StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty

Click Dangerous.

Close your eyes in a room full of StarCraft II players and you could be forgiven for thinking you were in the presence of a giant space cockroach, or a vast interstellar weevil, or something else with nasty chattering mandibles.

Idle talk is kept to a minimum when you're playing Blizzard's latest; in its place is a gentle mixture of half-formed strategic mumbling, sighs of defeat, and clicking, always clicking: clicking that's probably a dozen or so fingers frantically directing waves of Firebats, but could pass rather well for the juddering claws or antennae of some kind of horrible oversized bug.

Sure, giant space cockroaches are the stuff of nightmares, but so, for a lot of the people who play videogames, is something like StarCraft. It's a serious, heavyweight genre at its most serious and its most heavyweight. It's Korean TV channels where the crowds cheer as a mouse drags a small green box across the face of the jumbotron. It's build queues, build orders, and reverse-engineering your opponent's tech tree just by looking at what trundles out of his base.

If that sounds like the kind of thing you don't think you'd be very good at - the same way that stunt-biking, high-level karate, or a career in bioinformatics sound like the kind of thing you don't think you'd be very good at - don't give up just yet. Chances are if you're new to Blizzard's best-selling sci-fi universe you won't be very good at it at first, but with this outing you genuinely might find yourself wanting to put some serious time in to change all that.

That's not just because StarCraft II will run pretty snappily on older PCs - the beta actually runs acceptably on my ancient white Macbook, although the computer gets so hot it feels like I'm taking on the Zerg with the sun itself balanced in my lap.

'StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty' Screenshot 1

In StarCraft's brilliantly asymmetrical battles, units don't have opposites so much as they have antidotes.

It's not just because StarCraft II is rather beautiful, either, although it's filled with plenty of opportunities for a little virtual tourism as you skim through canyons dusted with bright sand and chunks of shiny rock, or swoop over the complex spouts of impossible waterfalls, and past murky rents in the earth where the twinkling points of techno-Aztec temples poke through the grime.

The reason you might want to give this one a go is because Blizzard has gone out of its way to make space for new players. There's space in multiplayer, certainly, where the traditional yet highly refined take on the 'make stuff and break stuff' approach (I am trademarking that right now, by the way, and I've asked Brian Eno to write a little bit of music that has to accompany it whenever it is said) will hopefully be tempered by Battle.net's new tournaments, leagues and matchmaking tech.

This week it was revealed that there's plenty of space for newcomers in single-player too. That doesn't necessarily mean that the series' sharper edges have been planed off, however. In fact, while the sequel's multiplayer content might be fairly conventional, the single-player campaign sees the developers expanding horizons slightly: trying new things, and reaching out in new directions.

'StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty' Screenshot 2

The single-player hub takes the form of a battle cruiser with rooms to visit and people to chat with. Load times as you move about are supernaturally fast, suggesting Blizzard is aware of how little patience some of its players have for any such indulgences.

The two missions I get to click my way through do a good job of highlighting the game's scope and playfulness. Selected from a heavily gilted space chart console, the single-player mode will generally give you a handful of objectives to choose from at any one time.

Today, I can either take on The Dig (not a reference to the LucasArts glum-'em-up apparently, but a siege-type offering centring around an unusually sizable space laser), or Welcome to the Jungle (definitely not a reference to the bizarre caper movie starring Sean William Scott and The Rock). Both are punchy little slices of action, and both play out in entirely different ways.

The Dig drops you into a dusty canyon on a world littered with ancient alien artefacts. For the first few minutes, you'll have a chance to get a feel for things as your Terran infantrymen make their way through a gently twisting maze crawling with spindly Protoss units, in numbers too insubstantial to make them anything less than target practice.

A handful of enemy gun emplacements threaten to form a nasty roadblock as you near the exit to the canyon, but they're only fodder for a new toy: siege tanks, which can either crawl around the terrain blasting away at alien menaces with their canons, or sacrifice mobility for greater firepower and range by transforming into stationary turrets.

Once you're out of the canyons, The Dig gets going. Ancient forces have left a convenient base for you to capture, and a huge laser cannon, which they were presumably using to bore through the massive reinforced doors of a nearby temple, which allegedly holds an artefact.

At this point, the level settles into a nice frantic rhythm, as you reinforce your position, set to work on the temple doors, and hunker down for the ensuing Protoss invasion.

While it sounds like a simple countdown siege scenario, what makes The Dig so brilliant is the choices it gives you. As an early level, the game's still suggesting the best placements for your siege tanks, but it gives you plenty of little unspoken decisions too.

Some of them are RTS staples - like calculating whether to invest in SCVs early on to harvest resources, or whether to protect both flanks with turrets - but some of them are a lot more entertaining, as you decide when to turn the huge laser cannon away from the temple door to use it on the incoming hordes, aware that with every second that ticks by scarier units are getting cooked up behind the scenes.

The laser cannon's interesting in other ways, too, as its sheer overwhelming firepower says a lot about the way Blizzard's separating its single- and multiplayer components.

While this year's C&C4 allowed you to carry all your toys between modes, meaning you could level a tank up in single-player to then blast away at your weaker friend in a skirmish, StarCraft II draws a line around the wackier units you'll be allowed to mess with in the solo campaign.

'StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty' Screenshot 3

Firebats are distinctly cute, considering they all have reformed lifers stuck inside them.

It's a smart move if it lets you play with insane gadgets like a 20-storey laser cannon, which would simply ruin most multiplayer battles; it's a seasoned genre veteran admitting that you balance multiplayer for fairness, but that single-player should always have a little blast of excess to it.

Speaking of excess, Welcome to the Jungle drops you onto a planet cluttered with revered Protoss temples - holy shrines which, sadly, also turn out to be a great source of handy Terrazine gas. The mission is simple: send out SCVs with Goliath escorts to collect all the resources, before the aliens discover that you're trampling all over their relics and turn up to give you an aggrieved shoeing.

The end result is anything but simple, however, as the Protoss start shutting down the temple gas vents down one by one, forcing you to take crazy risks as your collection teams fan out across the maps.

As the most efficient way of getting gas supplies also turns out to be the most dangerous - send a bunch of heavily-armed squads to the map's farthest corners as soon as you can - it's not long before the level has become an unpredictable rolling firefight. You pinball from one hectic encounter to the next, setting up hasty defensive walls as your SCVs gather fuel, and firing wildly over your shoulder as you beat a retreat.

'StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty' Screenshot 4

The Protoss look like bedroom bugs designed by the top men at Elizabeth Duke.

Compared to the stately pace of The Dig, it hardly feels like it's the same game, and yet it's the same controls, the same rules, and almost always the same units.

It's unlikely the variation will end there. Other treats in store in the single-player campaign include a level where a nearby supernova means there's a wall of flame advancing across the map as you battle it out with the alien scum, and a planet with a swift day-and-night cycle, which just happens to house hordes of photophobic zombies who rush you in the dark but evaporate when the sun is out.

It's a campaign that seems to be made of snarling vignettes, in other words. As such, it's understandable that Blizzard has decided to introduce yet another strand - challenge missions - to do the traditional single-player stuff, like preparing you for the tactics you'll most likely need when you finally go up against human opponents.

That's the real treat, then. While the Protoss and Zerg campaigns will have to wait for now, it still feels like you're getting three StarCraft games in one this time. Blizzard may have made us wait, but it's looking like it's all been worth it. StarCraft II: still terrifying, still very, very tempting.

StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty is due out for PC and Mac on 27th July.

Comments (35) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • MuchoPies #1 2 years ago

  • cianchristopher #2 2 years ago

    I know it's Blizzard, so it's probably not gonna happen, but it'd still be nice to get some sense of when the other two-thirds of this game will be released...

    I hope it doesnt end up like the Half-Life 2 episodes, with them being staggered out so much over so many years...
    Edited by 1 at 26/05/10 @ 11:50
  • Ryuken #3 2 years ago

    it still feels like you're getting three StarCraft games in one this time

    StarCraft had a hefty singleplayer and multiplayer too you know. Adding specific tutorial maps for that stressful, aged clickfest called multiplayer hardly sounds like an extra game. A great initiative of course but I'd rather have seen something actually new in multiplayer (mechanics-wise or a fourth race) as well instead of how to learn to play.

    For now only the story mode and the editor options seem like the biggest attractions to me. Which should be just enough. :)
  • mingster #4 2 years ago

    Your actually getting 3 starcraft games in 3 seperate packages as its a trilogy.
  • Eraysor #5 2 years ago

    Didn't realise tanks were equipped with "canons".

    Also, the beta is epic.
  • Kanjin #6 2 years ago

    the gameplay variation sounds very promising, a good turn away from 'move forwards, pewpew, explosions, move on, pewpew,' etc etc.
  • foamy #7 2 years ago

    best matchmaking system ever. love the beta
  • foamy #8 2 years ago

    they should also have a new race, but I'm guessing that would make races exponentially harder to balance.
  • Dagdriver #9 2 years ago

    mnah, still not convinced....
  • ybfelix #10 2 years ago

    Terrains look as geometric as SC1 or Warcraft 3. With hex grid introduced, probably even Civilization V is going to have a more natural looking map. Well, maybe those who play Starcraft as a form of chess demand it.

    Hope the story is good, SC1 has one of the best in RTS games.
  • Stuz359 #11 2 years ago

    Hard to believe it's taken this long for the sequel. Loved the universe and game from the first one.
  • Rubarack #12 2 years ago

    I'd love to believe that Blizzard will make multiplayer accessible for beginners, but outside of hiring several thousand people to play Starcraft badly to cover up early progression I see no way they can manage it. At any time it's highly unlikely there will be two beginners wanting to play at the same time. It will be one beginner and forty thousand frothing RTS fanatics and no matchmaking service in the world will get that beginner to come back.
    Edited by 1 at 26/05/10 @ 13:05
  • foamy #13 2 years ago

    rubarack, actually, now they have leagues, and you progress in them according to your victories/defeats. Also, the matches favor players according to their skill.

    Also, when you first play the game you have like 5 practise matches to place you in a league according to your performance.

    It's quite nice, I didn't play SC1 hardcore, and in quite some years, and i managed to get along very nicely in the multiplayer of SC2. It's the most addictive thing i've ever played.
    Edited by 1 at 26/05/10 @ 13:12
  • abigsmurf #14 2 years ago

    Starcraft is just too inaccessible for me to be excited about the multiplayer. I'm not too great at RTS as it is but the original starcraft had such an insane gulf between skilled and unskilled gamers it just wasn't fun.

    The extended beta for the game has only served to ensure that newbies are even more likely to have an unpleasant time when they first start playing.
  • Mooglepies #15 2 years ago

    Played 10 games of the beta and realised that I was spectacularly unenthusiastic about it. Don't get me wrong, I can see that what they've created is a fast paced, competitive, polished game but I think after more than a decade, I'm just bored of the traditional RTS genre in multiplayer.

    I look forward to seeing what the modding scene will do with the editor tools; hopefully it won't be just "Hey look, we remade DOTA!" over and over again and we'll see something interesting. I'd personally like to see something created in the vein of Dawn of War 2's victory points mode or World in Conflict's Domination mode.

    Single Player stuff continues to sound ace as well.
    Edited by 1 at 26/05/10 @ 13:13
  • ps3owner #16 2 years ago

    what are the minimum system requirements? my PC is a bit out of date
  • Mooglepies #17 2 years ago

    Who on earth is minus rating ALL of these posts so low? So far all I've seen are opinions on why there are so many barriers to new players getting into this game (and there are many of these) and some general opinions on matchmaking.

    Edit: Oh look, they're back to zero now. Perhaps a glitch with the rating system?
    Edited by 1 at 26/05/10 @ 13:40
  • ybfelix #18 2 years ago

    @Eraysor: proof that SC is ripping off 40K! ;)

    @Mooglepies: it was all negative for me as now
  • jonfon #19 2 years ago

    The anti-negging was me. It was bugging me and most of the comments seemed sensible so I bulk-countered the phantom negger and reset them back to 0.



    Edited by 1 at 26/05/10 @ 15:25
  • levitate #20 2 years ago

    I've not pre-ordered a game in a very long time. Now is the time to do it.
  • cairbre1977 #21 2 years ago

    Never played Star Craft but I liked C&C when it was good I really liked Company of Heroes and I am a RTS fan. Dune had me hooked for a long time. So I guess I should like this game as it seems StarCraft is the daddy. I am sure I will pick it up. I wonder will it be for sale on Steam? That way I can play it on both my mac and pc for the same price. That does not sound like something Activision and Bobby Cunt Face Kotick would agree with thou. I am sure he would like to charge me per game if he could.
  • Rack #22 2 years ago

    I've heard about the league system, but it won't help if everyone in all the leagues are RTS veterans. Given the reputation of Starcraft I'd say that's going to be likely at launch and certain within a month of release. The problems of getting into new RTS multiplayer is sadly just not anything within Blizzard's power to fix.
  • fknetwork #23 2 years ago

    Meh, starcrap 2, pc can keep it!
  • sneetch #24 2 years ago

    @cairbre1977
    Never played Star Craft but I liked C&C when it was good I really liked Company of Heroes and I am a RTS fan. Dune had me hooked for a long time. So I guess I should like this game as it seems StarCraft is the daddy. I am sure I will pick it up. I wonder will it be for sale on Steam? That way I can play it on both my mac and pc for the same price. That does not sound like something Activision and Bobby Cunt Face Kotick would agree with thou. I am sure he would like to charge me per game if he could.

    Just about every Blizzard game that I know of works on both Mac and Windows and the disk contains an installer for both operating systems so you'll more than likely be able to play any copy on both your PC and Mac.
  • caesar_ #25 2 years ago

    YOU MUST CONSTRUCT ADDITIONAL PYLONS!
  • wired009 #26 2 years ago

    After playing the beta for a few weeks, I'm finding SC2 to be lackluster. The game is too resource dependent, and racial strategies lack variety. There is hardly anything new that I wouldn't expect from SC1, which seems a shame given the time in development and the opportunities to evolve the RTS genre. Having played a lot of WC3, I miss the variety of tactics that arise from hero combinations and equipable items. WC3 also let you focus on battles more and less on constantly building miners and probes.
  • robg #27 2 years ago

  • Moz #28 2 years ago

    from watching the battle reports there are some crazy tactics you employ to out smart your opponent. Really can't wait for this have a feeling i may not sleep for a week!!!! Though i'm also going to suck at it not played RTS for years having played Starcraft to death and there not having been anything to match it since!!
  • Moz #29 2 years ago

    I've heard about the league system, but it won't help if everyone in all the leagues are RTS veterans. Given the reputation of Starcraft I'd say that's going to be likely at launch and certain within a month of release. The problems of getting into new RTS multiplayer is sadly just not anything within Blizzard's power to fix.

    Don't know much about the league system but is it set up at all like the football leagues 'cos if it is that would help new players as the vet players will all rise to the higher leagues in a matter of weeks if it's set up right.
  • hahayou #30 2 years ago

    @ybfelix
    I don't think it's supposed to look real, it's supposed to look like StarCraft.
    If you start taking the look seriously you'll only be asking questions about why comparing the massive capital ship spacecraft to the marine units makes the entire ship look smaller than the command deck they show in the cutscenes.

    Anyway, beta is my GOTY so far, so bring it on!
  • X3Entente #31 2 years ago

    firebats??? what?, is that screenie like where's wally or something, all i see is zerg
  • Rack #32 2 years ago

    It doesn't really matter how well the league system works, there just won't be enough amateurs for it to prevent experts from dominating every league. The same thing happened in Street Fighter IV. I've played SFII III and Alpha for hundreds, maybe even thousands of hours but I never moved out of the bottom league because absolutely everyone who played online was at least as good as me. A total beginner in that game would be double perfected in 15 seconds every single time, it wasn't the league's fault it arranged the players according to ability really well, it's just online naturally attracted the most fanatical players. Starcraft 2 will have this even worse.
  • ybfelix #33 2 years ago

    @hahayou: I'm not saying it should look real, I'm saying it would be nice if looked more natural. Will a less rectangular cliff contour make SC2 less SC and a worse game? I don't think so.
  • Globalexpress #34 2 years ago

    It still good to see some developers releasing exclusive on the PC. PC gaming is sill alive, barely.... lets not spoil it even more my downloading pirated copies of the game.
  • Lucky4Leaf #35 2 years ago

    I think this is not gonna be jaw dropping game ... sorry guys ...