Homefront

Leaping into a Homefront multiplayer demo in its first throes is like witnessing several dozen people all failing their driving tests at once. The game's jeeps and tanks are pretty zippy once you get to grips with them, but they're quirky; with forward and reverse on the left stick, and turning tied to the camera, there's a little bit of brain-lag to take into account. So, for the first few moments, fender benders and other slapstick RTAs dominate most of the action on the map.

Homefront's single-player mode bravely asks the question, "What if North and South Korea joined forces and tried to take over the world?" (The answer, incidentally, is that ignorant westerners such as myself would spend a lot less time asking questions like, "Which one's the bunch who really like StarCraft?")

The multiplayer game, meanwhile, asks simpler questions such as, "Would you prefer to blow up 31 other people using a silenced SMG or a rocket launcher stuck to the undercarriage of a model helicopter?"

Kaos Studios made a name for itself with the likes of Frontlines: Fuel of War and, before that, the Desert Combat mod for Battlefield: 1942. Large-scale encounters are in the team's DNA (as are Homefront's remote-controlled drone vehicles), so it's no surprise to see that Homefront's multiplayer cranks the player cap up to 32.

Nor is it a shock to realise you're being let loose in some of the largest maps you've probably seen in quite a while. The developers don't want these roomier, busier theatres to lapse into bland chaos, however, so they've introduced a few ideas to keep players focused.

1/11 We're promised dedicated servers on PC and consoles, which should be nice.

Previous Next View all ▸

Which is why while Homefront has staples (such as customisable load-outs, a persistent experience system, weapon unlocks and lots of familiar vehicles to blast around in) it also has a brand new idea. Titled Battle Points, or BP, it's a brilliantly shameless ploy to pay people to work together - and it seems to do the trick.

While you're awarded BP for kills and assists, you also get them for any action that helps your side directly or indirectly - whether you're capturing and defending locations, or zipping around in a recon drone and tagging enemies for the benefit of team-mates' radars.

BP can be used to buy weapons and vehicles on the fly. It's all done down on the d-pad and it's a pretty compelling system. Chunky decisions abound: head to the shops early and get a nice big gun, or wait to save up for that tank you've always wanted? It's like being eight again and learning to manage pocket money.

The new system has allowed Kaos to create matches that have an intoxicating sense of momentum to them as the big unlocks get earned. It's s also provided the opportunity to fix a couple of things that have needed fixing for a while.

Take vehicle spawning, for instance: rather than camping at vehicle hot spots for the next tank to auto-generate, you can buy one then choose to spawn in the driver's seat wherever you are. Or you can spend a bit less and spawn in another team-mate's vehicle, giving him a pleasant surprise – and a turret operator – in the process.

There's undoubtedly a spot of balancing to be done, however. At the moment Kaos positively flings BP at you, even giving you additional points for little things like rivalry kills.

Weaker players aren't left impoverished, either. At one point in my pre-alpha demo (and purely for the sake of objectivity, right?) I spent a whole match stumbling into gun fights backwards and stepping fatally out of flying choppers. However, I still had enough BP at the end for a down-payment on a tank. There's a happy medium to strike here: I shouldn't be kept out of the fun for being rubbish, but I shouldn't be too richly rewarded for wanton idiocy either.

Battle Points aren't the only thing Kaos has been working on to bring order to multiplayer. If bribery keeps you on message, the newly unveiled Ground Control mode should ensure that players keep circulating, too. Ground Control spawns three capture points on the map, and teams have to hold them in order to score. Once a score limit is reached, the round ends and the capture points shift about.

It makes for a dynamic game. Kitted out for sniping and tank warfare over wide open spaces, you'll be calmly sitting there just, you know, capturing Bravo, when everything changes and the score zones are suddenly wedged inside a deadly ramble of close-knit streets where your big juddering motor won't fit and your scoped rifle will be useless.

The maps shown so far showcase the different scope of the matches available quite well. Cul-de-Sac, an infantry only affair, is a riddle of tattered sitcom suburbs where vehicles simply wouldn't work, and soldiers fight it out in driveways and back yards on their own.

Farm, meanwhile, is much bigger: it's autumn in the countryside, the kettle's on and the crops are burning, and you can fiddle around with a range of choppers, tanks and jeeps - all of which are pretty deadly.

And there's always the drones, of course: dangerous little model choppers and buggies that allow you to mess with the enemy in some humiliating ways. It's largely a tactical choice: if you're taking damage, do you buy a mini-tank and race through the streets shooting rockets up people's trouser legs to draw the heat away from you?

Or do you take to the sky in a buzzy little helicopter kitted out to blast enemies from above and perform basic reconnaissance? The drones handle effortlessly and bring a pleasant kind of deadly Wall-E chic to proceedings, but the trade off is that you're a sitting duck when at the controls.

The world of the online military multiplayer game is one deathmatch I wouldn't personally want to have too much riding on at the moment. However, Homefront is looking pretty smart. With a focus on large-scale battles to mark it out and some clever ideas to make those battles actually work, this could be a viable option for anyone tired of Call of Duty or Bad Company.