Xbox back in the red
Operating loss for the March quarter.
Software giant Microsoft has announced its financial results for the first quarter of 2005, revealing that while the company overall saw solid profit growth, the Xbox division slipped back into the red with a USD 164 million operating loss.
Revenues in the Home and Entertainment Division, which primarily houses the Xbox project, actually grew year on year - rising to USD 583 million from USD 519 million in the same quarter last year.
The operating loss in the division also dropped year on year, falling to USD 164 million from USD 204 million, which could be seen as very positive - but can equally be interpreted in light of the fact that the previous quarter, ended on December 31st, saw the division post its first quarterly profit since the launch of Xbox.
That profit, USD 84 million on revenues of USD 1.27 billion, was largely driven by sales of Halo 2, while the first calendar quarter of 2005 has been much quieter for Microsoft on the software front. The firm will undoubtedly be hoping that the current quarter will be healthier, however, thanks to the launches of Jade Empire and Forza Motorsport.
In terms of Microsoft's overall performance, a little hit from the Xbox division certainly hasn't made any dent in the giant's progress. Overall revenues of USD 9.62 billion were reported for the quarter (up from USD 9.17 billion last year), with a gigantic operating income of USD 3.3 billion (up from USD 1.3 billion).
You may also like...
-
Happy Action Theater Review
-
ModNation Racers: Road Trip Review
-
Motorola Xoom 2 Tablet Reviews
-
Sony confirms PS Vita 1st Party digital only game prices
-
Call of Duty: Black Ops has best game ending ever, says Guinness World Records
-
Mass Effect 3 Demo: The First 20 Minutes
-
Sony explains PlayStation Vita game price strategy
-
Why Devs Owe You Nothing
-
DICE working on multiple Battlefield 3 fixes
-
3DS Ambassador Super Mario Bros. game updated
-
EGTV: Eurogamer playtests PlayStation Vita
-
Halo 4 Master Chief action figure flaunts new suit design
-
Rockstar mulling LA Noire 2 development
-
Tim Schafer: publishers aren't evil
-
Apple begins Foxconn factories inspections
-
The Witcher 2: Enhanced Edition Xbox 360 trailer
-
Mojang: no plans for Minecraft on Vita
-
App of the Day: Monkey Bump
-
Face-Off: Final Fantasy 13-2
-
Digital Foundry: PS3 Skyrim Lag Fixed?
-
UK Top 40: Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning beats Darkness 2
-
Who Killed Rare?
-
Fallout: New Vegas dev asks fans what game they would like it to Kickstart
-
Sony's $50m Vita marketing campaign targets PS3 owners
-
Activision: games are relationships, "brands in people's lives"









Comments (33) Latest comment 7 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Revenue of $9.62 billion a quarter....
Jeeeesauce
Sounds like they could let Xbox run at a loss for a very long time to come if necessary.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Anyway, it's not about financial results - it's all about market share.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
They have to show their shreholders that they are making money in all their divisions, or the shareholders will put pressure on them to shut down the loss-making division.
And that's in spite of the NEED of Microsoft's to get boxes with their logos under your TV...
The way I see it, if they fail to make a profit this time around, they'll have to close the division down... XBOX2 is their last chance to make good IMO
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
iirc they only making an operating profit on windows and office, granted it is a fupping huge profit but the rest runs at a substantial loss
a conspiracy theorist would argue that they simply run the other divisions at a loss to keep their competitors small.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Windows had 2 big failures (Windows 1 & 2) before selling correctly (Windows 3) and finally spreading all over the world (Windows 95 and sequels). Same for Internet Explorer.
Anyway, they made profit on the last quarter 2004 with the Xbox division (thanks to the huge sales of Halo 2). This shows the shareholders that even with an install based of only 20 millions, profits are possible.
As they expect a much bigger success on 360 (and I really think they will succeed), huge profits will be there before 2010.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Yes, the way IE is "selling" is rather ... interesting.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Revenue of $9.62 billion a quarter....
That's not all that much you know. Many British large companies make that much, particularly if you consider the state of the dollar. Microsoft's real gain over everybody is their immense profitability, at a third of total revenue. Because they only have high fixed costs and low marginal ones, they can make huge profits from small revenues once the fixed costs are covered. Also, their lack of competition allows them to cut down on advertising and charge uncompetitive prices. Writing windows a few million times onto CD has to be far cheaper than creating windows afresh a million times.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
It's not about "selling", it's about not giving up after a failure.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I think MS have done a fairly good job of getting a lot of Japanese developers on board (something the first Xbox lacked), and the more big name exclusive titles they get on board (either by having the most attractive platform to develop for, or simply by throwing money at people), the more chance they'll have of unseating Sony.
It will be interesting to see how the next generation goes with the roles reversed (ie Microsoft with the initial sales lead and Sony with the more powerful console). I can't see Nintendo playing any significant part this time around (but maybe the Revolution will surprise me...).
Comment below viewing threshold Show
LOL! It's funny because it's true!!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'd be sorry to see Microsoft quit after all this effort. Competition is good (and funny sometimes), so I'm a happy chappy to see them slug it out with Sony. I think MS hope that the competition will wither and die, but somehow I don't think this gen will be much different to the last.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
/bows
/exits stage left
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The press garnered from the launch of Xbox 360 alone has a net value... and it's very, very much higher than you'd probably guess...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Don't get me wrong, I think the Xbox is a great console and I'm sure the 360 will also be top quality. But the timing of the Xbox 360s launch has Dreamcast written all over it (and that's nowt to do with the logo) The Dreamcast was also an excellent console and probably had the best games ratio of good games, per total games released. If Sega had of had the financial clout of Microsoft they'd still be in the console hardware business.
Anyway stuff this, what I want to know.... Is who's this Sid guy?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
LOL! It's funny because it's true!!
I hope he doesn't get an enlargement for BGiE's sake.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The Xbox will never destroy the Playstation's fanbase. There are way too many Sony fanboys for the new console to make a decent impact. Anyway, I'd rather the Revolution did better than the Xbox 360.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Mate, no one gives a toss about their profits.
Well, apart from those teary-eyed nancies who concoct scenarios where Nintendo returns to the top of the market.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
If you think Microsoft will ever cancel it's console business because it is not profitable, you are completely fucking retarded.
Microsoft is going to do what it takes to capture market share. Microsoft doesn't give a fuck about profits because IT DOES NOT NEED PROFITS.
Many British large companies make that much, particularly if you consider the state of the dollar...
What the fuck are you talking about?
Revenue isn't the means in which you judge a company. Market capitalization is the markets way of giving a value factor to a company. There isn't a British company that comes anywhere close to Microsoft's market cap. Hell, Microsoft is worth about 1/6th the United Kingdom's entire economy-- at their stocks peak in 2000, they were nearly 1/2. There isn't a European company that comes anywhere close to making Microsoft profits. Each time a European company gets big, Americans just buy it!
Allow me to put Microsoft's Xbox division into perspective for you. Microsoft lost $134 million on the Xbox in this quarter.
Back in December, Microsoft paid a $3 dollar per share dividend to its shareholders with no strings attached. Microsoft has about 10 billion shares outstanding. Microsoft GAVE AWAY $32 billion dollars in cash in a single day.
Compare a 32,000 million one day giveaway with a 134 million quarterly loss, and maybe you'll realize how completely irrelevant the Xbox's profitability failure is to Microsoft. They don't give a flying fuck if they aren't making money on the system in the present, they just want market share.
And they are getting the market share. I've been saying it since 2001, and i'll continue saying it until it has become a reality: Microsoft is going to dominate this industry, and neither Sony nor Nintendo has the capacity to do anything about it. Sony and Nintendo do not have the resources nor the brains to compete with Microsoft for very long. Before they had the experience advantage. That's gone now, too.
This industry was born in the United States, gracefully captured by the Japanese, and is now in the process of being retaken by the Americans. Europe releases N-Gage. World laughs.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Insult me! I'm a European!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
BGiE is the guiding light. Praise him and worship him.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
BGiE.. You're the most retard, laughed at person I've seen on this forum to date... Even that dude who believed in Jesus and wanted to save us all wasn't as bad as you....
Your numbers are wrong btw... But lets not argue about them... Here's the facts you are ignoring/missing...
If Microsoft do not succeed in pushing the XBOX under the TV's of the masses this time around, they will not only lose this supposed 'console war' but stand to lose a great many other things; the most significant for them is the stranglehold monopoly on the home OS and thus the mindshare of the world for Windows, home entertainment, and communications (web/net/chat/email/online purchases). They are being attacked on many different fronts, only this time around, there will be a co-ordinated attack at their business from many different industries that know they must break Microsofts back, or all lose completely.
I wish i could tell you what I know, but I can't. You can chose to believe me or not but what is clear is that Microsoft really do have a hell of a lot more riding on the sucess/failure of the next 'console' than games marketshare.
In time, more will become apparent to the end-consumer. I really cannot go into more depth (and frankly, I wonder if you would listen anyway).
Comment below viewing threshold Show
What the fuck are you talking about?
Revenue isn't the means in which you judge a company. Market capitalization is the markets way of giving a value factor to a company. There isn't a British company that comes anywhere close to Microsoft's market cap. Hell, Microsoft is worth about 1/6th the United Kingdom's entire economy-- at their stocks peak in 2000, they were nearly 1/2. There isn't a European company that comes anywhere close to making Microsoft profits. Each time a European company gets big, Americans just buy it!
Someone said there was a lot of revenue, and i was putting it into perspective. Also, the comment about the dollar was relating to your favourite subject - exchange rates! A weak dollar means that you don't need as many pounds revenue to equate to microsofts amount. I think the oil giants BP and Shell do pretty well, as do HSBC.
And, revenue is a way of judging the size of a company. Maybe the economist didn't teach you that
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
/gets his eraser out and gets rid of the line...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Anyway, its most likely that the ppl from MS never even intended to make the xbx profitable. If i was to launch a console and had lots of money, my primary concern wouldnt be making a profit but creating market space for future plans.
They kinda succeded in doing just that. They created a brandname that everyone knows. They succeded in creating things where others failed (such as xbl). And they got the atention of producers and game developers from around the world (and if they didnt, then they just threw in a big bag of money
Anyway, they could win or loose, your guess is as good as mine and speculating on that is pointless (just as much as the statements about it). It doesnt depend on the money. It doesnt even depend on the quality of the avarage game on the system (if that where the case, they companies such as €A and Sony would have been out of buisiness long ago). Where does it depend on? Well, kinda the X factor. Creating a name that everyone wants to be assosiated with, a lifestyle symbol as a matter of speaking. If they can indetify themselves with the system, then they wil buy it and then they will buy the games. And in that, MS has learned its lesson.