Jump to navigation
Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars Interview

PC Xbox 360 Interview by Dave McCarthy

22 December, 2006

When EA planned to show off Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars at the Le Meridien hotel in Piccadilly, Polonium 210 was just a rare and highly radioactive metalloid, chemically similar to tellurium and bismuth (thanks Wikipedia!). But by the time the game's executive producer, Mike Verdu arrived on a wearying whistlestop tour to demonstrate the game, Polonium 210 had become synonymous with stealth, secrecy, and, of course, lethal poison, thanks to the tragic assassination of Alexander Litvinenko, just a few doors down the road.

Still, it's not all bad: at least Polonium 210 provides a pithy intro to a game featuring its own fair share of stealth, lethal substances, and secrecy. Specifically: the game features a return to the classic C&C universe, and thus the stealthy and devious forces of Nod; it also means a return to Tiberium, and apparently long-term low-level exposure to the Tiberium causes illness and (lethal) death (thanks again Wikipedia!); and unfortunately the hands-on bit of the afternoon is under embargo, because of EA's secrecy, so you won't be able to read about it till next month.

What you will be able to read, however, is an interview with Mike Verdu himself:

'Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars' Screenshot 1

The sun bleached, scorched earth, bears an obvious resemblance to the landscapes featured in Tiberian Sun.

Eurogamer: There's clearly a very large number of Command & Conquer fans out there who are very excited about Tiberium Wars right now. But how are you going to win over the die-hard element of the fanbase - the fans who won't be happy with any changes you make? What would you say to those guys?

Mike Verdu: That's a question that we struggle with on a daily basis because the truly hardcore guys really have issues with any big change that you make. Ultimately I think we win them over by delivering an experience that connects them emotionally with the game and that means the gameplay working with the story working with the multiplayer. It really needs to come together in a way that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. If we pull that off they'll forgive us for changing the way Tiberium looks and some of the other things that we've done to pull the world together a little bit, to define the look and feel of the units and the structures.

But people who have played the game do say that this is a Command & Conquer game; that it feels like C&C. And as fans of C&C ourselves, we think that for anyone to say that is the ultimate compliment, and it gets us fundamentally where we need to be. And yeah, it feels very familiar, but there's also a lot of power and flexibility and new stuff working under the hood, and so we're hoping that the initial familiarity will draw people in to experience everything else that we have to offer in the game.

Eurogamer: Where does C&C 3 sit alongside other RTS games, now that the genre has moved on so much since the original games were released? A lot of other RTS games these days have some sort of shtick, from the enormous scale of Supreme Commander, to the focus on supply lines in Company of Heroes. What's C&C 3's shtick?

'Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars' Screenshot 2

But obviously the C&C universe has moved on since then, so there'll be a whole host of new unit types in the game.

Mike Verdu: There are two things that I think are very interesting. The first is that I don't think anybody else is connecting players with a story as deeply as we do. We've got more than 35 single-player missions all tied together with a story fabric that's not just in the live action and the cut-scenes. They're still cool, but the story lives everywhere - it's in the mission objectives, it's in facts you collect about the world as you go, it's in conversations you overhear on the battlefield. It's really everywhere, and to have a story that has richness and depth and complexity and characters that change as they learn about the story and themselves, and conflicts that resolve... I mean it operates on different levels, it has themes that resonate throughout the campaigns. I just think that for a story experience you're not going to be able to beat C&C 3.

And then there's the multiplayer things that we're doing with spectator modes and tournaments and the reputation system and match broadcasts and all this other cool stuff. We're creating what I think is a competitive RTS. And that's also something that I think will set C&C 3 apart - the amount of support that's in there for the community to link up.

Eurogamer: Clearly the story's important then. How far will players be able to influence its course, and outcome?

Mike Verdu: The campaigns are divided up into theatres of war that are geographic locations. You actually get to pick the order of missions that you play and the choices that you make in those missions ripple forward into the other missions. So there are definitely meaningful choices that you make.

Eurogamer: And how does the gameplay in C&C 3 compare to previous C&C titles?

Mike Verdu: We're taking lessons that we've learned in Generals and the Battle for Middle-Earth series, and in Red Alert, and we're combining all of it with some things that we think are timeless from the original C&C. I think we're drawing lessons from everything we've done, and hopefully that should come through.

Eurogamer: What feature are you most pleased with?

Mike Verdu: Overall? The sense that when I play the game that it's a C&C game that honours the legacy of C&C. That's my favourite thing about the game. Very specifically, I think the in-game user interface is my favourite thing as a feature, because to be in the middle of a battle and to pull up my vehicle tab and quickly manufacture some new Mammoth tanks is pretty powerful, and it's something that no other game gives me. That's also unique and cool.

'Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars' Screenshot 3

It's still all about Tiberium, though.

Eurogamer: And one of the features that EA have emphasised is the AI in the game - particularly the skirmish modes, where players can tailor the playing style of their AI opponents. Could you talk a bit more about that?

Mike Verdu: One thing that we wanted to do was to take a page out of Zero Hour's book and let you play against opponents who embody a style of play that is classic - like rushing or turtling. Or you can play an opponent who uses some combination of classic tactics - maybe rush and then turtle, or maybe a tank rush, or maybe tech up to perform air attacks. So that really grants the skirmish some dimension that it hasn't had up till now. And occasionally I just like to play a turtling game where you can build up your army in peace and have at it late in the game, and to have an AI that lets me do that is cool.

Eurogamer: And if there's one thing you'd like to say about the game, what is it?

Mike Verdu: I really think that mix of fast, fluid and fun gameplay that has this timeless C&C quality with an epic story is an experience that we haven't had for a while and will actually feel new to people.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars on PC/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-20 of 20 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
northernlights
22/12/06 @ 08:29
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This is the game im most looking forward to in 2007, even above Halo 3, Mass Effect and GTA 4.
siro
22/12/06 @ 08:47
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
And more important: Why didn't the games in between C&C2 and this one not count as part 3?
AcidSnake
22/12/06 @ 09:10
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Let's hope they forget all about generals though, that was really a tremendous lowpoint for the series IMO...
JonFE
22/12/06 @ 09:10
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I really look forward to this and hope that they won't mess with it.

Just one thing: if you want to win the old-timers, build an installation procedure like the originals; EVA FTW :)
Edited 1 times, most recently on 22/12/06 @ 09:13
Xerx3s
22/12/06 @ 09:15
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ever since that over hyped pos CC:TS and the tripe that they released after it, I've lost all faith in the c&c universe. Especially since Westwood is nothing more than a franchise name these days.
pauleyc
22/12/06 @ 09:22
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Generals was C&C only by name. And I quite liked Tiberium Sun therefore I'm quite interested in this one.

It really needs to come together in a way that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. If we pull that off they'll forgive us for changing the way Tiberium looks[...]"

At first I thought he means the substance but it's still shiny mysterious crystals.
AcidSnake
22/12/06 @ 09:37
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well in that case Red Alert was C&C in name only as well?

I loved them all, but generals simply did so very very much wrong...
At least C&C and Red Alert had fun opposing sides to choose from while never really telling you who the 'bad guys' were...(especially the first red alert)...

But generals suddenly had a terrorist faction?!
Back to former glory please...
pauleyc
22/12/06 @ 09:42
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
AcidSnake, what I meant was that Generals felt like a completely different game, not related to the TD/TS and alternative RA/RA2 timelines. Or to put it simpler - there was no FMV nor Kane in Generals.
AcidSnake
22/12/06 @ 09:47
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I know what you mean...
Sad sad little game...
There was sooo much wrong with it...

But I'm not sure about something though...
When exactly did EA buy westwood?

I can only distinctly remember the crap 'challenge everything' before playing generals...
kmittal82
22/12/06 @ 09:49
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I hope they can go back to their roots of Red Alert, or even RA2 (which was the best one in my opinion)

I didnt quite like the "build anywhere you like" idea, and much preferred the old way of having a limited circle around ur MCV to build stuff.

Oh, and it would be good if MS have us a mouse to play this with too..
floppylobster
22/12/06 @ 10:14
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
C&C ruled and still does.
Red Alert 2: Yuri's Revenge ruled and still does.
Generals: Zero Hour was okay but like everything since Red Alert, was far too easy on the 'hard' setting.

C&C Tiberium Sun was the low point of the series. Taking itself waaaaay too seriously and delivered a 15-17 year old boys idea of a good story. If this is anything like that I feel I'm going to hate it.

Disclaimer: Opinions contained may not be yours. Doesn't mean either one of us is wrong.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 22/12/06 @ 10:16
FWB
22/12/06 @ 10:18
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So more of the same then.
Zomoniac
22/12/06 @ 10:47
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
There's a HD trailer of it here, it's very, very pretty.
Adam_T
22/12/06 @ 10:59
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"because to be in the middle of a battle and to pull up my vehicle tab and quickly manufacture some new Mammoth tanks is pretty powerful, and it's something that no other game gives me"

You can do that in Company of Heroes you dolt.

Any infantry. And builders. And research. And anything.
Adam_T
22/12/06 @ 11:02
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You should all know by now the the only thing EA can do well these days is interviews, previews, trailers, and hype.

Their delivery is amoung some of the worst in the industry.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 22/12/06 @ 11:02
zErOb_cOOl
22/12/06 @ 11:16
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought C&C Tiberium Sun was a horribly unbalanced game, and very over hyped. Too many long range projectile attacks also ruined the actual tactical combat for me, and I never got into the game. The game tried to add an even more futuristic edge to the game series, and add a few new interesting gameplay features but, quite simply, none of it worked.

The original C&C and Red Alert were by far the best games of the series, and that isn't nostalgia speaking, they simply got EVERYTHING dead right first time. I quite enjoyed generals, although it was short lived. I feel I only enjoyed it due to the dynamics of the game working differently to the original games. However, fighting terrorists always made battles interesting, due to the unusual way in which they can deploy bases anywhere and easily, and also upgrade their weapons using downed enemy vehicles, which I thought was quite cool, so more of that for C&C 3 imo.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 22/12/06 @ 11:19
Macross
22/12/06 @ 12:48
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This looks like a great return to form, I cant wait.

Not sure why you have such beef with generals though acid snake, while it wasnt really C&C it was quite good fun, especially multiplayer, wasted many a work lunchbreak on that :)
ronuds
22/12/06 @ 18:34
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So it looks like the UK is eagerly awaiting to fill EA's pockets some more?

Just kidding, but seriously though...
Xerx3s
22/12/06 @ 20:11
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
There's a HD trailer of it here, it's very, very pretty.

Looks meh compared to the likes of SC.

The original C&C and Red Alert were by far the best games of the series, and that isn't nostalgia speaking, they simply got EVERYTHING dead right first time.

Because they where made by Westwood?
Crea
23/12/06 @ 14:39
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Any hope I have for this is tempered by the knowledge that they'll likely use that same damn engine they used for C&C generals and Battle for Middle Earth.

I don't know what it is about that game engine, I just have a poor opinion of it. It seems pretty spec-hungry to me, and every game made with it has experienced multiplayer problems that took a fair amount of patching to fix. It's pretty poor with widescreen resolutions, if I remember rightly, requiring unsupported config hacks. And in both BFME and C&C generals I found the camera a little too zoomed in for comfort.

Gameplay wise they might be great, I just really, really dislike the Generals engine.

Comments: 1-20 of 20 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery