HFR? IMAX? 3D? arrgh! not sure how I want to see it.
I think we have HFR IMAX here in Nottingham so that looks favourite for our visit..
Would be interesting to hear your thoughts on the tech side...
Thanks much.
Journey's end.
Loading...hold tight!
Page
of 44 First / Last

beastmaster wrote:Possible film of the year maybe??????/?????//
On my way to see it now. Don't feel that hyped up about it at all. Only going to one showing ffs!
beastmaster wrote:Sweet, I'm going to an 8:30 showing!
There's a certain point where the film turns (at 8.40pm by my watch. Seriously, I looked!).
beastmaster wrote:Great, it's like Deathly Hallows part 1 again
Moving onto the film, the idea of turning what was originally a two part into a three part film series is a colossal mistake. The first 80 mins is a slow, boring, lumbering mess. They've reeeallly stretched it out. This is almost the running times of some films. A literal pain in the ass!
There is only one thing we say to Death: 'Maybe Tomorrow'
beastmaster wrote:Technically, you could say this about Fellowship, where the first half of the film is them arsing about in Hobbiton and having a party, before eventually managing to get a shake on and race to Rivendell. Which pretty much mirrors The Hobbit actually!
To sum up, skip the first hour
_ _ _
www.shadigital.com - is now dead dead dead
You dare to strike Scurrcules!?
Paintings & Photographs
Lukus wrote:Yeah but you've got to take into account the 2 points he took off for no explosions.
So in real terms, adjusting for beastmaster enthusiasm levels, that 7 is more like a 5.5.
You dare to strike Scurrcules!?
RedSparrows wrote:
Radagast is in it? Yeah!
LB, you really are a massive geek.
beastmaster wrote:Never in the history of film has there been a directors cut that's shorter.
If he does a shorter directors cut, I think that would be superb. The 'Non Studio Interference Cut'.
KingOfSpain wrote:It's about the same length with the little bits taken out and other previously dropped scenes put back in I think. Can't quite remember. Might be wrong.
Isn't the Alien Directors cut shorter than the theatrical cut? I might be wrong but I'm sure I heard it somewhere.
KingOfSpain wrote:Yeah it's a little bit shorter.
Isn't the Alien Directors cut shorter than the theatrical cut? I might be wrong but I'm sure I heard it somewhere.
LB, you really are a massive geek.
RedSparrows wrote:That coupled with them thinking their content is better than the source has me nonplussed. I cherish the Lord of the Rings and I will inevitably watch this but I just feel manipulated.
I'm not sure it's entirely the studio's fault that the book is being split into three.
I get the impression it's more 'The Hobbit-as-a-useful-hook-whilst-we-tell-the-story-of-Middle-Earth-in-its-entirety-during-that-period-right-down-to-Gandalf's-shoe-collection-and-wardrobe-thoughts.'
Widge wrote:I liked that part.beastmaster wrote:Technically, you could say this about Fellowship, where the first half of the film is them arsing about in Hobbiton and having a party, before eventually managing to get a shake on and race to Rivendell. Which pretty much mirrors The Hobbit actually!
To sum up, skip the first hour
Paintings & Photographs
Page
of 44 First / Last