and gets easier. And puts a weird premium in the game on "increase item chance/quality" power-ups.
  • miiiguel #68 6 years ago

    I'm really unsure if I should buy this game or not ? Do you guys feel it's worth, or should I wait for my Dead Rising and Saint's Row pre-orders ?
  • Les #69 6 years ago

    Most reviews agree the game totally lacks any AI, be it from your team members or from the enemies. If you do nothing, maybe 1 or 2 of the hundreds of on-screen enemies come to attack you.

    If things continue this way, I guess I'll stick to PC games (the only games platform with a future, once MS has destroyed the console) and the Wii during the next generation. The only 'innovative' extra's next gen games deliver so far are shiny graphics and more on-screen idiot enemies. Terribly disappointing. And what's even more disappointing is that most reviewers reveal themselves as graphics whores.
    Edited by 1 at 31/08/06 @ 11:32
  • bauhaus #70 6 years ago

    As a long term DW fan I am really enjoying N3

    yes its repatative but in a hypnotic kinda way, very littel strategy but tactically (ie when you unleash your orb attacks) appears to be key to some levels, its good fun, graphically i think its good too, I would recomend it to any DW fans out there
  • SimonM7 #71 6 years ago

    Yes its repetitive but in a hypnotic kinda way

    Excellent line and probably the best thing said about this genre of games I've seen.