Jump to navigation
Advertisement

L4D2/Mass Effect 2 PS3 listings an "error" News

PlayStation 3 News by Tom Bramwell

12 October, 2009

EA has told Eurogamer that PlayStation 3 listings for Left 4 Dead 2 and Mass Effect 2 were posted to the publisher's Russian website in error. They've since been removed.

Neither game had previously been announced for PS3, and neither of the games' predecessors appeared on the format.

However, there have been rumours about both for as long as they've been in the public domain. Left 4 Dead 2 seems the less likely of the two to appear, mind you, given Valve's ongoing protestations that it wants nothing to do with the PS3.

Check out our recent Left 4 Dead 2 and Mass Effect 2 hands-on previews to see why that's a shame.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Left 4 Dead 2 on Xbox 360/PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 72 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Aretak
12/10/09 @ 08:37
#1
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'd be surprised if Mass Effect 2 didn't make an appearance eventually. Although I've read people suggesting Microsoft still have something to do with the IP, so maybe not.
SeesThroughAll
12/10/09 @ 08:42
#2
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's known that this IP is set exclusively for "MS platforms", so only X360 or PC. Of course the listing was a mistake.
3william56
12/10/09 @ 08:51
#3
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No news is news!
Xerx3s
12/10/09 @ 08:59
#4
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"I'd be surprised if Mass Effect 2 didn't make an appearance eventually. Although I've read people suggesting Microsoft still have something to do with the IP, so maybe not."

I doubt it. They would have to release ME1 as well and that was published by MGS. Even if EA completely owns the IP, I doubt that MGS didn't have some sort of a "release on competing platforms and DIE!" clause in the contract.
TruSmiles
12/10/09 @ 09:01
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm sure I read in Edge that L4D2 was listed as PS3 as well, which got my partner all excited until I pointed out it was probably a mistake :\
Britesparc
12/10/09 @ 09:01
#6
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm pretty sure Mass Effect is a 360 exclusive. And Valve hate the PS3, so L4D2 is probably a no-show as well.
The Bodybuilder
12/10/09 @ 09:11
#7
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm sure MS still have connection to the IP, so I believe it has even less chance of coming to the ps3.
I would say L4D2 is more likely, as EA could just get another team to do the porting.
WinterSnowblind
12/10/09 @ 09:16
#8
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Didn't they also list Forza 3 for the PS3 at one point?

I'd have no problems with the PS3 getting Mass Effect 2, it's one of the best games this generation and everyone should really play it, but only getting the sequel would be a bit odd, as the first game was heavily story based and the second directly continues, even taking most of your choices over.

I also think we need some franchises to stay exclusives, we're at the point where almost everything is becoming multiplatform. At this rate, Halo and Uncharted will be the only games left giving us reason to own both systems.
BritishBlue1
12/10/09 @ 09:21
#9
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
And so, my hopes lie dashed and bloodied on a pile of bitter jagged rocks...
SeesThroughAll
12/10/09 @ 09:24
#10
-5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
but only getting the sequel would be a bit odd

Dead Rising 2 on the PS3 and Ace Combat 6 on the 360 (and an exclusive as well!) say hi!i
Xerx3s
12/10/09 @ 09:32
#11
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Didn't they also list Forza 3 for the PS3 at one point? "

No, I think it was some marketing company using PGR4 screenshots to market GT5p.
matrim83
12/10/09 @ 09:33
#12
+9
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@SeesThroughAll

Yay for ignoring the reason behind the thought and quoting stuff out of context.
Xerx3s
12/10/09 @ 09:34
#13
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Dead Rising 2 on the PS3 and Ace Combat 6 on the 360 (and an exclusive as well!) say hi!i "

Except that with both those games, the story could be completely replaced by something else and it wouldn't impact the game.

"And so, my hopes lie dashed and bloodied on a pile of bitter jagged rocks... "

Or you could just buy it on the PC or 360.
Moribundman
12/10/09 @ 09:42
#14
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bioware have given cryptic legalese type statements about "not announcing development of ME2 for the PS3" rather than simply "not developing ME2 for the PS3". Whether this is a case of "never say never" or actual pressure from the EA cash hoover is open for speculation.

It's been suggested that as EA now own the rights, they may now have the chance to release a double pack of ME1 and 2. If this happened, and they fiddled with the engine for ME1, then I'd like to think they'd rerelease it on the 'box and the PC too... Totally right about as many people as possible getting the chance to play this fantastic game.

But only if I can have Uncharted 2 on the 360 or PC in return ;-)
Retroid [mod]
12/10/09 @ 09:54
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"However, there have been rumours about both for as long as they've been in the public domain."

Especially in the case of L4D those rumours seemed to be wishful fanboys either leaping on any mistakes in PR or... well, just inventing stuff because they *have* to come out on their platform of choice! Which just makes people hopeful.
kangarootoo
12/10/09 @ 09:58
#16
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Xerx3s

"They would have to release ME1 as well and that was published by MGS."

Well, not really. Its unlikely I agree, but being a sequel is no reason for a game not to go cross platform (assuming there is nothing else blocking it).


@donnie080208

"YES but these are action games,while mass effect is a story driven RPG in which you will be missing out a lot if youve not played the first game."

That is neither here nor there. We are talking about whether a successful game franchise might be released cross platform.

It might be argued that the lack of prequel on the same platform affects the players enjoyment on the grounds that they don't know the backstory (I would argue that "missing out a lot" is exageration and that it won't impact enjoyment very much - as have the devs themselves). But that has nothing to do with whether it might happen (which is purely a business decision).
BritishBlue1
12/10/09 @ 10:00
#17
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Or you could just buy it on the PC or 360."

My current PC sucks and uses the Ubuntu OS anyway. I'm not thrilled about L4D2, zombie games just aren't my thing. I am, however, a Mass Effect fan, the side missions may have sucked and I thought the Asari were ridiculous but it is easily a modern classic in my opinion. I will probably hold out to make absolutely certain it's not coming to PS3 but justifying the cost of a console for just one game will be hard to swallow.
GrumpyLlama
12/10/09 @ 10:11
#18
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I loved the first game, but I switched to the PS3 when my second 360 died. It would be great if they released it for the PS3 but I'm not holding my breath. Same goes for left 4 dead, though I take the point that not enough people use voice chat on the PS3.
Moribundman
12/10/09 @ 10:13
#19
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Saints Row set precedent in terms of releasing a sequel on the PS3 without having released the first part, but would they REALLY release a 2-3 year old game (however great it is) on the PS3, even assuming they had the rights to?

Doubt very much that ME1 will see the light of day on the Playstation. And if it doesn't then the whole point of it being an "epic trilogy" will be buggered.

Probably wouldn't stop the EA machine from trying to milk their new cash cow though...
Xerx3s
12/10/09 @ 10:17
#20
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Well, not really. Its unlikely I agree, but being a sequel is no reason for a game not to go cross platform (assuming there is nothing else blocking it). "

It is if the first part is integral to the story. It's like reading the LotR and starting at book 2. You would probably have a hard time getting into the story as characters have already been introduced, plots have already been set out and events have already take place.
swissorc
12/10/09 @ 10:19
#21
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I wasn't aware valve are so anti-Playstation does anyone know why this is?
Xerx3s
12/10/09 @ 10:20
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"justifying the cost of a console for just one game will be hard to swallow. "

...
Moribundman
12/10/09 @ 10:22
#23
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Xerx3s I take your point. Bioware have gone on record saying they're trying to make ME2 accessable for newcomers though. Hope they don't go TOO far in that direction tho... I haven't played ME: Galaxy but I'm quite happy to pick up the story of Jacob and Miranda in ME2.
20charactersmax
12/10/09 @ 10:26
#24
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
> I wasn't aware valve are so anti-Playstation does anyone know why this is?

Gabe used to work for Microsoft before he founded Valve.
kangarootoo
12/10/09 @ 10:46
#25
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Xerx3s

I think comparing the ME series to Lor of the Rings is stretching things a little. The ME story wasn't that complex, but more importantly a game is interactive, so a great deal of the enjoyment comes from that interactivity. I agree that a game experience can suffer a little if the player hasn't played the appropriate prequel, but I think the effect is being overstated in this case.
kangarootoo
12/10/09 @ 10:48
#26
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"> I wasn't aware valve are so anti-Playstation does anyone know why this is?

Gabe used to work for Microsoft before he founded Valve."


That isn't the reason. Gabe is quite grown up enough not to let that sort of nonsense get in the way of his business. His preference for the 360 is for reasons technical and business (mainly technical). He has been quite open about this in the past.
freakzilla
12/10/09 @ 11:08
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
IF they were to come to the PS3 I'd definitely at least try to rent, but at the same time I've got enough games. I still have 10 unfinished PSN games, infamous, currently addicted to SOCOM and a few PSP and PS2 stuff still unfinished.

Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/10/09 @ 12:08
mr_writer
12/10/09 @ 11:22
#28
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I would buy both games without a second thought. However its quite clear they won't so hard luck I guess lol.
miiiguel
12/10/09 @ 11:34
#29
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Dead Rising 2 on the PS3 and Ace Combat 6 on the 360 (and an exclusive as well!) say hi!i "

This poster clearly never played Mass Effect, because comparing the narrative structure of Ace Combat (or even Dead Rising) to ME is painfull.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/10/09 @ 12:38
Widge
12/10/09 @ 11:42
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
L4D works fine without comms. I don't have a headset on PC and people just play with an understanding of what to do and how to play.

Well I suppose you can type to each other but by the time you hammer something out the moment has passed and your face has been eaten.
Les
12/10/09 @ 11:49
#31
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Bioware have gone on record saying they're trying to make ME2 accessable for newcomers though."

They'd better. The trouble with games is that the hardcore market doesn't seem to want to play anything older than 6 months... (Unless of course it's really old and gets a new life as DD). For books, age is hardly relevant.
miiiguel
12/10/09 @ 11:51
#32
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"justifying the cost of a console for just one game will be hard to swallow. "

...


Indeed "...", I always smile when I see this "for just one game" or "the only game" (over several games, mind you...), is like saying "it's the only and only one I'd like to play, because from the other hundreds and hundreds of games I have absolutly no interrest whatsover. The only. The One.... In this thread, at least."
SpaceMidget75
12/10/09 @ 11:53
#33
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I have to say Widge that whilst L4D may work fine without comms, it works much much better with it. Once you've played enough games of L4D with comms it's very hard to go back. Especially Versus mode.

solidSnake04
12/10/09 @ 12:00
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
if valve doesnt want to port it themselves at least they should hand the job to another company and stop complaining about the ps3 being crap. look at uncharted 2, and good examples of x platform like burnout.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/10/09 @ 13:29
solidSnake04
12/10/09 @ 12:34
#35
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The thing is I own both the Xbox 360 and the PS3. Look at my game collection for both machines. As an Xbox360 owner I feel like the PS3 only owners are missing out on a very good game. Left 4 Dead. Okay Everybody here will agree that Burnout is an excellent example of x platform development. surely it isnt impossible to have L4D up and running well on PS3. Its a huge market waiting out there.
kangarootoo
12/10/09 @ 12:34
#36
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@miiiguel

"This poster clearly never played Mass Effect, because comparing the narrative structure of Ace Combat (or even Dead Rising) to ME is painfull."

The poster did no such thing. He/she simply pointed out that precedent had been set for cross platform sequels to platform exclusive titles.


"they withhold it from ps3 out of spite"

Not everyone thinks the way you do.
Widge
12/10/09 @ 12:38
#37
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I really don't like Versus mode! I've only given it a short chance though, probably don't know the strategies and nuances. I can happily do normal campaign until the cows come home though. I play L4D to get away from the old vs. action.
miiiguel
12/10/09 @ 12:39
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The poster did no such thing. He/she simply pointed out that precedent had been set for cross platform sequels to platform exclusive titles.

Even to conceptually ilustrate a "precedent" using ME and Ace Combat in same sentence = Fail. Imo.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 12/10/09 @ 13:39
Edwin
12/10/09 @ 12:43
#39
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Buying Dragon Age on the 360 as I read somewhere you get a bonus for Mass Effect 2... sweet. Mass Effect is a 360 game get over it, or buy a 360 to play one of the best games this gen.. simple.
kangarootoo
12/10/09 @ 12:44
#40
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@miiiguel

Well you are setting some pretty high (and if I may say irrelevant) standards there then for defining =fail. Other commentors had suggested that the exclusive nature of the first game meant the sequel could not be cross platform. The poster simply gave prior examples of just such an occurrence.

There is nothing conceptual about it. Neither did you need to put precedent in quotation marks. The previously referenced releases are exactly that.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/10/09 @ 13:45
miiiguel
12/10/09 @ 12:51
#41
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"exclusive nature of the first game meant the sequel could not be cross platform"

Yes, that's more like it, the "exclusive nature" as in ME1 is not a game per se, it'a 1/3 of a game which strongly relies on its narrative. Ace Combat? (and I love Ace Combat).
Anyway, I still think ME can't be mixed in general exclusive titles (and it's a mistake, a "fail" one btw) which became cross platform, it's diferent. In my opinion of course. I can be wrong.
SpaceMidget75
12/10/09 @ 12:52
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Widge, give it some more goes mate. I hated versus the first few times but it truly is one of the most tactical and original competitive MP experiences I've played. People on my FL have had similar experiences.
GreyBeard
12/10/09 @ 12:59
#43
-2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I still suspect a PS3 Mass Effect is on the cards, but probably not a for a while yet.

MS aren't pursuing exclusives so much anymore now they have Natal to focus on, and realistically if EA didn't get control of Bioware's original IPs I'm not sure why they'd have bought the company.
kangarootoo
12/10/09 @ 13:00
#44
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@miiguel

"as in ME1 is not a game per se, it'a 1/3 of a game which strongly relies on its narrative"

I'm not sure what all this really means. Quite simply, that ME1 was platform exclusive does not mean that ME2 cannot be cross platform. That is all that is being said.

You may if you wish describe ME1 as 1/3 of a game, but in practical terms (i.e. when talking about releases, otherwise known as SKUs), its just not true.
miiiguel
12/10/09 @ 13:07
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm not sure what all this really means. Quite simply, that ME1 was platform exclusive does not mean that ME2 cannot be cross platform. That is all that is being said.

Well, I think the point here is that I didn't play ME to have an high score, or to blow some shit up up in the skies, I played to live its Universe and got really interrested on th plot. I don't see ME (or any game realy) as a SKU I'm not a retailer and I suck at economy real bad (I'm pretty good at spending thoough). I'm not saying it can't, I just say you can't compare AC to ME, and one just plays ME2 and not the 1st one, he'll be missing - at least one third - of the experience, that doesn't happen with AC franchise. Anyway, I think we're starting to circle.
A bit off-topicish, I think ppl at general gaming foruns are starting to loose the focus which should be the games and the whole SKU's, sales, numbers and shit is becoming their true hobby.
Got to go now!
miiiguel
12/10/09 @ 14:05
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I bought Mass Effect for my 360 and thought it was shit, i've got no interest in the second game.

While this might sound pedantic, that undoubtable statement is probably one of the reasons I like it so much.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/10/09 @ 15:14
davisorle
12/10/09 @ 14:06
#47
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
" Left 4 Dead 2 seems the less likely of the two to appear"

And sounds as if you arent aware fully there those are not even roumors and just screw ups. Purposly or not both those title are not even considere from those publishers to be released on another platfom or you know very well that the word would have been going around endlessly.
Quixz
12/10/09 @ 14:17
#48
-2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No! Sony you can't have it :)
kangarootoo
12/10/09 @ 14:21
#49
+9
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Dr_Strange

I might agree, except mum jokes float around in their own sphere of humour, transcending all normal boundaries of taste and maturity.

And in response to yet another yawnful "platform X is better than platform Y", it was kind of funny.
Widge
12/10/09 @ 14:22
#50
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
MGS2 appeared on the Xbox without the previous game... thats quite story heavy with a lot of nods to the previous game. You don't need the previous game to play it but it certainly helps.

Comments: 1-50 of 72 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Get Games.  Download Great PC Games!

X View gallery