How Castlevania Nearly Didn't Happen

Dave Cox reflects on the ups and downs of making Lords of Shadow.

Dave Cox is tired. He's spent the last two and a half years flying back and forth from Spain to the US to Japan making Castlevania: Lords of Shadow the best game it could possibly be. Now, with the game out, a top ten UK all-formats chart entry under its belt, and positive reviews to savour, it all seems worthwhile.

Here, in an interview with Eurogamer, the UK-born producer reveals the trials and tribulations of a project that Konami cancelled, approved, then cancelled again.

Eurogamer: Are you satisfied with the end result?

Dave Cox: I'm very satisfied. I'm very proud of the game. It's my first really big game. I've worked on New International Track & Field and GTI Club, but this is the first game where I was responsible. I had freedom to do what I wanted with Enrique [Ventura, senior game designer at Mercury Steam] and the Kojima guys.

A lot of developers have the management overseeing everything. We didn't have that at all. Because Kojima was on board, it was like, well just get on with it. So we had a lot of freedom to do what we wanted to do. That was nice. It was liberating.

Eurogamer: It's great that Kojima was associated with the game, but was it terrifying?

Dave Cox: There was pressure. It was quite tense. But it wasn't as bad as I thought it was going to be. We thought, oh, we're going to have to submit everything and he's going to have a say on everything. He was clear right from the beginning: this is your baby. You need to run with this. I'm just going to help you. I'll give you my advice, my experience, mentor you if you like, but it's your baby.

A few times we submitted things to them and they said, 'Well, maybe if you do this, do that.' Nine times out of 10 we'd try to accommodate what they wanted. But occasionally we couldn't. If there were technical reasons we'd say we can't actually do this. I'm really sorry. And they'd go, 'That's fine.'

But it's been great. I knew Kojima from Metal Gear Solid. When Metal Gear Solid was being developed I was a product manager for that. I went out to Japan and I met him and we got to know each other. We had the same interest in films and we got on well.

Having him on board was a bit nerve-racking but it was like having my friend to lean on, to say, 'We've got this problem, how would you guys solve this?' They would come back with solutions and it would be fantastic. If you're on your own you're on your own, you know what I mean? We had Kojima's team to give us feedback. They said, 'When we did MGS4 we did it this way.'

Eurogamer: Is there an example?

Dave Cox: We had big problems with lip-synch and facial animations. We did mocap but we didn't capture facials. When it came to doing all the lip-synching we were having a nightmare. The Kojima guys came to Spain – they said, 'We can't explain this on the phone. We're going to have to show you.' So they brought all the rigs of Snake. Then they showed us how they did it, how they rigged it. They helped us set it up.

A tip they gave us is, they shaded the teeth. When you've got teeth, it's all laid out flat. They shaded all the teeth and the tongue they made black, so that it looked like it was in a mouth. In some games you have really glowing teeth. It doesn't look right. They said, well if you shade the teeth – it's a simple thing when you think about it, you think, well, it's obvious, but so many games don't do it. We were like, this is amazing. We did it and it came out really well. The lip-synch and the facials with Gabriel are amazing.

Eurogamer: It's great you had that relationship, because I imagine some Japanese publishers would be more controlling with their beloved intellectual property.

Dave Cox: It's a trust issue. It's about respect. At the beginning there was scepticism and worry and mistrust. It took us a long time to get this project off the ground – well over a year of convincing people, bringing presentations and showing them the work we were doing.

People weren't convinced. At the beginning it was very frustrating. I remember coming back from the States after a presentation thinking, this isn't going to happen. But slowly and surely we carried on.

We did a playable level prototype – one of the levels in the middle of the game, actually. We brought it to Japan to a line-up meeting. Konami has line-up meets twice a year where all the development studios show what they've been working on. At that meeting everything changed. I'll never forget it. I came out of the meeting, Kojima-san was shaking my hand and talking to me about helping. And then it was, yeah, you guys have got the green light. This is go. Do it. It was a fantastic feeling. After so much hard work and tears and everything else it was brilliant.

Since that day it was relatively easy. Before that getting the project off the ground wasn't easy.

She doesn't look too healthy...

Eurogamer: Was it a cultural issue?

Dave Cox: It was a trust issue. It's Castlevania. It's a brand that's always been associated with Konami, especially in the old days when it was a very big title for Konami. There was worry about... One was the concept, because we wanted to take it in a more Western, darker, mature, gritty look and feel, bring it up to date with modern 3D. There was trepidation about it right from the get-go.

And also because it was a Spanish development studio. Japan wouldn't be in charge. To a certain extent, perhaps that's why Mr Kojima put his name to it, because it reassured everybody in Japan. Oh, if Kojima thinks it's great then fine.

Up to that point there was a lot of mistrust. Is it Castlevania? Isn't it Castlevania? Is this going to be homage to Castlevania? What's it going to be? We just carried on developing. We said, we're going to make the game, and if we have to change things here and there then fine, we'll do it. But we just wanted to get the game off the ground. It all fell into place.

Eurogamer: Was there a real danger that it might not have been released?

Dave Cox: Oh yeah. Oh yeah. Many times. Many, many times. In fact, there were a couple of times when it got stopped.

Eurogamer: Before that fabled meeting?

Dave Cox: Before. We were told we couldn't go ahead with it. I said, well, we've already prepared something. Can I at least come and show you this? And if you don't like it, fine.

We had Simon Belmont coming out of a castle, and a vampire. I don't know if we'll make it available later – maybe we will. It looks a bit crude now. But at the time it was fantastic. I flew to America and I showed this and then, thankfully, we got a stay of execution. They said go to prototype. It was a struggle.

Eurogamer: Was it marketing's job to build up hype for the game before release? Did you, as a developer, care about that kind of thing?

Dave Cox: We didn't intend to create a blockbuster. That wasn't the plan. The plan was to reintroduce Castlevania. We didn't have a multimillion-dollar budget. We didn't have 300 people working on the project. We're a pretty small team. Not a huge budget – middle-size budget if you like. Nothing like the kind of titles we're compared to.

We thought, let's just make a solid entry and reintroduce Castlevania and then take it step by step – see what happens after that. We never looked past this project at all. We just thought, we just want to do it and if this is the last thing we ever do, that's fine.

The hype and build-up was amazing but a little bit scary. You don't expect that. I never expected people to cheer and clap at E3. When I got up on stage I was surprised when everyone went crazy. You just don't expect that – well I certainly didn't.

All the hype and goodwill for the game, you always hope in your mind people will like what you're doing, of course. But you don't expect it. When good things happen, it's great. I'm pleased people like the game. I'm proud of the game on a personal level. If it's the last thing I ever do, I'll be totally happy with that. I'm proud to have my name associated with this game. All the people I worked with on this game sweat blood and tears. We cried together. It's got soul.

I've played it hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of times – I still get chills at certain points in the game. That's a good sign. We have a bit of a joke about it at Mercury Steam. I've got quite hairy arms, so if the hairs on my arms go goink, everyone's like, that's a good barometer that it's working.

Eurogamer: Castlevania is compared to a lot of games. What games is it fairly compared to, and what games is it unfairly compared to?

Dave Cox: I can understand the comparisons because a lot of people playing games are not aware of the history of Castlevania, and are not as old as I am. So I can understand why people say this game's like God of War, this game's like Uncharted. A lot of this goes on in the games industry anyway, where everything's compared to every other game.

I don't buy the comparisons to God of War. I've never been comfortable with it because we never set out to make a game like God of War. That wasn't the intention, at all.

Eurogamer: But do you understand that comparison?

Dave Cox: I do understand. When I look at it now I do understand. But when you've played enough of it you know it's not like God of War. It's got its little moments, but generally it's not like God of War.

Eurogamer: Gamers, though, have to form opinions based on previews, videos and trailers before release.

Dave Cox: Yeah. The demo we released at E3 was a bit worrying. Players got five minutes to pick the game up, play it, and then walk away. They need to be able to do things straight away. So we gave them the tutorial level, which is very combat-orientated because you're teaching the players combos. We were worried people were going to think it's just like this all the way through. That was a bit of a concern.

But I figured if people have fun with it, then they could read previews and reviews and understand the game is not just about combat in enclosed arenas.

Eurogamer: It's not just like God of War?

Dave Cox: Exactly. So it was a bit of a risk. But at the same time, I didn't want to drop them into a stage, die five times and go f*** that. I don't like it. It was a judgement call.

The game is more akin to the original classic Castlevanias. When we sat down, that was what we wanted to do. We wanted to go back to the classic Vanias, platforming, killing enemies as a guy on his way to the castle with a whip.

And we wanted a journey, like the older games. But a lot of games have taken influence from other games. In God of War, there are a lot of Castlevania influences there. If David Jaffe was here I'd chat with him and say, I'm sure there are some Castlevania things in there, and he'd probably say yeah, of course there are.

So I understand the comparisons, but I hope people see there's more to it than that.

Eurogamer: What about comparisons with Uncharted?

Dave Cox: I love Uncharted 2. I got reported as saying I hated it or something. That's absolutely not true. Uncharted 2, that and Batman [Arkham Asylum] were last year's best games. It's wonderful to be compared to a game like Uncharted.

Comments (27) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Golgo #1 2 years ago

    Any sign of PS3 save patch?
  • speedjack #2 2 years ago

    Am adding this to my Xmas list.

    3d Castlevania sounds sacrilegious to me - but I've only heard good things about this.

    /looks

    Hey - its only £22.99 @ game ! SOLD :-

    http://www.game.co.uk/Games/Xbox-360/Act...
    Edited by speedjack at 27/10/10 @ 15:06
  • muscleblade #3 2 years ago

    Glad it got made. It was a journey worth taking even if it took awhile to get to the end. The game could have been half as long and be better for it. The lenght of the game made it more epic of course. The game has so much replay value though and it will take 100 hours to fully complete it.
  • J0rdan_KZ #4 2 years ago

    Lords of Shadow is actually a pretty damn good game. In my opinion it manages to make itself more distinct from God of War by allowing the player to be offensive as well as defensive in their attacks (by using shadow and light magic respectively). And at the same time, didn't turn into Dante's Inferno.

    I really only had 2 complaints about the game. I often felt that many of the unlockable moves were simply not powerful enough or executed fast enough to be useful against larger enemies who could kill you in 2 hits even on Normal and that the narrative felt incredibly disconnected from the actual gameplay. I'd go into more detail but huge spoilers are stopping me! :)
    Edited by J0rdan_KZ at 27/10/10 @ 12:15
  • Paulie_P #5 2 years ago

    I bought this on Friday and loving it so far - to me its more than an 8.
  • geordiek #6 2 years ago

    Anyone know how this was recieved in japan?
    Great game, loved the cut scene after the credits!
  • spekkeh #7 2 years ago

    Well as a tip for next time, artists should work in service of the level designers, instead of the other way round.

    It's certainly the prettiest game I've ever seen, which is hugely commendable for a dev team that according to him 'didn't have a multimillion dollar budget' (I don't really believe it, what with Stewart and Carlyle in there), but it certainly feels like they drew all this epic scenery and then tried to figure out how one would traverse it. It was the first game in a very long time where after being frustrated to the bone, I thought, sod it, I'm using a walkthrough.
  • gaming47 #8 2 years ago

    my friends say this game is not bad and not good
  • klem578 #9 2 years ago

    I'm on the 8th chapter right now and i have to say that it's been a a while since i enjoyed an action game as much as this, really epic stuff lads, awesome, awesome artwork, brilliant soundtrack and the atmosphere is so thick that you can cut it with a knife...

    Mr Cox, if you're reading this, i think that you've made a terrific job with your team BUT, next time ( for the sequel that is) please do the following :

    1) Don't actually lie about platform parity regarding technical issues that the game has (bad framerate on one console, even worse on the other one)...

    2) Spend some actual time in optimizing the game engine because frankly, LOS has one of the worst framerates in a game out there - can't get it running at 60fps ? (which most action games like NG/DMC/Bayonetta do so for a reason) - fraking optimize it so that it can run -at least - at 30fps.
    The technical aspects of the game really bring it down, it's a real shame since the rest of the package is glorious.
    Also, while you're at it, implement some actual lip-sync in the next one because it feels like we're watching mimes performing in LOS, it's pretty strange thing too since you've actually received help from Konami Japan (K.productions) regarding this matter.
    The character modeling for the humans (besides Gabriel) seems like it's been done by fresh graduates out of a 3D modeling school.
    For the game to bear the "official Kojima productions logo" TM, it feels shonky and somewhat unfinished - always regarding the tech aspects of it- i'm quite surprised that you were able to ship the game in this state, 22-23FPS average in an action game is -how shall i put it- a pretty "bad thing" to do...

    3) Remove that horrible shaky-cam effect, it's downright nausea inducing, plus, it adds absolutely nothing to the presentation/feel of the game.

    4) The combat is pretty good in LOS but you could fine-tune it by adding some invincibility frames here 'n' there between moves and having your enemies actually stagger during mid-combo.
    Assign the dodge and block functions to different buttons.

    I bought this one and i will most surely buy the sequel too but please, show some actual coding/optimization efficiency for the next one.

    For a 1st "try"/outing though you did a pretty amazing job, keep it up :)
    Edited by klem578 at 27/10/10 @ 12:57
  • Vanmunt #10 2 years ago

    managed to get half way through chapter 10 before calling it a day... first time I haven't finished a game for a long time. Others may like it, I found it boring and the puzzles a chore.
  • cherryuk #11 2 years ago

    hmmm as much I like Castlevania and have been a fan for ages, I tried the demo and the whole slow down thing annoyed me a little bit too much and it's too close to God of War.
  • Darren #12 2 years ago

    Castlevania: LoS was a real surprise for me. I enjoyed the demo but I've never been a fan of the earlier games - hell, I barely even played them except for a demo or two and I loathed the dated 2D XBLA game I tried earlier on this year - but I love the full game. It's beautiful to look at, fun to play,and the boss fights are just the right side of challenging. Even the audio is perfect.

    Love the mix of combat and exploration but to be honest it does feel an awful lot like God of War III, not that that is a complaint as that is one of my 2010 gaming highlights. The similarities are probably why I'm enjoying the new Castlevania game so much but at least this one is longer than 7 hours!
  • SnoppleMonster #13 2 years ago

  • Golgo #14 2 years ago

    Thanks for heads-up SnoppleMonster. Let the vampire slaying (re-)commence!
  • djed #15 2 years ago

    That trailer was pretty competent, to say the least.
  • riz23 #16 2 years ago

    Got to say this game is actually rather brilliant! I played the demo and thought hmm is this really Castlevania? A mate said hey, it's good you should go get it, so I did, and fuck me if it isn't amazing. Incredible looks, up there with anything, wild bosses, and still has a Castlevania feel. Dave Cox, you and your crew did a top notch job!
  • RexRunti #17 2 years ago

    I actually really enjoyed this game. However a lot of the character models were a bit shonky (villagers and the fact that his wife and the mute girl looked nearly identical), the witch levels were pointless to the overall story and most importantly too many of the puzzles (whilst cool) relied on colour making the game imposible to colour blind people. That said I'd get a sequel if it came out.

    PS. Did any one else find it funny that the guy that looked like Sean Connery was voiced by Patrick Stewart?
  • Munkhee #18 2 years ago

    Excellent game. Played this just after (belatedly) finishing God of War 3, and in my opinion Castlevania is the better game. Astounding achievement given MecurySteam's last game (Jericho, which I also played), and the fact that the GoW team had the benefit of building on an established design. That Castlevania is also over twice as long as GoW3, and features more variety in creature designs and locations, BUT no doubt had a much smaller budget is simply incredible. Well done to everyone involved! Count me in for the sequel :-)
  • SG79 #19 2 years ago

    Like last year's Batman AA, this was this year's most pleasant surprise. Well done throughout, and graphically, aside from some A2C grass sticking out, it's pretty much as detailed as the pre-rendered backgrounds used in the GC RE games. The combat was well done, the storyline telling, pacing. Definitely a personal GOTY.
  • popflux #20 2 years ago

    This is a great game. The combat is awesome, the graphics are as good as anything out there, the soundtrack is epic. Even the story, which I felt was the weakest part of the game, REALLY picked up at the end and I am totally on board for the sequel. This is up there with Mass Effect, BFBC2 and Super Street Fighter 4 for my personal GOTY.
  • technicianTed #21 2 years ago

    I enjoyed the game but it wasn't in my top 5 list of games of the year.
    I found by the 2nd half i got a little bit bored doing the same thing over and over again(that could be due to the size of the game).

    It did have great graphics and music though despite a wobbly framerate at times.

    Mass effect 2 is my game of the year(so far).
  • carlosdfn #22 2 years ago

    As someone who loved this game I just want to thank eurogamer for this fantastic interview. Looks like they had a very rough time but fortunately in the end it was worth it.
  • captain-future #23 2 years ago

    what I personally missed was the "classic" CV art, look and feel, the protagonist looks more like a generic Prince of Persia than anything else.

    don't get me wrong, I gave Lords of Shadow a positive 8/10 but I'm on the fence about is it a true CV game?
  • spekkeh #24 2 years ago

    Finished the game a few seconds ago (pretty awesome ending btw), I noticed the relatively small dev team, they must have some of the best artists ever, truly brilliant stuff, must have busted their balls off.

    Still, they must up their level design and QA teams if I'd be inclined to buy the sequel.
  • gjgjg #25 2 years ago

    '...put shading on the teeth' lol. I cant believe such an obvious improvement is a 'wow I'd never have tried that' thing!

    Liking the game a lot, it's a nice challenge. The biggest gripes I have is the:
    - 'over detail' factor -where things look very shiney and a bit pixel-messy due to very fine details coming out as kinda pixelated. A 'fuzzing up' of edges would be nice, I get that they were going for fine detail in dense amounts but it just doesnt translate that well imo.
    -shake effect (is it intended low quality motion blur?-hard to say) I thought it could be related to the above, but i find myself going through my tv settings again and again to find something to tone it down. In the end I just walk through the levels instead of run!
    -frame rates in cut scenes. Feels related to the first point, sacrificing overall output quality to pack more (action in this case) in.
    Gripes aside, loving it!
  • slivir #26 2 years ago

    Still only half way through the game. I love it. You can see a lot of love went into this game. The art direction is probably the best I've yet seen in a video game. Let's hope they get the go ahead to make another one.
  • Phishfood #27 2 years ago

    Nice to see Kojima helping out the little guys