Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Hirai: PSN subscription a "possibility" News

PlayStation 3 News by Robert Purchese

19 November, 2009

Sony appears to be considering a subscription model for PlayStation Network that would sit alongside the existing free membership.

Such a manouevre would bring PS3 in line with Xbox Live, which offers a premium Gold subscription and free Silver membership.

"SCE will further increase sales by offering users new entertainment through the combination of hardware, software, peripheral and PlayStation Network," said PlayStation head Kaz Hirai in a statement.

"Especially in the online area, we are studying the possibility of introducing a subscription model, offering premium content and services, in addition to the current free services."

Sony referred to the PlayStation Network as "gaining momentum" in a new presentation spotted in a dark corner of the internet (by VG247).

The same document mentioned a "new revenue stream from subscription" under the PlayStation Network tab, and also talked of reiterated Sony's plan to support 3D on all consoles via a firmware update.

Advertisement

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 88 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Incarta
19/11/09 @ 16:49
#1
+19
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'd rather they didn't. And if they did, it better be cheap as chips
Hendo
19/11/09 @ 16:49
#2
+8
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sign of the times, really.
I don't see how they can keep an online service going for free with server costs and all that.
el_pollo_diablo
19/11/09 @ 16:50
#3
+24
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Let's hope not. They did promise "free forever" after all.
Shakey_Jake33
19/11/09 @ 16:52
#4
+12
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
They'd loose one of their biggest advantages over Microsoft, especially now PSN is mostly feature-comparible to Live now. Hopefully he means something like media access, rather than online play.
cianchristopher
19/11/09 @ 16:54
#5
+29
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No surprise, really!

But the least they can do , if they start charging, is get their download speeds up to par with Xbox Live.

I have my 360 and PS3 both wired into my router, and the 360 can download a 1gb demo in the same amount of time that it takes for the PS3 to download a 50mb patch. It's ridiculous, free or not!
Razzajazz
19/11/09 @ 16:54
#6
+14
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
And now it all makes sense why they still haven't implemented cross-game chat yet....
Bertie [staff]
19/11/09 @ 16:56
#7
+17
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'd imagine they'll still harp on about the advantage, but Live is a serious money maker for Microsoft and look what the company has done with the money - Live is a stronger platform than PSN. It's going to be interesting what Sony opts to do, as going too close to an XBL Gold/Silver setup will be PR-pudding for Microsoft.

AliRay
19/11/09 @ 16:58
#8
+11
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't know how this would work, if they still allowed competitive online play on the free service.

Surely thats why most people pay for a Live Gold sub? If Sony cut their basic subscription I *think* some folks might be pissed off.

And a few 'premium' videos and themes won't sell it very well, imo.
Collymilad
19/11/09 @ 16:59
#9
-7
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"I'd rather they didn't. And if they did, it better be cheap as chips "

Like xbox live?
Joco84
19/11/09 @ 17:00
#10
+7
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I converted from 360 to PS3 when my 360 tanked. I thought to myself "why not give a PS3 a try, it's got free online gaming"

After 2 years of happy online gaming, I'm now finding out that Sony might start charging me for a service that was supposed to be "free forever".

If this happens, Sony won't be seeing me online anymore, I will be seriously tempted to go back to the 360.
Hendo
19/11/09 @ 17:03
#11
+20
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@cianchristopher
I have my 360 and PS3 both wired into my router, and the 360 can download a 1gb demo in the same amount of time that it takes for the PS3 to download a 50mb patch. It's ridiculous, free or not!

I don't know why you're getting marked down because this is absolutely the case with me, PSN downloads are mega slow compared to anything else I use (laptop, phone, Wii, 360).
Steroyd
19/11/09 @ 17:03
#12
+10
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Especially in the online area, we are studying the possibility of introducing a subscription model, offering premium content and services, in addition to the current free services."

This leads me to believe they're concocting something in the MMO arena or some such, or this quote is utter bollocks.
stepneg
19/11/09 @ 17:04
#13
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So much for always free, to be fair PSN is shite compared to live so hopefully it will be a comparable service although not one I will be paying for along with live.
designerheadache
19/11/09 @ 17:05
#14
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
my only fear is that they start charging so i cant play my friends online, its my biggest bugbear with Live and if Sony follow suit i wont be pleaseed.
M_of_the_sys
19/11/09 @ 17:08
#15
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Back to MSN and free internet games for me. Sniff.
Ace Grace
19/11/09 @ 17:09
#16
+11
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I will never pay to play online.
dangerpuss
19/11/09 @ 17:09
#17
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't see how they can possibly get anyone to pay a subscription fee unless it's for online play. Is anyone going to pay for exclusive demos? And MMOs will want their own dedicated revenue stream, not a slice from a general subscription pie.
stepneg
19/11/09 @ 17:11
#18
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Back to MSN and free internet games for me. Sniff."

Why, if I only had my PS3 I would much rather pay 30 quid a year so PSN could function like Live, like someone else said if anything to speed up the patch downloads, I remember spending two nights downloading updates for MGS Online only to spend 35 minutes trying to get in a game, it's free but its awful.
Cappy
19/11/09 @ 17:13
#19
+9
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I hope they keep online play free.

I don't use it enough to justify paying a monthly subscription, it would cripple a game like Demon's Souls which isn't your traditional sort of online game but benefits greatly from most people being connected and being able to participate online.
Flying_Pig
19/11/09 @ 17:15
#20
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'd only be willing to pay for this, if it offered something significant over and above the existing PSN service - which is actually pretty good IMHO
Britesparc
19/11/09 @ 17:18
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think Sony will do this eventually - maybe for the PS4 - and also that, eventually, MS will offer a stripped-down multiplayer component for Silver users.

Again, this might not happen till the next generation, but I think we'll start to see lots of premium content - demos, videos, additional features/aps, maybe clan support - for "Gold" members, and then just plain old store access and basic multiplayer functions for "Silver".
Les
19/11/09 @ 17:22
#22
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
While I think it's a stupid idea that can alienate part of the current user base, I don't really care as I don't use online much except for updates and the store. But with them bleeding so much money, they have to try something to get additional revenue.
M_of_the_sys
19/11/09 @ 17:27
#23
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Why, if I only had my PS3 I would much rather pay 30 quid a year so PSN could function like Live, like someone else said if anything to speed up the patch downloads, I remember spending two nights downloading updates for MGS Online only to spend 35 minutes trying to get in a game, it's free but its awful."

You would be happy to pay; I would not. It's simple really.
I'm happy with the service because I've never had a problem with it. I have no trouble online. My download speeds are fine (with the exception of MAG) and I experience no lag.
I've never used Live before. What are the advantages?
NotSoSlim
19/11/09 @ 17:28
#24
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You guys ever thought they may do subscription for psn games n video rentals??

DevilsNeverCry
19/11/09 @ 17:30
#25
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
PSN Subscription ushers the word 'fail' to mind.

I seriously hope Sony aren't considering this for the online play. I don't think they will personally, because even if they charge for premium store access, if the online stays as is then they will at least have that over MS - optional subscription for 'full' store access, but you can still enjoy your 40quid game withough the extra 40quid for online for a year.

On the flip side, paying a premium for ANYTHING when we already get it for free is a massive kick in the face for long time PS3 and PSN users. Sony would be wise to introduce something entirely new with the intention to be 'paid for' rather than slap a fee on existing services, otherwise I will get rid of everything PS3 apart from exclusives.
kangarootoo
19/11/09 @ 17:31
#26
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So long as they add extra stuff for the subscription, and keep everything that is currently free, free... then I don't really mind.
kangarootoo
19/11/09 @ 17:32
#27
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"offering premium content and services, in addition to the current free services"

People seem to be missing that bit. They aren't going to start charging for online play are they.
mr_writer
19/11/09 @ 17:39
#28
-8
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Do any of your fucktards read? YOU WON"T BE CHARGED TO PLAY ONLINE. Jeysus it just means you get more bells added to the service if you pay.

If you'd don't want them and are happy paying sweet FA and just playing online, then you can do this.

Thats the difference between this and LIVE if you could play online with a Silver memebership no one would care about Gold really.
alimokrane
19/11/09 @ 17:39
#29
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@mr_writer

I still dont see how they would encourage people to join the premium service. If they keep online play for free, NO ONE and I mean NO ONE will go to their premium service which would mean introducing it in the first place is POINTLESS.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 19/11/09 @ 17:41
VicViper
19/11/09 @ 17:41
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
We already have Core in the states (maybe here haven't looked into it) which is a subscription based extra that provides early access to demos/betas and video etc, thats a package deal.

If there not doing online play and I'm fairly sure most would consider paying for demos something they would not do I can't really see what they can offer as a worth while extra.

Edited 1 times, most recently on 19/11/09 @ 17:44
Widge
19/11/09 @ 17:41
#31
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well as long as that is the case, then ok, I don't really want to pay to play games online. I always got that "gym subscription going to waste" sensation when I went a long period without using Live. Also it would be a sucky resource drain for multi-console users.

I'm happy with what it gives at the moment, if people want to pay for early demos or other such shite, then let them... as long as when I fancy playing something online I can just do it.
Razzajazz
19/11/09 @ 17:43
#32
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Like I said earlier, they're not going to charge for anything that's currently free, that'd be beyond stupid. But I can see them charging for cross-game chat, as well as any other innovation that comes from this point forward. Hopefully they wouldn't be idiotic enough to alienate their current user-base, but I wouldn't be surprised if the premium PSN sub didn't exactly match Xbox Live Gold feature for feature.
kangarootoo
19/11/09 @ 17:44
#33
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@alimokrane

How can you say that when you don't know what the premium service will include?

The question is rhetorical.
M_of_the_sys
19/11/09 @ 17:45
#34
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"offering premium content and services, in addition to the current free services"

Might sound a bit paranoid but I will say "for now". At which point do they decide that certain services and content are premium? If I can play online for free then that's fair enough.

@mr_writer

What are these bells that you speak of?
BritishBlue1
19/11/09 @ 17:47
#35
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hm, this doesn't bode well, I was hoping they wouldn't go the same way as Microsoft. This may not be too bad as long as they keep online gaming free...
Pedrolot
19/11/09 @ 17:47
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Erm....They said it would co-exist with the free service?
ParanoidZombie
19/11/09 @ 17:49
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I wouldn't be too worried about PSn becoming a xboxlive gold-type service, it's just typical PR stuff by Sony,they're throwing some ideas at us and analyze the feedback. Since said feedback is gonna be overwhelmingly negative, they will abandon the idea altogether and find another way to make profit with PSN (by focusing on making Home relevant and then charging for the access IMO).
Edited 1 times, most recently on 19/11/09 @ 17:50
Incarta
19/11/09 @ 17:51
#38
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"If you'd don't want them and are happy paying sweet FA and just playing online, then you can do this."

"Erm....They said it would co-exist with the free service?"

For now.

Who's to say they wouldn't come back a year after launching this and say "Yeah, we're still losing money, we're gonna start charging to play online."

Slippery slope...
Edited 1 times, most recently on 19/11/09 @ 17:52
Paulie_P
19/11/09 @ 17:51
#39
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I hope they keep it free. I won't be able to subsidise two different subscriptions to play online for a year, I'm struggling to justify paying one subscription as it is.
kangarootoo
19/11/09 @ 17:54
#40
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Half the people in this thread need a foil hat.
WinterSnowblind
19/11/09 @ 18:00
#41
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'd rather see Microsoft do something like this too. Make online play free, but keep the subscription for many of the frills such as early demo's and perhaps even the party system.. That at least would greatly expand the amount of people who play online
Widge
19/11/09 @ 18:00
#42
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
and the other half a fail hat
GamesConnoisseur
19/11/09 @ 18:02
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
People moaning about the subscriptions possibility beggars my belief! MARK me down for all you want. NOTHING is free.. that is the utter truth.

EVERYTHING costs, sure there are different ways of funding running expenses, servers, PSN store administration and developments and so on. I would rather pay a cheap subscription, make it more competitive to XBL Gold fine, but as long as that would funds a better run PSN. I m all for it.

SONY if you are listening, I ll pay up. As long as the result will show a greater advantage over non pay and where contents and service is better.

Sure PC is mostly free, but its wildly all over the place, and interestingly people do pay subs for certain downloading/server services and hence not exactly free?!
kangarootoo
19/11/09 @ 18:04
#44
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@WinterSnowblind

I predict free XBLive play in the not too distant. Once they have a rack of other chargeable services, they can proably flip the switch and see a large increase in online play (which can bring its own indirect revenue streams, such as advertising).
AbracadaverAK
19/11/09 @ 18:15
#45
-2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Why would MS stop charging for something people are clearly happy to pay?

Perspective, people. £35 a year is perfectly reasonable price for this sort of service
light&shadow
19/11/09 @ 18:19
#46
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well, let's not forget the current service is NOT free. It currently costs developpers/publishers 30% of the sales price to cover sony's expenses. And I think it should stay that way.

You wouldn't pay the rent of a retailler's shop would you?
EarlBassett
19/11/09 @ 18:21
#47
+9
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ Mr_Writer

I deduce two thing from your "fucktards" post:

1) You read Aint It Cool News
2) You are a cock
George Roper
19/11/09 @ 18:24
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
LOL @ whiners

PSN is gash compared to Live, so this is a welcome change if it improves quality.

If.
Gaol
19/11/09 @ 18:34
#49
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
PSN is not gash, it's performed well for me for 3 years. I've never had any issues with slow downloads or lag (Everybody's Golf patching aside), and there haven't been any bad outtages.

I'd really begrudge becoming a second class citizen unless I paid a sub though, especially for stuff like demos being a week later. Sony have a lot of goodwill at the moment with regards the PS3, this would be a sure fire way of losing it.
Incarta
19/11/09 @ 18:37
#50
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
£35 - 40 is perfectly reasonable.

£70 - 80 for two services that do the same job?

What about if Ninty adopt this too? £120!?

That might not be such a big deal for some with money to burn on our hobby, but for those of us with stuff to pay for in the real world, it's a genuine blow.

But yeah, I personally don't have a problem with it as long as the online play stays free.

Comments: 1-50 of 88 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Get Games.  Download Great PC Games!

X View gallery