EA polling about Woods "controversy"
Would it put you off buying golf games?
While EA is publicly backing Tiger Woods, the publisher is reportedly polling people to see whether the golfer's infamous "mistakes off the course", to borrow Peter Moore's phrase, will affect sales of its games.
In a recent Greenfield Online survey (thanks Kotaku), the publisher is seen to ask whether the controversy has "made your impressions of EA Sports more or less favourable". The survey also asks: "Has the controversy made you more or less likely to buy a Tiger Woods-related videogame in the future?" (More!)
Earlier this month EA Sports boss Peter Moore updated his blog with a post supporting Woods, apparently on the basis that EA had chosen to work with the golfer for sporting reasons and not so he could "act as an arm's length endorser".
Given that the decision appears to have been made to stick with him, presumably the survey is either old or geared towards something else, like marketing, or what kind of message to write in a sympathy card e.g. "Sorry about your mistakes off the course, best keep your head down for a bit. Love (too soon?), Pete."
You may also like...
-
Warp Review
-
Why Can't Games Do Sex?
-
The Kickstarter Conundrum
-
Assassin's Creed 3 release date announced
-
Remedy's message to Alan Wake PC pirates: "enjoy the story!"
-
Full-length Far Cry 3 cinematic trailer
-
NCsoft confirms Guild Wars 2 on console
-
Dear Esther Review
-
Huge range of PlayStation 2 Classics storm European PlayStation store
-
Japan PlayStation Vita sales at lowest ever weekly total
-
Bethesda on Skyrim's viewable Morrowind, Cyrodiil: "maybe we'll use it one day"
-
Assassin's Creed Revelations getting Desmond single-player DLC
-
Indie game Dear Esther profitable in less than six hours
-
App of the Day: Tongue Tied!
-
Syndicate launch trailer blasts out the dubstep
-
Far Cry 3 release date revealed by leaked trailer
-
Alan Wake PC version footage
-
Solitaire Blitz Preview: Why PopCap's Approach to Facebook Gaming is Anything But Casual
-
Valve selling a virtual Team Fortress 2 ring for $100
-
PS3 exclusive JRPG Ni No Kuni out in Europe Q1 2013
-
Notch can match Schafer's $13m Psychonauts 2 budget valuation
-
The Walking Dead screenshots shamble in
-
UFC Undisputed 3 Review
-
Ubisoft and TrackMania dev announce ShootMania Storm
-
Will there be a PS3 version of The Witcher 2?









Comments (34) Latest comment 2 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
No.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
But aas the brand impact lost anything since the controversy? For me, truthfully, I'd have to say yes.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Me no think so.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Now, the O.J. Simpson case, THAT was controversial. Some golfer (even a big name golfer as Tiger Woods) who's unfaithful to his wife is certainly not controversil - just not particularly nice.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I in no way condone cheating on your wife and kids, but by comparison Tiger Woods is still a reasonable human being.
On subject, I kind of wonder whether the Tiger Woods brand is really worth the money anymore. It may not "put people off" the purchase, but that is hardly the bar to set for yourself as a developer. Surely the question should be "is the association with Tiger Woods still a purchase driving factor".
Why spend millions on the association if the best result you can be sure of is that it will do no harm to do so?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
His wife chased him, though. Used an expensive golf club on an expensive car. Some people just have no respect for material things!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"Large company polling/focus grouping about branding=news? "
is the article not an excuse for a welcome reprise of The Simpsons joke about Mayor Quimby? EA polls members of the public because Tiger poles members of the public etc
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Is this what you were looking for? http://ww w.break.com/games/tiger-woods-w...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Especially, the "Wand coming"-part made me smile. I'm sorry ...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The simple question is why was a golfer earning as much as Tiger was anyway? Is that really necessary?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Must be a bit of an "albatross" around their necks, though. About as favourable as being seen by an attractive lady with a "bogey" hanging from your nose or buying a set of expensive curtains only to find there's a "hole in one".
/Gets coat
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
It certainly put me off golf dvds though
I bought 'Tiger's favourite 18 holes' and was very disapointed to find out it was actually about golf
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
He's recently been in a serious car accident remember.
Ok, there were no lasting injuries, but I'm sure he's still feeling below par.
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh somebody get me that drumset
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"This is a sad public relations exercise to appear like they listen to and care about their customers opinions"
But of course they care about their customers opinions, because those opinions tell them whether people will buy their product or not. I don't mean "care" like they want to give us a hug, but they absolutely want to know what people think.
Its got bugger all to do with whether EA think he is evil or not. If it was about that, they wouldn't poll the public would they. They are polling us because ALL they care about is what we as paying customers think.
@Kami
"The simple question is why was a golfer earning as much as Tiger was anyway? Is that really necessary?"
It doesn't work that way though, just like it doesn't work that way for anybody in paid employment. None of us get paid what we "deserve", we get paid what we are worth based on the revenue we generate for our employer or sponsor. Tiger Woods was generating a huge amount of cash for various companies, so of course he was worth what he was getting paid. Without him, nobody would be making the piles of money they were making.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
This whole Tiger Woods thing remands me a lot of the Brand-Sachs scandal here in the UK. Thousands upon thousands of people going berserk calling for heads to be put on spikes, politicians wading in with their 2 pence worth (and claiming it back on expenses
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show