mcmonkeyplc wrote:Mr Ed?
The title and the first few posts suggest people are thinking the end of the world is neigh!
Thanks for expressing interest in my signature!
Introducing the secret seekers and their eight-year quest
"If there's anything in reality that's not fun, we will change it."
Loading...hold tight!
Page
of 371 First / Lastmcmonkeyplc wrote:Mr Ed?
The title and the first few posts suggest people are thinking the end of the world is neigh!
Thanks for expressing interest in my signature!
Chopsen wrote:mcmonkeyplc wrote:Mr Ed?
The title and the first few posts suggest people are thinking the end of the world is neigh!
mcmonkeyplc wrote:Losing your income is scary. Read the first few posts again.Vice.Destroyer wrote:The title and the first few posts suggest people are thinking the end of the world is neigh!mcmonkeyplc wrote:Nobody here is panicking. Just commiserating at a huge chunk of the workforce who won't have paychecks.
CALM THE FUCK DOWN!
Yes it's probably the biggest bank to fail for a long time but it's needed as a signal to the markets that they need to start behaving. Just because they are a certain size does not mean banks are exempt from risks.
This will create a domino effect but we dont know how big. There is really no use in panicing about this.
JDub wrote:Yeah must suck to be a Lehmans employee right now - tough to find new work in that sector at the moment I'd imagine.
Funnily enough, one of my very good mates works for them - Apparently last Thursday, a bunch of them went out for a 'farewell to Lehmans' drink. I think they knew it was over even then...
HoadTheFoul wrote:For those that might have missed this on the last page.
I work for Lehman, been asked to come in as normal tomorrow but exepcting them to come up to the floor any moment and kick everyone out. Will be bringing a big bag as I have a load of personal stuff at my desk.
Looks like they'll be no redundancy and no guarantee we'll get paid for the last few weeks. Only been there for 6 months after been asked by my former boss to move with him from UBS.... typical.
Don't think for a minute things like this only affect a relatively affluent few, I'm certainly not wealthy and have a large mortgage and 2 kids... guess I'll have to look for something else, but given the markets at the moment, I'm pretty much relying on contacts to try and get something.

Thanks for expressing interest in my signature!
HoadTheFoul wrote:That really really sucks.
Looks like they'll be no redundancy and no guarantee we'll get paid for the last few weeks.
Load "$" wrote:Are you the guy who rings me (recently qualified ACA) up all the time offering "great opportunities in industry", but only in London?
My CV.
Airline recruitment 3 years.
Financial Grad recruitment 4 years
Future isn't looking particularly rosy.
Merlinho wrote:I have people to do the ringing for me. But while we are on the subject...Load "$" wrote:Are you the guy who rings me (recently qualified ACA) up all the time offering "great opportunities in industry", but only in London?
My CV.
Airline recruitment 3 years.
Financial Grad recruitment 4 years
Future isn't looking particularly rosy.
LB, you really are a massive geek.
JDub wrote:Of course they did - the funded the drinks by selling their Lehamns shares short. Laughing all the way to their next bank.
Funnily enough, one of my very good mates works for them - Apparently last Thursday, a bunch of them went out for a 'farewell to Lehmans' drink. I think they knew it was over even then...
urban wrote:
tbh i think this is all for the greater good.
freedom.
If you can read this you really need to fiddle with your forum settings.
Come and get it cumslingers!
Come and get it cumslingers!
Leolian'sBro wrote:One guy phoned me the other day, said his first name without saying what company he was from, as if I should know him..and then asked me if I'd got "pissed" on the weekend. Good first impressions there.
I used to get phonecalls all the time when I just got my ACA. I actually took one of them up on my offer when I wanted to move jobs. The interview went something like this.
Me:
I don't want anything in Internal Audit.
I don't want anything in Group Accounting.
I don't want anything in Internal Audit.
I don't want anything in Group Accounting.
I don't want anything in Internal Audit.
I don't want anything in Group Accounting.
I don't want anything in Internal Audit.
I don't want anything in Group Accounting.
I don't want anything in Internal Audit.
I don't want anything in Group Accounting.
I don't want anything in Internal Audit.
I don't want anything in Group Accounting.
I don't want anything in Internal Audit.
I don't want anything in Group Accounting.
Him:
We've got this one position which looks ideal for you. It's in internal audit...
Me:
NGNNNGNGGG
Him:
...or this other excellent opportunity in Group Accounting?
Me:
/turns green, jumps through wall.
True story.
Aspic wrote:Quite right the US would shame British Leyland in the 1970's for protectionist, union controlled, backwards working practices.Constuction in New Jersey is exactly as shown in the Soprano's. The US will suffer much worse than the rest of the world, but with the Global economy we are all in the same boat.lavalant wrote:Very true. And at its heart the US has never really been that capitalist, unless it suited the US economy. Look at the protectionism over steel a couple of years back. Trade unions would have cried tears of pride over that one.Aspic wrote:capitalism is a class system = dog eat dog, this is just the working class tax payer getting screwed by the super rich.
IFor a "capitalism is all" system of government, the US is proving heart-warmingly socialistic.
Even though they caused the credit crunch, somehow I don't think the upper classes will be in the dole queue anytime soon.
mcmonkeyplc wrote:Panic is never called for - but when you have hoary old figures like Greenspan saying this is the worst turmoil in living memory, it's a cause for a slight trembling of the lip.
Loss of income is very scary, but general public panic is not called for...yet. It does suck for those that work for Lehman Brothers and people in the financial services sector but all industries go through this. In the long term it's healthy to get rid of the dead wood.
I know that sounds like un-emotional economics and that is what it is. I too feel the pressure and fear losing my job. These things do happen though and it will happen again.
Sorry if I offended anyone.
Jeepers wrote:Oh I agree completly about this effecting other industries too. Hence why I fear for my job too. I guess I dont think there is any point in getting shit scared because this was bound to happen at some point during our lives.mcmonkeyplc wrote:Panic is never called for - but when you have hoary old figures like Greenspan saying this is the worst turmoil in living memory, it's a cause for a slight trembling of the lip.
Loss of income is very scary, but general public panic is not called for...yet. It does suck for those that work for Lehman Brothers and people in the financial services sector but all industries go through this. In the long term it's healthy to get rid of the dead wood.
I know that sounds like un-emotional economics and that is what it is. I too feel the pressure and fear losing my job. These things do happen though and it will happen again.
Sorry if I offended anyone.
And I don't think you can say that the direct effects of this collapse are limited to those in the financial services - the financial services are the markets that keep industry moving. If they seize up, the repercussions for any business that relies on debt to grow (or survive) are major.
Altho' I agree in some respect - the US govt shouldn't (can't?) attempt to prop these markets up. Short-term pain is better than long-term misery, and in this case, the US has been right (imo) to drop Lehmann's and cage-off Merril. Now we have to see whether they have to do the same for Morgan Stanley, Goldmann, etc.
Come and get it cumslingers!
PSN: BanjoFett
XBL: Banjo Fett
Page
of 371 First / Last