Rate the last film you watched out of 100 Page 2033

  • Page

    of 2842 First / Last

  • Deckard1 11 Dec 2012 16:06:07 29,160 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    nickthegun wrote:
    I dont think that strictly counts
    I think you missed the face. The argument is over ipso fatso the face wins all

    [img]http://www.premiermodelstyle.com/premier-blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/smug-smile.jpg
    [/img]

    Fish fingers and chips pretty straight forward.

  • Deleted user 11 December 2012 16:14:35
    The Hobbit was written first, but then after LotR he went back and rewrote bits of it so it fit better with the LotR storyline.

    Just thought I'd throw that out there for shits and giggles.

    Edited by meme at 16:15:54 11-12-2012
  • Deckard1 11 Dec 2012 16:17:00 29,160 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    The argument is over. Don't make me post the face again.

    Fish fingers and chips pretty straight forward.

  • LeoliansBro 11 Dec 2012 16:18:53 44,736 posts
    Seen 43 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    So Star Wars, the Dicked-About-With Edition is a prequel to The Empire Strikes Back, original edition?

    LB, you really are a massive geek.

  • Gambit1977 11 Dec 2012 16:19:58 10,382 posts
    Seen 15 hours ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    LeoliansBro wrote:
    So Star Wars, the Dicked-About-With Edition is a prequel to The Empire Strikes Back, original edition?
    No!

    It's an adaptation ;)
  • Deleted user 11 December 2012 16:23:34
    I don't think the book Hobbit is a prequel myself, just saying that there's no real convenient pigeonhole for it.
  • Deleted user 11 December 2012 16:30:40
    Lucas claims the whole 12 episodes of Star Wars were written before the original trilogy came out, so is the "prequel" trilogy not actually prequels?
  • Deckard1 11 Dec 2012 16:32:34 29,160 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    No that's just a case of Lucas talking shit.

    Fish fingers and chips pretty straight forward.

  • LeoliansBro 11 Dec 2012 16:47:47 44,736 posts
    Seen 43 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    meme wrote:
    I don't think the book Hobbit is a prequel myself, just saying that there's no real convenient pigeonhole for it.
    It kinda is a prequel IMO. Prequels don't have to be written after the books they foreshadow.

    LB, you really are a massive geek.

  • Jeepers 11 Dec 2012 16:49:44 13,230 posts
    Seen 1 minute ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    TDKR: 4/10
    It was quite shit. And I liked the last one quite a bit.
  • Deleted user 11 December 2012 16:51:52
    Well, that's sort of what I meant. I don't think it's a prequel, but people who think it is aren't really wrong.
  • Deleted user 11 December 2012 16:53:55
    Was the Red Dragon film a prequel?

    (And yes, I know about Manhunter).
  • ronuds 11 Dec 2012 17:01:48 21,788 posts
    Seen 1 year ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    I'm pretty sure Red Dragon's a prequel, but I can't remember what makes me believe that.
  • LeoliansBro 11 Dec 2012 17:02:51 44,736 posts
    Seen 43 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Because it is set earlier than Silence of the Lambs.

    LB, you really are a massive geek.

  • ronuds 11 Dec 2012 17:07:03 21,788 posts
    Seen 1 year ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Something in the movie must happen to give that away?

    That's what I can't remember.
  • nickthegun 11 Dec 2012 17:09:00 61,039 posts
    Seen 50 seconds ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    But the book was written before the silence of the lambs, so its not a prequel.

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    My man gives real loving that's why I call him Killer
    He's not a wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am, he's a thriller

  • nickthegun 11 Dec 2012 17:12:05 61,039 posts
    Seen 50 seconds ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    ronuds wrote:
    Something in the movie must happen to give that away?

    That's what I can't remember.
    The fact that it quite explicitly is set before silence of the lambs.

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    My man gives real loving that's why I call him Killer
    He's not a wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am, he's a thriller

  • LeoliansBro 11 Dec 2012 17:13:50 44,736 posts
    Seen 43 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    nickthegun wrote:
    But the book was written before the silence of the lambs, so its not a prequel.
    Yes it is.

    Star Wars is a prequel to Empire Strikes Back.

    Even if we accept that what we are talking abut here when we say 'prequel' (something which is done later but set earlier), the film is a prequel although the book is not.

    LB, you really are a massive geek.

  • nickthegun 11 Dec 2012 17:16:10 61,039 posts
    Seen 50 seconds ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Star wars was written before TESB, so its not.

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    My man gives real loving that's why I call him Killer
    He's not a wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am, he's a thriller

  • nickthegun 11 Dec 2012 17:19:59 61,039 posts
    Seen 50 seconds ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Is it a prequel?

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    My man gives real loving that's why I call him Killer
    He's not a wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am, he's a thriller

  • Deleted user 11 December 2012 17:20:42
    Slenderman is a prequel to Minecraft.
  • LeoliansBro 11 Dec 2012 17:24:01 44,736 posts
    Seen 43 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    nickthegun wrote:
    Star wars was written before TESB, so its not.
    Yes, but a prequel doesn't have to be written later. It is simply 'something that occurs before'.

    To mirror the point, a 'sequel' doesn't have to be written earlier.

    LB, you really are a massive geek.

  • LeoliansBro 11 Dec 2012 17:24:41 44,736 posts
    Seen 43 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    The word prequel has stopped having any meaning in my head.

    LB, you really are a massive geek.

  • Deleted user 11 December 2012 17:25:59
    A prequel is very specifically something that was written later. The -quel suffix is specifically about the release chronology.
  • mrpon 11 Dec 2012 17:26:32 29,418 posts
    Seen 5 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    I'm just seeing pre-school and seagull, to be honest.

    Give yourself 5 or gig, you're worth it.

  • Deleted user 11 December 2012 17:30:00
    A prequel is essentially a sequel (comes after), that is set before (pre). It's an amalgam word.

    So Star Wars is not a prequel to Empire. It's just the preceding film. Episode 1 is a prequel as it is a sequel that is set before.

    I was being intentionally annoying about Red Dragon. The film was basically positioned as a prequel, although the book was set before so it isn't one. The Hobbit film is kinda the same thing.

    Edited by kalel at 17:30:16 11-12-2012
  • ronuds 11 Dec 2012 17:33:48 21,788 posts
    Seen 1 year ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    You're an amalgam.
  • Deleted user 11 December 2012 17:34:21
    To be really clear, a prequel is actually a type of sequel. It's a sequel that it set before. But in a narrative sense it presumes knowledge of what comes later.

    So for Episode 1 to work, you actually have to seen Episodes IV, V and VI. You need to know that Anakin becomes Vader and that Senator Palpatine is the Emperor etc etc. If you watch Episode I, II and III before you watch IV, V and VI then the story won't really make sense, and things like you finding out that Vader is Luke's father will have no impact.
  • Deleted user 11 December 2012 17:34:27
    Red Dragon is an adaptation, a prequel and a remake. It's an adapremake.
  • Page

    of 2842 First / Last

Log in or register to reply