Assassin's Creed: Director's Cut Edition

Altair of this pun eventually.

Just as before, we're not going to tell you anything. Well, we're going to talk about the game, obviously. We're going to talk about the slightly incongruous American killer running around the Middle East in an eagle garb severing jugulars. We're going to talk about the new PC-specific missions, and how it looks compared to the multi-million-selling console versions, and what kind of crackpot control scheme the console-to-PC converters have assembled this time.

But we're not going to talk about what happens apart from that. Because, well, you might want to be surprised. And we're not going to talk about Jade Raymond either, because we're bored as well.

So, Assassin's Creed: Director's Cut Edition (let's call it AC/PC, and use the phrase "pioneering Australian hard-rockers", so we get some amusing Google typo traffic) is virtually identical to the PS3 and 360 third-person games. You play as Altair, an arrogant, quickly disgraced Crusades-era assassin working for a man in a black cape who sounds like Christopher Lee.

You get to run around massive openworld versions of Damascus, Acre and Jerusalem mining the crooks, couriers and careless talk for information, which allows you to hunt down and kill local arms dealers, minor despots and other naughty individuals who are all somehow connected. The best bit was and is that you don't just trawl the streets; you can climb virtually anything and race across rooftops, hopping precisely from beam to ledge to gangplank without sacrificing any momentum. All of which led some to christen it the next-generation Prince of Persia.

There's a streak of lofty pretention throughout, but it's quite tolerable. One of its most obvious influences is on the control scheme, which is in effect moving, turning the camera, running, jumping and walking, but in Ubiland is actually a marionette system with low and high profile moves, head controls and tickets to the opera.

On the PC, the WASD keys handle directional movement (there's no strafing), holding the right mouse button runs, holding shift makes you walk, and holding spacebar allows you to blend (spilling and seeping through crowds like a tall glass of death). Holding mouse2 and spacebar allows you to sprint and free-run. Number keys then select bits of your arsenal and, in time-honoured tradition, you hack away with mouse1.

There are some other bits, but you're probably free-running for the exits already, so let's just admit that it ties you in knots for a few minutes but then clicks and you rarely think about it again. Or you plug in a 360-style gamepad, which works automagically.

'Assassin's Creed: Director's Cut Edition' Screenshot 1

AC/PC takes an already gorgeous game world and adds another million pixels, or more.

Pretty much all the cool things you can do are tied up in the "investigation" missions, information from which coagulates into a bloody mandate from the local Bureau chief to do some murder. You sit on benches eavesdropping on conversations; you pickpocket by walking along after people and grabbing at their purses while they're not looking; you bump people off in crowds so that informants will tell you things; and to find missions in the first place you clamber up vast towers, steeples and minarets so that the camera can swizzle around you while dramatic music plays, and Altair can take in the scene, before diving out of the sky into a bale of hay hundreds of metres below.

New to the PC are four additional investigation types. Archer Assassinations involve sneaking up on rooftop archers without alerting them; Merchant Stand Destruction Challenges are about smashing up merchant stands, amazingly (there was an unlockable Achievement for this in the Xbox 360 version); Escort Challenges have you guide a vulnerable fellow assassin about town.

Our favourite though is Rooftop Race Challenges, where one informant tells you that he doesn't know anything, but that another chap nearby does and can be reached by getting hold of him before he disappears. Convoluted though it is, translating this into a breakneck chase across rooftops, sprinting, leaping, vaulting and climbing with urgency, while a timer ticks down at the top of the screen, makes perfect sense. The ones we saw were quite easy, but if they're tightened up for later in the game then they could be among the standouts.

With the information gathered and your mini-map sights set on the local mark, you then have to try and get close to them, which provokes a big in-game cut-scene where you shuffle, losing camera focus, through a nearby crowd. After which you strike. Except it's rarely that simple, especially if you want to kill without attracting attention, which is virtually impossible.

One man hides in a ship, another needs to be killed during a public execution, while another still is berating his troops in the depths of a massive fortress, which in any other game would be a level in itself - so epic is the scale and precise the attention to detail. Then you have to escape back to the bureau until the heat is off. In Assassin's Creed, getting the Crusader Feds off your back involves breaking the line of sight and then concealing yourself - on a bench among innocents, in a hay bale, or perhaps in one of the ubiquitous rooftop shacks.

Beyond all that, you can make your own fun, hunting down Templar Knights and collectible flags around the three cities, your home town of Masyaf or the giant Kingdom area that acts as a hub to the other locations. The absence of "Games for Windows - Live" features means no unlockable, 360-style Achievements for doing so, but, on the bright side, there's the absence of "Games for Windows - Live" to celebrate.

'Assassin's Creed: Director's Cut Edition' Screenshot 2

Rooftop Race Challenges help vary the investigation process.

As to performance, AC/PC certainly murders your processor - with our 2.4GHz Intel Core2Duo system, equipped with 2GB RAM and a 320MB GeForce 8800 GTS, coping fine with the early Solomon's Temple and Masyaf sections but struggling to pelt 60 frames at our eyes every second in other areas. The Kingdom, in particular, fought hard with our PC's innards, and the innards were losing, as galloping through the sprawling hills and villages became a canter and then an unplanned trot.

Then again, we were playing at 1920x1080 - something neither the PS3 nor 360 versions did - and it was perfectly playable and looked delicious throughout, offering plenty of pixel headroom for environments like the sumptuous Damascus, with its vast draw distance, to expand into. Staring down from the tops of towers or peering into the city from the cliffside road that winds down to it, it was hard not to pause for a screen-grab.

Those worried that Vista and DirectX 10 will be a necessity needn't be - the game looks stunning on DX9 hardware running under XP, with a v-sync lock option to help avoid tearing, and seems to be occupying 6.6GB of hard disk space for those wondering. What's more, a few frame-rate issues aside, our seemingly finished code was extremely stable.

Which is good news for PC gamers who have been sticking their fingers in their ears for five months and humming loudly. Assassin's Creed had and has its problems, but it was still a fascinating experience, with brilliantly violent execution moves in sword combat, a real atmosphere and sense of place and enough content to fill a good few evenings.

With the added variety of a few new mission types, the boosted resolution of a fancy graphics card, and a PC starting price of around GBP 25, it will be worth looking again even if the launch reviews put you off way back in November. After all, it was always a question of how much fun you'd have, rather than whether you would have any, and this Director's Cut seems to have been sharpened sensibly.

Assassin's Creed: Director's Cut Edition is due out on PC on 11th April.

Comments (24) Latest comment 4 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • syphaa #1 4 years ago

    I think this would require an UBER rig to run.
    The 360 only just manages to display AC without the odd frame here and there.

    Looks pretty though. Good for PC'ers. I really enjoyed playing this through. Just take it slow to really get immersed.
  • miiiguel #2 4 years ago

    6.6gb? That's a disapointment. I thought these ultra good looking games would only be possible with the Blu-Ray...
  • AtomicBanana #3 4 years ago

    Glad to see PC Gamers aren't left out of the disappointment that is assassins creed ;)
  • Altrezia #4 4 years ago

    I have the PS3 version, but I'm looking forward to the PC version for two reasons
    1- My PC should be able to play it without issue.
    2- The hope that modding community could go mad with it?
  • Darren #5 4 years ago

    AC/PC? Why not AC/DC which has more of a ring to it for some reason and is more acronymically (is that a word?) correct?
  • RamblinSydRumpo #6 4 years ago

    "working for a man in a black cape who sounds like Christopher Lee."

    Have you ever actually heard Christopher Lee? Or are we not referring to Christopher Lee the actor?
  • Freek #7 4 years ago

    They're still pretending there's a secret to be experienced from a story point of view? Because the joke was out even before the console release. And the fact that it wasn't so much a twist as the game's premise, that's explained within the first 30 seconds you start playing it.
  • RedPanda #8 4 years ago

    Post deleted at 14:31:59 28-01-2012
  • benuaq #9 4 years ago

    No Games for Windows Live stuff, yaaay!
  • dsmx #10 4 years ago

    I'm impressed that eurogamer tried it on exactly the same PC specs as I have makes knowing if it will run on my PC very easy.
  • syphaa #11 4 years ago

    Funnily enough Red Panda, its because Shadow of the Colossus is a COMPLETELY different game...or am I missing a joke in there somewhere?
  • Feanor #12 4 years ago

    "As to performance, AC/PC certainly murders your processor - with our 2.4GHz Intel Core2Duo system, equipped with 2GB RAM and a 320MB GeForce 8800 GTS, coping fine with the early Solomon's Temple and Masyaf sections but struggling to pelt 60 frames at our eyes every second in other areas. The Kingdom, in particular, fought hard with our PC's innards, and the innards were losing, as galloping through the sprawling hills and villages became a canter and then an unplanned trot.

    Then again, we were playing at 1920x1080 -"

    Jesus, that's a massive resolution to choose for a brand new game given the good-but-not-great specs you have.

    My PC is the same except my processor only runs at 2.13 GHz, but my monitor only goes up to 1440 * 900.
  • Altrezia #13 4 years ago

    Agree with Feanor.
    Entry level PC imho!
  • Barkotron #14 4 years ago

    Is it processor or graphics limited though? If it's killing your CPU then the resolution is, to a point, irrelevant. Did it speed up a lot at lower resolutions?

    When's this finally out? I've got a pre-order from many, many moons ago I'd like to see turning up...
  • brooza #15 4 years ago

    AC/DC are all Scottish, other than the singer who is a Geordie
  • Nill #16 4 years ago

    Is it processor or graphics limited though?

    Definitely the graphics card in this case - resolution is very graphic-memory intense. Seeing as their card only packs 320mb (I have that very same card as well and really regret not getting one with more RAM), I bet they'd get alot more performance out of it, had they settled for 1280x720 - which is even less than HALF the amount of pixels that 1920x1080 is.
  • Waldo #17 4 years ago

    I think this would require an UBER rig to run.

    It will, because Ubi is well-known for their lack of effort/optimizing with their console-to-PC ports.
  • UncleLou #18 4 years ago

    Those worried that Vista and DirectX 10 will be a necessity needn't be - the game looks stunning on DX9 hardware running under XP

    And the devs already said the DX10 version will look exactly the same, but have better perfromance. Which is as a surprisingly sensible approach.
  • VMerken #19 4 years ago

    Am building an uber rig, will run this cheap puppy for a test or two.

    Neither the Xbox 360 nor the PS3 version looked cool enough to warrant a 60/65EUR 1st day purchase.
  • DodgyPast #20 4 years ago

    An 8800GTS 320Mb will struggle at anything past 1600x1200.

    Those who've got the 512Mb GT's and a proper HD TV are in for a real treat, it's actually one of the better games on a decent PC, no turning down the features, just giving those of us with a decent PC the best looking version.

    \o/
  • Lexx87 #21 4 years ago

    Just got myself a 9800 GT2, should be easy.
  • Svecke #22 4 years ago

    Hey, it'd be great to buy this over Steam! Oh, that's right, they don't sell it to Europeans on there.

    Wankers.
  • 7creature #23 4 years ago

    As it was already said - @ 1920x1200 (heh, even @ 1280x960 with AA and AF) CPU is basically irrelevant.

    Pentium Dual-Core or better, doesn't matter if you run only the game - heh, lowly Pentium Dual-Core will probably give the same result as high-end quadcore - OF COURSE provided you don't run other demanding stuff in the backgroud, like Photoshop, Dreamweaver, WMware emulation of 3 systems or other CPU intensive tasks :-)

    Playing @ 1920x1200 @ max details with old GTS with 320 MB is really, really cheeky. That card struggles with these settings in way older games.
  • apainlessa #24 4 years ago

    Core2Duo here oc'ed at 3.5Ghz, 2GB of RAM at 1000MHz and BFG 8800 GTS 640 OC2 on 1680x1050 resolution. It plays like a dream with everything on high, no stutter no nothing. looks beautiful (not as polished graphics as COD4, but very close) and sound is amazing.oh, DX10 obviously :)
    only Crysis taxes my set-up at the moment at this resolution but then we're still waiting for a graphics card thats going to destroy Crysis....