Dead Rising 2 Preview

Fortune flavours the grave.

Of all the Japanese studios gunning for global acceptance (and at this point it basically is all of them), Capcom is taking the greatest strides. Bionic Commando, Dark Void and Spyborgs have all been produced by Western studios, and Dead Rising 2 is the latest to follow suit, designed by Canadian developer Blue Castle Games. Combined with more widespread use of Capcom's feted MT Framework multi-platform engine technology, it makes for a global strategy in every sense.

You worry though, listening to Capcom R&D chief Keiji Inafune talk about the game, that the publisher is in danger of missing a vital point. "I was actually shocked to hear that a lot of the Western press, as well as Western gamers, were saying that it looks like a Western game on the outside, but on the inside it still feels very Japanese," Inafune says of the first Dead Rising, speaking through translator Ben Judd. "With Dead Rising 2, one of the internal goals that we had for ourselves was to truly make a Western game, to make it down to the core what a Western game is."

This is all well and good, but it's worth considering the context of Inafune's original 'shock': when Western gamers - ourselves included - first took to Dead Rising, Capcom's Japanese-developed Xbox 360 action-adventure, it wasn't just the single-location dynamic, 72-hour time window and non-linear mission structure, nor the brilliant comic violence of the kill counter, and hacking up hundreds of on-screen zombies with props looted from shops in the Willamette Mall, that gave it traction. It was something quintessentially Japanese in the mechanics - the photography hook, the secret bonuses, the caricatured badguys and their indulgent cut sequences. Surely going west risks the loss of so much of what gave the game its unusual flavour?

'Dead Rising 2' Screenshot 1

Inafune says that Chuck Greene has a reason for being in Fortune City, although we'll have to wait and see what he's after.

Fortunately, if he wasn't conscious of it at the time, Inafune insists that his original meetings with Blue Castle boss Dan Brady corrected that. "Dan was talking to us and brought about a very good point: one of the best things about Dead Rising 1 wasn't the fact that it's Western, it's the fact that it seems Western but also has that certain Japanese spice," he says. "We realised this was the kind of company that would be able to make the compromises and work with us to make the perfect blend between East and West that would be necessary for Dead Rising 2."

To this end, Blue Castle began by refining the technology to vastly exceed the impressive 500-zombies-at-once baseline set by the first game. As new protagonist Chuck Greene - a former motocross champion on a mission - slices his way through waves of shambling undead on the Las Vegas-style strip at the heart of the game's new setting, Fortune City, Brady hits a few buttons and fills out the screen. At first with 1,000 zombies - twice what Dead Rising could do, and nowhere near enough to trouble the game engine - and then with 2,000, and eventually 7,000. The frame-rate dips to compensate, but not to unplayable levels. In fact, the greatest threat to the player, as he charges down the strip on a motorbike carving up the crowd, is that the volume of bodies and blood splatter striking the camera and flying across it makes it difficult to see where you're going. You're actually blinded by the carnage.

'Dead Rising 2' Screenshot 2

One of the shots in the video preceding the demonstration shows Chuck downing a cocktail. Presumably this improves his aim with the pool cue.

Mechanically the combat - well, the one-way flood of slaughter - looks similar to Dead Rising 1, with a button-mashing three-stage horizontal melee attack, concluding in an uppercut, and an over-the-head downward smash as the two principle means to batter zombies with objects strewn and hidden around the game world.

Chuck's movements are also similar to those of Frank West, and at first his arsenal looks like the familiar collection of blunt and bladed props that gave the Willamette Mall its raison d'etre. There are baseball bats, guitars, bar stools, and roulette wheels grabbed from the tables of a small casino off the strip. Costumes return too. Like Frank, Chuck is not averse to the odd wardrobe change, but at least this time he does it with offensive intent, donning a moose head, which can be used to mow through zombies, or tusk them into the air. Other improvements include projectile weapons, like an assault rifle - not the game's core focus, Brady insists, but evidently well-implemented, with a tight, Gears of War-style over-the-shoulder fully automatic firing mode and the welcome addition of strafing.

As the demo continues, however, you realise that the assault rifle belongs there not just for the comic potential of kneecapping Fortune City's former inhabitants, but as an enabler. A propane tank with nails sticking out of the sides, for example, can be attached violently to a zombie, who then gets up and shambles around. Chuck backs away and switches to the rifle, targeting the propane tank sticking out of zombie's back and blasting everything in the vicinity to pieces. Dead Rising emphasised zombies as playthings like this - dumping buckets on their heads to blind them, for instance - so Dead Rising 2 goes further. The bucket returns, only this time it has three handheld powerdrills stuck through the sides. When Chuck slaps it on a zombie, it shreds its head in a shower of gore and then falls to the ground once the skull pops.

If you reckon that hints at improvising new tools out of the things you find lying around, so does Inafune, although he stops short of confirming it. But we are shown a couple of examples of more exotic weapons that thrill and delight almost as much in their wider conceptual potential as they do in the fine detail of the violence. There's a double-ended paddle, for example, with a chainsaw strapped to either end, which Chuck swings as though he's rowing through the sea of zombies. And in finale, there's a motorbike with chainsaws attached to each of the handlebars. Driving headlong through the 7,000 zombies, Brady's front wheel squashes while the blades dice for deaths four or five abreast.

The way in which the chainsaws go to work is another technical improvement, with a procedural system designed to cut where you actually cut - best illustrated with the sword, which hacks off limbs and the tops of heads among other protrusions depending on Chuck's position relative to your shambling target. A downward strike cleaves from skull to groin, and the remains peel apart and slump. There's blood everywhere - and the way blood splatters and flies, and seems to slow as the particles thin out in flight, is another subtle pleasure.

'Dead Rising 2' Screenshot 3

The Fortune City strip looks around a mile long, with neon-fronted monstrosities and the jangle of slots to either side.

It can be disappointing to turn up to see a game and get a tech demo - and the Fortune City strip, from the phallic Yucatan casino at one end to the coaches plugging the other, is designed in this instance to showcase concepts and mechanics, rather than the game itself. But Dead Rising was a game that captured our imagination as much for its possibilities, and the surprise and joy of discovery, as it did in its structure, so today's demo is a natural introduction. I don't feel too hard done by when Inafune declines to confirm many specifics about the rest of the game.

We can infer a certain amount, at least. The on-screen HUD looks similar, which speaks to similar progression - with a chunkified and presumably extendable health-bar, the same Prestige Points meter feeding into a levelling system, a money total and of course the zombie kill-counter in the bottom right. Inafune won't comment directly on the return of photography or mission structure, but says he and Blue Castle want to "keep 100 per cent of what made the first game good, and lose 100 per cent of what got in the way". They are considering using the 72-hour period of the first game again, and the divisive save system is being thoroughly contemplated behind the scenes.

There will also be multiplayer despite the confusion at GDC. "We're at a point in game history that you need to have some form of multiplayer component in a game," says Inafune. "Single-player alone is not going to cut it. So rest assured we are going to put multiplayer in the game, but I can't go into specifics about what type of multiplayer as that directly relates to some of the game systems that we don't want to talk about at this event. It will be online multiplayer, so keep that in mind." He also deflects a question about co-op and other playable characters, but doesn't rule it out.

'Dead Rising 2' Screenshot 4

Given the time left for optimisation, the fact that the 7,000 zombies money shot only tickles the frame-rate is very promising.

For all the things we don't know so far though, Inafune's mindful approach and the first visible dabs of innovation from Blue Castle paint an encouraging picture - of a game that seeks to realise the untapped potential of certain aspects of Dead Rising, while remaining true to its strengths. Those principles, and the exchange of ideas between Blue Castle and Capcom Japan, may be unorthodox and complicated - Inafune bemoans problems with timezones, among other things, on several occasions - but it's the soul within the body of Capcom's new-world thinking.

Never mind the mixed parentage, it's good parenting that matters, and for now that seems to mean bringing it up in the West, but giving it a Japanese education. Global acceptance may be on the cards again.

Dead Rising 2 is due out for PlayStation 3, Xbox 360 and PC at an undisclosed date in the future.

Comments (48) Latest comment 3 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • DFawkes #1 3 years ago

    Stop trying to westernise your games, Japanese developers. They don't need it.

    Looks good though.
  • mrpon #2 3 years ago

  • Xerx3s #3 3 years ago

    Erm, wasn't this out on the ps3 as well?
  • mingster #4 3 years ago

  • Tyranix #5 3 years ago

    "Single-player alone is not going to cut it."

    How very, very wrong they are.

    Still, the game sounds like it will be great and I loved the first one. Looking forward!
  • mrpon #6 3 years ago

    Chuck looks like Steve McQueen crossed with Desperate Dan!
  • mkreku #7 3 years ago

    It's coming to PC! Right?
  • speedjack #8 3 years ago

    Stop trying to westernise your games, Japanese developers. They don't need it.

    Japanese gaming sales vs. west suggest otherwise :-

    http://ww w.neoseeker.com/news/9809-ninte...
  • stepneg #9 3 years ago

    The first one would have been an absoulte classic if it didn't have stupid boss batlles and a borked save system. I loved the game but hated it in equal amounts, if thats possible.
  • Darknight #10 3 years ago

    "Single-player alone is not going to cut it."

    WRONG! Make a high quality single player game, tell a decent story, and let us have fun in the game and you can often make a game that is far more entertaining than the multiplayer component that devs are needlessly tacking on to games these days.
  • Gazza_UK #11 3 years ago

    is this actually going to be on the ps3?
  • El_MUERkO #12 3 years ago

  • coomber #13 3 years ago

    Glad it wasn't just me that saw that comment about how single-player action doesn't cut it any more.

    WTF is wrong with these developers? How can they all be getting it so wrong? Lots of us DON'T want pointless death match games tacked on at the expense of the single-player experience!
  • El_MUERkO #14 3 years ago

    is this actually going to be on the ps3?

    i'd assume it is considering they mention the engine is multi-platform "designed by Canadian developer Blue Castle Games. Combined with more widespread use of Capcom's feted MT Framework multi-platform engine technology"
  • BlackKraken #15 3 years ago

    For the love of god, DONT have the 72 hour mechanic again PLEASE. I hate timed bits in games and thats what completely put me off dead rising, the fact that the whole damn game is timed... eurgh.
  • Pac-man-ate-my-wife #16 3 years ago

    Being a recent 360 owner I've not picked up Dead Rising as comments suggested it was very much a first generation title, however I love the concept and will likely pick up this sequel.

    I do agree wholeheartedly that the single player experience is a must. I generally hate playing online so couldn't give a flying feck about multiplayer, unless it's local.
  • Gearskin #17 3 years ago

    These "tacked on" multiplayer experiences cost little resources. Single player campaign content is locked down early. It's like when people moan about DLC. Fallout 3's extras are pretty lengthy, but they come out soon after release of the game. How? Because they were already working on the DLC before the main game was finished. Because the content of the main game was locked down much earlier.
  • Waldo #18 3 years ago

    "We realised this was the kind of company that would be able to make the compromises and work with us to make the perfect blend between East and West that would be necessary for Dead Rising 2."

    So in other words, they were the lowest bidder?
  • JHuxley #19 3 years ago

    Nice bullshots.

    "For the love of god, DONT have the 72 hour mechanic again PLEASE"

    Agreed. Forcing you to run around in order to complete objectives on time sapped the fun out of exploring and messing around.
  • skuzzbag #20 3 years ago

    "WTF is wrong with these developers? How can they all be getting it so wrong? Lots of us DON'T want pointless death match games tacked on at the expense of the single-player experience!"

    I remember reading comments like this seven years ago!

  • mungolikebeans #21 3 years ago

    Is this thread about putting some dough in an oven?
  • miiiguel #22 3 years ago

    The weirdest thing is that Blue Castle Games only did so far baseball games.
  • SixFootHalfling #23 3 years ago

    "For the love of god, DONT have the 72 hour mechanic again PLEASE I hate timed bits in games and thats what completely put me off dead rising, the fact that the whole damn game is timed... eurgh."

    So do I, but when the time limit is roughly 2 hours to do a 5-20 min quest, you can hardly complain can you?

    Plus there is the fact that you didn't have to do beyond the second mission to unlock the whole mall, which took all of 1 of the games 72 hours, so was it really that bad? Oh no, only 7.1 hours (game time was 10x real world time) to explore a mall, whatever shall I do?
  • PlugMonkey #24 3 years ago

    For the love of god, DONT have the 72 hour mechanic again PLEASE. I hate timed bits in games and thats what completely put me off dead rising, the fact that the whole damn game is timed... eurgh.

    For the love of god, DO have the 72 hour mechanic again PLEASE. It was a massive breath of fresh air to be told someone required urgent help and actually have to get there urgently. It generated a kind of tension I've not seen much in other games.

    This didn't detract from the fun of exploring and messing around one iota - you just didn't do it in the same playthrough. Do a messing around playthrough. Do an exploring playthrough. Do a rescuing the survivors playthrough. Do a finding out the story playthrough. Do a killing as many zombies as you can playthrough. Then and only then, do a do-it-all-in-one perfect playthrough. It's a wonderful system.

    It would be a massive step backwards to muddy my 'messing about and exploration' with the occasional bit of plot exposition, and then gum up what is supposed to be an exciting race against time by me deciding to wander off for three days experimenting with weapons while the whole sinister plot just stops and waits for me.

    They need to do a much better job of communicating the idea; but this isn't a film or a book. You don't start at the beginning, carry on until you get to the end and then stop. Or at least you don't have to. It's a toy, that you can play with in a number of ways. Compartmentalising them makes each one more distinct, and more pleasurable.

    Edit: Basically, anyone who tried to 'complete' the game on their first playthrough played the game wrong.

    Pretty much everyone I know who played Dead Rising either loved it because they clocked the idea that they weren't supposed to even try and find out the story until they had played the game through a few times, or hated it because they tried to do everything on their first go and got frustrated when they couldn't.

    And you have to lay that one firmly at the door of the devs, who neglected to tell anyone that that was the idea, so you either chanced upon it or missed out on one of the most original game experiences in years. DON'T CHANGE IT, JUST DO IT RIGHT NEXT TIME.
    Edited by 1 at 28/04/09 @ 17:58
  • drumbaby #25 3 years ago

    PC and Xbox 360?

    Capcom, get your knob out of Msoft's arse.
  • BillyBrush #26 3 years ago

    @PacManAte My Wife

    It still looks better than most of the games that come out....a lot better...think Resi5 levels of sheen...i'd certainly check it out if i were you as it's aged pretty damn well, games that look better than DR = only a handful
  • Nithron #27 3 years ago

    So they ship the development out to Canada, and the main character ends up being called Chuck.

    You couldn't make this stuff up.
  • suicida #28 3 years ago

    +1 million to what PlugMonkey said, DR is one of my favourite games of this generation.

    Please don't fuck up the sequel Canadian Devs!
  • RESIDENT_nEVILe #29 3 years ago

    Not Canadian enough! The protagonist should be either:
    a) A Mountie
    b) An ice hockey legend
    c) A bitchin' snow boarder
    d) Mike Meyers
  • tomwhitaker #30 3 years ago

    Absolutely spot on PlugMonkey. The only thing that really needs fixing from the first time is the survivor AI.
  • Garfy #31 3 years ago

    The broken AI was what put me off the first one, stupid f***s wouldn't follow me or run when their life depends on it.
  • TriggerHippie #32 3 years ago

    Chuck looks like a nob. At least we'll be able to cover him up with an assortment of stupid hats.
  • EmiliasHorse #33 3 years ago

    Was always going to be a must have buy. This preview did just what a good preview should, it made me moist.
  • Harmonica #34 3 years ago

    ""For the love of god, DONT have the 72 hour mechanic again PLEASE" "

    It's a zombie game, based off the many zombie movies. That's the main mechanic for a reason and it should return again.

    edit: also, the save system was perfect because it instilled fear into the player and made it more than just reloading if you die.
    Edited by 1 at 28/04/09 @ 22:04
  • Roamer #35 3 years ago

    "Single-player alone is not going to cut it. "

    That's a lie. Stop wasting resoureces on slapping on half-baked multiplayer features. If you're going to do something - do it properly. A split-screen co-op mode, for example, would be heaven.

    I bought Too Human thinking it was a decent hack-and-slash RPG that I could play with my mates, only to find out there was no multiplayer - except for online, which is frankly uninteresting in games reliant on cooperation and lengthy play sessions..
  • WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot #36 3 years ago

    Okay - "something quintessentially Japanese in the mechanics - the photography hook, the secret bonuses, the caricatured badguys and their indulgent cut sequences. Surely going west risks the loss of so much of what gave the game its unusual flavour?"

    Let's not forget an awkwardly implemented attempt at social commentary mostly lost in a fragmented and illogical narrative. This is what made the game moronic and tedious, and it's loss can only improve the franchise. Remember how the front of the game box bore a warning about how this game didn't have anything to do with Romero's "Dawn of the Dead"? That wasn't a marketing ploy, it was a recipe to improve the game. Watch "Dawn of the Dead," loose the idiotic boss battles and terrible survivor AI. Come up with a better hero then a motocross driver. You ramped up the zombie count from 500 to 7000, surely this stuff can't be that hard!

    As a Canadian, my disapprobation towards this game being developed in a slipshod way in my homeland is somewhat displaced by the fact that George Romero, Praise Be Unto Him, decided to immigrate to my country.
  • Vice.Destroyer #37 3 years ago

    @PlugMonkey, you are the poster I most want to be like. If it is possible, I love your post like no other post ever on Eurogamer. Defending one of my favourite games against some of the stupidest complaints ever. The only thing that I thought was a bit crap in the game was the AI of the survivors. Nothing else.

    7,000 zombies? I cannot wait.
  • mkreku #38 3 years ago

    How does one fit 7000 zombies into one screen?
  • SliderNL #39 3 years ago

    Only one thing absolutely needed CO-OP
  • Menace #40 3 years ago

    He looks like Aaron Eckhardt
  • OrangeGoblin #41 3 years ago

    Keep 72 hours, keep the save system. The sense of urgency and tension more than makes up for having to replay bits, and for once if a video game character dies then they stay dead. I found myself running out of time and having to make the choice between saving different survivors. "Sorry mate," I'd think as the zombies began to chow down, "I just couldn't make it." Awesome.
  • funkyd #42 3 years ago

    God this should be great.
  • Meho #43 3 years ago

    So:

    "The bucket returns, only this time it has three handheld powerdrills stuck through the sides. When Chuck slaps it on a zombie, it shreds its head in a shower of gore and then falls to the ground once the skull pops."

    and yet MadWorld sold about four copies relying on the same over-the-top, improvisational kill-mechanic... Hmmm....
  • smernicki #44 3 years ago

    sounds like it may have lost some of the humour for the sake of gore: attaching a chainsaw to everything doesn't necessarily make it a better game
  • InsoFox #45 3 years ago

    Sounds great and do want, but some of his comments make me sad. Especially the bit about pure single player not being possible. Bullshit.
  • Rubarack #46 3 years ago

    Once again, exactly as Plugmonkey puts it.

    There really wasn't much at all wrong with Dead Rising once you got used to how it works, really all I want from the sequel is an expansion of what made the original so great and a refinement of some of its rough edges. This preview is being worryingly vague, are we getting Dead Rising 2 or generic zombie mashup 3,000,000?
  • Grayvern #47 3 years ago

    It wasn't the Japanese elements, the photography and such that annoyed me in the first.

    It was the time limit something I have never wanted for even a small section of a game let alone a full one. The save system compounded this, it wasn't the real problem.

    + Just saw the single player doesant cut it comment and have lost all faith. Anyone with half a brain realises that multiplayer is only a draw in those games where it's wanted or the focus, developers really need to realise they aren't going to win from multiplayer because players already have games they go to for that.

    Co-op is perhaps different in that i reckon more games need it and not over the internet either, a lot of games could be enhanced by co-op but not traditional multiplayer.

    But I always think twice when buying a game I want for single player, that is advertised specifically as having multiplayer as Im paying for something ill never use.
    Edited by 1 at 29/04/09 @ 13:34
  • Machiavellian #48 3 years ago

    I am thinking the reason Single Player doesn't cut it because most people just rent a game that only has Single Player even if it's top notch. The amount of people that play a game single player more than once is limited even if there are a lot of things to go through and pick up on the second or third run.

    Case in point would be Uncharted. I rented the game and beat the single player but did not feel the need or want to go back and play it again so I never purchased the game. Not only that but so many new games continued to be release that I rarely find time to go back to a single player game once I finished it. Uncharted 2 probably will get my money because it has co-op which is a feature that I feel is worth the dough because I probably would replay those levels again with my friends. Another game on the same front would be Bioshock.

    Anyway, at this point no one knows if the Multiplayer would be tack on or not so I am willing to wait and see how they do it for such a game as DR.