Crysis Preview

E3: Junglist massive.

So. To start off with, we could tell you the one about how Crysis is being developed by Crytek, and how it also developed Far Cry, and about the Ubisoft / EA switch, but you probably know all that already. Or we could start with the storyline, which is basically about fighting aliens in jungles and isn't likely to excite anyone who's played more than two videogames very much. So instead, let's start with what you really need to know about Crysis: it looks superb.

Specifically, it looks great running on Windows Vista with DirectX 10. It looks swish with DirectX 9 too, as it happens, but there's a reason Crytek is showing us two videos for comparison - the difference is clear. From the way shadows move through the jungle and light falls through the branches to the smoke and fire curling around a giant alien mech that comes looming out of the darkness, it's obvious that we're looking at a whole new level of detail and realism.

"It's the next generation in Windows gaming - visual fidelity, density and immersion," says Crytek CEO and founder Cevat Yerli. But he's also keen to emphasise that it's not all about looks; the new technology, he argues, actually enhances gameplay and most definitely isn't just there for the sake of it.

"We are focusing all technology on either immersion or gameplay. If it doesn't serve the purpose, it won't go in," he explains. So yes, you'll find plenty of soft shadows, depth of field, motion blur and fancy lighting effects here - but all with good reason.

"For example, if [the technology] is about breakable objects, it's supposed to bring new gameplay. If it's about real time shadows, I need to be able to use that to read enemy presence. If it's about clouds, I want to fight inside the clouds, with an enemy in the skies. All technology is for the purpose of being a vehicle for the gameplay," Yerli explains.

Trunk call

'Crysis' Screenshot 1

All together now - 'Hiiigh, wayyy, tooo, the, Danger Zone'

Let's take the game's "bendable, destructible foliage", say. Not the most exciting of concepts on paper, but when you've seen a player fire off a round at a tree trunk so that it breaks off and comes crashing down on the head of an unfortunate enemy across the other side of the jungle - all without having to break cover - things start to make sense.

Then there's the other type of technology showcased by the game, as in the fictional kind. (NB: Those who've played more than two videogames may wish to skip the next few paragraphs.) Crysis is set in 2019, and begins with a giant asteroid crashing out of the sky to land on an island in the Pacific. The North Korean Government creates a perimiter around the crash site, but the Americans aren't too happy about this, so they send in a Delta Force squadron to do a bit of recon.

It's not long before they end up in conflict with the North Koreans, battling it out for ownership of the asteroid. Only, as it turns out, it isn't an asteroid at all - it's a giant alien spaceship, standing a massive two kilometres high. The ship generates a huge shield which flash freezes the island, and messes up the world's weather system. As the North Koreans and the Americans realise that the invasion of Earth has begun, they also realise that they now have rather more in common than they thought, and team up to take on the enemy.

Which means, as a Delta Force operative, you're no longer fighting boring old humans, but giant mechanical alien beings with highly sophisticated weapons and a thundering war cry that makes the T-rex in Jurassic Park sound like, well, a much bigger and scarier T-rex, to be honest.

But unlike dinosaurs, these beings - known as hunters - have more tricks than scary noises and big teeth up their sleeves [cunning - Ed]. For starters, they're equipped with special sensors which allow them not only to locate their enemies through sight and sound, but to quickly establish which enemy poses the greatest threat. When it comes to attacking, they have plenty of options - they can attempt to pin you down with their huge metal claws, or pick you up and chuck you over a nearby cliff, or even freeze your body before shattering it into hundreds of tiny and presumably very cold pieces.

Suits you

'Crysis' Screenshot 2

There’s only one way out of a situation like this. And it probably involves guns.

So you'll probably be grateful for the fact that your character comes equipped with the very latest in military technology circa 2019 - namely a special combat suit, which Yerli describes as being in itself "a kind of a dynamic hero."

The suit has three different modes - strength, speed and armour. "Those modes allow you to make a tangible difference, a tactical difference, at any moment," Yerli explains.

"You can increase the speed to actually dodge bullets or enemies. You can increase your strength to pick up heavy weapons, to punch harder, to actually punch trees to break them if you want... If you increase your armour, you can become a walking tank." What this boils down to in tactical terms, Yerli says, is that "you can modify your play style given the challenge you are [facing]."

For example, if you want to create a barrier between you and an enemy, you can switch strength mode on, uproot a tree and place it down as a roadblock. If you're facing a particularly nasty bunch of opponents, or perhaps just a bunch of weaklings you can't be bothered to take too long over, you can opt for the armour mode. Alternatively, speed mode lets you run away to a safe place where you can have a nice sit down and play Animal Crossing until it's all over. Possibly.

So for the most part, you'll spend the game exploring the island, fighting off hunters and getting to grips with the various options your combat suit gives you. But then, just when you're getting comfortable, Crysis will pull the rug out from under you - or rather the jungle floor. That's because the last two hours of the game take place in zero gravity, which stirs things up more than somewhat.

Mixing it up

"Zero G gaming is pretty interesting because once you've almost mastered Crysis, we are bringing a new mix to the table," Yerli says.

"Zero G is about being free floating and actually having to watch not only in front of you and up and down, but in every [direction]. Now you're also looking down and under your feet; you're not safe any more, you're not walking."

You're not in the jungle any more, either, since the Zero G levels take place in the huge alien spaceship. Which means you'll have to work out brand new ways of defeating your enemies as you face off with them on their own turf - in between dealing with the effects of zero gravity, of course.

"For example, in Zero G, when you get shot you get propelled back... And when you shoot weapons in a spin, you actually spin as well," Yerli says.

"Many gameplay details feature in Zero G only, because they're only possible in Zero G."

It's not yet clear whether the Zero G element will also come into play in the multiplayer modes, of which there are four. These include, according to Yerli, "Three standard modes - Team Match, Death Match and Capture the Flag. But all standard modes are actually tactical, and [play differently to those in] other games, because of the innovation we have with the suit and the weapons system.

"We're actually introducing new gameplay mechanics which are not available in other shooters, so it makes it an inherently different experience."

But what of the fourth, non-standard mode? Well, Yerli says, it's called Power Struggle, and it's "About the Americans fighting the North Koreans, trying to capture artefacts and bring them back to buildings. When you do [this], it unlocks new weapon trees and skill trees."

Yerli explains that this creates a kind of economic system within the game, and unlocks new ways to play - but that's all he'll say for the moment, as Power Struggle is being kept under wraps for a while longer. However, he does confirm that all the modes will be for up to 32 players.

Let's push things forward

'Crysis' Screenshot 3

We can’t look at images like this any more without shouting 'Walt! WAAAALT!'

He also confirms that there are no plans to develop an Xbox 360 or PS3 version of Crysis, stating: "It's a matter of focus... It's not a matter of stupidity, and not a matter of economics, it's really just pushing PC gaming forward."

So how long does Yerli think it will be before the PC catches up with next-gen consoles? "Actually I think that Crysis will show that [the PC] has not only caught up, but surpassed [consoles] already.

"PC gaming, Windows gaming actually, offers a superior experience to any of the other gaming platforms. We don't want to constrain ourselves now with certain platform restrictions... It's a more dynamic platform, and we can actually accommodate our gameplay design and vision to the platform easier."

Yerli isn't too worried about the future of PC gaming once the next-gen consoles arrive, either. "I think the PC market overall in total may decline, but I think the hardcore gamer base which we are targeting - the absolute fanbase of high-end gaming - will actually increase."

If Crysis plays as good as it looks, he might just be right. But for now, we'll just have to wait and wonder what the multi-functional combat suit, that zero gravity gameplay, the new multiplayer mode and those fancy technological tricks will bring to the mix. In the meantime - did we mention that it looks wicked?

Comments (29) Latest comment 6 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • oishiiniku #1 6 years ago

    Ok, so this'll look incredible on the highest of high-end machines, but how many copies will they sell? Developing a game with requirements that are higher than newly released/soon to be released next gen consoles seems a bit prohibitive to me... The gameplay innovations sound really interesting, but I'm no way plonking down 1500 quid to play it.
    Edited by 1 at 10/05/06 @ 19:13
  • ekko #2 6 years ago

    They can make profit selling the technology (game engines, etc.) to other companies.
  • floW #3 6 years ago

    hehheh, EG's right:

    WWAAALLLTTT!!!!!
  • UncleLou #4 6 years ago

    Mwuahaha, can't wait for this.

    And as for the hardware requirements: let's wait and see. Alleged system hogs Far Cry and Doom 3, to name just two, weren't nearly as bad as people had predicted. And you have to upgrade once in a while anyway, that's PC gaming for you.
  • Talha #5 6 years ago

    IF a game can sell Vista PCs, this is it. I think later versions on consoles could follow. As far as I see, the only thing next gen consoles are lacking is RAM, which might limit level sizes etc.

    That said, funnily enough, NVIdia's 6 and 7 series is advertised to be Vista and Directx capable. Maybe, just maybe, with DX10 the 7 series cards can run this game to some degree at least.

    @UncleLou: Yeah, they were not nearly as bad, they were FAR WORSE. Not everyone has an endless line of credit with World Bank like you. ;-). Take Far Cry - even after two years, there are not many cards that can run it that well. Yes, Doom is toast by now but that also took at least one year before mainstream consumers could run it well as the dev intended.
    Edited by 1 at 10/05/06 @ 19:30
  • Kay #6 6 years ago

    That second screenshot looks almost photorealistic...guess we'll have to shell out on DX10 cards to fully appreciate this.

    K
  • MrAtheist #7 6 years ago

    There arent any graphic cards available yet that use the features of DX10 (obviously with Vista and DX10 still a fair way off :-). You will need an absolute monster PC to run the DX10 'Vista' version, that goes without saying.
  • Talha #8 6 years ago

    @MrAtheist : Yeah, I know - but both MS and NVidia say on their sites that the 7 series cards are DX10 capable, if I remember correctly. Obviously that will have to be coupled with something like 18 GB RAM and a triple-core 5MHz processor.

    Anyway, what's wrong with a little hope, eh?
  • ecureuil #9 6 years ago

    "We can’t look at images like this any more without shouting 'Walt! WAAAALT!'"

    Man.. thought I was going crazy. I've just watched 9 episodes of Lost in a row, it's everywhere!
  • koopa #10 6 years ago

    Duh, PC games have the option to customize graphics options. Far Cry looked and played really good on my old Athlon xp1700/Radeon 8500, though not at highest settings (but still better looking than any console game). If you want the highest settings you'll need to spend some money, otherwise set the graphics quality to x360/ps3 level;)
  • MrWonderstuff #11 6 years ago

    I chuckled when I read that caption.
  • Kay #12 6 years ago

    Obviously the DX10 cards aren't here yet, but they will be the time Vista (and Crysis) arrives.

    K
  • Azazel #13 6 years ago

  • MrAtheist #14 6 years ago

    @Talha: I think the confusion comes from people thinking Vista and DX10 are the same thing. MS list the minimum requirement for Vista as a DX9 card, so you can happily use Vista with a 7900 or whatever as Vista comes with a special version of DX9 to ensure backwards compatability.

    If you want all the new bells & whistles of DX10 version games (there is a great article over on hardocp.com called "DX10 and the future of gaming";) you are going to need a new card - that will be £400 please says Mr ATI :)
  • BillGaitas #15 6 years ago

  • ralphwolfenstein #16 6 years ago

    It's screaming '360/PS3 port'

    within 18 months of release, I guarantee it

  • UncleLou #17 6 years ago

    Talha, I think something's wrong with your PC, frankly. :)

    I never have high-end hardware, because it just isn't worth it, and I never have to make compromoises really except maybe when it comes to AA. I am the typical Geforce 4 TI -> 6600 GT -> 7600 GT user, cards you can buy for about 200 EUR when they're new. I upgrade my CPU every 2 years at best.

    To say that Doom 3 was a system-hog just isn't true. Neither was Far Cry, which was perfectly playable on my XP 2400 at the time it was released. I frankly don't know what you mean when you say there aren't many cards that can play Far Cry even today.

    Sorry, but you exaggerate, badly. And you're doing it in every PC thread these days. Don't make me cry! ;)
    Edited by 2 at 10/05/06 @ 20:56
  • Khab #18 6 years ago

    God damn you. Now I want to upgrade this heap again.
  • Khab #19 6 years ago

    And UL is right - I can run Far Cry just fine on this Athlon 64/1gig/Radeon 9700(!). Smooth as silk in 1024x768.
  • p_p #20 6 years ago

    I wish Bethesda and Rockstar still loved the PC as much as Crytek does.
    Edited by 1 at 10/05/06 @ 22:11
  • ecureuil #21 6 years ago

    I want this game so bad, but it will be three years until I can afford a PC that can run this game properly.
  • Mashum #22 6 years ago

    Far Cry went downhill for me when the mutant monkey things started coming out of the woodwork. I hope that the zero G element to this game doesn't do something similar.

    Thumbs up for doing a PC game that doesn't have to pander to console specs though! I love my 360 but I haven't seen anything for it that looks this good.
    Edited by 1 at 10/05/06 @ 23:07
  • Feanor #23 6 years ago

    "And UL is right - I can run Far Cry just fine on this Athlon 64/1gig/Radeon 9700(!). Smooth as silk in 1024x768."

    I think the 1 gig of RAM was critical to have Far Cry run properly. That's just from what I've read - my PC barely runs the original Counter Strike.
  • Talha #24 6 years ago

    @UncleLou : Would you care to explain WHY would I exaggerate, given that I am a PC gamer myself? I am talking about playing these games at the highest settings at resolutions of 1280x1024 or above. Obviously you can PLAY all these games (Far Cry, FEAR, Doom etc) at lower quality and settings, but they look nothing like what they do at the highest settings. That's what I meant by 'playing well', not just 'playing'.

    Today, with my Athlon64 3000 and 7900GT, I can play Doom at virtually any resolution with the highest settings, but Far Cry still stutters in places, and FEAR goes downhill at any reslution above 1280, even with soft shadows disabled. One would think that something was indeed wrong with only my PC, but if you go to sites like ExtremeTech, they still use Far Cry and FEAR as their benchmarks and they STILL manage to stutter in their tests even on the highest spec cards, albeit on high resolutions.

    I agree that I should have mentioned that I was talking about the highest settings for all these games. I hope that clears things up. I also agree that high-end hardware just isn't worth it, the second- or third-fastest of the range is the best value for money.
    Edited by 1 at 11/05/06 @ 05:10
  • Svecke #25 6 years ago

    Zero G will be the mutant monkey of Crysis... I mean, how "fun" can it be to float around and not have any controll over yourself. Someone hits you with a bullet in the shoulder, and suddenly you're spinning around like crazy, hit a wall and rebounds, and end up within meele distance from one of your enemies. Who hit you. Spinn, bounce, hit, spinn, bounce, hit, baaaaaarf! :p

    Yes.... sounds like FUN! :D
  • UncleLou #26 6 years ago

    That does indeed clear things up a bit, Talha, but it makes your complaints not much more understandable. What's the problem with games that need top hardware on the highest settings in high resolutions, when they scale down well and still look good?

    When Doom 3 was released, for example, it was made clear that the "ultra" setting was for cards which weren't even really on the market at the time. And yet it looked fantastic on the "high" settings which were perfectly playable with a mid-range system. If the "ultra" setting wouldn't even have been in the options, nobody would have complained.

    It was a similar situation with Trackmania Sunrise, a game that scales down perfectly even on low-end systems, and yet people complained they couldn't run it with the max settings and all fancy effects ebabled and 4xAA. If they wouldn't have built all the effects into the engine, again, noone would have complained or noticed something is missing.

    I perfectly understand complaints about games that have horrendous hardware requirements and don't scale down well - GRAW seems to be such a game. But that's an entirely different matter altogether.
  • Talha #27 6 years ago

    @UncleLou : Well THAT's my problem, not an 'entirely different matter'. Most games don't scale down as well as Doom 3, which looked good even at 800x600. Same with HL2, which played wodnerfully even at the highest settings on my 9600XT.. But, I repeat: most top PC games at low settings just bear a passing resemblance to how they look at highest settings. In the end all I am asking is that any PC game running on a mid-range card should not look or play completely horrendous. My point is that even the highest-end experience should not be AS expensive as it is, be it a gaming PC or the PS3.

    Edited by 1 at 11/05/06 @ 08:15
  • Triggerhappytel #28 6 years ago

    Sounds good, if not quite as revolutionary as Crytek think. And I have to admit, I'm a bit jaded with another vs-aliens in a FPS. Will wait to see how their 'revolutionary' features pan out.

    Also, I wouldn't be surprised to see this make it onto the consoles within about 12 or 18 months. It is being published by EA, remember?
  • optimusprym8 #29 6 years ago

    there's always Dx9.d or whatever the non-Vista-only-Dx10 version will be...