Geohot: Call of Duty hacks not my fault
"I have never played PS3 online ever."
George "Geohot" Hotz, currently being sued by Sony for cracking the PlayStation 3's security wide open, has denied his actions have led to hacks ruining first-person shooter Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2.
In January developer Infinity Ward blamed Sony and the PS3's compromised security for the Modern Warfare 2 hacks that are blighting the game.
"Sony has recently acknowledged a breach in security on the PS3 which resulted in games to become exposed to exploits and hacks," Robert Bowling, aka fourzerotwo, said.
"Modern Warfare 2 is no exception to this security exploit and we understand that some of you have experienced problems with stats and other issues associated with this."
In an update on Hotz's website, in which he called for donations to help pay for lawyers in his increasingly bitter legal battle against Sony, the US hacker denied the accusation.
"No, I'm not," he said in response to his own question: "Donate to help you, you're the reason I can't play Modern Warfare now..."
"I have never played PS3 online ever. Frankly I'm amazed by the apparent ease with which these cheats were created, security 101, why is the security in the client anyway?
"I had no idea this would happen, and am in full support of the cheaters being permabanned from PSN."
Sony is in the process of banning the PSN accounts of those it suspects of hacking their PS3s.
"By identifying PlayStation 3 systems that breach our guidelines and terminating their ability to connect to PlayStation Network, we are protecting our business and preserving the honest gameplay experiences that you expect and deserve," Sony said.
"Rest assured, this message does not apply to the overwhelming majority of our users who enjoy the world of entertainment PlayStation 3 has to offer without breaching the guidelines detailed above, and we urge you to continue doing so without fear."
You may also like...
-
Going Hardcore in Diablo 3 65
-
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Review 123
-
Judge recommends US Xbox 360 ban 152
-
Japan chart: My Little Sister Can't Possibly Be This Cute takes top spot 65
-
App of the Day: This Could Hurt 3
-
Growing Paynes: How Remedy's Hero Went Rockstar in Max Payne 3 37
-
Diablo 3 Review 242
-
Inside Xbox team set up on their own 30
-
Sony developing Shadow of the Colossus movie 39
-
Wii U Darksiders 2 graphics "at least as good" as PS3, Xbox 360 versions' 53
-
Street Fighter 25th Anniversary Collector's Set announced 40
-
Diablo 3: Blizzard nerfs monk in first hotfix 49
-
Diablo 3 fastest-selling PC game ever, biggest PC game launch in history 70
-
Face-Off: Max Payne 3 146
-
Dragon's Dogma Review 126
Comments (75) Latest comment 1 year ago
Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
/McNulty
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Sure he didn't directly involve in all those particular hacks, but door was opened and now what the long term prospect for playing PS3 online mp games without any cheatings? PC been blighted too but with extra policing via Steam etc helping, so Sony will need to give assistance to IW etc to ensure people are on best behaviour.
X360 too but not as noticeable and MS well known for regularly wielding ban hammer very liberally.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
If you believe this to be illegal or wrong, but have ever downloaded anything in DivX format then you are nothing but an hypocrite. DivX was a hacked codec originally (3.11 and the
What about XBMC which started life on a hacked XBOX console back in the day which turned into a pretty awesome multi platform media centre tool?
Oh noes! The humanity of the history of hacking! Wont someone please think of the children.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"Sir, you maintain that these hacks are not your fault and do not accept any responsibility for any damage done with the work that you produced and released into the wild, is that right? What you have done is like slipping a rohypnol into a girls drink, taking her home and leaving her on the bed, putting a neon sign outside of her door, advertising this fact, with a condom dispenser on her bedside table."
She'd say something along these lines. I am sure of it.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
All he did was crack the security and tell everyone else how to do it.
"All i did was work out how to break into this building and tell everyone else in the world how to do it
Comment below viewing threshold Show
First man says "It wasn't me! I didn't make him stand there! It's all gravity's fault!"
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
He's a scared little kid that did something silly, and is about to get bummed by a giant.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
All you have to do is hexedit your save game file you don't need a hacked PS3.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Seriously, hacking the PS3 to him meant that other prople wouldnt take this work and run with it - for all his programming skills, the guys a fucking moron.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
p2p. Not all games require servers for more than matchmaking.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'd have thought there were plenty of law firms in the US who'd take on his case on the offchance securing a win would make more of a name for them and also take a % of any settlement.
If he runs out of money and ends up lawyerless I guess he can bust out his rap in the courtroom to see if that gets him anywhere.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
You can have your PS3 connected online without playing online. My PS3's on the internet but I pretty much don't play online games on it because of the amount of knobheadery that goes on. Last online game I played at all was Borderlands, and that was only ever with friends. These days it's pretty much 1P or local MP only. But I still buy DLC & etc.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
People saying he is still to blame as he opened the door to it are just ill informed.
That is like saying that if a robber climbed into your house via an open window and stole all your possessions, then a second robber unlocked your door, that the second robber should be blamed for the loss of all your goods!
Sony and Activision are more than happy for people to think that these security issues are all down to GeoHotz as it makes people miss the point that the security on CoD was appalling and could easily be worked around by any hacker (without any help / info / tools from GeoHotz).
Comment below viewing threshold Show
[link url=http://www.ps3news.com/PS3-Hacks/video-call-of-duty-4-ufo-ps3-hack-is-getting-out-of-hand-1/
]http://www.ps3news.com/PS3-Hacks/video-c...[/link]
and here is a report about the leaderboards in PS3 COD:ModernWarfare 2 being hacked in 7th Dec 2009:
[link url=http://www.computerandvideogames.com/228963/news/modern-warfare-2-hack-breaks-ps3-leaderboards/
]http://www.computerandvideogames.com/228...[/link]
GeoHotz released his hack on January 26 2010, so both these issues were already there 'before' his hack.
I'm not saying I agree with him hacking the PS3, but he shouldn't be blamed for what other people have already done.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Geohot can argue that what he did constituted free speech. He can't argue that he was completely ignorant of the consequences. It was obvious what would happen. Likewise it is obvious why Sony are not putting measures in to make PSN off limits to modders.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
These hacks existed before Geohot did his thing.
People just want someone to blame when really it is completely the fault of Infinity Ward.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
He made the tools, he has no say in how people use them.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Also, how many people out there have used a video recorder in the past to record a TV show so they could watch it whenever they want? Should video recorders be illegal? Should you be arrested? If not why not? What is the real difference in a device designed to allow you to copy something to watch back in your own time (or illegally sell, share, modify or watch multiple times skipping additional payments i.e fast-forward ads) and some software that allows you to make a copy of a game as a backup (or illegally sell, modify / hack it)?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
To add to the analogies - just because someone leaves a car unlocked, does that exonerate you from stealing it?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
@stalefart This is the pirate's favourite myth. And I used to spout it a lot. Until I realised I owned a DS with CycloDS and exactly zero official games.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
a) You DON'T need a hacked PS3 to do the CoD exploits. (Just bloody google it people!)
b) These exploits pre-date both his and failoverfl0w's "work" by quite some time.
With these in mind how the hell can he be responsible for ruining your CoD games?
You *may* be able go lay the blame for opening the door to piracy, but for allowing hex-editing files to exploit save-games... that's down to the devs poor security checks and whichever cheating toe-rag decided leak how to do it on YouTube et al.
I suspect GeoHot and co will now be used rightly or wrongly as a scape-goat for any and all of Sony's PS3 woes for some time.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Let's be honest, XBL is also a wasteland since they introduced cross game chat. In Halo or Gears of War all you ever see are speech bubbles next to peoples' names and the people using their mic are usually morons anyway.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
(Well all pirates are a problem but...)
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Oh, ok. Thanks for taking the time to clear that up.
:/
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I've also heard the "myth" re: the spending / downloading ration of "pirates". I think this is the article that stalefart & co allude to;
[link url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/4718249.stm
]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/4718249.stm
[/link]
Whether it's true today (or even applicable to videogames) is another thing. Not even sure it was true then tbh. Figures can and will be easily manipulated, just look at any & all government released statistics (regardless of which govenment / country of residence).
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Also, putting your PayPal donation links back up was really stupid. If Sony successfully prove that you've made even a couple of cents in profit from your work you're looking at a potential criminal charge for profiting from unlawful activity when Sony crush your rather weak legal defence and win this case.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I hope Sony tear you a new arsehole in court you dick!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
And as has been pointed already; CoD was suffering from hacks and glitches long before the PS3 was jailbroken.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Been hearing this line a lot the last few weeks, not going to happen, ever. Firstly look at the 360, it included no new anti-piracy protection at launch and was piracy enabled almost immediately, it retained and even built on the support of the original Xbox, which also didn't feature any new countermeasures and was piracy enabled almost immediately. Nintendo DS is arguably the most pirated games device on the market right now, still supported by most big name publishers. Historically, piracy has had zero appreciable effect on the support a platform receives from publishers/developers, I very much doubt that the PS3 will be the first here.
Secondly, if we look back at just the last 18 months or so you'll notice that development on the PS3 has actually increased/improved. In 2008/early 2009 most developers simply ported to the PS3, we got none of the PS3's unique features, shitty frame rates and memory issues as the code wasn't properly optimised. From mid 2009 onwards cross platform parity has vastly improved, games are including more of the PS3s unique features like Youtube uploading and in game screenshots, frame rates are more or less equal to the 360, new AA techniques have been developed that play to the strengths of RSX, even Valve has gotten on board and are brining cross platform saves and multiplayer with them. Developers are finally realising that the slow burn of the PS3 is going to make it the bigger platform in the end and are starting to put the effort in, some are even changing sides, I doubt that the concept of piracy will change that either.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
1) Geohot didn't crack PS3's security, FailOverFlow did. What Geohot is sued for is the fact that he distributed the keys and tools to hack. (IMHO that was illegal and even morally wrong, but that's besides the point)
2) COD hacks have nothing to do with the hacked security of PS3. What Geohot said is true: Security 101=never trust a client. You don't need a hacked PS3 to hack COD. It's entirely the COD dev's fault that they screwed up their server security.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Jessica "geoHotz" Pollard.
whatever.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
nah i'm kinding he wont get lock up in the clink, he may get a reduced fine and a job working for sony in there I.T department.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
http://www.cnet.com/4520-6033_1-6376177-...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
also its funny how its all been put on geohot already. The fail0verflow guys had a conference about the hack before geohot stepped into the light. They demonstrated teh hack and mentioned how it was done, then SOMEHOW it all became geohots hack.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
It's been done for chip and PIN, and for the Oyster card.
You'll notice how no one that discovered or publicised these exploits has gone to jail. If you were caught using these exploits for illegal purposes however, then you'd be in the shit.
Draw from that analogy what you will.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
is the author of how to add nitrious speed boost to a car liable for when someone uses info to exceed the speed limit? No.
I can buy a book on how to make a bomb, but only the person that uses the bomb to kill is guilty not the author.
A hammer may be used as an useful tool or a murder weapon.
Geohot simply gave a how to get into te system how to, he Never posted a how to cheat how to.
All these posts metaphors showing guilt are lame.
FYI one court already ruled Jailbteaking an iPhone IS LEGAL!!
So legal precedent is on his side.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xKOX91vPcc
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Finally someone speaking sense on here, thank the lord.
Ofcourse legal precedent is on his side people - no court in the world would ever side with Sony - no judge would want to be the man to create the scenario in which they admit that a company owns its product after it has been sold. It would raise too many difficult questions about ownership/personal property and the transference of rights regarding the use of property once money has exchanged hands.
What Geohot did was document the manipulation of a product Sony created and sold. Its not like we are renting our consoles from Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft. Surely once money has exchanged hands, we own the rights to use, alter, and destroy the product in any way we see fit because it belongs to us.
He has already won - they are just going to cripple him with legal costs, slow him down with cease and desist notifications as the case progresses.
@Butr0sButr0s
Yeh that was a bit dumb - distributing the copywrited material was some what dumb. But then again, it is still a tricksy topic, given that he has simply accessed information off a product he now owns, having gained the rights to it after having exchanged money for it? I dunno.
I should have listened more to my old law-student housemate
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
They'd tell me they have an update to my engine.
The new engine is better, but it removes my air conditioner.
This annoys me cuz I like my cool air.
But Chevy tells me I don't have to update my
Engine, if I want to keep air condition feature
That's ok, don't update - I just can't drive it then!!!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
What he did was wrong yes, but the article is about Geohot being blamed for the Call of Duty hacks and him denying it. That is true, in in this case 'that' is what matters. Sony / Activision are trying to cover up the fact that they had crappy client side security by blaming it all on Geohot when nothing to do with these hacks are related to anything Geohot did.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
It's not that simple.
The court decided that Apple's protection was NOT to prevent unlawful copying, but to prevent competition. Therefore an exception to the DMCA was added which specifically mentions smartphones (even jailbreaking an iPad is still illegal).
Geohot's publishing of the PS3 encryption keys can still be considered an act of copyright protection circumvention, which is illegal. And obviously a PS3 is not a phone.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
-Firemonkey. I agree with you 100%. Blame shouldn't be placed on him for the call of duty cheating. I was just focusing on the the current lawsuit against him and what I believe will be the inevitable outcome for better or for worse.