Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Conflict: Denied Ops Preview

PC Xbox 360 PlayStation 3
Preview by Ellie Gibson

29 January, 2008

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

Everything's going all casual these days - sex, Fridays, commercially successful first-person tactical shooter series. Just look at Conflict: Denied Ops. It's in development at Pivotal Games, it's coming to PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 this spring, and as designer Terry Watts explains, it's the first time a Conflict game has been aimed at casual players.

"In the previous games, because there was so much depth in terms of the tactics and the control system, it meant people were often put off by how much they had to learn to get into the game," he explains.

"We really wanted to improve on that. We wanted to be able to give the game to someone who'd never played a Conflict title before and watch them get on with it. In previous games they possibly needed to spend a little bit of time with it to get into it, but hopefully with Denied Ops we can just give the pad to somebody and they'll have a good time."

So how do you make a first-person tactical shooter series more accessible? For starters, you don't make it first-person; Denied Ops is the first Conflict title to feature a third-person viewpoint. "We did spend a lot of time deciding that, but this game for us was about changing the Conflict brand slightly and expanding in a new direction," says Watts. "We thought we'd take a chance and try to attract new players."

Army of two

Another key decision Pivotal took when considering how to make the game appeal to a wider audience was to reduce the squad size. Now you're dealing with two rather than four men, and you can take direct control of them at any time or issue orders by pressing a single button.

'Conflict: Denied Ops' Screenshot 1

It's hard to tell whether this is from the PS3 or 360 version. Perhaps because they look pretty much the same.

Each character has a different skill-set. Graves is a sniper, while Lang is into heavy weapons. His advantage in close-quarters combat is offset by the fact he's slightly slower than Graves. Some objectives can only be achieved by one of the characters - if a computer needs hacking, for example, Graves is the only man for the job.

According to Watts, this two-man system is easier for casual players to manage and also allows them to complete missions in a way that suits their style of play. However, it's also what should ensure the game still appeals to more hardened shooter fans.

"You've got complete freedom in all the levels to go anywhere at any point, independent of where your partner's going," he says. "So there's a lot of tactics in there for both the casual and in-depth player."

If you prefer to fight from a distance you can complete objectives almost entirely as Graves, trusting that Lang will keep himself busy and follow where you lead. However, the one-button order system offers plenty of scope for developing more tactical strategies. You can order your partner to protect a specific area, to attack specific enemies, to draw fire while you make a move and so on.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Conflict: Denied Ops on Xbox 360/PC/PlayStation 3?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-28 of 28 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Eighthours
29/01/08 @ 11:48
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Explosive barrels! These terrorists are always so careless.
xAx
29/01/08 @ 11:52
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's hard to tell whether this is from the PS3 or 360 version. Perhaps because they look pretty much the same.

braces for impact
MouzerMalti
29/01/08 @ 11:59
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Conflict Denied: Ops is pretty bad if you ask me, I played the 30 minute demo... boring and just dumb. The AI is retarded. The only advantage is the option to change character any-time throughout the game.
DutchDemons
29/01/08 @ 12:11
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i hope one day a virus breaks out that infects all casual gamers...
DoKtoR
29/01/08 @ 12:12
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Casual gamer??? I'm a pretty casual gamer and the control system from the first conflict game took me less than 5mins to pick up. I'm sick of game developers treating casual gamers like idiots that can only handle one button controls... this will be one conflict that I wont touch, aside from the best thing about the last games being 4 player coop I see even less reasons to get the game.
CaptCastle
29/01/08 @ 12:21
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bah, damn tag line. It will take me all day to get that song out of my head now.

"The S, the U, the P the E the R, Super Sharp Shooter Shooter"
KD
29/01/08 @ 12:22
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Super sharp shooter tag? i like it someone knows they're drum and bass :)
Prox
29/01/08 @ 12:26
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Err I'm not sure 'casual gamers' are going to want to play a game about military dudes shooting people dead.
I think the phrase is thrown around far too much - my mum isn't going to put down Bejewelled or Brain training to try out Conflict, casual controls or not.
skillian
29/01/08 @ 12:38
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@DoKtoR: If you've played the previous versions of Conflict games and have played 4-player co-op, I doubt you're the kind of person that would normally be described as a 'casual gamer'. Although, as Prox says, the term is bandied about so much now as to become almost meaningless.
tripitaka
29/01/08 @ 12:47
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Previous conflict games were 3rd person, Conflict DO is a first person game AFAIK.
DoKtoR
29/01/08 @ 12:52
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So why alienate people who did like facets of the previous incarnations for people that aren't likely to like the game anyway? seems like a waste of a dev team to me.
Apostle
29/01/08 @ 12:57
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Casual hey? Put me right off the game, right there.
kangarootoo
29/01/08 @ 13:24
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@DoKtoR

You seem to be coming down pretty hard on them, all based on your own definition of yourself as a casual gamer. It could easily be the case that you are simply no the casual gamer audience to which they refer. Sound reasonable?

I'm not sure any two people have the same definition for what a casual gamer actually is?

"Err I'm not sure 'casual gamers' are going to want to play a game about military dudes shooting people dead"

Likewise, if "casual" means our collective parents, I agree this game would not rock their boat.

Casual can refer to someone who doesn't spend many hours playing per day, but is very familiar with games (me for instance). It could mean someone who is unused to playing games and can't be relied on to be aware of conventions (START button for pause and so on). It could mean someone of moderate sensibilities who doesn't like the idea of blasting human characters to death in realistic settings.

I think it is a little early to be forming judgements, purely on the basis of a word that is perhaps one of the least defined in this whole industry.
kangarootoo
29/01/08 @ 13:25
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"So why alienate people who did like facets of the previous incarnations for people that aren't likely to like the game anyway?"

Well, there is a core assumption on your part that this is what is being done in this case. They may be doing neither.
barnard666
29/01/08 @ 13:27
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't think anyone who posts on a games news website falls in the category of "casual gamer".
asphaltcowboy
29/01/08 @ 14:09
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
According to EDGE, it's bloody awful.
souljah
29/01/08 @ 14:16
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The S, the U, the P the E the R, Super Sharp Shooter Shooter"


Damn, I've got it stuck now!

"Super sharp shooter shooting super super super sharp shots"
Benno
29/01/08 @ 14:24
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I loved the first conflict desert storm, playing with my friends and that

but this looks fucking shite!!! I hate the fact that the devloper have pivoted (no pun intended.. actually to be fair, it was intended) from third person to first person

its cheap

i love call of duty and all, but i much prefer a good third person game to a first person game

/is very annoyed

I mean why even make this game???? There are games out there which I can tell do absolutly everything better than this game

So why even make it? why?

Whoever buys this game should die in an epic car fire

/releasing internet rage
PEANUTXXI
29/01/08 @ 16:48
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I quite enjoyed C:DS - shame they've stuffed this up. It was a different type of army shooter and they've basically dumbed it down and jumped on the FPS bandwagon.

No sale.
MORBO
29/01/08 @ 17:44
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Super Sharp Shooter shooting super sharp shots Dzzzdangdzzdzzzdzdzzzdzzzz :)
darc
29/01/08 @ 17:54
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The guy in the pic on the home page looks like he's picking his nose w/ the scope. :P
PatrickEwing
29/01/08 @ 19:59
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
fuck casual gamers, fuck them in their fucking arse.

agreed that desert Storm I & II were wicked good, this sounds like bollocks.
DoKtoR
30/01/08 @ 06:47
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@kangarootoo

Last time I bought or played a game- New Super Mario Bros (DS)... is that casual enough for you?

If a casual gamer is defined as someone who plays games on a casual basis with no specific favourite genre- then that is me.

And how am I coming down hard on anyone? Several of the comments on this game come down on it with far more harsh words than me.

@barnard666

So anyone who posts on Eurogamer cannot technically be a "casual gamer" in your opinion? (fair enough, your entitled to your opinion even if it has little basis for any fact).
Golgo
30/01/08 @ 10:49
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Note to developers: can we have a few more games with 'Ops' in the title, please? It sounds really cool and well hard.
BobsUncle
30/01/08 @ 13:11
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
C:DS = Ace
C:DS2 = Super Ace
C:V = Super Ace, ability point upgrade thingy was good as it enabled you to get 2 heavy gunners if you wanted. Only missed super super ace because they jumped on the Vietnam bandwagon.
C:GS = Shit. Apparently the point system was 'too involved' so removed it and dumbed it down.

This one = Super super shit as everything will be watered down for idiots. Maybe they should issue those old joysticks with one red button on the top to go with it.
padcrusher
30/01/08 @ 19:44
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's really a sad day when developers start dumbing down their games.
Surely no one could possibly think that the Conflinc series were in any way dificult to play, could they?
Ah well, looks like yet another one of my favourites has gone down the pan.
rubthisway
31/01/08 @ 00:03
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought that track was underground, who knew.

http://www.discogs.com/release/41100

systems
01/02/08 @ 10:27
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Does anyone else miss the heady hardcore days of Rogue Spear and Operation Flashpoint? I like my games with as many stats and options as possible, as realistic as possible.

I won't be getting Conflict: Retard Ops.

Comments: 1-28 of 28 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery