Pitts recalls making America's first coin-op

Winning battle with Bushnell, but not war.

Bill Pitts, maker of America's first coin-operated videogame, has lamented choosing the "geek path" and staying "honest" to Galaxy Game's inspiration, Spacewar!

In doing so, he handed the coin-op market to Nolan Bushnell, the man who would go on to found Atari and make his fortune. But the two could very easily have become business partners.

"He had heard of us through mutual contacts," Pitts told author Tristan Donovan in his new book Replay - The History of Video Games (re-printed here with the author's kind permission).

"He called me up and said, 'Hey, come on over and see what I'm doing. I know you're building a version of Spacewar! using a whole PDP-11 [computer] and that's gotta cost a lot of money and I just want to show you the one I'm doing because I think you're going to lose a lot of money.'"

Pitts and business partner Hugh Tuck - whose parents were funding Galaxy Game - met Bushnell in the summer of 1971. "I was curious. I didn't know what was inside their game," said Bushnell.

But Bushnell, who was working on a cheaper adaptation of Spacewar!, was disappointed by Pitts and Tuck's expensive unit, which housed a $20,000 PDP-11 computer.

Pitts was no more enthusiastic about Bushnell. "I was very impressed by his engineering skills but our game was absolutely true to Spacewar!. It was a real version of Spacewar!," he said. "Nolan's thing was a totally bastardised version."

A few weeks later, in September 1971, Galaxy Game became America's first coin-op videogame. It was installed in student hub Tressider Union, and with a cheap asking price of 10 cents a go or 25 cents for three - plus a free game for the winner - crowds flocked; at times they were "10 deep", recalled Pitt. "Everybody was really excited about it, so Hugh and I decided to build version number two," he said.

"Version number two" would cut costs by featuring two games on one cabinet, and have proper fibreglass casing. But by the time the unit was complete, Tuck's family had invested $65,000, a fortune in 1971. The cost was too monstrous to ever be recouped in 10-cent instalments and Pitts and Tuck had to give up.

On the other hand, Nolan Bushnell's Computer Space was created with bespoke hardware that needed no expensive central computer. That had meant dropping the duels and gravitational fields of Spacewar! and opting for a spaceship shooting two flying saucers instead.

Computer Space did "fantastically well" to begin with, but was tested on an audience Bushnell hadn't realised was student-dominated. When Computer Space was rolled out proper in bars across the US, the game struggled; Bushnell said it was "too complex" for the working man's beer bars. "Compared to the games that came after it looks like a flop. But I had never created a million-dollar product before," he added. "It represented a reasonable royalty stream for me." And with it, Bushnell had birthed the arcade videogame scene in the US.

Bushnell would go on to found Atari and rewrite the history books with Pong.

Pitts concludes: "The truth is Hugh and I were both engineers and we didn't pay attention to business issues at all. My driving goal was to recreate Spacewar! with coin operators on it. Nolan was much more of a businessman than I was. His emphasis was to take Spacewar! and try to drive it down a business path, whereas I was trying to drive it down a geek path by being honest to the game."

Replay - The History of Video Games goes on sale tomorrow, 19th May for £12.99. Tristan Donovan explores, in that chapter alone, every angle of the Spacewar! scene, recalling Pitts' addiction to breaking and entering disused Stanford University buildings where he eventually stumbled onto the AI laboratory and the "amazing" computer that played Spacewar!.

Bushnell also shared his experience of the first Atari Pong production line: "They were horrible. We had a bunch of heroin addicts and things like that. They were stealing our TVs," he said. "We were young and dumb is what I like to say. But we learned quickly."

Comments (9) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Retroid #1 2 years ago

    I love reading stuff like this! I was looking up the "making of" Pitfall! over the weekend thanks to buying it on Game Room and enjoying it far more than I thought I would.
  • FooAtari #2 2 years ago

    Looks like an interesting book. May well pick it up, like Retroid I love this stuff.
  • GrandpaUlrira #3 2 years ago

    Sounds interesting, but is this an advertorial or a genuine article?
  • schachmatt #4 2 years ago

    Newbie book author asks online game mag employee (maybe an aquaintance?) for possibilities of cheap advertisment.
    Employee thinks for a second, tells him to just send in one anecdote, he'll sell it as news.
  • Bertie Verified Senior Staff Writer, Eurogamer.net #5 2 years ago

    Sounds interesting, but is this an advertorial or a genuine article?

    Well, what do you think?

    I wrote this as a genuine article. If we were ever to write an advertorial on Eurogamer we'd clearly label it so. We're not meanies. Promise.

    Donovan's rep asked if we'd like to use some of the content and we said yes. I found Re-Play to be fascinating as I'm sure many of you would. But then I did only read a small part of the book - the rest might be about dinosaur ninjas or something.
    Edited by Bertie at 19/05/10 @ 10:03
  • Fletche #6 2 years ago

    "the rest might be about dinosaur ninjas or something."

    Sold! Will pick this up at some point, the history of gaming fascinates me as it makes you realise how far this industry has come in a short time
  • Acrid #7 2 years ago

    Interesting article, I think I'll take a look at this book next time I leave the safety of my home and head out in to the path of the big yellow face that burns.

    I've never heard of the 3 games mentioned here so it's off to Google for me, but finding out that these games pre-date Pong! is like a cold hard slap in the face, it's like finding out that Santa, The Toothfairy and God aren't real, except this hurts more, my faith has crumbled and I'm really bored at work and thats why I'm typing all this drivel, oh well back to pretending to work...
  • schachmatt #8 2 years ago

    Bertie: What's the news then? From your statement it's the book.
    So why did you make the news about Pitts? Why the need to camouflage its about the book?
  • GrandpaUlrira #9 2 years ago

    @Bertie. I wasn't intending to be horrible about it, by the way, but it was just something about the tone, especially in the penultimate paragraph, that seemed un-EG-like, and more like a sports interview where the second half is about revolutionary new Adidas boots or whatever.