Jump to navigation
Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

Night Watch Review

PC Review by Oliver Clare

12 September, 2006

Right, that's it, no more game-playing for me. From now on I'm just going to read optimistic previews and get my pleasure from anticipation. If I'd done this with Night Watch then the following paragraphs would have been blissfully free of nasty, soul-rotting whinge-words; no 'ill-conceived', no 'woeful', no 'disappointing', no 'hopeless', no 'dire'. The sum-total of Global Negativity wouldn't have been increased by 0.00000000000026%; right now I'd be a fractionally less cynical, less suspicious gamer.

You see Night Watch looked so promising on paper. A modern-day Moscow-based tactical RPG with vampire coppers, lycanthrope gangsters, lots of spell-weaving and fisticuffs - you'd have to be carved out of Siberian salt not to be tempted by a prospect like that. The concept sounded great and the engine - borrowed from mesmerising WW2 firefight game Silent Storm - that was great for sure. All developer Nival had to do was not screw up. As long it didn't strip most of the colour out of the inherited combat system, make its missions dull and prescriptive, and clog the game with tiresome cut-scenes it was onto a winner.

Bolshy Ballet

Well, surprise-surprise, Nival did screw-up. Not massively, not terminally, but NW is a pale midwinter shadow of what it could have been. Take the missions for instance. These, like every element of the game, are inspired by the 'Nochnoy Dozor' books: supernatural thrillers by a Kazakh writer called Sergey Lukyanenko. You lead a group of Night Watch heroes (ordinary Muscovites with supernatural talents and good hearts) through a series of turn-based skirmishes with Day Watch thugs (ordinary Muscovites with supernatural talents and hate-filled hearts). Though there's nothing inherently wrong with the approach, far too many of the scraps are dumped prefabricated into your lap. There you are exploring some atmospheric snow-sprinkled chunk of post-Soviet suburbia when a cut-scene kicks in showing a crowd of enemies approaching. When the clip ends you find yourself ensnared in an unavoidable, toe-to-toe rumble. Spells get traded, fists fly, one side emerges victorious, one is left sprawled on the permafrosty pavement.

This heavy-handed scripting together with the lack of long-range weaponry seriously curtails tactical options. In Silent Storm and its two offshoots (Sentinels and Hammer & Sickle) battles are much more mobile, malleable affairs; folk snipe at each other across levels, there's flanking, charges, retreats and use of cover. In NW it's all wham-kazam-thank-you-mam. Though the sorcery has its subtleties (there are dozens of spells available to each of the three character classes) it desperately needs a longer reach and a more obvious foil. If your adversaries were magic-less and armed with firearms and grenades, then potentially NW would have been a far more interesting game. But then, of course, it wouldn't have been Nochnoy Dozor.

Cadbury Heroes

'Night Watch' Screenshot 1

They don't mention blokes like this in the Rough Guide To Moscow.

Loyalty to the source material means the closest thing the Night Watch have to a standard-issue sidearm is a fey flashlight. The crystals can be scavenged, along with numerous other items, from the corpses of the slain. They can also be manufactured by Enchanter characters. The Blue Peter presenters of the Moscow magic scene, this class can transform everyday objects like apples, chocolate bars, spectacles, light bulbs and lottery tickets into useful combat aids and tonics. They can also hex opponents with curses. The most hands-on individuals in the game tend to be the Shapeshifters. Able to temporarily transform into beasts such as tigers, dogs, and wolves, they rely on their paws, claws and maws in brawls. Lastly you've got your Mages, no-nonsense spell-slingers that specialise in traditional wizard tricks like fireball-hurling.

Though you get you to choose the class of new team members introduced during the campaign, there's no opportunity to pick a team before a mission - another missed opportunity. When the scenario designers deign to send all your characters into the same battle then - despite the issues raised earlier - combat does have its appealing intricacies. Once characters have levelled-up a few times and acquired a decent selection of skills and equipment, a thoughtful tactician can execute some clever collaborative plays. During your turn (exploration is real-time, but the action is sliced into turns when enemies are sighted) you can get characters to steal magical energy from opponents then distribute it among their friends. You can heal and remove hexes. Hemmed-in heroes can be aided by knocking back attackers with telekinetic jujitsu.

Making an entrance

'Night Watch' Screenshot 2

In Silent Storm you'd have used a bazooka to get in.

The telekinesis spell is one of very few attacks that allows the SS engine to display arguably its finest attribute. One of the joys of Silent Storm was using high explosives and high velocity rounds to vandalise the levels. Everything was destructible meaning you could create your own impromptu doors and trapdoors with grenades. Troops could get blown through holes and windows. Sometimes entire walls collapsed exposing soldiers sheltering within. NW uses the same engine, but doesn't take advantage of the environmental fragility nearly as much as it should. Occasionally a flung friend or foe demolishes a newspaper kiosk or mangles a Lada, but that's about it.

Still, at least the battlegrounds are unusual and evocative. Slushy street scenes, bleak housing estates, echoing Metro stations, chilly parks and playgrounds... it's all deliciously Russian. Given the atmospheric surroundings it's a bit of a shame so much time is spent in the foggy, spectral dimension known as The Gloom. Night and Day Watch operatives can slip into this parallel world at any time, taking advantage of the ambience to enhance sorcery, move stealthily or bypass locked doors. As enemies tend to get Gloomy the second you encounter them, you usually have little option but to follow them in.

Silence is golden

'Night Watch' Screenshot 3

If anyone gets wounded Tigra can lick them better. Really.

A few more complaints before I nail the coffin-lid shut on NW. Plot-wise, this is an unnecessarily confusing experience. Frequent - too frequent - cut-scenes give the heroes lots of chances to waffle and wisecrack, and allow Nival's storytellers plenty of opportunities to muddy already murky waters. Not a good thing. Occasionally, the confusion even pollutes the missions themselves, poorly articulated objectives leading to aimless wandering. With a spider-shaped campaign, getting stuck wouldn't be such an issue; with the present linear structure you're forced to plug-away manfully until you see the light.

Or you could just quit of course, and go back to playing the superior Silent Storm. SS has its flaws and is woefully short of vampires, magic apples and manimals, but I'd choose it over Night Watch every time. Then again, I guess it is possible SS might not live up to your expectations, especially now I've raised them via this review. Maybe all-things-considered it would be best if you steer clear of that too. Yes, the safest strategy is the one I propounded back at the start. Anticipate upcoming games rather than playing released ones. Perpetual hope is free, and nobody gets hurt.

5/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Night Watch on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-26 of 26 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
MajesticMole
12/09/06 @ 07:23
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Is this not based on the Night Watch film? Sounds rather similar if it ain't....
sdrawkcabonit
12/09/06 @ 07:37
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
yep, its based directly off the films story
jonnyreb
12/09/06 @ 08:00
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
And the film was pretty good actually...........worth seeing for those that haven't.

Apparently part 2 is out in Russia, no news of a Euro release yet.

/Learns Russian to read the books...........
reality_cheque
12/09/06 @ 08:12
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm still in shock people liked the film... must be a matter of taste, as I hated it.
Midnight Raven
12/09/06 @ 08:14
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I liked the film quite a lot, actually. Pity the game apparently doesnŽt live up to it. IŽd love something new in the vein of the masterfully Jagged Alliance series. Sadly, this doesnŽt seem to be it.
jellyhead
12/09/06 @ 08:24
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I saw the film at the weekend, not bad actually, quite liked it.
Game looks shonky though. Shame.
Rich72
12/09/06 @ 08:32
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The film is absolute toilet.
Riggers
12/09/06 @ 08:56
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"/Learns Russian to read the books..........."

You don't have to, you can get the English version in WH Smiths. That's assuming you're in the UK...

EDIT: If not...http://play.com/Books/Books/4-/929103/Th...
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/09/06 @ 09:59
RedPanda
12/09/06 @ 09:01
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I quite enjoyed the film myself. Their truck rocked :)
tnomad
12/09/06 @ 09:08
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So despite the article using its entire length to slag this game off it got 5/10. Which presumably means despite every single flaw listed in the review it's not a bad game, just average.
w00t
12/09/06 @ 09:25
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Correct.
asphaltcowboy
12/09/06 @ 09:28
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The film was... interesting. I'm not sure if I liked it or not. The fact it made little to no sense to me probably didn't help!
Gremmi
12/09/06 @ 10:18
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The films are rubbish.

People only like them because they're technically impressive (for the budget and talent involved) and they're foreign.

If it was made and released in the US, everyone would be saying it's shit.
RedPanda
12/09/06 @ 11:34
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You sir, should frequent IMDB more. You'd do well there.
Tomo
12/09/06 @ 12:04
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm also in the "rubbish film" camp.
kangarootoo
12/09/06 @ 12:24
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm in the "liked the film" camp.

@Gremmi

10/10 for putting words into the mouths of others. Its all bollox though unfortunately.

Isn't it just possible that people liked the films for reasons of their own, which you have yet to discover?

@RedPanda

Hehe, good call.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/09/06 @ 13:25
MrChuckles
12/09/06 @ 13:23
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hey, the film is cool. I recently watched Day Watch and that was less cool, but watchable.

The original Night Watch cinematic release has possibly the best use of subtitles i have ever seen in my life (no sarcasm, truly original!).
mouse [staff]
12/09/06 @ 13:49
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The intro image for this article promised a sexy lady. I am appalled by these sly page impression gathering tactics.
bubble
12/09/06 @ 14:38
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Given the mythology and style established by the film I can't see how the game apparently got so much so wrong.

It's like getting the Star Wars or LOTR license and making a hash of that. Oh, hang on...
Pike
12/09/06 @ 19:17
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Isn't it just possible that people liked the films for reasons of their own, which you have yet to discover?

No, it's because they have shit taste.
dryden555
12/09/06 @ 20:14
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The movie is not rubbish -- the pacing is clearly off but several scenes are highly memorable and even original. There's some creativity at work in the film.
Gremmi
13/09/06 @ 08:57
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So no-one's denying the "If it was made and released in the US, everyone would be saying it's shit." comment then? 'Cause that's pretty much the crux of my point.
darkbhudda
13/09/06 @ 16:01
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/Decides to fire back a salvo into the flame war over a movie, when the review was about a game...

Gremmi said:
So no-one's denying the "If it was made and released in the US, everyone would be saying it's shit." comment then? 'Cause that's pretty much the crux of my point.
Just because we don't respond doesn't mean you aren't wrong. If it was made in the US, it would be crap because it would be made like a US movie which would be the wrong vibe for the film.

I can understand why people didn't like it, but some of us did, get over it.
And by some of us I mean the cool, intelligent, sexy people.

I don't know why people found the movie confusing. Mind you, coming out of Sin City I heard someone complain they didn't understand what was going on. His friend had to explain it was more than one story.

No wonder the US makes crap movies. They have to dumb down the plot to the lowest common retard.
alco75
13/09/06 @ 16:15
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Gremmi

It's a pointless comment to make: a film with the character and atmosphere of Night Watch could never be made in the US.
gnarl
13/09/06 @ 22:44
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The book's quite good by the way, and appears to only use the same characters and world as the film, not really the plot. Probably just like the game.
Gremmi
13/09/06 @ 23:15
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So you people who are saying "It wouldn't be the same as a US film" are aware the third part is being made in English and produced by Fox, right? Last I heard it was being recast with English-speaking actors replacing a lot of roles. I predict a lot of people saying it's crap for these very reasons before the film is even out. Sure, a lot of people don't like the films solely because they're foreign or whatnot, but how is that any different from saying "All US films suck"? Oh, and those people who didn't reaaally understand the first film aren't going to be in any way enlightened by Dnevnoy dozor. ;)

Whilst we're on the subject though, the best film to come out of Russia IMNSHO is Russkiy kovcheg (Russian Ark).
Edited 1 times, most recently on 14/09/06 @ 00:41

Comments: 1-26 of 26 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Metaboli

X View gallery