Bulletstorm dev denies Duke Nukem nod

But Bleszinski has had big influence.

Pulp sci-fi, muscle-bound alpha males, bad language, outrageous violence – on the face of it, it would seem Epic's forthcoming FPS Bulletstorm and the Duke Nukem series have a lot in common. Not so, insists developer People Can Fly.

"It's hard to believe, and I often kick myself for this, but I never really played Duke," the Polish studio's creative director, Adrian Chmielarz, told Eurogamer.

"I mean, I tried a few times, but I somehow always stopped playing after the first chapter or so. It was 1996, and I guess I did not know enough about American pop culture to appreciate Duke properly. So yeah, I never truly played it, so I guess I can honestly say that Bulletstorm was not inspired by Duke.

"I might be wrong," he continued, "but I believe Duke was always more of a parody than a real story, and while our one-liners and over-the-topness are icing on the cake, for Duke it is the cake. I guess people sometimes compare both games just because there's nothing else out there you can compare your game to if it's not a modern conflict type of shooter or just a shooter that's not afraid of humor."

Chmielarz went on to explain how much input Epic's design director and Gears of War creator Cliff Bleszinski has had on the game.

"Cliff - and a lot of other guys from Epic - have huge influence on the game. They're an integral part of the development process. That's their modus operandi; they worked very long and very hard to become one of the most respected and successful developers in the world and they'd never attach their name to anything that is not up to their ridiculously high standards.

"But it's important to remember that PCF is not an indie developer that Epic funds or something. We are Epic. It's just that Epic brass allowed us to keep the name, but other than this, we're just Epic, so it's not surprising that Cliff and the gang are heavily involved with the development of Bulletstorm."

People Can Fly started out as an independent developer but was snapped up by Epic following its bonkers, Marmite 2004 shooter, Painkiller. Has much changed since Cliff and the gang stepped in?

"There were 15 of us in 2002, and now there are over 70 of us supported by numerous companies from all around the globe, so the total number of people working on the game is in the hundreds.

"But you know what? I don't know how, but we managed to retain the spirit and the madness that was PCF in 2002, so despite the fact that now we have to be, like, serious and professional and stuff, we're still the guys who work hard so you can be rewarded for shooting other people in the ass."

You can take Chmielarz up on that offer when Bulletstorm launches on PC, PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 in February 2011. Eurogamer's Kristan Reed went hands-on with the game in May.

Gearbox Software's Duke Nukem Forever, also for PC, PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360, shouldn't be too far behind it.

Comments (7) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Lexx87 #1 2 years ago

    This game looks epic so I'm quite excited by it. Painkiller was simply fantastic so I have high hopes for this.
  • Skurmedel #2 2 years ago

    Is he saying Duke wasn't a good shooter? To the stakes! And bring torches! :)
  • DaemonSpawn #3 2 years ago

    It's fair to say that most of the modern gamers haven't played any Duke Nukem. I remember Quake, Half-Life or Mechwarrior 2 fondly, but have no special feelings about Duke. Hell, that ventrilo harassment youtube video is probably more popular than the game itself.
    It may have been fun at the time, but definitely not a breakthrough - who'd even know about DNF have it not been in development for 12 years?

    Painkiller meanwhile is relatively fresh (2004) shooter which was the first to implement physics engine for something better than messing with idiotic puzzles - that stake gun is among the best weapons I've ever possessed in virtual reality. Not to mention imaginative enemy design, fantastic levels and decent metal soundtrack.

    So who needs DNF anyway? Better have a proper Painkiller successor like Bulletstorm than a sequel to the game no one played.
    And where the hell are Colonial Marines, Gearbox?
    Edited by DaemonSpawn at 08/10/10 @ 22:44
  • HeNiCiDe1988 #4 2 years ago

    theres no way they weren influenced or havnt played duke nukem 3d. But it was a late announcement and so they went for a hero that isnt the norm with the current heroes which was that of a duke nukem type and then duke got announced so they aint the only one. But painkiller was an awesome game so even if the heroes are similar which is quiteclear the games will be totally different.
  • superstu1337 #5 2 years ago

    Oi Pisalin try pissing off you fucking retard.

    In other news:

    MISS PAC-MAN DEVS DENY PAC-MAN INFLUENCE.
  • Alf-Life #6 2 years ago

    "denies"? Making a non-story into a headline EG? :p
  • Felwyn #7 2 years ago

    "I guess people sometimes compare both games just because there's nothing else out there you can compare your game to if it's not a modern conflict type of shooter or just a shooter that's not afraid of humor."

    video game industry in a sentence.